Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-908-9 | CAS number: 75-85-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
2-Methylbutan-2-ol is not mutagenic in vitro in bacteria (two Ames tests) and in mammalian cells (HPRT assay). An in vitro chromosome aberration assay in mammalian V79 cells with 2-Methylbutan-2-ol demonstrated that the test sustance has no potential to induce chromosome aberrations.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Ames
In a reverse gene mutation assay the bacteria strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 of S.Typhimurium and and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA were exposed to 2 -Methylbutan-2 -ol at concentrations of 33 µg - 5000 µg/plate in the precence and the absence of metabolic activation applying both the standard plate and the pre-incubation method (BASF SE, 2012). A biologically relevant increase in the number of his+ or trp+ revertants was not observed in the standard plate test or in the preincubation test either without S9 mix or after the addition of a metabolizing system. According to the results of the present key study, the test substance 2 -Methylbutan-2 -ol is not mutagenic in the S.Typhimurium/Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay under the experimental conditions chosen here.
2 -Methylbutan-2 -ol was further investigated using the gene mutation studies in bacterial (Salmonella typhimurium: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538) and in Saccharomyces cerevisae ( Rowe and McCollister, 1982). In both test no genotoxicity could be observed with and without metabolic activation.
In vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test (HPRT test)
2-Methylbutan-2-ol was assessed for its potential to induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus using V79 cells of the Chinese hamster according to OECD guideline 476 (Harlan CCR GmbH, 2012). The assay was performed in two independent experiments with identical experimental procedures, using two parallel cultures each. The first experiment was performed with and without liver microsomal activation and a treatment period of 4 hours. The second experiment was performed with a treatment period of 24 hours in the absence of metabolic activation and 4 hours in the presence of metabolic activation. The cell cultures were evaluated at the following concentrations:
Experiment I:
without S9 mix: 27.5; 55.0; 220; 440; 880 µg/mL
with S9 mix: 27.5; 55.0; 110.0; 220; 880 µg/mL
Experiment II:
without S9 mix: 27.5; 55.0; 110; 220; 440; 880 µg/mL
with S9 mix: 27.5; 55.0; 110; 220; 440; 880 µg/mL
No precipitation of the test item was observed in all experiments up to the maximum concentration. No relevant cytotoxic effects occurred up to the maximum concentration of 880 µg/mL (appro. 10 mM) with and without metabolic activation. No relevant and reproducible increase in mutant colony numbers/10E6 cells was observed in the main experiments up to the maximum concentration. The mutant frequency remained well within the historical range of solvent controls. An increase of the induction factor reaching the threshold of three times the mutation frequency of the corresponding solvent control was observed in the second culture of the second experiment without metabolic activation at 110 µg/mL. However, the isolated increase was judged as biologically irrelevant fluctuation as it was neither reproduced in the parallel culture under identical experimental conditions nor dose dependent as indicated by the lacking statistical significance. No significant dose dependent trend of the mutation frequency was indicated by linear regression analysis. The positive controls showed a district increase in induced mutant colonies. In conclusion, under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells and therefore, 2-Methylbutan-2-ol, was considered to be non-mutagenic in this HPRT assay.
In vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
In a
chromosome aberration assay (Harlan CCR GmbH, 2012, OECD 473, GLP
compliance) 2-Methylbutan-2-ol was tested in Chinese Hamster V79 cells.
The highest applied concentration (880 µg/mL; approx. 10 mM) was chosen
with regard to the molecular weight of the test item and with respect to
the current guideline. Two independent experiments of the chromosome
aberration assay were performed. In Experiment I the exposure period was
4 hours with and without S9 mix cells were fixed and stained after 18
hours. In Experiment II the exposure period was 4 hours with S9 mix and
24 hours without S9 mix cells were fixed and stained after 18 hours (-
S9 mix) and after 28 hours (+ S9 mix). Cytotoxicity was indicated by
reduced cell numbers. The cell numbers were determined microscopically
by counting 10 defined fields per coded slide. Furthermore, mitotic
index (% cells in mitosis) was determined. Breaks,
fragments, deletions, exchanges, and chromosome disintegrations were
recorded as structural chromosome aberrations. Gaps were recorded as
well but not included in the calculation of the aberration rates. 100
well spread metaphases per culture were evaluated for cytogenetic damage
on coded slides. Only metaphases with characteristic chromosome numbers
of 22 ± 1 were included in the analysis. No
precipitation in the culture medium nor an influence of the test item on
osmolarity or pH value was observed. No
relevant cytotoxicity, indicated by reduced mitotic indices and/or
reduced cell numbers could be observed in either experimental part, up
to the highest applied concentration.In
both experiments, in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no biologically
relevant increase in the number of cells carrying structural chromosome
aberrations was observed. The aberration rates of the cells after
treatment with the test item (0.0 - 2.5 % aberrant cells, excluding
gaps) were within the range of the solvent control values (0.5 - 2.5 %
aberrant cells, excluding gaps) and within the range of the laboratory
historical solvent control data. No
evidence of an increase in polyploid metaphases was noticed after
treatment with the test item as compared to the control cultures. In
both experiments, either EMS or CPA were used as positive controls and
showed distinct increases in cells with structural chromosome
aberrations. In
conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions
reported, the test item 2-Methylbutan-2-ol did not induce structural
chromosomal aberrations in V79 cells of the Chinese hamster in vitro,
when tested up to the highest required concentration.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data 2 -Methylbutan-2-ol is not subject to C&L regarding genetic toxicity according to Directive 67/548/EEC and Regulation 1272/2008/EC.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.