Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 222-437-8 | CAS number: 3470-98-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
- Key study: skin irritation (in vivo; OECD 405; New Zealand White rabbits; semiocclusive): slightly irritating;
- Supporting: skin irritation (in vitro;
OECD 439): irritating;
- Supporting: skin corrosion (in vitro; Corrositex Assay; no guideline
available): non-corrosive.
- Key study: eye irritation (in vivo; OECD 405; New Zealand White
rabbits, undiluted): irritating
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2013-11-26 to 2013-12-27
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2500 (Acute Dermal Irritation)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Covance, Denver, PA
- Age at study initiation: 25 to 26 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: between 2.9 and 3.8 kg
- Housing: individually in suspended stainless steel cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): PMI Nutrition International Certified Rabbit Chow No. 5322 was provided ad libitum throughout the study except during designated procedures. To avoid potential gastrointestinal disturbances, food was withheld for approximately 24 to 48 hours after receipt. Food was then gradually increased over a 3-day period.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Municipal tap water following treatment by reverse osmosis and ultraviolet irradiation was available ad libitum throughout the study.
- Acclimation period: at least 7 days before the first day of dosing.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21-22
- Humidity (%): 44-49
- Air changes (per hr): Ten or greater air changes per hour with 100% fresh air (no air recirculation) were maintained in the animal rooms.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 26 Nov 2013 (day of arrival) To: - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL
The test substance was administered as received (pure). Dose calculations were not corrected for purity. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- - animal 1: 3 min, 1h and 4hours
- animal 2: 4 hours
- animal 3: 4 hours - Observation period:
- For the 3-minute exposure: Immediately after patch removal, 1 hour after patch removal, and 24, 48, and 72 hours after patch application.
For the 1-hour exposure: Immediately after patch removal, 1 hour after patch removal, and 24, 48, and 72 hours after patch application.
For the 4-hour exposure: 1 hour after patch removal, and 24, 48, and 72 hours after patch application.
If dermal irritation persisted at any test site, the observation period was extended for the affected animals up to 21 days. - Number of animals:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: approximately 1 inch x 1 inch
- Type of wrap if used: The gauze patches were held in contact with the skin at the cut edges with a nonirritating tape. Removal and ingestion of the test substance were prevented by placing an elastic wrap over the trunk and test area (semi-occlusive binding).
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): test substance was removed using gauze moistened with deionized water followed by dry gauze.
- Time after start of exposure: immediately after patch removal.
SCORING SYSTEM:
EPA-FIFRA Dermal Irritation Descriptive Classification:
The 1- (or initial observation), 24-, 48- and 72-hour erythema and oedema scores for all animals were added and the total divided by the number of test sites (5 (= animal 1(3 test sites: 3-min, 1-hour, 4-hour) + animal 2 (1) + animal 3(1))) x 4 (= number of observation time points: 1-hour, 24-hour, 48-hour and 72-hour) to yield the Primary Irritation Index (P.I.I.). The calculated Primary Irritation Index (P.I.I.) was classified according to the Dermal Irritation Descriptive Classification (1).
EEC Dermal Evaluation Criteria:
The 24-, 48- and 72-hour scores were added separately for erythema and oedema. For a group of three animals, the calculated mean scores were expressed individually. The resulting appropriate Primary Irritation Indices (P.I.I.) was classified according to the EEC Dermal Evaluation Criteria (2).
References:
1. Pesticide Assessment Guidelines, Subdivision F, Hazard Evaluation: Human and Domestic Animals-Addendum 3 on Data Reporting, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1988.
2. Commission of European Communities, Official Journal of European Communities, Annex VI, General Classification and Labeling Requirements for Dangerous Substances and Preparations, No. L 225/263-314, August 2001.
- Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 3-min exposure
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: very slight erythema was noted on Day 14, which subsequently resolved completely by Day 21
- Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 1-hour exposure
- Score:
- 0.75
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: The dermal irritation was not observed on Day 7, but was observed again on Day 14.
- Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- of 3 animals
- Time point:
- other: 4-hour exposure
- Score:
- 1.33
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: The dermal irritation was not observed in 1/3 test sites on Day 7, but was again observed in that animal on Day 10. Dermal irritation did not resolve completely in the remaining 2 test sites.
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Remarks:
- mean from gradings at 24, 48 and 72-hour observation time points
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 4-hour exposure
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 21 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: the score of 1 for erythema was still present at day 21 post-exposure
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Remarks:
- mean from gradings at 24, 48 and 72-hour observation time points
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 4-hour exposure
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Remarks:
- mean from gradings at 24, 48 and 72-hour observation time points
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 4-hour exposure
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 21 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 1-hour observation time point
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 24 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Remarks:
- mean from gradings at 24, 48 and 72-hour observation time points
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 4-hour exposure
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: no irritation responses
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Remarks:
- mean from gradings at 24, 48 and 72-hour observation time points
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 4-hour exposure
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: no irritation responses
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Remarks:
- mean from gradings at 24, 48 and 72-hour observation time points
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 4-hour exposure
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: no irritation responses
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- 3-Minute Exposure
Exposure to the test substance produced no erythema or oedema through 72 hours post-dose; however, very slight erythema was noted at the single test site on Day 14, which subsequently resolved completely by Day 21 (Table 1).
1-Hour Exposure
Exposure to the test substance produced very slight erythema at the single test site immediately after patch removal (Table 2). The dermal irritation was not present at the 1-hour scoring interval, but was present again at the 24-, 48-, and 72-hour scoring intervals. The dermal irritation was not observed on Day 7, but was observed again on Day 14. Day 21 scoring revealed no irritation. Additional dermal findings included desquamation.
4-Hour Exposure
Exposure to the test substance produced very slight erythema at 3/3 test sites and very slight oedema at 1/3 test sites by the 1-hour scoring interval (Table 3). Well-defined erythema was observed in 1/3 test sites at the 24-, 48-, and 72-hour scoring intervals. The dermal irritation was not observed in 1/3 test sites on Day 7, but was again observed in that animal on Day 10. Dermal irritation did not resolve completely in the remaining 2 test sites. Additional dermal findings included blanching (focal and/or pinpoint areas up to 10% of the test site) in 1/3 test sites and desquamation in 3/3 test sites. - Other effects:
- No other effects were reported in treated animals.
- Interpretation of results:
- slightly irritating
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: according to Primary Irritation Index
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the test (4 hour exposure), the test substance is considered to be a slight irritant to the skin of the rabbit. The calculated Primary Irritation Index for the test substance was 1.33.
According to the EEC Dermal Evaluation Criteria, the test substance is considered to be a nonirritant for erythema and oedema - Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to assess the corrosive effects of the test substance when given as a single dermal administration to rabbits. Each of 3 rabbits received a 0.5 mL dose of the test substance as a single dermal application. The dose was held in contact with the skin under a semi-occlusive binder for exposure periods of 3 minutes, 1 hour, and 4 hours for 1 animal and exposure periods of 4 hours for 2 animals. Following the completion of each exposure period, the binder was removed and the remaining test substance was wiped from the skin using gauze moistened with deionized water followed by dry gauze. Test sites were subsequently examined and scored for dermal irritation for up to 21 days following patch removal.
3-Minute Exposure
Exposure to the test substance produced no erythema or oedema through 72 hours post-dose; however, very slight erythema was noted at the single test site on Day 14, which subsequently resolved completely by Day 21.
1-Hour Exposure
Exposure to the test substance produced very slight erythema at the single test site immediately after patch removal. The dermal irritation was not observed at the 1-hour scoring interval, but was present again at the 24-, 48-, and 72-hour scoring intervals. The dermal irritation was not observed on Day 7, but was observed again on Day 14. Day 21 scoring revealed no irritation. Additional dermal findings included desquamation.
4-Hour Exposure
Exposure to the test substance produced very slight erythema at 3/3 test sites and very slight oedema at 1/3 test sites by the 1-hour scoring interval. Well-defined erythema was observed in 1/3 test sites at the 24-, 48-, and 72-hour scoring intervals. The dermal irritation was not observed in 1/3 test sites on Day 7, but was again observed in that animal on Day 10. Dermal irritation did not resolve completely in the remaining 2 test sites. Additional dermal findings included blanching (focal and/or pinpoint areas up to 10% of the test site) in 1/3 test sites and desquamation in 3/3 test sites.´
Conclusion
Under the conditions of the test (4 hour exposure), the test substance is considered to be a slight irritant to the skin of the rabbit. The calculated Primary Irritation Index (P.I.I) for the test substance was 1.33.
According to the EEC Dermal Evaluation Criteria, the test item is considered to be a nonirritant for erythema and oedema as listed below:.
Animal No./Sex
Erythema
Edema
P.I.I.
3-Minute Exposure
5810/M
0.00
0.00
0.00 - Nonirritant
Irritation Rating
Nonirritant
Nonirritant
1-Hour Exposure
5810/M
1.00
0.00
0.75 - Slight irritant
Irritation Rating
Nonirritant
Nonirritant
4-Hour Exposure
5810/M
2.00
0.00
1.33 - Slight irritant
5811/M
1.00
0.00
5812/M
1.00
0.00
Irritation Rating
Nonirritant
Nonirritant
Reference
Table 1. Individual dermal irritation scores (3 -min exposure; animal 1)
Animal No. /Sex/ Body weight (kg) |
Scoring Interval |
Erythema |
Oedema |
5810/M 2.903 |
Patch removal |
0 |
0 |
1 hour |
0 |
0 |
|
24 hours |
0 |
0 |
|
48 hours |
0 |
0 |
|
72 hours |
0 |
0 |
|
7 days |
- |
- |
|
10 days |
- |
- |
|
14 days |
1 |
0 |
|
21 days |
0 |
0 |
Primary Irritation Index = 0.00 (Non-irritant)
Table 2. Individual dermal irritation scores (1-hour exposure; animal 1)
Animal No. /Sex |
Scoring Interval |
Erythema |
Oedema |
Comments |
5810/M |
Patch removal |
1 |
0 |
|
1 hour |
0 |
0 |
|
|
24 hours |
1 |
0 |
|
|
48 hours |
1 |
0 |
|
|
72 hours |
1 |
0 |
|
|
7 days |
0 |
0 |
DES |
|
10 days |
0 |
0 |
DES |
|
14 days |
1 |
0 |
DES |
|
21 days |
0 |
0 |
|
DES - desquamation
Primary Irritation Index = 0.75 (Slight irritant)
PII = ((Summe of erythema and oedema scores at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours) / ( 1 (Number of test sites) x 4 (Number of scoring intervals))
Table 3. Individual dermal irritation scores (4-hour exposure; animal 1, 2 and 3)
Animal No. /Sex/ Body weight (kg) |
Scoring Interval |
Erythema |
Oedema |
Comments |
5810/M |
Patch removal |
1 |
0 |
|
1 hour |
1 |
1 |
|
|
24 hours |
2 |
0 |
BLA-1 |
|
48 hours |
2 |
0 |
BLA-1 |
|
72 hours |
2 |
0 |
BLA-1 |
|
7 days |
1 |
0 |
DES |
|
10 days |
1 |
0 |
DES |
|
14 days |
1 |
0 |
DES |
|
21 days |
1 |
0 |
DES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5811/M |
Patch removal |
1 |
0 |
|
1 hour |
1 |
0 |
|
|
24 hours |
1 |
0 |
|
|
48 hours |
1 |
0 |
|
|
72 hours |
1 |
0 |
|
|
7 days |
1 |
0 |
|
|
10 days |
1 |
0 |
DES |
|
14 days |
1 |
0 |
DES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5812/M |
Patch removal |
1 |
0 |
|
1 hour |
1 |
0 |
|
|
24 hours |
1 |
0 |
|
|
48 hours |
1 |
0 |
DES |
|
72 hours |
1 |
0 |
|
|
7 days |
0 |
0 |
|
|
10 days |
1 |
0 |
DES |
|
14 days |
1 |
0 |
DES |
DES: desquamation
BLA-1: blanching
Primary Irritation Index = 1.33 (Slight irritant)
PII = ((Sum of erythema and oedema scores at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours) / ( 3 (Number of test sites) x 4 (Number of scoring intervals))
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2014-02-10 to 2014-03-10
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2400 (Acute Eye Irritation)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Covance, Denver, PA.
- Age at study initiation: 29 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: between 2.9 kg to 3.2 kg at initiation of dosing
- Housing: individually in suspended stainless steel cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum (PMI Nutrition International Certified Rabbit Chow No. 5322)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum (Municipal tap water following treatment by reverse osmosis and ultraviolet irradiation)
- Acclimation period: at least 12 days before the first day of dosing
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 69°F to 72°F (21°C to 22°C)
- Humidity (%): 37 - 43
- Air changes (per hr): Ten or greater air changes per hour with 100% fresh air (no air recirculation) were maintained in the animal rooms.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 /12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 2013-02-11 To: 2013-03-10 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single exposure
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours and up to 10 days after dosing
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no
SCORING SYSTEM: according to the Ocular Grading System (based on Draize) (see attached pdf)
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein
The eyes were macroscopically examined with the aid of an auxiliary light source for signs of irritation at 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours and up to 10 days after dosing according to the Ocular Grading System presented above which is based on Draize. Following macroscopic observations at the 24-hour scoring interval, the fluorescein examination procedure was repeated on all test and control eyes and any residual test substance was gently rinsed from the eye at that time using physiological saline. If fluorescein findings were noted at 24 hours, a fluorescein exam was conducted on the affected eyes at each subsequent interval until a negative response was obtained and/or until all corneal opacity had cleared. - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 10 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 10 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 10 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.67
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 10 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Exposure to the test article produced corneal opacity in 1/3 test eyes by the 24-hour scoring interval and complete resolution occurred by the Day 7 scoring interval. Iritis was observed in 1/3 test eyes by the 1-hour scoring interval and in 2/3 test eyes by the 24-hour scoring interval. Complete resolution of the iritis occurred in 1/3 test eyes by the Day 7 scoring interval and in 2/3 test eyes by the Day 10 scoring interval. Conjunctivitis (redness, swelling, and/or discharge) occurred in 3/3 test eyes by the 1-hour scoring interval and complete resolution occurred in 1/3 test eyes by the Day 7 scoring interval and in 2/3 test eyes by the Day 10 scoring interval. An additional ocular finding of neovascularization (2/3 test eyes) was noted during the study.
- Other effects:
- Decreased faecal output, including reduced faecal size and absence of faeces, was observed in all animals on at least 1 day during the study. Animals were treated with buprenorphine, an opioid, from Days 1 through 5, and opioids are known to cause decreased faecal output. Therefore, the decreased faecal output is likely an effect of the buprenorphine treatment.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 2 (irritating to eyes) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- According to the Kay and Calandra Evaluation Criteria, the test item is considered to be a moderate irritant to the ocular tissue of the rabbit.
The total ocular irritation score for the 24-, 48-, and 72-hour intervals was individually added for corneal opacity, iris lesion, conjunctival redness, and conjunctival oedema. According to the EEC Ocular Evaluation Criteria, the test substance is classified as non-irritant for corneal opacity, irritant for iris lesions, conjunctival redness and oedema. According to the CLP criteria, the test item is classified as a Category 2 irritant to the eye (potential to induce reversible eye irritation). - Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to assess the irritant and/or corrosive effects of the test substance when given as a single ocular administration to rabbits. Each of 3 rabbits received a 0.1 mL dose of the test substance in the conjunctival sac of the right eye. The contralateral eye of each animal remained untreated and served as a control. Test and control eyes were examined for signs of irritation for up to 10 days following dosing.
Exposure to the test article produced corneal opacity in 1/3 test eyes by the 24-hour scoring interval and complete resolution occurred by the Day 7 scoring interval. Iritis was observed in 1/3 test eyes by the 1-hour scoring interval and in 2/3 test eyes by the 24-hour scoring interval. Complete resolution of the iritis occurred in 1/3 test eyes by the Day 7 scoring interval and in 2/3 test eyes by the Day 10 scoring interval. Conjunctivitis (redness, swelling, and/or discharge) occurred in 3/3 test eyes by the 1-hour scoring interval and complete resolution occurred in 1/3 test eyes by the Day 7 scoring interval and in 2/3 test eyes by the Day 10 scoring interval. An additional ocular finding of neovascularization (2/3 test eyes) was noted during the study. Decreased faecal output was observed in all animals. This observation, which is a known pharmacological effect of opioids, was likely due to the buprenorphine treatment that the animals received from Days 0 to 5. According to the Kay and Calandra Evaluation Criteria, the test substance is considered to be a moderate irritant to the ocular tissue of the rabbit. The total ocular irritation score for the 24-, 48-, and 72-hour intervals was individually added for corneal opacity, iris lesion, conjunctival redness, and conjunctival oedema. According to the EEC Ocular Evaluation Criteria, the test substance is classified as indicated below:
Animal No./Sex
Corneal Opacity
Iris Lesion
Conjunctival Redness
Conjunctival Edema
5981/M
2.00
1.00
3.00
2.00
5984/M
0.00
1.00
2.67
2.00
5985/M
0.00
1.00
2.00
0.33
Irritation Rating
Nonirritant
Irritant
Irritant
Irritant
According to the CLP criteria, the test substance is classified as a Category 2 irritant to the eye (potential to induce reversible eye irritation).
Reference
Table 1. Individual ocular irritation scores
Animal No. /sex/ body weight (kg) |
|
Cornea |
Iris |
Conjunctivae |
Total |
Test Eye |
Control Eye |
||||||||
Interval |
O |
A |
OxAx5 |
I |
Ix5 |
R |
S |
D |
(R+S+D) x 2 |
|
Fluorescein examination |
Secondary ocular findings |
Fluorescein examination |
Secondary ocular findings |
|
5981/M/ 3.241 |
1 hour |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
14 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
24 hours |
2 |
1 |
10 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
29 |
FAO |
|
NFE |
|
|
48 hours |
3 |
1 |
15 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
34 |
FAO |
|
|
|
|
72 hours |
1 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
24 |
FAO |
|
|
|
|
day 7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
day 10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
5984/M/ 2.861 |
1 hour |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
14 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
24 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
10 |
15 |
NFE |
|
NFE |
|
|
48 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
12 |
17 |
|
VAS-1 |
|
|
|
72 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
12 |
17 |
|
VAS-3 |
|
|
|
day 7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
VAS-1 |
|
|
|
5985/M/ 3.057 |
1 hour |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
14 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
24 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
13 |
NFE |
|
NFE |
|
|
48 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
72 hours |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
11 |
|
VAS-1 |
|
|
|
day 7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
|
VAS-4 |
|
|
|
day 10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
VAS-1 |
|
|
O - opacity; A - Area of cornea involved; I - Iritis; R - redness; S - swelling; D - discharge;
FAO - Fluorescein dye retention associated with the area of corneal opacity;
NFE - No fluorescein retention was observed;
VAS - 1: Total area of vascularized corneal tissue was < 10 % of corneal surface (neovascularization - very slight);
VAS - 2: Total area of vascularized corneal tissue was > 10 % but < 25 % of corneal surface (neovascularization - mild);
VAS - 3: Total area of vascularized corneal tissue was > 25 % but < 50 % of corneal surface (neovascularization - moderate);
VAS - 4: Total area of vascularized corneal tissue was > 50 % of corneal surface (neovascularization - severe).
Table 2. Mean ocular score
1 hour |
15.67 |
24 hours |
19.00 |
48 hours |
20.67 |
72 hours |
17.33 |
day 7 |
5.33 |
day 10 |
0.00 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin Corrosivity (in vitro)
Prior to the in vivo and in vitro irritation testing, N-Butylpyrrolidone was evaluated with the Corrositex test method to determine its corrosive potential and to designate its Packing Group classification (in Vitro International, 2013). The Corrositex test is a standardized and reproducible method that can be employed to determine the potential corrosivity and determine the Packing Group classification of specified categories of chemical compounds under the hazardous materials transportation regulations administered by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and international dangerous goods codes. The Corrositex test predicts the in vivo corrosive potential of a chemical compound or mixture by using as an endpoint the time it takes for the chemical to permeate through or destroy a synthetic biobarrier. When the chemical has passed through this biobarrier, a visual change is produced in a proprietary Chemical Detection System (CDS).
To achieve this objective, the sample was subjected to a three-step testing process. First, a qualification test is done to ensure that the test sample and the CDS reagent are compatible. This is achieved by placing either 150 μL of a liquid or 100 mg of a solid into an aliquot of the CDS reagent and observing it for the presence of any detectable change. If a physical or color change is observed, the sample is judged to be compatible with the detection solution and the remainder of the test is performed. The second step of the Corrositex test utilizes appropriate indicator solutions to permit categorization of the test sample as either a Category 1 or Category 2 material. Category 1 materials are typically strong acids/bases, while Category 2 materials are typically weak acids/bases. The third step in the test is performed by applying the test sample to the biobarrier. When the chemical permeates through or destroys the full thickness of this biobarrier, it comes into contact with the CDS which then undergoes a simple color change. This color change is visually observed, and the time required for the color change to occur is recorded. The time required to destroy the biobarrier is recorded for four sample replicates and the mean of these replicates is utilized to designate the UN Packing Group classification as I (severe corrosivity; corrositex time is 0 - 3 min (Cat 1 and 2)), II (moderate corrosivity; corrositex time > 3 - 60 min (Cat 1) and > 3 - 30 min (Cat 2)), III (mild corrosivity; corrositex time is > 60 - 240 min (Cat 1) and > 30 - 60 min (Cat 2)), or Noncorrosive (NC; corrositex time is > 240 min (Cat 1) and > 60 min (Cat 2)). Positive and negative controls are analyzed concurrently to confirm the test’s validity. The results of this study indicated that the sample was compatible with the Corrositex system and was classified as a Category 2 material. The results obtained from the evaluation of four replicate samples were highly reproducible, demonstrating that a mean time of >60 minutes required to destroy the synthetic biobarriers. These findings lead to the designation of this sample as a non-corrosive.
Skin irritation (in vitro)
Since N-Butylpyrrolidone was not corrosive in the Corrositex test method, skin irritation potential of the test substance was determined in the Human Skin Model Test following OECD 439 Guideline (LAUS, 2012; Report No. 12092002G840). One valid experiment was performed. Three tissues of the human skin model EpiDerm™ were treated with N-Butylpyrrolidone for 60 minutes. 30 µL of the liquid test item (using a nylon mesh) were applied to each tissue and spread to match the tissue size (0.63 cm²; as indicated by supplier). DPBS-buffer was used as negative control, 5 % SDS-solution was used as positive control. After treatment with the negative control, the absorbance values were within the required acceptability criterion of 1.0 < mean OD (optic density) < 2.5. The positive control showed clear irritating effects. Variation within tissues was acceptable (< 18 %). After the treatment with the test item, the relative absorbance values were reduced to 3.1 %. This value is well below the threshold for irritation potential (50 %). Therefore, N-Butylpyrrolidone is considered as irritant in the Human Skin Model Test. The study result supports findings in the in vivo test.
Skin irritation (in vivo)
According to the testing strategy outlined in OECD 404 Guideline (step 6), no further testing is required if a substance is irritating in a valid in vitro irritation test. Then, an appropriate classification as skin irritant should be required. However, the classification and labelling of the structurally related substances N-Methylpyrrolidone (CAS 872-50-4) and N-Ethylpyrrolidone (CAS 2687-91-4) differed for this endpoint: Cat 2, H315: Causes skin irritation (NMP) and non classified (NEP). Therefore, no definitive conclusion could be made whether or not NBP is irritating in vivo. Therefore an in vivo study was conducted.
N-Butylpyrrolidone was given as a single dermal administration to New Zealand White rabbits (OECD 404; Charles River Laboratories, 2014a; Report No. 20050801). Each of 3 rabbits received a 0.5 mL dose of the test substance as a single dermal application. The dose was held in contact with the skin under a semi-occlusive binder for exposure periods of 3 minutes, 1 hour, and 4 hours for 1 animal and exposure periods of 4 hours for 2 animals. Following the completion of each exposure period, the binder was removed, and the remaining test substance was wiped from the skin using gauze moistened with deionized water followed by dry gauze. Test sites were subsequently examined and scored for dermal irritation for up to 21 days following patch removal.
At 3-minute exposure, the test substance did not produce erythema or oedema through 72 hours post-dose period. However, very slight erythema was noted at the single test site on Day 14, which subsequently resolved completely by Day 21.
After 1-hour exposure, the test substance produced very slight erythema at the single test site immediately after patch removal. The dermal irritation was not observed at the 1-hour scoring interval, but was present again at the 24-, 48-, and 72-hour scoring intervals. The dermal irritation was not observed on Day 7, but was observed again on Day 14. Day 21 scoring revealed no irritation. Additional dermal findings included desquamation.
After 4-hour exposure, the test substance produced very slight erythema at 3/3 test sites and very slight oedema at 1/3 test sites by the 1-hour scoring interval. Well-defined erythema was observed in 1/3 test sites at the 24-, 48-, and 72-hour scoring intervals. The dermal irritation was not observed in 1/3 test sites on Day 7, but was again observed in that animal on Day 10. Dermal irritation did not resolve completely in the remaining 2 test sites. Additional dermal findings included blanching (focal and/or pinpoint areas up to 10 % of the test site) in 1/3 test sites and desquamation in 3/3 test sites.
In conclusion, N-Butylpyrrolidone is considered to be a slight irritant to the skin of the rabbit under the conditions of the test (4 hour exposure). The calculated Primary Irritation Index (P.I.I) for the test substance was 1.33.
According to the EEC Dermal Evaluation Criteria, N-Butylpyrrolidone is considered to be a nonirritant for erythema and oedema as listed below:
Animal No. | Erythema | Edema | P.I.I. |
3-Minute Exposure | |||
1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 - Nonirritant |
Irritation Rating | Nonirritant | Nonirritant | |
1-Hour Exposure | |||
1 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.75 - Slight irritant |
Irritation Rating | Nonirritant | Nonirritant | |
4-Hour Exposure | |||
1 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 1.33 - Slight irritant |
2 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
3 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |
Irritation Rating | Nonirritant | Nonirritant |
Eye irritation (in vivo)
The objective of this study was to assess the irritant and/or corrosive effects of N-Butylpyrrolidone when given as a single ocular administration to rabbits (OECD 405; Charles River Laboratories, 2014b; Report No. 20054210). Each of 3 New Zealand White rabbits received a 0.1 mL dose of the test substance in the conjunctival sac of the right eye. The contralateral eye of each animal remained untreated and served as a control. Test and control eyes were examined for signs of irritation for up to 10 days following dosing.
Exposure to the test article produced corneal opacity in 1/3 test eyes by the 24-hour scoring interval and complete resolution occurred by the Day 7 scoring interval. Iritis was observed in 1/3 test eyes by the 1-hour scoring interval and in 2/3 test eyes by the 24-hour scoring interval. Complete resolution of the iritis occurred in 1/3 test eyes by the Day 7 scoring interval and in 2/3 test eyes by the Day 10 scoring interval. Conjunctivitis (redness, swelling, and/or discharge) occurred in 3/3 test eyes by the 1-hour scoring interval and complete resolution occurred in 1/3 test eyes by the Day 7 scoring interval and in 2/3 test eyes by the Day 10 scoring interval. An additional ocular finding of neovascularization (2/3 test eyes) was noted during the study. Decreased fecal output was observed in all animals. This observation, which is a known pharmacological effect of opioids, was likely due to the buprenorphine treatment that the animals received from Days 0 to 5. According to the Kay and Calandra Evaluation Criteria, N-Butylpyrrolidone is considered to be a moderate irritant to the ocular tissue of the rabbit. The total ocular irritation score for the 24-, 48-, and 72-hour intervals was individually added for corneal opacity, iris lesion, conjunctival redness, and conjunctival oedema. Mean scores from gradings at 24, 48 and 72 hours after application of N-Butylpyrrolidone are indicated below:
Animal No./Sex | Corneal Opacity | Iris Lesion | Conjunctival Redness | Conjunctival Edema |
5981/M | 2.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 |
5984/M | 0.00 | 1.00 | 2.67 | 2.00 |
5985/M | 0.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 0.33 |
Irritation Rating | Nonirritant | Irritant | Irritant | Irritant |
According to the EEC Ocular Evaluation Criteria, the substance is classified as non-irritant for corneal opacity but irritant for iritis and conjunctival redness and oedema. According to the CLP criteria, N-Butylpyrrolidone is classified as a Category 2 irritant to the eye (potential to induce reversible eye irritation).
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin irritation
According to the classification criteria outlined in the section 3.2.2.2. (Guidance on the Application of CLP criteria, 2013), if the mean value of ≥ 2.3 ≤ 4.0 was reached for erythema/eschar or for oedema in at least 2 of 3 tested animals from gradings at 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal, the classification as Skin Irritant would be assigned. The mean values for erythema and oedema measured in the in vivo study are all under the cut-off values triggering C&L. The mean values for erythema/eschar from gradings at 24 -h, 48 -h and 72 -h after patch removal were 2.0, 1.0 and 1.0 in animal 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The mean values of 0.0 for oedema were measured at the same reading points in each animal. On the other hand, the irritation responses after 4-hour exposure were delayed (the dermal irritation was not observed in one animal on day 7, but was again observed in that animal on day 10) and persisted to the end of the observation period (day 14) in two animals. The results of in vitro studies have not been taken into account for the purposes of classification and labelling since they are overruled by the in vivo results. Based on this data, the target substance N-Butylpyrrolidone meets criteria under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 for classification and labelling as a skin irritant (Cat. 2, H315: Causes skin irritation).
Eye irritation
According to the classification criteria outlined in the section 3.3.2.2. (Guidance on the Application of CLP criteria, 2013), if a substance cause positive but reversible reactions such as corneal opacity (score ≥ 1), iritis (score ≥ 1), conjunctival redness (score ≥ 2) or conjunctival oedema (chemosis) (score ≥ 2) in at least 2 of 3 tested animals from gradings at 24, 48 and 72 hours after application, the classification as Eye Irritant (Category 2) is assigned. The average irritation scores over 24, 48, and 72 hours for corneal opacity were 2.0, 0.0 and 0.0 in animal 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Iritis mean score of 1.0 was yielded for each of the test animal. The conjunctivae mean scores for redness were 3.0, 2.67 and 2.0 for animal 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The chemosis mean scores of 2.0, 2.0 and 0.33 have been reported for the three tested animals, respectively. According to these values, the positive responders were: one out of three animals for corneal opacity, three animals for iritis and conjunctival redness as well as 2 animals for conjunctival chemosis. Therefore, according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, N-Butylpyrrolidone should be classified as a Category 2 irritant to the eye (H319: Causes serious eye irritation).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.