Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-549-4 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 03-24-2020 to 06-25-2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 429, July 22, 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Physical state / color: Liquid / colourless to slightly yellow
Storage conditions: Room temperature, under nitrogen - Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CBA/Ca
- Remarks:
- CBA/CaOlaHsd / SPF
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- Age on day 0: 8 - 12 weeks
Sex: Female
Supplier: Envigo RMS GmbH
Kreuzelweg 53
NL-5961 NM Horst
Arrival in the test facility: Acclimatization period at least 5 days before the first test
substance application
Identification: The single housed animals were identified by cage cards
Body weight on day 0: 18.6 g – 22.3 g (pretest)
17.2 g – 20.9 g (main test)
Room temperature / relative humidity: The animals were housed in fully air-conditioned rooms. Central air-conditioning guaranteed a range of 20 – 24°C for temperature and of 45 – 65% for relative humidity. There were no deviations from these ranges, which influenced the results
of the study.
Day / night rhythm: 12 h / 12 h (6.00 a.m. – 6.00 p.m. / 6.00 p.m. – 6.00 a.m.)
Type of cage: Polycarbonate cages type MII with mesh wire tops supplied by BECKER & Co., Castrop-Rauxel, Germany
Enrichment: PLEXX mouse tunnel (red, transparent) and nest building material Nestlets (Ancare, Typ NES 3600) (PLEXX b.v.; AB Elst, Netherlands)
Number of animals per cage: 1 animal
As group housing may increase oral exposure due to grooming of the animals and may interfere with clear observations of each individual animal, animals were single housed for the duration of the test.
Feeding: Mouse and rat maintenance diet “GLP”, Granovit AG, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland; ad libitum
Drinking water: Tap water ad libitum
Bedding: Dust-free wooden bedding was used in this study (the present supplier is documented in the raw data). - Vehicle:
- methyl ethyl ketone
- Concentration:
- 10% and 50% (first pretest)
0.5%, 1.0% and 2.5% (2nd pretest)
0.05%, 0.1% and 0.25% (main study) - No. of animals per dose:
- 5
- Details on study design:
- Conduct of the study
The study comprised four test groups. Each group consisted of 5 mice.
Randomization: Prior to first application, the animals were distributed to the individual groups, received animal numbers and were allocated to the respective cages according to the randomization instructions of Win Rando Version 3.2.
Body weight determination: Individual body weights on day 0 prior to the first application and on day 5 prior to the sacrifice of the animals.
Signs and symptoms: Obvious signs of systemic toxicity and/or local inflammation at the application sites were noted for each animal in the raw data.
Mortality: A check for moribund and dead animals was made twice each workday (beginning and end) and once on Saturdays, Sundays
and on public holidays.
Form of application: Epicutaneous application is simulating dermal contact with the compound, which can occur under practical use conditions.
Application volume: 25 μL per ear
Site of application: Dorsal surface of both ears
Frequency of application: 3 consecutive applications (day 0 – day 2) to the same application site
³H-thymidine injection
On study day five (about 66 to 72 hours after the last application of test substance to the ears), about 20 μCi 3H-thymidine* in 250 μL sterile saline were injected into the tail vein of the mice.
Terminal procedures
The animals were sacrificed on study day 5 about 5 hours after 3H-thymidine injection by cervical dislocation under Isoflurane anesthesia.
Determination of ear weight: Immediately after the death of each animal, a circular piece of tissue (diameter 0.8 cm) was punched out of the apical part of each ear of all animals. The weight of the pooled punches was determined for each animal. These measurements serve for
detecting a potential inflammatory ear swelling.
Removal and weight determination of the lymph nodes:
Immediately after removal of the ear punches, the left and right auricular lymph nodes were dissected. The weight of the pooled lymph nodes from both sides was determined for each animal.
Preparation of cell suspension and determination of cell count:
After weight determination, the pooled lymph nodes of each animal were stored in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) in an ice
water bath until further preparation. A single cell suspension was prepared as soon as possible after dissection by carefully
passing the lymph nodes through an iron mesh (mesh size 200 μm) into 8 mL phosphate-buffered physiological saline. For
determination of cell counts, an aliquot of each suspension was further diluted with Casy®ton in a ratio 1:500. The cell count was
determined using a Casy® Counter.
Measurement of 3H-thymidine incorporation of the lymph node cells:
The remaining cell suspensions were washed twice with PBS and precipitated with 5% trichloro-acetic acid (TCA). Each precipitate was transferred to scintillation fluid and incorporation of 3H-thymidine into the cells was measured in a β-scintillation counter.
Data evaluation
Table(s) and/or figure(s) of measured parameters presented in the report were produced using a PC-based tabular calculation software. The mean and individual data were not always rounded, but the significant digits were produced by changing the display format.
Consequently, calculation of mean values by using the individual data presented in the report will in some instances yield minor variations in value. - Positive control substance(s):
- other: Alpha-Hexylcinnamaldehyde, techn. 85%
- Statistics:
- Mean values and standard deviations of the measured parameters were calculated per test group from the individual values. The stimulation indices of 3H-thymidine incorporation, cell count, lymph node weight and ear weight measurements were calculated by dividing the mean values per test group and/or single animal values by the mean of the vehicle treated group.
Statistical analysis of 3H-Thymidine incorporation, cell count, lymph node weight and ear weight were performed by the WILCOXON test. - Positive control results:
- Result of last run including a periodic positiv control:
1%, 5%, 15% Alpha-Hexylcinnamaldehyde, techn. 85%
Stimulation Index (3H-Thymidine incorporation): 3.06, 7.70 and 11.13 (ratio of test group values to control group values >=3.0 indicates a positive result.
Stimulation index (cell counts): 1.59, 2.26 and 3.00
EC 3: ca. 1
EC 1.5: ca. 1 - Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks:
- 3H-thymidine incorporation
- Value:
- 1
- Test group / Remarks:
- vehicle MEK
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks:
- 3H-thymidine incorporation
- Value:
- 2.55
- Test group / Remarks:
- 0.05% in MEK
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks:
- 3H-thymidine incorporation
- Value:
- 9.1
- Test group / Remarks:
- 0.10% in MEK
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks:
- 3H-thymidine incorporation
- Value:
- 22.44
- Test group / Remarks:
- 0.25% in MEK
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks:
- cell counts
- Value:
- 1
- Test group / Remarks:
- vehicle MEK
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks:
- cell counts
- Value:
- 1.55
- Test group / Remarks:
- 0.05% in MEK
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks:
- cell counts
- Value:
- 2.24
- Test group / Remarks:
- 0.10% in MEK
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks:
- cell counts
- Value:
- 3.53
- Test group / Remarks:
- 0.25% in MEK
- Parameter:
- EC3
- Remarks:
- 3H-thymidine incorporation
- Value:
- 0.053
- Remarks on result:
- other: %
- Parameter:
- other: EC1.5
- Remarks:
- cell count
- Value:
- 0.048
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- %
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1A (indication of significant skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Basonat HA 3000 exhibits a skin sensitizing potential in the Local Lymph Node Assay under the test conditions chosen.
- Executive summary:
The skin sensitizing potential of Basonat HA 3000 was assessed using the radioactive Local Lymph Node Assay. The assay simulates the induction phase for skin sensitization in mice. It determines the response of cells in the auricular lymph nodes to repeated application of the test substance to the dorsal skin of the ears. Groups of 5 female CBA/CaOlaHsd mice each were treated with 0.05%, 0.10% and 0.25% (w/w) preparations of the test substance in methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) or with the vehicle alone. Each test animal was treated with 25 μL per ear of the appropriate test-substance preparation or the vehicle alone, applied to the dorsal surfaces of both ears on three consecutive days. Three days after the last application, about 20 μCi 3H-thymidine in 250 μL sterile saline were
injected into the tail vein of the mice. About 5 hours after the 3H-thymidine injection, the mice were sacrificed, and the auricular lymph nodes were removed. Lymph node response was evaluated measuring 3H-thymidine incorporation (indicator of cell proliferation). The cell count and weight of each animal’s pooled lymph nodes were also determined. In addition, a 0.8 cm diameter sample was punched out of the apical part of each ear, and for each animal, the weight of the pooled punches was determined to obtain an indication of possible ear skin irritation. No signs of systemic toxicity or irritation were noticed in all animals during general observation.
When applied as 0.10% and 0.25% concentrations in MEK, the test substance induced biologically relevant (increase to 3-fold or above of control value = stimulation index (SI) ≥ 3) and concentration-dependent increases of 3H-thymidine incorporation into the cells from the auricular lymph nodes. The increase of the 0.05% concentration failed to reach the cutoff value. The increases of 3H-thymidine incorporation were statistically significant at all concentrations. Concomitantly, all concentrations induced biologically relevant and statistically significant responses (increase to 1.5-fold or above of control value = stimulation index (SI) ≥ 1.5) in the auricular lymph node cell counts. The increase of the 0.05% concentration lies at the border of of biological relevance. In addition, statistically significant increases in lymph node weights were noted at all concentrations.
The test-substance concentrations did not cause any increases in ear weights (no increase to stimulation index (SI) of ≥ 1.25), demonstrating the absence of relevant ear skin irritation.
Thus, it is concluded that Basonat HA 3000 exhibits a skin sensitizing potential in the Local Lymph Node Assay under the test conditions chosen. The threshold concentration for sensitization induction was around 0.05%. The EC 3 (estimated concentration that leads to the SI of 3.0) for 3H-thymidine incorporation was calculated by linear regression from the results of the 0.05% and 0.10% concentrations to be 0.053%. The EC 1.5 (estimated concentration that leads to the SI of 1.5) for cell count was calculated by semi-logarithmical regression from the results of the 0.05% and 0.10%
concentrations to be 0.048%.
Reference
Pretest / Irritation Screening
In the pretest two mice each were treated with test-substance concentrations of 10% and 50% (1st pretest) and 0.5%, 1.0% and 2.5% (2nd pretest) on three consecutive days. Overall, no relevant signs of systemic toxicity were observed in the pretests. However, reduced general condition was observed in the animals treated with the 10% and 50% concentrations on study day 2.
After application of the 10% and 50% concentrations, the animals showed severe increases (>25%) in ear weights (compared to historical vehicle values) and ear thickness measurements as indication of excessive ear skin irritation. In addition, well-defined erythema (day 2) and slight scales on the ear skin (day 5) were observed at the 10% concentration. Moderate to severe erythema (day 2) and moderate scales on the ear skin (day 5) were noted in animals treated with the 50% concentration. After treatment with the 1.0% and 2.5% concentrations, the animals showed severe increases (≥25%) in ear thickness measurements as indication of excessive ear skin irritation. Slight scales on the ear skin were observed at the 2.5% concentration on study day 5. The 0.5% concentration did not show relevant signs of local ear skin irritation. Considerably increased lymph node weights were observed in all concentrations without a clear dose-response relationship.
Test Group |
Treatment |
Animal No. |
Lymph Node Weight [mg/Lymph Node Pair] |
Mean |
S.D. |
Stimulation Index1(SI) per animal |
Stimulation Index1(SI) per test group |
|
vehicle historical control |
|
|
5.3 |
0.3 |
|
1.00 |
1 |
10% in MEK |
1 2 |
23.8 17.5 |
20.7 |
4.5 |
4.49 3.30 |
3.90 |
2 |
50% in MEK |
3 4 |
22.1 21.8 |
22.0 |
0.2 |
4.17 4.11 |
4.14 |
3 |
0.5% in MEK |
5 6 |
17.7 18.1 |
17.9 |
0.3 |
3.34 3.42 |
3.38 |
4 |
1.0% in MEK |
7 8 |
19.6 20.9 |
20.3 |
0.9 |
3.70 3.94 |
3.82 |
5 |
2.5% in MEK |
9 10 |
19.5 24.7 |
22.1 |
3.7 |
3.68 4.66 |
4.17 |
Test Group |
Treatment |
Animal No. |
EarWeight [mg/animal] |
Mean |
S.D. |
Stimulation Index1(SI) per animal |
Stimulation Index1(SI) per test group |
|
vehicle historical control |
|
|
30.9 |
1.3 |
|
1.00 |
1 |
10% in MEK |
1 2 |
38.0 40.4 |
39.2 |
1.7 |
1.23 1.31 |
1.27 |
2 |
50% in MEK |
3 4 |
42.9 41.8 |
42.4 |
0.8 |
1.39 1.35 |
1.37 |
3 |
0.5% in MEK |
5 6 |
30.4 31.9 |
31.2 |
1.1 |
0.98 1.03 |
1.01 |
4 |
1.0% in MEK |
7 8 |
34.0 33.5 |
33.8 |
0.4 |
1.10 1.08 |
1.09 |
5 |
2.5% in MEK |
9 10 |
35.9 36.9 |
36.4 |
0.7 |
1.16 1.19 |
1.18 |
1 test group x / vehicle MEK (historical control)
Test Group |
Treatment |
Animal No. |
Ear Thickness [µm] |
||||||||
d 0 |
d 2 |
d 5 |
|||||||||
left |
right |
Mean |
left |
right |
Mean |
left |
right |
Mean |
|||
1 |
10% in MEK |
1 2 |
200 205 |
200 200 |
200 203 |
260 250 |
260 250 |
260 250 |
270 280 |
270 280 |
270 280 |
2 |
50% in MEK |
3 4 |
200 200 |
200 200 |
200 200 |
270 260 |
270 260 |
270 260 |
340 360 |
350 360 |
345 360 |
3 |
0.5% in MEK |
5 6 |
200 205 |
200 205 |
200 205 |
225 225 |
225 225 |
225 225 |
240 245 |
235 240 |
238 243 |
4 |
1.0% in MEK |
7 8 |
200 200 |
200 200 |
200 200 |
225 225 |
225 225 |
225 225 |
250 250 |
250 255 |
250 253 |
5 |
2.5% in MEK |
9 10 |
205 200 |
205 200 |
205 200 |
245 240 |
245 245 |
245 243 |
270 275 |
265 270 |
268 273 |
Test Group |
Treatment |
Animal No. |
Difference d 0 to d 2 [µm] |
Ear swelling d 2 (%) |
Difference d 0 to d 5 [µm] |
Ear swelling d 5 (%) |
1 |
10% in MEK |
1 2 |
60 48 |
30 23 |
70 78 |
35 38 |
2 |
50% in MEK |
3 4 |
70 60 |
35 30 |
145 160 |
73 80 |
3 |
0.5% in MEK |
5 6 |
25 20 |
13 10 |
38 38 |
19 18 |
4 |
1.0% in MEK |
7 8 |
25 25 |
13 13 |
50 53 |
25 26 |
5 |
2.5% in MEK |
9 10 |
40 43 |
20 21 |
63 73 |
30 36 |
Test Group |
Treatment |
Animal No. |
Body Weight d0 [g] |
Body Weight d5 [g] |
Body Weight Change d5-d0 [g] |
||||||
Individual |
Mean |
S.D. |
Individual |
Mean |
S.D. |
Individual |
Mean |
S.D. |
|||
1 |
10% in MEK |
1 2 |
18.9 18.6 |
18.8 |
0.2 |
19.9 19.2 |
19.6 |
0.5 |
1.0 0.6 |
0.8 |
0.3 |
2 |
50% in MEK |
3 4 |
21.3 19.3 |
20.3 |
1.4 |
20.5 19.3 |
19.9 |
0.8 |
-0.8 0.0 |
-0.4 |
0.6 |
3 |
0.5% in MEK |
5 6 |
20.1 18.7 |
19.4 |
1.0 |
19.9 19.8 |
19.9 |
0.1 |
-0.2 1.1 |
0.4 |
0.9 |
4 |
1.0% in MEK |
7 8 |
20.0 22.1 |
21.1 |
1.5 |
19.8 21.9 |
20.9 |
1.5 |
-0.2 -0.2 |
-0.2 |
0.0 |
5 |
2.5% in MEK |
9 10 |
22.3 21.0 |
21.7 |
0.9 |
23.3 21.9 |
22.6 |
1.0 |
1.0 0.9 |
0.9 |
0.1 |
Nature and duration of clinical findings of individual animals:
Test Group |
1 |
|
Treatment |
10% in MEK |
|
Animal Numbers |
1 |
2 |
reduced general condition |
d2 |
d2 |
Test Group |
2 |
|
Treatment |
50% in MEK |
|
Animal Numbers |
3 |
4 |
reduced general condition |
d2 |
d2 |
Test Group |
3 |
|
Treatment |
0.5% in MEK |
|
Animal Numbers |
5 |
6 |
|
- |
- |
Test Group |
4 |
|
Treatment |
1.0% in MEK |
|
Animal Numbers |
7 |
8 |
|
- |
- |
Test Group |
5 |
|
Treatment |
2.5% in MEK |
|
Animal Numbers |
9 |
10 |
|
- |
- |
Nature and duration of local findings of individual animals
Test Group |
1 |
|
Treatment |
10% in MEK |
|
Animal Numbers |
1 |
2 |
well-defined erythema |
d2 |
d2 |
scales on the ear skin, slight |
d5 |
d5 |
Test Group |
2 |
|
Treatment |
50% in MEK |
|
Animal Numbers |
3 |
4 |
moderate to severe erythema |
d2 |
d2 |
scales on the ear skin, moderate |
d5 |
d5 |
Test Group |
3 |
|
Treatment |
0.5% in MEK |
|
Animal Numbers |
5 |
6 |
|
- |
- |
Test Group |
4 |
|
Treatment |
1.0% in MEK |
|
Animal Numbers |
7 |
8 |
|
- |
- |
Test Group |
5 |
|
Treatment |
2.5% in MEK |
|
Animal Numbers |
9 |
10 |
scales on the ear skin, slight |
d5 |
d5 |
Main test
3H-thymidine incorporation, cell count and lymph node weight
When applied as 0.10% and 0.25% concentrations in MEK, the test substance induced biologically relevant (increase to 3-fold or above of control value = stimulation index (SI) ≥ 3) and concentration-dependent increases of 3H-thymidine incorporation into the cells from the auricular lymph nodes. The increase of the 0.05% concentration failed to reach the cutoff value. The increases of 3H-thymidine incorporation were statistically significant at all concentrations.
Concomitantly, all concentrations induced biologically relevant and statistically significant responses (increase to 1.5-fold or above of control value = stimulation index (SI) ≥ 1.5) in the auricular lymph node cell counts. The increase of the 0.05% concentration lies at the border of of biological relevance. In addition, statistically significant increases in lymph node weights were noted at all concentrations.
Test Group |
Treatment |
³H-thymidine incorporation [DPM/Lymph Node Pair] |
|||
Mean |
S.D. |
Stimulation Index1 |
|||
1 |
vehicle MEK |
120.9 |
45.4 |
1.00 |
|
2 |
0.05% in MEK |
308.1 |
59.2 |
2.55 |
## |
3 |
0.10% in MEK |
1,099.6 |
340.3 |
9.10 |
## |
4 |
0.25% in MEK |
2,712.2 |
445.9 |
22.44 |
## |
Test Group |
Treatment |
Cell Counts [Counts/Lymph Node Pair] |
|||
Mean |
S.D. |
Stimulation Index1 |
|||
1 |
vehicle MEK |
9,952,800 |
1,624,907 |
1.00 |
|
2 |
0.05% in MEK |
15,420,800 |
1,836,718 |
1.55 |
## |
3 |
0.10% in MEK |
22,309,600 |
4,161,851 |
2.24 |
## |
4 |
0.25% in MEK |
35,161,600 |
7,514,526 |
3.53 |
## |
Test Group |
Treatment |
Lymph Node Weight [mg/Lymph Node Pair] |
|||
Mean |
S.D. |
Stimulation Index1 |
|||
1 |
vehicle MEK |
5.2 |
0.9 |
1.00 |
|
2 |
0.05% in MEK |
7.0 |
1.0 |
1.34 |
## |
3 |
0.10% in MEK |
9.3 |
1.3 |
1.77 |
## |
4 |
0.25% in MEK |
14.3 |
0.8 |
2.73 |
## |
1vs. mean of test group 1 (vehicle control)
## = statistically significant for the value p ≤ 0.01
Ear weights
The test-substance concentrations did not cause any increases in ear weights (no increase to stimulation index (SI) of ≥ 1.25), demonstrating the absence of relevant ear skin irritation.
Test Group |
Treatment |
Ear Weight [mg/animal] |
||
Mean |
S.D. |
Stimulation Index1 |
||
1 |
vehicle MEK |
31.1 |
1.8 |
1.00 |
2 |
0.05% in MEK |
30.0 |
1.1 |
0.97 |
3 |
0.10% in MEK |
30.6 |
0.9 |
0.98 |
4 |
0.25% in MEK |
31.4 |
1.3 |
1.01 |
1 vs. mean of test group 1 (vehicle control)
## = statistically significant for the value p ≤ 0.01
Body weights
The expected mean body weigh gain was generally observed in all test groups during the study period.
Test Group |
Treatment |
Animal No. |
Body Weight d0 [g] |
Body Weight d5 [g] |
Body Weight Change d5-d0 [g] |
||||||
Individual |
Mean |
S.D. |
Individual |
Mean |
S.D. |
Individual |
Mean |
S.D. |
|||
|
|
1 |
17.7 |
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
17.2 |
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
1 |
vehicle MEK |
3 |
19.5 |
18.8 |
1.4 |
19.5 |
19.1 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.8 |
|
|
4 |
19.2 |
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
-0.8 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
20.6 |
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
20.0 |
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
19.6 |
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
-0.2 |
|
|
2 |
0.05% in MEK |
8 |
19.4 |
19.3 |
1.0 |
20.3 |
19.7 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
|
|
9 |
17.5 |
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
19.9 |
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
-0.1 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
19.8 |
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
18.7 |
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
3 |
0.10% in MEK |
13 |
19.2 |
19.3 |
0.5 |
20.1 |
20.2 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.4 |
|
|
14 |
19.1 |
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
19.9 |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
19.2 |
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
20.4 |
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
4 |
0.25% in MEK |
18 |
18.1 |
19.5 |
1.1 |
19.0 |
20.7 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
0.7 |
|
|
19 |
20.9 |
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
19.0 |
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
Clinical signs
No signs of systemic toxicity were noticed in all animals during general observation.
Local findings
No local findings were observed during the observation period.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (sensitising)
- Additional information:
The skin sensitizing potential of Basonat HA 3000 was assessed using the radioactive Local Lymph Node Assay according to OECD TG 429. When applied as 0.10% and 0.25% concentrations in MEK, the test substance induced biologically relevant (increase to 3-fold or above of control value = stimulation index (SI) ≥ 3) and concentration-dependent increases of 3H-thymidine incorporation into the cells from the auricular lymph nodes. The increase of the 0.05% concentration failed to reach the cutoff value. The increases of 3H-thymidine incorporation were statistically significant at all concentrations. Concomitantly, all concentrations induced biologically relevant and statistically significant responses (increase to 1.5-fold or above of control value = stimulation index (SI) ≥ 1.5) in the auricular lymph node cell counts. The increase of the 0.05% concentration lies at the border of of biological relevance. In addition, statistically significant increases in lymph node weights were noted at all concentrations.
The test-substance concentrations did not cause any increases in ear weights (no increase to stimulation index (SI) of ≥ 1.25), demonstrating the absence of relevant ear skin irritation.
Thus, it is concluded that Basonat HA 3000 exhibits a skin sensitizing potential in the Local Lymph Node Assay under the test conditions chosen. The threshold concentration for sensitization induction was around 0.05%. The EC 3 (estimated concentration that leads to the SI of 3.0) for 3H-thymidine incorporation was calculated by linear regression from the results of the 0.05% and 0.10% concentrations to be 0.053%. The EC 1.5 (estimated concentration that leads to the SI of 1.5) for cell count was calculated by semi-logarithmical regression from the results of the 0.05% and 0.10% concentrations to be 0.048%.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
In a state-of-the-art LLNA according to OECD TG 429, the substance showed EC3 values <2%. According to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, Annex I, classification is required as skin sensitising Cat.1A; H317: May cause an allergic skin reaction.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.