Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 464-080-2 | CAS number: 613246-79-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2016-09-01 to 2016-11-28
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2006
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2015
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 850.5400 (Algal Toxicity, Tiers I and II) (January 2012)
- Version / remarks:
- 1996
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- No sampling
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: Preparation of test solutions were performed using the WAF method (according to OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 23) as follows: Each test concentration was prepared individually by adding an amount of test item (appropriate for the concentration) into the dilution water (OECD medium) and mixing for a period of one hour to achieve an equilibrated concentration. Each solution was then filtrated through a membrane filter (0.22 μm) to separate the possible non-dissolved test material. The test solutions were prepared immediately before introduction of algae (start of the experiment). - Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Raphidocelis subcapitata (formerly known as Pseudokirchneriella subcapita and Selenastrum capricornutum) (Printz-Starr).
- Source: The algae were supplied by the SAG: Collection of Algal Cultures, Inst. Plant Physiology, University of Göttingen, Untere Karspüle 2, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany
- Method of cultivation: The stock cultures are small algal cultures that are planted on agar regularly. These are transferred to fresh medium at least once every two months under standardised conditions according to the test guidelines.
The pre-culture is intended to give an amount of algae suitable for the inoculation of test cultures. The pre-culture was prepared with Algal Mineral Salts Culture Medium, incubated under the conditions of the test and used when still exponentially growing, normally after an incubation period of about three days. (The pre-culture was incubated for three days at this test.) - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Test temperature:
- 22.5 and 24.0°C
- pH:
- 7.73 – 9.31
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- The following nominal concentrations were tested: 0.1, 0.4, 1.6, 6.3, 25, 100 mg/L (loading rate)
No measured concentrations as no analytical determination possible. - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Erlenmeyer flasks
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: ~250 mL volume with 100 mL test medium.
- Aeration: No
- Initial cells density: 1 × 10^4 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: 84.00 × 10^4 cells/mL (mean value) after 72 hours in the Untreated control.
- No. of vessels per concentration: 3
- No. of vessels per control: 6
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: According to OECD guideline
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: yes
- Adjustment of pH: No
- Photoperiod: 24 h
- Light intensity and quality: 7980 lux
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED
- Determination of cell concentrations: The cell numbers were determined at 24, 48 and 72 hours after starting the test by manual cell counting using a microscope with counting chamber
- Other: The morphological changes of algal cells compared to the control were examined at 24, 48 and 72 hours after starting the test using a microscope.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 4
- Range finding study: Each test concentration was prepared individually by adding an amount of test item (appropriate for the concentration) into the dilution water (OECD medium) and mixing for a period of one hour to achieve an equilibrated concentration. Each solution was then filtrated through a membrane filter (0.22 μm) to separate the possible non-dissolved test material. Untreated control ran parallel in the test.
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: Based on the results of the non-GLP Preliminary Range-Finding Test (see above) six test concentrations in a geometric series (with a spacing factor of 4) were used in the main test. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7)
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 0.58 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95 % CL: 0.46 - 0.73 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC20
- Effect conc.:
- 0.84 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95 % CL: 0.69 - 1.01 mg/L
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 1.7 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95 % CL: 1.45 - 1.99 mg/L
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.4 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 0.27 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95 % CL: 0.60 - 0.81 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC20
- Effect conc.:
- 0.38 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95 % CL: 0.31 - 0.45 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 0.7 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95 % CL: 0.60 - 0.81 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.1 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.4 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control: yes
- Observation of abnormalities: No
- Any observations that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: No morphological abnormalities were observed in the control and in the lowest test item concentration (0.1 mg/L) during the experiment. No precipitation was observed. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- In this 72-h algal growth inhibition test with Raphidocelis subcapitata, the obtained results showed that the test item had significant toxic effects on the growth of Raphidocelis subcapitata. All validity criteria were met. The results are based on nominal test item concentrations (loading rate). The calculated biological endpoints are EC10 (growth rate) 0.58 mg/L, EC50 (growth rate) 1.70 mg/L, EC10 (yield) 0.27 mg/L, EC50 (yield) 0.70 mg/L, NOEC (growth rate) 0.4 mg/L and NOEC (yield) 0.1 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the test item SIKA Hardener LTJ on the growth of a unicellular green algal species Raphidocelis subcapitata (formerly known as Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata). Exponentially growing cultures of Raphidocelis subcapitata were exposed to various concentrations of the test item over several generations under defined conditions. The algal growth in relation to a control culture was determined over a fixed test period of 72 hours and thus, over several algal generations. The test method of application and the test species Raphidocelis subcapitata are recommended by the test guidelines. Based on the results of non-GLP Preliminary Range-Finding Test the following six test concentrations in a geometric series (with a spacing factor of 4) were tested: 0.1, 0.4, 1.6, 6.3, 25, 100 mg/L (loading rate). The test concentrations were prepared using the WAF method (by preparing individual WAFs). Due to the rapid hydrolysis of the test item (SIKA Hardener LTJ ) validation of suitable analytical method was not possible for the verification of test item concentration in aqueous test media. Analytical determination of the test item concentrations was not feasible, therefore biological endpoints of the test are based on the nominal test item concentrations (loading rate). Biological results are based on the nominal test item concentrations (loading rate).For the determination of the LOEC and NOEC, the calculated mean growth rates and yield at the test concentrations were tested on significant differences to the control values by Bonferroni t-Test using TOXSTAT software. The test item had a statistically significant inhibitory effect on the growth of Raphidocelis subcapitata after the exposure period of 72 hours based on the average specific growth rate in concentrations of 1.6, 6.3, 25 and 100 mg/L and based on yield in concentrations of 0.4, 1.6, 6.3, 25 and 100 mg/L (Bonferroni t-Test, 1 tailed, α=0.05) when compared to control. The ErCx and EyCx values of the test item and their confidence limits were calculated using Probit analysis by TOXSTAT software. The calculated biological endpoints are EC10 (growth rate) 0.58 mg/L, EC50 (growth rate) 1.70 mg/L, EC10 (yield) 0.27 mg/L, EC50 (yield) 0.70 mg/L, NOEC (growth rate) 0.4 mg/L and NOEC (yield) 0.1 mg/L.
Reference
Description of key information
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the test item SIKA Hardener LTJ on the growth of a unicellular green algal species Raphidocelis subcapitata according to OECD guideline 201. The calculated biological endpoints are EC10 (growth rate) 0.58 mg/L, EC50 (growth rate) 1.70 mg/L, EC10 (yield) 0.27 mg/L, EC50 (yield) 0.70 mg/L, NOEC (growth rate) 0.4 mg/L and NOEC (yield) 0.1 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater algae:
- 1.7 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
- 0.58 mg/L
Additional information
Growth Inhibition Test of SIKA Hardener LTJ on Algae (Raphidocelis subcapitata)
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the test item SIKA Hardener LTJ on the growth of a unicellular green algal species Raphidocelis subcapitata (formerly known as Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata). Exponentially growing cultures of Raphidocelis subcapitata were exposed to various concentrations of the test item over several generations under defined conditions. The algal growth in relation to a control culture was determined over a fixed test period of 72 hours and thus, over several algal generations. The test method of application and the test species Raphidocelis subcapitata are recommended by the test guidelines. Based on the results of non-GLP Preliminary Range-Finding Test the following six test concentrations in a geometric series (with a spacing factor of 4) were tested: 0.1, 0.4, 1.6, 6.3, 25, 100 mg/L (loading rate). The test concentrations were prepared using the WAF method (by preparing individual WAFs). Due to the rapid hydrolysis of the test item (SIKA Hardener LTJ ) validation of suitable analytical method was not possible for the verification of test item concentration in aqueous test media. Analytical determination of the test item concentrations was not feasible, therefore biological endpoints of the test are based on the nominal test item concentrations (loading rate). Biological results are based on the nominal test item concentrations (loading rate).For the determination of the LOEC and NOEC, the calculated mean growth rates and yield at the test concentrations were tested on significant differences to the control values by Bonferroni t-Test using TOXSTAT software. The test item had a statistically significant inhibitory effect on the growth of Raphidocelis subcapitata after the exposure period of 72 hours based on the average specific growth rate in concentrations of 1.6, 6.3, 25 and 100 mg/L and based on yield in concentrations of 0.4, 1.6, 6.3, 25 and 100 mg/L (Bonferroni t-Test, 1 tailed, α=0.05) when compared to control. The ErCx and EyCx values of the test item and their confidence limits were calculated using Probit analysis by TOXSTAT software. The calculated biological endpoints are EC10 (growth rate) 0.58 mg/L, EC50 (growth rate) 1.70 mg/L, EC10 (yield) 0.27 mg/L, EC50 (yield) 0.70 mg/L, NOEC (growth rate) 0.4 mg/L and NOEC (yield) 0.1 mg/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.