Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 248-948-6 | CAS number: 28299-41-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Ditolyl ether was investigated in the Salmonella/microsome test (Ames
test) in 1982 using 4 strains of S. typhimurium and in 2015 using 5
strains of S typhimurium. In both studies, no evidence of mutagenic
activity of ditolyl ether was seen with and without metabolic
activation. Additional, ditolyl ether was evaluated as inactive in the
in vitro rat primary hepatocyte UDS assay.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- The S9 fraction was prepared from the livers of Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague Dawley rats
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- -----plate incorporation methodology,
S. typh TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA98, TA102 with and without S9-mix
0, 50, 160, 500, 1600, 5000 µg/plate
--additionally S. typh TA100, TA1537 with and without S9-mix
0, 1.6 , 5, 16 µg/plate
-----preincubation methodology
S. typh TA 1535 with and without S9-mix
0, 1.6, 5, 16, 50, 160, 500, 1600 µg/plate
S. typh TA100, TA1537 with and without S9-mix
0, 1.6, 5, 16, 50, 160, 500 µg/plate
S typh TA98 with and without S9-mix
0, 16, 50, 160, 500, 1600 µg/plate
S typh TA102 with and without S9-mix
0, 50, 160, 500, 1600. 5000 µg/plate
-- additionally S typh TA1535, TA98 without S9-mix
0, 1.6, 5 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- cumene hydroperoxide
- mitomycin C
- other: 4-Nitro-1,2-phenylenediamine, 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- According to OECD TG 471 ( plate incorporation methodology and pre-incubation methodology
- Evaluation criteria:
- A reproducible and dose-related increase in mutant counts of at least one strain is considered to be a positive result. For TA1535, TA100, TA1537 and TA98 this increase should be about twice that of solvent controls. For TA102 an increase of about 100 mutants should be reached. Otherwise, the result is evaluated as negative. However, these criteria may be overruled by good scientific judgment.
In case of questionable results, investigations should continue, possibly with modifications, until a final evaluation is possible. - Statistics:
- no data
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: plate incorporation test strain-specific at 160 µg/plate and above bacteriotoxic, precipitation at 5000 µg/plate: pre-incubation: stain specific bacteriotoxic at 16 µg/plate and above; precipitation at 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
- Executive summary:
The principal aim of this study was the investigation of the test item for point mutagenic effects using a plate incorporation test and a repeat test with preincubation modification. For this purpose, the test item, dissolved in DMSO, was administered in initially doses of up to and including 5000 μg per plate without and with S9 mix on the five Salmonella typhimurium LT2 mutant strains TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA98 and TA102, according to the OECD guideline 471 under GLP conditions. In the plate incorporation test strain-specific bacteriotoxic were seen at 160 μg per plate.and above and in the pre-incubation test at 16 µg/plate and above, In both methodologies substance precipitation occurred at 5000 μg per plate.
Under the experimental conditions reported (direct plate incorporation procedure and preincubation modification) the test item did not induce gene mutations by base-pair changes or frame-shifts in the genome of the S. typhimurium strains used, when tested up to a maximum recommended dose of 5000 μg/plate in the absence and presence of S9 mix.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro DNA damage and/or repair study
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: DNA damage and/or repair
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: scientific acceptable and well documented
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Ditolyl ether was evaluated for mutagenic effects in the in vitro rat primary hepatocyte Unscheduled DNA Synthesis (UDS) assay. Freshly prepared rat hepatocytes were exposed to 6 concentrations of ditolyl ether ranging from 5 µg/ml to 100 µg/ml in the presence of 10 µCi/ml ³HTdr (18 Ci/mmole). UDS was measured by counting nuclear grains.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- other: DNA damage and repair assay, unscheduled DNA synthesis in mammalian cells in vitro
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: primary rat-hepatocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat hepatocytes are self metabolically active cells.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 100 µg/ml (the highest dose group was not used for evaluation due to cytotoxicity of the test article).
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Ditoylether was dissolved in DMSO.
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-acetylaminofluorene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Unscheduled DNA synthesis.
- Evaluation criteria:
- - the viability of the hepatocytes collected by this process normally exceeds 70%. although values between 50% and 70% viability can also been acceptable. trials below 50% are considered unacceptable
- the viability of the monolayer cell cultures used for the UDS assay must be 80% or greater. normally, the viability of attached cells is about 90%
- the number of viable cells in the negative (vehicle) control cultures should remain reasonably stable over the experimental time period because rapidly declining (dying) cultures may not respond in a representative manner to the test article treatments. therefore, the number of viable cells in the negative control cultures must be 60% or greater after 16-24 hours.
- for each of the 50 cells on each slide, the number of nuclear grains is scored, as well as numbers of three cytoplasmatic grain counts from nuclear-sized areas adjacent to each nucleus
- for the conditions described here, greater than or equal to 5 net nuclear grains is chosen as a conservative estimate as to whether a particular cell is responding or is in "repair"
- the avarage net nuclear grain counts (NG) in the negative control cultures should range between -8 to +1. no more than 10% of the cells should be in repair
- a minimum of 4 to 5 dose levels will be analyzed for NG
- only cells viable at the time of fixation wand with nuclei evenly coated with emulsion will be scored
- S-phase cells having dense NG will be excluded - Statistics:
- An evaluation will be made of the percentage of cells in repair per dose groups compared to the negative control using a one-sided 2x2-chi²-test corrected for continuity (Yater, 1934; Armitage, 1971). to assess the statistical significance of a result, the square root of the test statistic is compared to the upper 95% quantile of the normal standard distribution.
- Species / strain:
- hepatocytes:
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 100 µg/ml was cytotoxic
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Ditolyl ether was evaluated as inactive in the in vitro rat primary hepatocyte UDS assay.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
- Executive summary:
Method: ditolyl ether was evaluated for mutagenic effects in the in vitro rat primary hepatocyte Unscheduled DNA Synthesis (UDS) assay. Freshly prepared rat hepatocytes were exposed to 6 concentrations of ditolyl ether ranging from 5 µg/ml to 100 µg/ml in the presence of 10 µCi/ml ³HTdr (18 Ci/mmole). UDS was measured by counting nuclear grains.
Result: negative, ditolyl ether was evaluated as inactive in the in vitro rat primary hepatocyte UDS assay.
Reference: Lehn (Bayer AG), 1990
Referenceopen allclose all
Ditolyl ether was evaluated as inactive in the in vitro rat primary hepatocyte UDS assay.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
In an in-vivo micronucleus assay according OECD TG 475 no indication for
a mutagenic effect was found.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: scientific acceptable and well documented
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 475 (Mammalian Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- 10 mice (5 male + 5 female) received a single oral application of 0.1 ml/kg bw of the test substance. Animals were killed after 24, 48 and 72 hours and bone marrow was reprocessed. 1000 polychromatic erytrocytes were evaluated and the number of normochromatic erythrocytes counted. Additionally micronucleated cells per 1000 normochromatic and polychromatic erythrocytes were determined.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- mammalian bone marrow chromosome aberration test
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Male + female NMRI-mice, SPF, ca. 8 - 12 weeks old, weight 24- 34 g, husbandry: conventional in makrolon cages typ II, maximal 5 animals per cage, separated by sex and test groups.
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- Test substance was applicated in peanut oil, positive controls were applied in deionized water, negative controls reveived peanut oil.
- Details on exposure:
- No further data.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24, 48 or 72 hours.
- Frequency of treatment:
- single application
- Post exposure period:
- animals were sacridied after 24, 48 or 72 hours
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
103.5 mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal conc. - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 animals (5 males + 5 females)
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- 10 animals received 29.5 mg endoxan/kg bw
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- 1000 polychromatic erytrocytes were evaluated and the number of normochromatic erythrocytes counted. Additionally micronucleated cells per 1000 normochromatic and polychromatic erythrocytes were determined
- Statistics:
- According Wilcoxon.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Treated animals revealed no signs of poisoning and survived until sacrifice.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
- Executive summary:
Method: 10 mice (5 male + 5 female) received a single oral application of 0.1 ml/kg bw of the test substance. animals were killed after 24, 48 and 72 hours and bone marrow was reprocessed. 1000 polychromatic erytrocytes were evaluated and the number of normochromatic erythrocytes counted. Additionally micronucleated cells per 1000 normochromatic and polychromatic erythrocytes were determined.
Result: no indication for a mutagenic effect was found. treated animals revealed no signs of poisoning and survived until sacrifice.
Reference: Herbold (Bayer AG), 1984.
Reference
No signs of a mutagenic effect after a single oral application of 0.1 ml/kg of the test substance.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
According to the OECD guideline 471 under GLP conditions ditolyl ether, dissolved in DMSO was administered in initially doses of up to and including 5000μg per plate without and with S9 mix on the five Salmonella typhimurium LT2 mutant strains TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA98 and TA102 using the plate incorporation and the pre-incubation methodology (Meyer 2015). Under the experimental conditions the test item did not induce gene mutations by base-pair changes or frame-shifts in the genome of the S. typhimurium strains used, when tested up to a maximum recommended dose of 5000μg/plate in the absence and presence of S9 mix. Thus this actual test confirms the result of the Ames test from 1982 with only 4 Salmonella typhimurium strains in test. Taking into account the negative result of the in vivo micronucleus test in addition with the negative in vitro UDS assay in primary hepatocytes ditolyl ether showed no evidence of mutagenic activity.
Justification for classification or non-classification
All available genetic toxicity tests (in-vitro as well as in-vivo) were negative - therefore a non-classification of ditolyl ether is justified.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.