Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-232-8 | CAS number: 136-23-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: read-across from a comparable to guideline and with acceptable restrictions study
- Justification for type of information:
- The long-term toxicity of zinc bis(dibutyldithiocarbamate) to aquatic invertebrates is based on read-across from the structural analogue zinc bis(diethyldithiocarbamate).
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 3.2 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Non-GLP-compliance, near guideline study, published in reviewed literature, minor restrictions in design and reporting, but otherwise adequate for assessment.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test was a pre-guideline 21-day reproduction study with neonate (<24 h) Daphnia magna, at least five concentrations were tested in five-fold including a blank control. Ten daphnids were used for each replicate sample. The test solutions were renewed three times a week and were prepared fresh at each renewal. The number of surviving females and number of neonates were recorded daily, the neonates being removed from the test vessels after counting.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- The test medium used was 50-µm filter UV-sterilised Lake IJssel water. Stock solutions were prepared in the test medium. The test solutions were renewed three times a week and were prepared fresh at each renewal. The ration of concentrations was 1.8; actual concentrations were not verified during the experiments. At least five concentrations were tested in five-fold including a blank control.
- Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- The experiment was started with newborn (< 24 h) daphinds from a laboratory stock culture. These were fed daily with 3E+08 cells/L of the unicellular green alga Chlorella pyrenoidosa.
- Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Post exposure observation period:
- None
- Hardness:
- 225 mg/L (as CaCO3)
- Test temperature:
- 20 +/- 0.5 °C
- pH:
- 8.1
- Dissolved oxygen:
- Not reported
- Salinity:
- Not relevant
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- At least: 0, 3.2, 5.6, 10 and 18 µg/l
- Details on test conditions:
- The experiments were carried out in a temperature room at 20 ± 0.5 °C with a 12-h photoperiod. The tests were conducted in 800-ml vessels to which 500 ml of the test solution was added. The pooled neonates were randomly distributed into cohorts of ten animals each and transferred to the test vessels. The daphnids were fed daily 3E8 cells of the unicellular green algae Chlorella pyrenoidosa. The number of surviving females and number of neonates were recorded daily, the neonates being removed from the test vessels after counting. When daphnids appeared to be males, these animals were excluded from both fecundity and survival analysis. Oxygen concentrations and pH were measured at regular intervals.
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 3.2 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 10 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- 14 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: 13-15
- Details on results:
- The survival pattern of the daphnids was clearly related to the exposure concentration and a gradual decline of the LC50 with time was observed. Generally, the lower rate of population increase casued by certain concentrations of test compounds was due to both increased mortality and fewer clutches per female. The latter was also due to reduced parental survival.
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The results were summarized in life-table form. The intrinsic rate of natural increase, rm, was calculated for each cohort of ten animals by successive approximation from the equation:
Sum of lx.mx.e^-rm.x = 1
Where lx is the proportion of individuals surviving to age x, mx is the age-specific fecundity (number of females produced per surviving female at age x), and x is days. As rm calculated after 21 days is indistinguishable from rm estimated for the entire life-span, due to the great importance of early reproduction, all calculations were based on 21-day experiments. Finally, means and errors were calculated.
Differences in mean survival and rm between treatments and blank control were tested using the Willimas’ test. After verification of differences between blank and solvent control (Student’s t-test). Prior to the Willimas’ test, the data were tested for homogeneity of variances using the Bartlett test. Normailty was verified by means of a Shapiro-Wilk test, or graphivcally, by plots of ordered data against the normal order statistic. It should be noted that in case of survival data the arcsin square root transformation of the proportion of survivorsin each test vessel was used. The lowest concentration wwhich was significantly different from the control was denoted as LRCT (lowest rejected concentration tested; similar to the LOEC). Differences were considered significant at the p < 0.01 level. From the LOEC the NOEC was derived by applying a factor of 1.8. The LC50 values and their 95% confidence limits were determined according to Kooijman (1981).
Kooijman SALM (1981). Parametric analyses of mortality rates in bioassays. Water Res. 15: 107-119.
Referenceopen allclose all
Description of key information
The 21-d NOEC of 3.2 µg/L in Daphnia magna will be used in the assessment.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect concentration:
- 3.2 µg/L
Additional information
No long-term tests are available with Daphnia for zinc bis(dibutyldithiocarbamate). The results from the structural analogue zinc bis(diethyldithiocarbamate) are used (for details see Reporting Format as attached to the respective IUCLID entry and CSR Appendix A.1). A 21-d NOEC value of 3.2 µg/L in Daphnia magna from a semi-static non-GLP, near guideline study without analytical monitoring (van Leeuwen et al., 1985a) is used in the assessment.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.