Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-385-7 | CAS number: 58-55-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
In the long-term studies in rats and mice in which the substance was given by gavage, a carcinogenic effect was not observed.
Rat, gavage, 2 years: no carcinogenicity (Nyska et al., 1998; NTP 1998)
Mouse, gavage, 2 years: no carconogenicity (NTP 1998)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Justification for classification or non-classification
From the available data, there is no indication given for a carcinogenic potential of theophylline. Therefore, the substance has not to be classified according to requirements of the EU, Annex VI of Directive 67/548/EEC and of GHS.
Additional information
In a 2 year study, Fischer 344 rats (males and females, 50 animals per sex) were treated by gavage of theophylline in corn oil. The rats were given 0; 7.5; 25 and 75 mg/kg bw/day 5 days a week. There were no significant differences in mortality between control and dosed groups. No clinical findings were attributed to theophylline treatment. Histopathological, an increased incidence of periarteritis was found in high-dose males, which is considered as rat- specific response to vasodilators (OECD SIDS 2004). No significantly increased incidences of neoplasms were found in the treated rats. There were dose-related negative trends in the incidences of mammary gland fibro-adenoma and fibro adenoma or carcinoma (combined) in females; and the incidences in the mid and high-dose females were significantly lower than those in the control group. According to the authors, these differences correlated with decreased body weights.
There was no evidence of carcinogenic activity related to theophylline administration (Nyska A. et al. 1998, Arch. Toxicol. 72, 731 -737; NTP 1998).
In a further 2 -year gavage study, B6C3F1 mice were exposed 5 days a week to 15, 50 and 150 mg/kg bw/day in males and to 7.5; 25; 75 mg/kg bw/day in females. Mortality was increased in high-dose males. Body weights were reduced in high-dose males and females and in mid-dose females. No significantly increased incidences of neoplasms or non-neoplastic lesions were found in the treated mice. Decreased incidences of hepatocellular adenomas and hepatocellular adenomas or carcinomas (combined) were found in the treated mice. According to the authors, increases in the incidences of hepatocellular neoplasms in male mice had been shown to be associated with Helicobacter hepaticus infection when hepatitis was also present. Additionally, in the livers of male mice increased incidences of hemangiosarcoma were observed in studies with Helicobacter-associated hepatitis. Thus, interpretation of the decreased incidences of liver neoplasms was difficult. Incidences of lesions at other sites observed in this study were not considered to be significantly impacted by Helicobacter hepaticus infection or its associated hepatitis.
There was no evidence of carcinogenic activity related to theophylline administration (NTP 1998).
No data in humans on the carcinogenicity of theophylline per se are available. Case-control studies did not show an association between total methylxanthine intake and breast cancer (Lubin, F. et al., 1985, JNCI 74, 569 -573; Schairer, C. et al. 1987, Int. J. Cancer 40, 469 -473; Rohan, T.E. and McMichael, A.J. 1988, Int.J.Cancer 41,390 -393; see Chapter 7.10.3).
Conclusion:
Theophylline showed no carcinogenic activity in rats and mice up to the highest dose tested (75 mg/kg bw/d in rats and female mice and up to 150 mg/kg bw/d in male mice). In humans, case-control studies did not show an association between total methylxanthine intake and breast cancer.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.