Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 11 October 2011 to 24 November 2011
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- Substance name: Reactive Yellow F01-0555
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Crl:WI
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Species and strain: Crl:WI rats
Source: Charles River Laboratories, Research Models and Services, Germany GmbH, Sandhofer Weg 7, D-97633
Hygienic level: SPF at the supplier; standard laboratory conditions during the study
Justification of species/strain: The rat is regarded as suitable species for toxicology and reproduction studies. Wistar rat was selected due to experience with this strain of rat in toxicity and reproduction toxicity studies and known fertility.
Number of animals: Main groups: 48 male, 48 female rats, 12 animals/sex/group, 4 groups; a sufficient number of at least 8 pregnant females/group was achieved.
Recovery groups: 10 male, 10 female rats, 5 animals/sex/group, 2 groups, Control and High dose
Positive Control MNT group: 12 male and 12 female rats, 1 group
At the completion of the study, the spare animals were returned to CiToxLAB Hungary Ltd. spare colony, as their use was not required (no replacements with spare animals were performed)
Age of animals: Young adult rats, approximately 11-12 weeks old at starting and 13-14 weeks at mating. The age range within the study was kept to the minimum practicable.
Body weight range: Males: 320-404 g, Females: 205 g- 259 g; did not exceed ± 20% of the mean weight for each sex at onset of treatment
Acclimation period: At least 6 days (6 days from animal arrival to pre-treatment ophthalmoscopy examination, 12 days to onset of treatment)
Husbandry
Animal health: Only healthy animals were used for the test, as certified by the veterinarian. Females were nulliparous and non-pregnant.
Room number: 524
Cage type: Type II and/or III polypropylene/polycarbonate
Bedding: Lignocel® Hygienic Animal Bedding produced by J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH+Co.KG (Holzmühle 1, D-73494 Rosenberg, Germany). Details of bedding quality are reported.
Light: 12 hours daily, from 6.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m.
Temperature: 20.7-23.8°C
Relative humidity: 34 - 55%
Ventilation: 15-20 air exchanges/hour
Housing/Enrichment: Rodents were group-housed, up to 5 animals of the same sex and dose group/cage, with the exception of the mating and gestation/delivery period, when they were paired or individually housed, respectively. Group housing allowed social interaction and the deep wood sawdust bedding allowed digging and other normal rodent activities (i.e. nesting).
The temperature and humidity were measured twice daily; no deviations from the target ranges were noted during the study.
Food and water supply
Animals received ssniff® SM R/M-Z+H "Autoclavable complete feed for rats and mice – breeding and Maintenance" produced by ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH, D-59494 Soest Germany ad libitum, and tap water from municipal supply, as for human consumption from 500 ml bottle ad libitum.
Water quality control analysis is performed once every three months and microbiological assessment is performed monthly by Veszprém County Institute of State Public Health and Medical Officer Service (ÁNTSZ, H-8201 Veszprém, József A.u.36., Hungary).
The food and water are considered not to contain any contaminants that could reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.
Animal identification
Each parental/adult animal (P Generation) was identified by a number unique within the study, written with indelible ink on the tail and cross-referenced to the Animal Master File at CiToxLAB Hungary Ltd. This number consisted of 4 digits, the first digit being the group number, the second, 0 for the males and 5 for the females, and the last 2, the animal number within the group, as indicated in the Experimental design section.
The boxes were arranged in such a way that possible effects due to cage placement were minimized and were identified by cards showing the study code, sex, dose group, cage number and individual animal numbers, date of mating and delivery.
The new-borns (Offspring, F1 Generation) were identified by cutting off digit-tips up to one day after birth.
Randomization
All parental/adult (P) male and female animals were sorted according to body weight by computer and divided to weight ranges. An equal number of animals from each weight group was randomly assigned to each dose group to ensure that test animals were as nearly as practicable of a uniform weight. The grouping was controlled by SPSS/PC software according to the actual body weight, verifying the homogeneity/variability between/within the groups and cages. Males and females were randomized separately.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- Vehicle
Name: Distilled, sterile water for injection, PhEUR
Lot No.: 8490910, 0110111
Manufacturer: TEVA Pharmaceutical Corporation
Expiry Date: September 2013, January 2014 respectively
Storage: Room temperature - Details on mating procedure:
- Main and Positive Control MNT animals:
Mating began after the animals have attained full sexual maturity, 2 weeks after the initiation of treatment, with one female and one male of the same dose group (1:1 mating) in a single cage. Females remained with the same male until copulation occurred, for up to 5 days. A vaginal smear were prepared daily during the mating period and stained with 1% aqueous methylene blue solution. The smears were examined with a light microscope, the presence of vaginal plug or sperm in the vaginal smear was considered as evidence of copulation (Day 0 of pregnancy as defined by the relevant guidelines). Sperm positive females were caged individually. Mating pairs were clearly identified in the data, mating of siblings was avoided.
Recovery animals:
Recovery animals were not mated and, consequently, were not used for the assessment of reproduction/developmental toxicity. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The samples were evaluated by UV-HPLC method
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Males were dosed for 28 days (14 days pre-mating and 14 days mating/post-mating period).
Females were dosed for 14 days pre-mating, for up to 5 days mating period, through gestation and up to the day of necropsy (at least 4 days post-partum dosing). - Frequency of treatment:
- Test item or Control (water)-treated Groups 1-4 Main animals were administered the dosing solutions daily on a 7 days/week basis.
- Details on study schedule:
- Males were dosed for 28 days (14 days pre-mating and 14 days mating/post-mating period), then were euthanized and subjected to necropsy examination, as no additional mating was considered required.
Females were dosed for 14 days pre-mating, for up to 5 days mating period, through gestation and up to the day of necropsy (at least 4 days post-partum dosing). The day of birth (viz. when parturition was complete) was defined as Day 0 post-partum. Females showing no-evidence of copulation were sacrificed as practical, 26-27 days after the end of the mating period.
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 62.5, 250, 1000 mg/kg bw/Day
Basis:
nominal conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Number of animals: Main groups: 48 male, 48 female rats, 12 animals/sex/group, 4 groups; a sufficient number of at least 8 pregnant females/group was achieved.
Recovery groups: 10 male, 10 female rats, 5 animals/sex/group, 2 groups, Control and High dose
Positive Control MNT group: 12 male and 12 female rats, 1 group - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- The dose levels were selected by the Sponsor in consultation with the Study Director based on available data and information from previous experimental work, including the results of an acute oral toxicity study (CiToxLAB Hungary Ltd. study code 11/174-001P) and a repeated dose range finding study in the rat (CiToxLAB Hungary Ltd. study code 11/174-220PE), with the aim of inducing toxic effects but ideally no death or suffering at the highest dose and a NOAEL at the lowest dose.
The oral route was selected as it is a possible route of exposure to the test item in humans. - Positive control:
- A Positive Control group for the Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test (MNT) was added; the animals were mated and females allowed to deliver similarly to the Main animals, then treated once with 20 mg/kg bw Cyclophosphamide, administered by intraperitoneal injection approximately 24 h prior to scheduled necropsy (males, on Day 27 for necropsy on Day 28; females, on PPD4 for necropsy on PPD5).
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- Clinical observations and functional observation battery (FOB)
All animals: Animals were inspected for signs of morbidity and mortality twice daily, at the beginning and end of the working day. General clinical observations were performed daily, after treatment at approximately the same time with minor variations, or in the afternoon (pm) as practical during the working day, as no peak period of effects was noted after dosing during the first days of treatment. During Recovery period, the animals were similarly observed daily as practical.
All animals were monitored for pertinent behavioural changes, signs of difficult or prolonged parturition and all signs of toxicity including mortality. Any changes were recorded including onset, degree and duration of signs as applicable.
More detailed examinations were made once before the first exposure (to allow for within-subject comparisons), then at least weekly, in the morning (am) or before treatment. These observations were made outside the home cage in a standard arena, at similar times as practical. The animals were monitored for changes in skin, fur, eyes, mucous membranes, occurrence of secretions and excretions, and autonomic activity (e.g. lachrymation, piloerection, pupil size, unusual respiratory pattern), or changes in gait, posture and response to handling as well as the presence of clonic or tonic movements, stereotypies (e.g. excessive grooming, repetitive circling), difficult or prolonged parturition or bizarre behaviour (e.g. self-mutilation, walking backwards); special attention were directed towards the observation of tremors, convulsions, salivation, diarrhoea, lethargy, sleep and coma. No such clinical signs were observed during the study.
Main animals, 5 males and 5 females/group, “subgroup A”:
Assessment of any potential test item related neurotoxicity was performed during the last exposure week (males, on Day 26 am, females, on PPD 3 am). In order to avoid hyperthermia of pups, dams were removed from the pups for not more than approximately 30-40 minutes. Selected animal were subjected to the functional observation battery, including qualitative assessment of the grip strength, and to measurements of the landing foot splay and fore/hind grip strength.
To measure the landing foot splay, the fore/hind paws of the rat were painted with ink and the rats were dropped from a horizontal position onto the appropriate record sheet covering the examination table. The distance between the two resulting ink spots was measured.
Fore/hind grip strength measurements were conducted using a grip strength meter (Model GS3, Bioseb, Chaville, France), an instrument designed to quantify objectively rodent muscular strength, in order to identify and assess quantitatively any potential effect of test item. The rats were held appropriately such that the fore limbs were allowed to grip the support bar and gently pulled back until they released the bar; the device measured the maximum grip strength. This was performed 3 times for each animal on each test day. The procedure was repeated with the hind limbs with the appropriate grip support; results are tabulated with individual and mean data.
Sensory reactivity to different type of stimuli (e.g. auditory, visual and proprioceptive), assessment of grip strength and motor activity were conducted and the general physical condition and behaviour of animals were tested. A modified Irwin test was performed. Parameters such as, but not limited to body position, locomotor activity, respiration rate, respiration type, piloerection, head searching compulsive biting or licking, circling, upright walking, retropulsion, jumping, exophthalmos, twitches, clonic convulsions, tonic convulsions, tremor, startle, transfer arousal, spatial locomotion, gait, posture, limb position, finger approach, finger withdrawal, touch escape response, diarrhoea, diuresis, visual placing, grip strength, body tone, corneal reflex, pinna, toe pinch, grasping reflex, positional struggle, skin, mucous membrane colour, salivation, palpebral closure, lachrymation, limb tone, abdominal tone, tail pinch, righting reflex, and/or vocalisation were evaluated.
Recovery animals: Neurotoxicity evaluation was similarly conducted in the Recovery animals towards the end of the Recovery period, on Day 54, for necropsy on Day 56.
Body weight measurement : All adult Main and Recovery animals were weighed with accuracy of 1 g for randomization purposes, then on Day 0, afterwards at least weekly and at termination. Parent females were weighed on gestation Days GD0, 7, 14 and 20 and on postpartal Days PPD0 (within 24 hours after parturition) and PPD4 (before termination). Body weights of the female animals were additionally weighed on gestational Days GD10 and 17 in order to give accurate treatment volumes, but these data were not evaluated statistically.
Food consumption measurement : Animal food consumption was determined by re-weighing the non-consumed diet with a precision of 1 g on Day 7 then at least weekly.
Ophthalmology: The fundus of eyes of all animals was examined before treatment. Five male and 5 female Control and High dose animals (“subgroup C”) randomly selected from groups 1 and 4, during the last week of treatment prior to necropsy (males, Day 26 pm, females, PPD 3 pm). Mydriasis was produced after instillation of a mydriatic agent (eye drops "Mydrum") into the conjunctival sac. The examination was performed using a Gowlland ophthalmoscope. As no ophthalmoscopic alterations were found, no additional examination was performed in other animals.
Observation of the delivery process, offspring and nursing instinct
Main Females were allowed to litter and rear their offspring. Delivery process was observed as carefully as possible. All observations were recorded as applicable. No evidence of abnormal deliveries was recorded. The duration of gestation was recorded and was calculated from Day 0 of pregnancy. Dams were observed to record whether they form a nest from the bedding material and cover their new-borns or not. The efficiency of suckling was observed by the presence of milk in the pups' stomach. All observations were recorded as applicable.
Each litter was examined as soon as possible after delivery to establish the number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, runts (pups that are significantly smaller than normal pups) and the presence of gross abnormalities. Observations are reported individually for each adult animal.
In addition to the observations on parent animals, the pups (offspring) were monitored for any behavioural changes.
Live pups were counted, sexed, weighed individually within 24 hours of parturition (ex. Day 0 or 1 post-partum, PND0 or 1) and on PND4, with accuracy of 0.01g. All the litters were checked and recorded daily for the number of viable and dead pups. The pups found dead and intact (not cannibalized) were subjected to necropsy with macroscopic examination in order to identify the possible cause of death. All observed abnormalities were recorded.
CLINICAL PATHOLOGY All animals selected for blood sampling were fasted (overnight period of food deprivation).
For terminal blood sampling of Recovery animals, 3 samples were taken from each animal: one for haematology (1.2 mL blood, in tubes with K3-EDTA as anticoagulant, 1.6 mg/mL blood), one for blood clotting times (1.4 mL blood for APTT and PT measurements, in tubes with sodium citrate as anticoagulant) and one to obtain serum (approximately 1 mL blood as practical, in tubes with no anticoagulant) for clinical chemistry.
For Day 14 blood sampling of Main animals selected (subgroup B), 2 samples were taken from each scheduled animal: one for haematology (1.2 mL blood, in tubes with K3-EDTA as anticoagulant, 1.6 mg/mL blood) and one to obtain serum (approximately 1 mL blood as practical, in tubes with no anticoagulant) for clinical chemistry.
For terminal blood sampling of Main animals selected (subgroup B), one sample for blood clotting times (1.4 mL blood for APTT and PT measurements, in tubes with sodium citrate as anticoagulant) were taken from scheduled animals.
For urine collection, the selected animals (Main subgroup B and Recovery) were placed in metabolic cages for approximately 16 hours and food and water deprived, then water were provided at libitum for at least approximately 2 hours prior to necropsy and organ weight measurements.
Main animals, 5 males and 5 females/group, “subgroup B”:
Laboratory examinations for haematology and clinical chemistry evaluation were conducted at the end of pre-mating period, on blood samples collected from the sublingual vein, prior to the start of mating on Day 14 from 5 animals/sex/group randomly selected (“subgroup B”).
Coagulation evaluation (APTT and PT) was performed at the completion of the treatment, on blood samples collected by cardiac puncture from subgroup B animals under pentobarbital anaesthesia, immediately prior to scheduled necropsy.
Urine sampling (approximately 16 hours sampling period) was performed prior to necropsy from the same subgroup B (urinalysis on Day 28-males, PND 5-females).
Recovery animals: Haematology, coagulation and clinical chemistry investigations were conducted at the completion of the Recovery period, 14 days after the first scheduled euthanasia of Main dams. Blood samples were collected by cardiac puncture under pentobarbital anaesthesia, immediately prior to scheduled necropsy.
Urine sampling (approximately 16 hours sampling period) was performed from the Recovery animals prior to necropsy (urinalysis on the day of nec
ropsy, conducted 14 days after the first scheduled euthanasia of the Main dams).
Haematology and blood clotting times
The parameters evaluated are detailed below in a table under any other information materials and methods.
Clinical Chemistry
The parameters evaluated are detailed below in a table under any other information materials and methods.
Urinalysis
The parameters evaluated are detailed below in a table under any other information materials and methods. - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- Vaginal smears were prepared daily during the mating period and stained with 1% aqueous methylene blue solution. The smears were examined with a light microscope, the presence of vaginal plug or sperm in the vaginal smear was considered as evidence of copulation (Day 0 of pregnancy as defined by the relevant guidelines).
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- For the adult animals, detailed histological examination was performed on the selected list of retained organs in the Control and High dose groups (Main and Recovery) and all macroscopic findings (abnormalities) from all animals. Special attention was paid to evaluation of the stages of spermatogenesis in the male gonads and histopathology of interstitial testicular cell structure.
- Litter observations:
- Each litter was examined as soon as possible after delivery to establish the number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, runts (pups that are significantly smaller than normal pups) and the presence of gross abnormalities.
In addition to the observations on parent animals, the pups (offspring) were monitored for any behavioural changes. Live pups were counted, sexed, weighed individually within 24 hours of parturition (ex. Day 0 or 1 post-partum, PND0 or 1) and on PND4, with accuracy of 0.01g. All the litters were checked and recorded daily for the number of viable and dead pups. The pups found dead and intact (not cannibalized) were subjected to necropsy with macroscopic examination in order to identify the possible cause of death. All observed abnormalities were recorded. - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- Pathology
Gross necropsy was performed on all animals. Terminally, after completion of the treatment or Recovery periods as applicable, animals were sacrificed under pentobarbital anaesthesia followed by exsanguination. After exsanguination the external appearance was examined, cranium, thoracic and abdominal cavities were opened and the appearance of the tissues and organs were observed macroscopically. Any abnormality was recorded with details of the location, colour, shape and size, as appropriate.
Special attention was paid to the organs of the reproductive system. The number of implantation sites and of corpora lutea was recorded in the Main females as applicable.
At the time of termination, body weight and weight of the following organs of all parental animals were determined:
- With a precision of 0.01 g: uterus (with and without cervix), vagina, testes, epididymides (total and cauda), prostate, seminal vesicles with coagulating glands, brain
- With a precision of 0.001 g: ovaries, pituitary
The weighed organs and all organs showing macroscopic lesions of all adult animals were preserved. The eyes with the optic nerve were retained in modified Davidson’s fixative. Testes and epididymides were preserved in Bouin’s solution, all other organs in 10% buffered formalin solution.
From subgroup B Main animals and Recovery animals, the following organs were weighed in addition to the ones previously mentioned:
- With a precision of 0.01 g: heart, kidneys, liver, spleen and thymus
- With a precision of 0.001 g: adrenals.
For all organs, paired organs were weighed individually. Individual and/or paired absolute organ weight are reported for each animal and adjusted for the body and brain weights. Paired organ weights as applicable were summarised. Relative organ weight (to body and brain weight) were calculated and reported.
For the adult animals, detailed histological examination was performed on the selected list of retained organs in the Control and High dose groups (Main and Recovery) and all macroscopic findings (abnormalities) from all animals. The retained tissues and organs were embedded in paraffin wax, sections were cut at 4-6µ by microtome and transferred to slides. Tissue sections were stained with haematoxylin-eosin/phloxine and examined by light microscope.
As no test item related pathology findings were noted, no additional histopathology evaluation was considered required. Special attention was paid to evaluation of the stages of spermatogenesis in the male gonads and histopathology of interstitial testicular cell structure. Detailed histological examination of the ovaries covered the follicular, luteal, and interstitial compartments of the ovary, as well as the epithelial capsule and ovarian stroma. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- Pups euthanized at PND4 were carefully examined at least externally for gross abnormalities. Any pups showing abnormalities in structure or behaviour, including the pups found dead and intact (not cannibalized) were subjected to necropsy with macroscopic examination, in order to identify the probable cause of death if possible.
- Statistics:
- Data were recorded on the appropriate forms from the relevant SOPs of CiToxLAB Hungary Ltd., and then tabulated using the Microsoft Office Word and/or Excel, as appropriate. Numerical data obtained during the conduct of the study were subjected as appropriate to calculation of group means and standard deviations.
The statistical evaluation of appropriate data (marked † below) was performed with the statistical program package SPSS PC+4.0. The homogeneity of variance between groups was checked by Bartlett’s homogeneity of variance test. Where no significant heterogeneity was detected, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out. If the obtained result was significant, Duncan Multiple Range test was used to access the significance of inter-group differences. Getting significant result at Bartlett’s test, the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance was used and the inter-group comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U-test. Chi2 test was performed as feasible. - Reproductive indices:
- Formulae for Calculation of Mating and Fertility Indices are included in pdf attached under background information.
- Offspring viability indices:
- Formulae for Calculation of Pups’ Mortality and Sex Ratio Indices are included in pdf attached under background information.
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- staining of faeces and urine
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- See below for details
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
Details on results (P0)
No test item related mortality occurred during the study.
Clinical observation
No test item-related adverse effects or systemic clinical signs were noted following administration of REACTIVE YELLOW F01-0555 daily by oral gavage under the conditions of this study, or in the Control animals administered 10 mL/kg vehicle (distilled, sterile water for injection).
In the Main animals, light orange discoloration of the faeces and dark yellow urine were noted during the treatment period from Day 1 in all animals at 1000 mg/kg bw/day, considered to be due to elimination of REACTIVE YELLOW F01-0555 or its metabolites through urine and an expected staining effect. Low dose female 2501 showed minor decreases in activity, hunched back position, piloerection and paleness between Days 35 and 38, unrelated to test item administration but associated with a total foetal mortality and incidental delivery difficulties.
Neurological assessment
There were no toxicologically significant changes in the animal behaviour, general physical condition, in the reactions to different type of stimuli, grip strength or motor activity in the control or treated groups, at the evaluation performed towards the end of the treatment or Recovery periods.
Increased vocalization was observed on occasion in the animals throughout all the dose groups, or slightly increased startle response occurred in 2/5 High dose Main males examined, when subjected to the modified Irwin test (functional observation battery). However, there were no treatment-related differences to the Control, or the incidence was considered low, respectively, and no dose, or gender related response were noted, and these variations were considered to be without toxicological significance and within the normal biological variation with respect to behaviour, reactions to different type of stimuli or manipulations.
No test item related effects or statistically significant variations were observed in the landing foot splay test.
When compared to Control, there were no statistically or toxicologically significant differences in the mean grip strength values of the forelimbs or hind limbs in the High dose Main animals when evaluated on Day 24 (males) or PPD 3 (females). In the Low and Mid dose Main animals, slightly higher than Control mean grip strength of the hindlimbs was observed in the males, up to 12%, p<0.01, without a dose or gender response. Slightly lower than Control grip strength of the forelimbs was noted in the High dose Recovery males, -10%, p<0.05, but not in the females. In the absence of a consistent dose or gender response these variations were regarded as incidental and not to reflect an adverse or a test item related effect.
Ophthalmology
No test item related changes compared to pre-treatment were noted at ophthalmoscopy examination.
Body weight and body weight gain
No adverse effects considered toxicologically significant were noted on the mean body weight and body weight gain values following daily administration of REACTIVE YELLOW F01-0555 at dose levels up to and including 1000 mg/kg bw/day, either during the treatment or Recovery periods.
There were no statistically significant differences to Control in the mean body weights at any of the dose levels tested in both Main and Recovery animals. The body weight gain mean values showed minor increases or decreases in the treated animals, including slightly higher than control mean values in the Low and/or Mid dose Main females during pre-mating period between Days 0 and 14, or slightly lower mean value in the High dose Recovery females, between Days 14 and 21. Based on the isolated incidence and lack of a consistent dose or gender response, these variations were regarded as incidental and without toxicological significance.
Food consumption
There were no test item-related differences to Control in the mean daily food consumption in any test-item treated Main or Recovery group (62.5, 250, or 1000 mg/kg bw/day) when compared to the Control.
Minor differences to Control were noted or variations within the group, generally associated with changes in the study schedule including mating, delivery, or fasting before blood collection for clinical pathology evaluation, unrelated to treatment and with no toxicological significance.
Clinical pathology
Haematology
No test item related effects, or changes considered toxicologically significant were noted in the haematology parameters evaluated in either Main or Recovery animals.
Variations were noted in a few parameters, on occasion attaining statistical significance, including statistically higher eosinophil count up to 128% in the High dose Main males, p<0.05, but up to – 59% lower in the Mid dose Main females, or up to 87% higher than control white blood cell count in the Main females, although associated with a relatively low mean value in the Control group, no dose response and attaining statistical significance at 62.5 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day dose levels, but without similar variations in the males. Evaluation of the mean and individual results in comparison with the Control data did not reveal any test-item related cause of the changes noted, and/or no consistent dose or gender-related response was observed. Therefore, these differences observed between the Control and treated groups were considered to be incidental or individual findings, which were not related to treatment, were generally comparable with the expected physiological range or were with no toxicological significance.
There were no statistically or toxicologically significant differences to Control in the haematology parameters evaluated in the Recovery animals.
Clinical chemistry
There were no toxicologically significant changes or adverse effects on the animal serum chemistry that could be ascribed to REACTIVE YELLOW F01-0555 administration in the conditions of this study.
In the Main animals evaluated on Day 14, an apparent total bilirubin T BIL increase was noted in the male animals, 16%, 48% and 89% higher than Control in the Low, Mid and High dose groups, respectively, without statistical significance or a similar response in the females. This was considered to be related to a possible spectral interference with the analytical method caused by the discolouration of the serum by the test item and not to reflect an adverse effect on the liver function.
Other clinical chemistry parameters showed on occasion statistically significant variations, however, there was no dose or gender response or the values were within the physiological ranges. For this reason, these variations were not considered toxicologically significant or related to treatment.
Urinalysis
REACTIVE YELLOW F01-0555 administration daily by oral gavage at up to and including 1000 mg/kg bw/day did not result in any test item-related effects considered adverse at urinalysis performed prior to necropsy in either Main or Recovery animals.
The urine specific gravity or volume showed minor variations, on occasion statistically significant in the Recovery animals, however, with no dose or gender-dependent, and not considered to be of toxicological importance in correlation with test item administration in the conditions of this study. The few other minor variations observed did not attain statistical significance and/or were regarded as normal background changes.
Oestrus cycle, reproductive ability assessment and indices
There were no statistically significant differences between the Control and test item-treated groups with regard to reproductive ability or in the mating or gestation indices, or effects considered adverse or toxicologically significant in correlation with REACTIVE YELLOW F01-0555 administration. The mating and fertility indices were 100% in all groups. The gestation index varied between 92% (Low dose females) and 100% (Control, Mid and High dose females) in the test item treated groups, due to female 2501, pregnant with implantation sites but not delivered, values which are comparable with concurrent control data in Wistar rats.
Test item administration was considered to have no impact on the duration of the mating period. Successful coitus (sperm positive vaginal smears and/or vaginal plugs) generally occurred within up to 5 days of pairing (cohabitation).
Evaluation of the gestation, parturition and post-partal period
No test item effect on the duration of pregnancy or abnormalities in the gestation outcome ascribed to the treatment were observed.
The mean duration of pregnancy was similar in the control and test item treated groups and varied from 21.50 days (21 to 22 days) in the Controls, 21.36 days in the Low 62.5 mg/kg bw/day dose group (generally 21 to 22 days), 21.33 days (21 to 22 days) in the Mid 250 mg/kg bw/day dose group, to 21.50 days (21 to 22 days) in the 1000 mg/kg bw/day high dose group, values comparable with the contemporaneous historical control data (gestation length: 22.40 ± 0.53 days, range: 22 to 23 days, n = 22). All the parturitions were normal, except female 2501, pregnant with implantation sites but not delivered.
The number of corpora lutea and implantation sites were comparable in the treated groups up to and including 1000 mg/kg bw/day with the mean value recorded in the Control group.
There were no statistically significant differences or effects that could be ascribed to treatment on the pre/post-implantation, post-natal or total mortality values (%) at up to and including 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
The intrauterine, postnatal and/or total foetal mortality values (%) appeared to be higher in the Low dose group, without statistical significance or any dose response, but due to individual, biological variability (females 2501, pregnant with implantation sites but not delivered, with total pre-natal mortality, and female 2507, with relatively high pre-implantation mortality followed by total post-natal mortality, having one pup born alive on GD24 but not surviving to PND4), unrelated to treatment.
Body weight and body weight gain
There were no effects considered adverse on the offspring weight or weight gain following administration of REACTIVE YELLOW F01-0555 at 62.5, 250 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day to parental generation under the conditions of this study.
PATHOLOGY EVALUATION AND ORGAN WEIGHTS
Pathology evaluation
Parental Generation (including subgroup B)
Macroscopic Findings:
Treatment-related macroscopic findings were observed in the digestive content and mucosa of the stomach, small intestines, cecum, colon and/or rectum. These consisted of dark/orange liquid material in the content and dark/orange discoloration of the mucosa in 15/24, 21/24 and 24/24 adult rats from the Low, Mid and High Dose groups, respectively.
All other changes were incidental or terminal procedure-related.
Microscopic Findings:
Test item-related findings were histologically observed in the stomach, mesenteric lymph node, small intestines, cecum, colon and/or rectum and correlated with the gross lesions noted at necropsy.
Eosinophilic material adhered to the mucosa of the stomach or intestines and/or deposited in the cytoplasm of the glandular epithelial cells in the stomach and enterocytes of the intestines was microscopically observed. In the macrophage cytoplasm of the mesenteric lymph node eosinophilic pigment was microscopically seen. There was clear evidence of the dose relationship to severity and incidence of these changes in both genders.
Stomach
Minimal to moderate severity (mainly minimal/mild) was noted in the 3/16, 18/22 and 21/24 rats from the Low, Mid and High Dose groups. Moderate degree was recorded only in 4/24 High Dose animals.
Small intestine (duodenum, jejunum and/or ileum)
Minimal to moderate grading was present in 1/16 Low, 7/22 Mid and 16/24 High Dose animals. There was similar proportional distribution of the eosinophilic material in particular regions of the small intestine in both males and females.
Caecum, colon and/or rectum
Minimal to mild severity was observed in 4/22 Mid and 11/24 High Dose rats. Rectum was affected only in one High Dose female (4510).
Mesenteric lymph node
Minimal eosinohpilic pigment in the cytoplasm of macrophages was noted in two High Dose females. This observation is consistent with clearance of the test material by lymphatic drainage from the alimentary tract.
All other changes were incidental or regarded as common background.
There was no evidence of REACTIVE YELLOW F01-0555-related histological findings in the High animals or macroscopic observations from all groups in the reproductive organs. Histopathological evaluation of the male gonads as well as testicular interstitial cell structure, the spermatogenic cells representing different phases of the development and differentiation of the spermatozoons were similar in Control and High Dose males. The follicular, luteal and interstitial compartments of the ovary as well as epithelial capsule and stroma were similar histological structure in both Control and High Dose females.
RECOVERY (DAY 56)
Macroscopic Findings:
There was no evidence of test item-related macroscopic findings.
Enlargement of the testes in 1/5 Control male, enlarged spleen or adrenals in 2/10 High Dose, dilatation of the uterus by clear fluid in 2/5 Control and 1/5 High Dose females were incidental, terminal procedure-related or associated with physiological changes during oestrus cycle.
Microscopic Findings:
Following 14 days recovery period, resolution of majority test item-related changes was noted in the stomach, small and large intestines or mesenteric lymph node. Minimal eosinophilic material in the mucosa of the stomach was observed in 4/10 High Dose animals and was regarded as a minor residual effect without toxicological significance in the absence of associated reactive changes.
All other changes were incidental or regarded as common background.
In summary, a daily oral (gavage) administration of REACTIVE YELLOW F01-0555 to Wistar rats under the conditions of this study was associated in the Main animals with eosinophilic material adhered to the mucosa of the stomach, small or large intestines and/or deposited in the cytoplasm of the glandular epithelial cells in the stomach and enterocytes of the intestines, and with eosinohpilic pigment in the cytoplasm of macrophages in the mesenteric lymph node. There was a dose relation to severity and incidence of these findings. These microscopic observations were also in correlation with the dark/orange discoloration noted at necropsy.
Following a 14 day recovery period, almost all residual microscopic effects of the treatment were completely recovered. It occurred that the test item has not been completely cleared following 14 days withdrawal of treatment in the stomach of 3/5 male and 1/5 High Dose female animals, however this finding was regarded as a minor residual effect without toxicological significance in the absence of associated reactive changes.
Organ weights
There were no toxicologically significant changes in organ weight values noted after REACTIVE YELLOW F01-0555 administration at up to and including 1000 mg/kg bw/day, evaluated immediately after completion of the treatment, at necropsy on Day 28 (Main males), PPD5 (Main females) or after additional 14 days after the first scheduled euthanasia of the dams on Day 41, with necropsy on Day 56 (Recovery male and female animals).
Variations were noted in the absolute and/or relative organ weights adjusted for the terminal body or brain weight when compared to Controls, on occasion attaining statistical significance. In the absence of any dose or gender response, or of any clinical pathology, macroscopic or microscopic changes, these variations were not considered toxicologically significant or related to treatment.
Effect levels (P0)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No test-item related adverse effects were observed at the highest dose tested - 1000 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Target system / organ toxicity (P0)
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
Details on results (F1)
In the Control group, 173 pups were examined and in the 62.5 mg/kg bw/day Low dose group, 156 pups, with 1 (Control) and 2 pups (Low dose) found dead and cannibalized, respectively. In the 250 mg/kg bw/day Mid dose group, 1/181 pups examined was found dead with a positive lung floating test, after being not suckled on PND0. In addition, 2 pups were cannibalized between PND2 and 2 additional pups were not suckled. In the 1000 mg/kg bw/day High dose group, 2/183 pups examined were found dead and intact, one on PND0, after being not suckled, with negative lungs flotation test, and one on PND1 (thus, no floating test was required), with no external or internal macroscopic findings.
The number of viable pups on PND4 as well as pups survival indices on PND0 and PND4 when evaluated as litter data were comparable to control values at up to and including 1000 mg/kg bw/day, or showed minor variations ascribed to individual, biological variability.
The sex ratios were similar in the Control and treated groups, with no statistically significant differences observed.
Body weight and body weight gain
There were no effects considered adverse on the offspring weight or weight gain following administration of REACTIVE YELLOW F01-0555 at 62.5, 250 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day to parental generation under the conditions of this study.
When evaluated per litter basis, the mean litter weights on PND 0 and 4, pups body weight and/or body weight gain evaluated on PND 0 and 4 showed no statistically or toxicologically significant differences compared to controls in the F1 generation.
When evaluated for all pups, statistically significant, slightly higher than Control values were noted in the mean body weights in the Mid and/or High dose groups, on PND0 and/or PND4, with a slightly lower than Control body weight gain mean values. As no test item related clinical signs or macroscopic findings were noted, these variations for all pups and not per litter basis were ascribed to individual variability.
Pathology evaluation
FOUND DEAD
F1 Generation
Three intact pups were found dead between Days 0-1 post partum. Necropsy was performed on 1 and 2 pups from Mid and High Dose groups, respectively. Positive floating test was observed in one animal from the Mid Dose group. Negative floating test was seen in 1/2 High Dose pups. A specific cause of death could not be determined for these animals and based on the low incidence and distribution throughout all the dose groups, their death was considered unrelated to treatment.
TERMINAL
MAIN (DAY 28 or PPD5)
F1 Generation
Macroscopic Findings:
No macroscopic changes were seen in F1 offspring generation euthanized and examined externally at scheduled termination.
Effect levels (F1)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No test-item related adverse effects observed at highest dose tested - 1000 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Target system / organ toxicity (F1)
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
Measured concentrations of the dosing solutions
Analytical occasion |
Nominal concentration mg/mL |
Measured concentrations with the 95% confidence intervals, mg/mL |
Measured concentration in percentage of the nominal |
First week (11 Oct. 2011) |
6.25 |
6.29±0.13 |
101 % |
25 |
25.5±0.4 |
102 % |
|
100 |
103±2 |
103 % |
|
Midway (07 Nov. 2011) |
6.25 |
6.23±0.07 |
100 % |
25 |
25.4±0.3 |
102 % |
|
100 |
103±2 |
103 % |
|
Last week (23 Nov. 2011) |
6.25 |
6.32±0.11 |
101 % |
25 |
25.7±0.4 |
103 % |
|
100 |
103±3 |
103 % |
TABULAR SUMMARY REPORT:
|
Dose (mg/kg bw/day) |
|||
Control |
62.5 |
250 |
1000 |
|
Pairs started (N) |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
Surviving females showing evidence of copulation (N) |
12/12 |
12/12 |
12/12 |
12/12 |
Females achieving pregnancy (N) |
12/12 |
12/12 |
12/12 |
12/12 |
Conceiving days 1 - 5 (N) |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
Conceiving days 6 - 14 (N) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Pregnancy ≤ 21 days (N) |
6 |
9 |
8 |
6 |
Pregnancy = 22 days (N) |
6 |
0 |
4 |
6 |
Pregnancy ≥ 23 days (N) |
0 |
1# |
0 |
0 |
Dams with live young born (N) |
12/12 |
11/12 |
12/12 |
12/12 |
Dams with live young at PN4 (N) |
12/12 |
10/12 |
12/12 |
12/12 |
Corpora lutea/dam (mean) |
22.08 |
19.91 |
19.92 |
19.92 |
Implantations/dam (mean) |
16.17 |
15.45 |
16.00 |
16.08 |
Live pups/dam at birth (mean) |
22.08 |
19.91 |
19.92 |
19.92 |
Live pups/dam at day 4 (mean) |
16.08 |
15.45 |
16.00 |
16.08 |
Sex ratio at birth (mean) |
46.27 |
52.39 |
45.45 |
49.65 |
Sex ratio at PN4 (mean) |
45.69 |
52.20 |
45.46 |
49.95 |
Litter weight at birth (mean) |
93.1 |
90.1 |
101.7 |
102.0 |
Litter weight at day 4 (mean) |
159.0 |
179.2 |
167.1 |
170.4 |
Pup weight at birth (litter mean) |
6.49 |
6.48 |
6.75 |
6.73 |
Pup weight at day 4 (litter mean) |
11.33 |
11.98 |
11.30 |
11.38 |
STRUCTURALLY ABNORMAL PUPS |
||||
Dams with 0/Dams with live born |
12/12 |
11/12 |
12/12 |
12/12 |
Dams with 1 or ≥2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
LOSS OF OFFSPRING# |
||||
Pre-implantation (corpora lutea minus implantations) |
||||
Females with 0 |
1/12 |
2/12 |
2/12 |
2/12 |
Females with 1 |
1/12 |
1/12 |
1/12 |
0/12 |
Females with 2 |
0/12 |
1/12 |
0/12 |
1/12 |
Females with ≥3 |
10/12 |
8/12 |
9/12 |
9/12 |
Pre-natal/post-implantation (implantation's minus live births) (intrauterine) |
||||
Females with 0 |
3/12 |
7/12 |
5/12 |
4/12 |
Females with 1 |
6/12 |
1/12 |
4/12 |
5/12 |
Females with 2 |
1/12 |
2/12 |
2/12 |
2/12 |
Females with ≥3 |
2/12 |
2/12 |
1/12 |
1/12 |
Post-natal (live births minus alive at post-natal day 4) |
||||
Females with 0 |
6/12 |
6/11 |
8/11 |
7/11 |
Females with 1 |
5/12 |
4/11 |
2/11 |
1/11 |
Females with 2 |
1/12 |
0/11 |
1/11 |
1/11 |
Females with ≥3 |
0/12 |
1/11 |
0/11 |
2/11 |
* = p < 0.05 ** = p < 0.01 DN = Duncan's multiple range test
# Female 2501 was pregnant with implantation sites but not delivered (total pre-natal mortality), and female 2507 had 60% pre-implantation mortality followed by total post-natal mortality, with 1 pup born alive on GD24 but not surviving to PND4.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, under the conditions of this study, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for REACTIVE YELLOW F01-0555 for parental/adult and F1 effects is considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
- Executive summary:
The purpose of this Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test in the Rat study was to obtain information on the possible toxic effects of the test item following repeated daily administration by oral gavage to Wistar rats. Reversibility of any treatment-related changes was evaluated following a 14-day Recovery period. The study also comprised a reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test, intended to provide initial information on possible effects on male and female reproductive performance such as gonadal function, mating behaviour, conception, pregnancy, parturition and also on the development of the F1 offspring from conception to Day 4 post-partum. In addition, the test item was evaluated for genotoxic effects by examining the induction of micronuclei in bone marrow erythrocytes of treated and Control animals.
In the Main Groups, male and female Wistar rats were treated for 2 weeks pre-mating, then during the mating/postmating period, males for 28 days and females throughout gestation period and up to and including postpartum/lactation Day PPD 5, according to the following Experimental Design:
Gr. No.
Group Designation
Dose Level
(mg/kg bw/day)Conc. (mg/mL)
Dose volume
(mL/kg bw)
Animal Numbers/ID ()
Male
Female
1
Control
0
0
10
1001-1012
1501-1512
2
Low dose
62.5
6.25
2001-2012
2501-2512
3
Mid dose
250
25
3001-3012
3501-3512
4
High dose
1000
100
4001-4012
4501-4512
An additional 5 male and 5 female rats from the Control and High dose Recovery Groups 1 and 4 scheduled for follow-up observations were not mated, but treated up to the first scheduled euthanasia of the Main dams (Day 41), then kept at least for 14 days without treatment to detect delayed occurrence, or persistence of, or recovery from toxic effects, and were subjected to necropsy with macroscopic examination on Day 56.
Gr. No.
Group Designation
Dose Level
(mg/kg bw/day)Conc. (mg/mL)
Dose volume
(mL/kg bw)
Animal Numbers/ID (Recovery)
Male
Female
1
Control
0
0
10
1013-1017
1513-1517
4
High dose
1000
100
4013-4017
4513-4517
A Positive Control group for the Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test (MNT) was added. The animals were mated and females allowed to deliver, similarly to the Main animals, then treated once with 20 mg/kg bw Cyclophosphamide, administered by intraperitoneal injection approximately 24 h prior to scheduled necropsy, males, on Day 27 for necropsy on Day 28; females, on PPD4 for necropsy on PPD5.
Gr. No.
Group Designation
Cyclophosphamide Dose Level (mg/kg bw)
Cyclophosphamide Conc. (mg/mL)
Dose volume
(mL/kg bw)
Animal Numbers /ID
Male
Female
5
Positive Control MNT
20
10
2
5001-5012
5501 -5512
Parameters measured during the study included signs of morbidity and mortality twice daily, daily or detailed weekly observation of clinical signs, neurological and ophthalmoscopic assessment, weekly body weight and food consumption, and clinical pathology evaluation, including haematology, coagulation, clinical chemistry and urinalysis. In addition, the reproductive performance and indices, pregnancy, parturition and postpartum/lactation period were monitored in the adult Main animals, and viability, clinical signs and development were evaluated in their F1 offspring until PND4. At termination, necropsy with macroscopic examination was performed. Weights of selected organs were recorded and representative tissues/organs were sampled and preserved in appropriate fixatives from the adult animals. Histopathology evaluation was conducted on selected tissues and organs retained in fixative and processed to slides from the Control and High dose 1000 mg/kg bw/day animals and on all organs with macroscopic findings from the Low 62.5 mg/kg bw/day and Mid 250 mg/kg bw/day dose groups.
In addition, bone marrow smears were prepared at necropsy and evaluation of induction of micronuclei was evaluated in bone marrow erythrocytes of the Control and High dose Main animals.
Analysis of formulations (concentration, homogeneity) and assessment of test item stability in this vehicle under the conditions employed on the study was performed in the Analytical Laboratory of CiToxLAB Hungary Ltd. Stability tests (CiToxLAB Hungary Ltd. study code 11/174-316AN) at concentrations from approximately 1 to 100 mg/mL in ultrapure water indicated a 1-day stability at room temperature and a 4‑day stability, while stored refrigerated at 2-8ºC, when the recovery range was 100%-103%, which lies within the acceptance range of 100 ± 10%.
Concentration and homogeneity of formulations were evaluated using a UV-HPLC method on duplicate samples collected from the top, middle and bottom of test item solutions, and one sample from the control taken and analysed fresh on 3 occasions during the study. The measured concentrations varied between 100% and 103% of the nominal concentrations (6.25, 25 and 100 mg/mL). No test item was detected in the Control solution samples. These results were considered suitable for the study purposes.
REACTIVE YELLOW F01-0555 administered daily by oral gavage to Wistar rats did not result in test item related mortality or clinical adverse effects at daily, weekly or neurological assessment, in ophthalmological changes, or changes in the body weight, food consumption, haematology, coagulation, clinical chemistry, or urinalysis parameters at dose levels of 62.5, 250, or 1000 mg/kg bw/Day during either the treatment or after a 14-Day Recovery period under the conditions of this study.In the Main animals, light orange discoloration of the faeces and dark yellow urine was noted during the treatment period as of Day 1, one day after the onset of treatment on Day 0, in all animals at 1000 mg/kg bw/day, due elimination of REACTIVE YELLOW F01-0555 or its metabolites through urine and an expected staining effect.
At evaluation of the reproductive parameters during mating and of gestation, delivery and post-partum/lactation period until PPD5 in the conditions of this study, no test item related, or adverse effects were noted.
Treatment-related dark/orange liquid material in the content and dark/orange discoloration of the mucosa of the stomach, small intestines and/or caecum, colon and rectum were observed at 62.5, 250 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day macroscopically in the Main Parental Generation at necropsy.
Histologically, eosinophilic material adhered to the mucosa of the stomach, small or large intestines and/or deposited in the cytoplasm of the glandular epithelial cells in the stomach and enterocytes of the intestines, and with eosinohpilic pigment in the cytoplasm of macrophages in the mesenteric lymph node were noted. There was a dose relation to severity and incidence of these findings. These microscopic observations were also in correlation with the dark/orange discoloration noted at necropsy. Following a 14 day recovery period, almost all residual microscopic effects of the treatment were completely recovered. It occurred that the test item has not been completely cleared following 14 days withdrawal of treatment in the stomach of 3/5 male and 1/5 High Dose female animals, however this finding was regarded as a minor residual effect without toxicological significance in the absence of associated reactive changes.
Additionally, three pups were found dead and intact and were necropsied between PND 0 and 1. A specific cause of death could not be determined for these animals and based on the low incidence and distribution throughout all the dose groups, their death was considered unrelated to treatment.
There were no adverse effects ascribed to test item administration on the F1 offspring viability, clinical signs or development.
No induction of micronuclei in bone marrow erythrocytes was observed following administration of REACTIVE YELLOW F01-0555 to Wistar rats daily by oral gavage to the High dose Main animals at 1000 mg/kg bw/day, thus, there was no evidence of any genotoxic activity of the test item under the conditions of this study.
In conclusion, under the conditions of this study, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for REACTIVE YELLOW F01-0555 for parental/adult and F1 effects is considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
Iako ECHA većinu materijala na ovim stranicama osigurava na vašem jeziku, dio ove stranice samo je na engleskom. Dodatne informacije o politici višejezičnosti ECHA-e.
Dobro došli na stranice ECHA-e Ove stranice ne podržavaju potpuno Internet Explorer 7 (i njegove ranije inačice). Preuzmite noviju inačicu Internet Explorera.
Na ovom portalu koristimo kolačiće kako bismo vam osigurali najbolje iskustvo njegova pregledavanja.
Saznajte više o tome kako upotrebljavamo kolačiće.