Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 209-132-5 | CAS number: 556-61-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
In long term chronic oral toxicity/oncogenicity studies in which methylisothiocyanate was administered to rats or mice in the drinking water, the only significant changes were a decreased body weight gain and water consumption in the high dose groups. NOEL’s were 20 and 10 ppm for mice and rats, respectively. Methylisothiocyanate showed no oncogenic activity.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Carcinogenicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Carcinogenicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Carcinogenicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Mandatory classification and self classification:
- Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 andDirective 67/548/EEC: not classified
Additional information
No chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity studies utilizing the inhalation route were located. Two-year bioassays with the rat and mouse in which methylisothiocyanate was administered via the drinking water were reported in the draft assessment report of metham sodium (Anonymous, 2007).
Methylisothiocyanate was administered to 60 Sprague-Dawley rats/sex/group in the drinking water at concentrations of 2, 10, or 50 ppm for 104 weeks (Anonymous, 2007). Vapor loss from the water bottles was minimized with a redesign of the water bottles. Average doses over the two years were males: 0, 0.08, 0.37, or 1.60 mg/kg/day; females: 0, 0.12, 0.56 or 2.65 mg/kg/day. An additional 10 rats/sex/group were similarly treated for an interim (52 week) sacrifice. No histopathologic lesions were present in any organ at 52 weeks. Survival was similar among the groups. Water intake and body weight were decreased in males in the 50 ppm group, an effect the authors attributed to loss of palatability with the addition of methylisothiocyanate to the water. Food intake was comparable to controls. No oncogenic response was seen at any dose level.
In a 106-week study, methylisothiocyanate was given in drinking water at concentrations of 0, 5, 20, 80, 23 or 200 ppm to 70 ICR-JCR mice/sex/group (Anonymous, 2007). Calculated doses, based on drinking water analysis and water consumption were males: 0, 0.68, 2.74, 9.82, or 21.34 mg/kg/day; females: 0, 0.76, 3.04, 10.81, or 24.06 mg/kg/day. Mortality was comparable for all groups (35-56%). No specific clinical signs were observed, but ruffled hair and dull coat were noted at 80 and 100 ppm. There was decreased body weight gain in males and females at 200 ppm and in males at 80 ppm. There were no differences in food consumption. Observed changes in hematology and clinical chemistry parameters were either transient or non-dose related. There was no abnormal tissue histopathology. There were no differences in tumor types or time to appearance of tumors between the treatment groups.
Justification for selection of carcinogenicity via oral route endpoint:
No reliable study was available.
Justification for selection of carcinogenicity via inhalation route endpoint:
No reliable study was available.
Justification for selection of carcinogenicity via dermal route endpoint:
No reliable study was available.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.