Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Valid studies with Reinblau BLW (CAS 32724-62-2) for skin and eye irritation are available.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: scientifically acceptable and sufficient documented
Principles of method if other than guideline:
500 µl of the test substance was applied to the intact inner surface of one ear per animal; exposure time was 24 hours. The test-substance was fixed by a plaster. The post exposure observation time was 7 days.
GLP compliance:
no
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
not specified
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hours
Observation period:
7 days
Number of animals:
2 animals
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
48 h
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
48 h
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
48 h
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
48 h
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Other effects:
no corrosive effects evident

Score = 0 at any time point (1h, 24h, 72h, 5d, 6d and 7d).


Therefore Macrolex Blau RR is not irritating to the skin

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Executive summary:

500 µl of the test substance was applied to the intact inner surface of one ear per rabbit; exposure time was 24 hours. The test-substance was fixed by a plaster. The post exposure observation time was 7 days.

No erythema and no edema was visible. Therefore Macrolex Blau RR is not irritating to the skin.

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: guideline study
Principles of method if other than guideline:
500 µl of Macrolex blau RR fl. was applied on a 2.5 x 2.5 cm² area at the shaved trunk of 3 rabbits and fixed semi-occlusively for 24 h. Reading was carried out 1, 24, 48, 72 h and 8 d the application.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours
Observation period:
8 days
Number of animals:
3 animals
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Remarks:
determination of the erythema score was not possible due to substance induced coloration of the skin
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Remarks:
determination of the erythema score was not possible due to substance induced coloration of the skin
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Remarks:
determination of the erythema score was not possible due to substance induced coloration of the skin
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4

At 1, 24, 48, 72 h a determination of the erythema score was not possible due to substance induced coloration of the skin. At 8 d the score was 0.


Edema score was 0 at any time point (1, 24, 48, 72 h, and 8 d)

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Executive summary:

500 µl of Macrolex Blau RR fl. was applied on a 2.5 x 2.5 cm² area at the shaved trunk of 3 rabbits and fixed semi-occlusively for 24 h. Reading was carried out 1, 24, 48, 72 h and 8 d after the application.

At 1, 24, 48, 72 h a determination of the erythema score was not possible due to substance induced coloration of the skin. At 8 d the score was 0. Edema score was 0 at any time point (1, 24, 48, 72 h, and 8 d). The primary irritation index is = 0.

The test substance is classified as non-irritant.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
100 µl Macrolex Blau RR fl. was applied into the conjunctival sac of the right eye of 3 rabbits. Reading was carried out 1, 24, 48 and 72 h, and 8 d afterthe application of the test substance.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Duration of treatment / exposure:
8 days
Observation period (in vivo):
8 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 rabbits
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4

Macrolex RR fl. produced a primary irritation value of 0 concerning irritation in mucous membrane on the eye

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Executive summary:

100 µl Macrolex Blau RR fl. was applied into the conjunctival sac of the right eye of 3 rabbits. Reading was carried out 1, 24, 48 and 72 h, and 8 d afterthe application of the test substance.

Macrolex RR fl. produced a primary irritation value of 0 concerning irritation in mucous membrane on the eye. Thus, the test substance is not irritating to the eyes.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Skin irritation


In a study performed according OECD 404 (Schreiber, 1982) 500 µl of the test substance formulated in glycerin were placed on a plaster and applied on the skin of 3 rabbits. After 4 hours the plaster was removed and the exposed skin area was cleaned with water. Erythema/scab building and edema were scored according to Draize at 24, 48 and 72 hours. No erythema and no edema was observed. At 1, 24, 48, 72 h a determination of the erythema score was not possible due to substance induced coloration of the skin. At 8 d the score was 0. Edema score was 0 at any time point (1, 24, 48, 72 h, and 8 d).


In another study (Thyssen, 1975), 500 µL of the test substance was applied on the skin of 2 rabbits for 24 hours. Erythema and edema were scored according to Draize No erythema nor edema were observed. Scores were 0 at any time point (1, 24, 72 h, 6 and 7d).


 


Eye irritation


In a valid study according OECD 405 (Schreiber, 1982) 100 µl (ca. 40 mg) test substance was applied into the conjuctival sac of 3 rabbits. The treated eye was washed after 24 hours with physiological saline. Eyes were examinated after application of test substance for 7 days. Cornea, iris, conjunctiva (erythema and chemosis) were scored according to Draize at 24, 48 and 72 hours. Mean values (24, 48 and 72 h) for cornea score = 0, iris score = 0, conjuctivae score = 0 and chemosis score = 0. The test substance is not irritating.


 

Justification for classification or non-classification

Due to the results of the skin irritation/corrosion and eye irration study a classifiacion is not justified.