Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 216-904-5 | CAS number: 1694-31-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin Irritation:
Based on the available data for the structurally similar read across substances and applying the weight of evidence approach, it can be concluded that the target chemical will also tend to behave in a similar that of the read across substances. Therefore, tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate was estimated to be not irritating to skin.Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation,tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoatecan be classified under the category “Not Classified”.
Eye Irritation:
Based on the available data for the structurally similar read across substances and applying the weight of evidence approach, it can be concluded that the target chemical will also tend to behave in a similar that of the read across substances. Therefore, tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate was estimated to be not irritating to eyes.Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation,tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoatecan be classified under the category “Not Classified”.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Weight of evidence based on structurally similar chemicals
- Justification for type of information:
- Weight of evidence based on structurally similar chemicals
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Weight of evidence approach based on similar chemicals
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The weight of evidence report has been prepared based on the read across substances identified based on structural and functional similarity to assess the dermal irritation potential of tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material: tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate- Molecular formula: C8H14O3- Molecular weight: 158.196 g/mol- Smiles notation: O(C(C)(C)C)C(CC(C)=O)=O- InChl: 1S/C8H14O3/c1-6(9)5-7(10)11-8(2,3)4/h5H2,1-4H3- Substance type: Organic- Physical state: Liquid
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not specified
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 1. no data available2. 0.5 ml3. 0.01 ml
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 1. no data available2. 4 hours3. 24 hours
- Observation period:
- 1. no data available2. 24,48 hours till 7 days3. 24 hours
- Number of animals:
- 1. no data available2. 63. 5
- Details on study design:
- The study is based on weight of evidence approach from the read across values
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No signs of irritation observed
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not irritating
- Conclusions:
- Based on the available data for the structurally similar read across substances and applying the weight of evidence approach, it can be concluded that the target chemical will also tend to behave in a similar that of the read across substances. Therefore, tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate was estimated to be not sensitizing to skin.Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation,tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoatecan be classified under the category “Not Classified”.
- Executive summary:
In different studies,tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoatehas been investigated for potential for dermal irritation to a greater or lesser extent. The studies are based on in vivo experiments in rabbits for target chemical as well as its structurally similar read across chemicals. The results are summarized as follows:
Skin irritation effects were estimated by four different models i.e, Battery, Leadscope, SciQSAR and CASE Ultra used within Danish QSAR database for tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate . Based on estimation, no severe skin irritation effects were known when tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate was exposed to rabbit skin. Hence, tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate can be considered not irritating to skin.
This estimated result is supported by an experimental performed to determine the primary dermal irritation potential of the structurally similar chemical in rabbits. 0.5 ml undiluted test chemical was applied to the clipped dorsal skin of 6 New Zealand White rabbits under occlusive wrapping for 4 hours. After 4 hours of exposure, the occlusive dressing was removed and the excess test chemical was gently removed. The test sites were inspected for erythema and edema at 1 hour, 1, 2, 3, 7 and 14 days post removal of the dressing. The dermal reactions were scored by the methods of Draize.
5 of 6 rabbits had a very slight local erythema, which also developed in the sixth animal by 24 hr. Edema, slight in 5 rabbits and moderate in one, was also present. After 3 days, only half the animals had just detectable erythema, and one had mild edema. Apart from mild desquamation, no effects were seen at 7days. Since the effects were completely healed by 7 days, the test chemical can be considered to be not irritating to skin.
The above results are further supported by another acute dermal irritation study carried out to assess the irritation potential of the other structurally similar chemical. Primary skin irritation on rabbits was recorded in a 10-grade ordinal series and was based upon the severest reaction that develops on the clipped abdominal skin of each of five albino rabbits within 24 hours of the uncovered application of 0.01 ml of undiluted sample or of solutions in water, propylene glycol, or acetone. Grade 1 indicates no irritation and Grade 2 the least visible capillary injection from the undiluted chemical. Grade 6 indicates necrosis when undiluted and Grade 10 indicates necrosis from a 0.01% solution. Primary Dermal Irritation score for the test chemical was Grade 2.
Based on the grade, the test chemical was considered to be not irritating to skin.
Based on the available data for the structurally similar read across substances and applying the weight of evidence approach, it can be concluded that the target chemical will also tend to behave in a similar that of the read across substances. Therefore, tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate was estimated to be not sensitizing to skin.Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation,tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoatecan be classified under the category “Not Classified”.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Weight of evidence approach based on similar chemicals
- Justification for type of information:
- Weight of evidence approach based on similar chemicals
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Weight of evidence approach based on similar chemicals
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The weight of evidence report has been prepared based on the read across substances identified based on structural and functional similarity to assess the ocular irritation potential of tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material: tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate- Molecular formula: C8H14O3- Molecular weight: 158.196 g/mol- Smiles notation: O(C(C)(C)C)C(CC(C)=O)=O- InChl: 1S/C8H14O3/c1-6(9)5-7(10)11-8(2,3)4/h5H2,1-4H3- Substance type: Organic- Physical state: Liquid
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not specified
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 1. 0.1 ml2. 0.5ml
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single exposure
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 24 hours
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- no data available
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 1. no data available2. 6
- Details on study design:
- The study is based on weight of evidence approach from the read across values
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No signs of irritation observed
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not irritating
- Conclusions:
- Based on the available data for the structurally similar read across substances and applying the weight of evidence approach, it can be concluded that the target chemical will also tend to behave in a similar that of the read across substances. Therefore, tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate was estimated to be not irritating to eyes.Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation,tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoatecan be classified under the category “Not Classified”.
- Executive summary:
Based on the available studies for the structurally similar read across chemicals, weight of evidence approach was applied to assess the ocular irritation potential of tert-butyl 3 -oxobutanoate.
Acute toxicity studies were carried out to estimate the toxicity of the structurally similar chemical. Eye injury in rabbits was recorded in a 10- grade ordinal series and was based upon the degree of corneal necrosis that results from instillation of various volumes and concentrations of chemical. Grade 1 indicates at most a very small area of necrosis resulting from 0.5 ml of undiluted chemical in the eye. Grade 5 indicates a so-called severe burn from 0.005 ml, and Grade 10 indicates a severe burn from 0.5 ml of a 1% solution in water or propylene glycol.
Primary Eye Irritation score after 24 hours for the test chemical was Grade 2. Based on the grade, the test chemical was considered to be not irritating to eyes.
This is supported by the results of a study was performed to determine the primary ocular irritation potential of the other structurally similar chemical in rabbits.
0.1 ml of the test chemical was instilled Into the Inferior Conjunctival Sac of One Eye of Each of Six New Zealand white Rabbits. The eyelids were held together for 1 second. The treated eyes were observed for conjunctival redness, chemosis and iridial inflammation, corneal injury at 1,4,24 hours and 2,3,7 days post instillation. Corneal integrity was checked before dosing by the instillation of 2% Fluorescein and irrigation with water 20 seconds later. Only animals without Fluorescein staining were used.
There was no evidence of corneal injury on macroscopic inspection or following the instillation of 2% fluorescein. At 1-hr post instillation there was just detectable excess conjunctival redness in 5 rabbits, of which 2 showed slight chemosis and 1 a moderate chemosis. Mild iritis was seen in 2 animals, persisting up to 4 hr. All eyes got completely healed by 24 hr post instillation.
The Primary irritation scores after 24 hours for conjunctival redness, chemosis, discharge and iris were 0.
Based on the scores and observations, the test chemical can be considered to be not irritating to eyes.
Based on the available data for the structurally similar read across substances and applying the weight of evidence approach, it can be concluded that the target chemical will also tend to behave in a similar that of the read across substances. Therefore, tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate was estimated to be not irritating to eyes.Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation,tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoatecan be classified under the category “Not Classified”.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin Irritation:
In different studies,tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoatehas been investigated for potential for dermal irritation to a greater or lesser extent. The studies are based on in vivo experiments in rabbits for target chemical as well as its structurally similar read across chemicals. The results are summarized as follows:
Skin irritation effects were estimated by four different models i.e, Battery, Leadscope, SciQSAR and CASE Ultra used within Danish QSAR database for tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate . Based on estimation, no severe skin irritation effects were known when tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate was exposed to rabbit skin. Hence, tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate can be considered not irritating to skin.
This estimated result is supported by an experimental performed to determine the primary dermal irritation potential of the structurally similar chemical in rabbits. 0.5 ml undiluted test chemical was applied to the clipped dorsal skin of 6 New Zealand White rabbits under occlusive wrapping for 4 hours. After 4 hours of exposure, the occlusive dressing was removed and the excess test chemical was gently removed. The test sites were inspected for erythema and edema at 1 hour, 1, 2, 3, 7 and 14 days post removal of the dressing. The dermal reactions were scored by the methods of Draize.
5 of 6 rabbits had a very slight local erythema, which also developed in the sixth animal by 24 hr. Edema, slight in 5 rabbits and moderate in one, was also present. After 3 days, only half the animals had just detectable erythema, and one had mild edema. Apart from mild desquamation, no effects were seen at 7days. Since the effects were completely healed by 7 days, the test chemical can be considered to be not irritating to skin.
The above results are further supported by another acute dermal irritation study carried out to assess the irritation potential of the other structurally similar chemical. Primary skin irritation on rabbits was recorded in a 10-grade ordinal series and was based upon the severest reaction that develops on the clipped abdominal skin of each of five albino rabbits within 24 hours of the uncovered application of 0.01 ml of undiluted sample or of solutions in water, propylene glycol, or acetone. Grade 1 indicates no irritation and Grade 2 the least visible capillary injection from the undiluted chemical. Grade 6 indicates necrosis when undiluted and Grade 10 indicates necrosis from a 0.01% solution. Primary Dermal Irritation score for the test chemical was Grade 2.
Based on the grade, the test chemical was considered to be not irritating to skin.
Based on the available data for the structurally similar read across substances and applying the weight of evidence approach, it can be concluded that the target chemical will also tend to behave in a similar that of the read across substances. Therefore, tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate was estimated to be not irritating to skin.Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation,tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoatecan be classified under the category “Not Classified”
Eye Irritation:
Based on the available studies for the structurally similar read across chemicals, weight of evidence approach was applied to assess the ocular irritation potential of tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate.
Acute toxicity studies were carried out to estimate the toxicity of the structurally similar chemical. Eye injury in rabbits was recorded in a 10- grade ordinal series and was based upon the degree of corneal necrosis that results from instillation of various volumes and concentrations of chemical. Grade 1 indicates at most a very small area of necrosis resulting from 0.5 ml of undiluted chemical in the eye. Grade 5 indicates a so-called severe burn from 0.005 ml, and Grade 10 indicates a severe burn from 0.5 ml of a 1% solution in water or propylene glycol.
Primary Eye Irritation score after 24 hours for the test chemical was Grade 2. Based on the grade, the test chemical was considered to be not irritating to eyes.
This is supported by the results of a study was performed to determine the primary ocular irritation potential of the other structurally similar chemical in rabbits.
0.1 ml of the test chemical was instilled Into the Inferior Conjunctival Sac of One Eye of Each of Six New Zealand white Rabbits. The eyelids were held together for 1 second. The treated eyes were observed for conjunctival redness, chemosis and iridial inflammation, corneal injury at1,4,24 hours and 2,3,7 days post instillation. Corneal integrity was checked before dosing by the instillation of 2% Fluorescein and irrigation with water 20 seconds later. Only animals without Fluorescein staining were used.
There was no evidence of corneal injury on macroscopic inspection or following the instillation of 2% fluorescein. At 1-hr post instillation there was just detectable excess conjunctival redness in 5 rabbits, of which 2 showed slight chemosis and 1 a moderate chemosis. Mild iritis was seen in 2 animals, persisting up to 4 hr. All eyes got completely healed by 24 hr post instillation.
The Primary irritation scores after 24 hours for conjunctival redness, chemosis, discharge and iris were 0.
Based on the scores and observations, the test chemical can be considered to be not irritating to eyes.
Based on the available data for the structurally similar read across substances and applying the weight of evidence approach, it can be concluded that the target chemical will also tend to behave in a similar that of the read across substances. Therefore, tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate was estimated to be not irritating to eyes.Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation,tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoatecan be classified under the category “Not Classified”.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The results of the experimental studies from the target as well its structurally similar read across substances indicate a possibility that tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate can be not irritating to skin and eyes.
Hence by applying the weight of evidence approach, tert-butyl 3-oxobutanoate can be considered to be not irritating to skin and eyes. It can be classified under the category “Not Classified” as per CLP regulation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.