Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 417-790-1 | CAS number: 78418-01-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Repeated dose toxicity: oral
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 18 June 1993 to 09 August 1993
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- GLP study following OECD guideline 407. However, dose level was reduced from 300 mg/kg bw/day to 200 mg/kg bw/day from day 13 of the treatment (death occured). Temperature also dropped to 18°C on two occasions and several organs were not weighed (thymus, spleen, brain and heart)
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 994
- Report date:
- 1994
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 407 (Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dose level reduced from 300 mg/kg/day to 200 mg/kg/day from day 13 of the treatment, temperature dropped below 19°C at two occasions, several organs not weighed (thymus, spleen, brain and heart)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 417-790-1
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 78418-01-6
- Molecular formula:
- C15H20O4
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-Hydroxy-5-(1-oxooctyl)benzoic acid
- Reference substance name:
- MEXORYL SAB
- IUPAC Name:
- MEXORYL SAB
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Mexoryl SAB
- Physical state: white fibrous powder
- Analytical purity: 99.7%
- Purity test date: 1993-04-20
- Lot/batch No.: opT4E
- Storage condition of test material: in the dark at room temperature
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: CRL:CD(SD)BR
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River limited, Margate, U.K.
- Age at study initiation: 3-4 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 124-160 g for males, 112-148 g for females
- Housing: in groups of 5 in stainless steel cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): SQC Rat and Mouse maintenance Diet No. 1, Expanded (Special Diets Services Limited, Witham, England), ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 10 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18-23
- Humidity (%): 40-60
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 18 June 1993 To: 09 August 1993
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- polyethylene glycol
- Remarks:
- PEG 300
- Details on oral exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: separate preparations were prepared freshly each day, for each dose level
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): no data
- Concentration in vehicle: 1, 3, 10 and 30 (then 20) mg/mL for 10, 30, 100 and 300 (then 200) mg/kg bw/d groups
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 mL/kg bw
- Fluka Chemicals Ltd, Gillingham, U.K.; Batch numbers 322054/1393 and 322054/11292 - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Homogeneity and stability of the preparations were checked. Concentrations were measured by HPLC using a detection wavelength of 274 nm.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 28 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
10 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
actual ingested
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
30 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
actual ingested
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
100 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
actual ingested
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
300 then 200 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 for control and the highest dose level
5 for the 3 other dose levels (10, 30 and 100 mg/kg bw/d) - Control animals:
- yes
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: based on the existing toxicity data
- Due to deaths and adverse clinical signs dose level was reduced from 300 to 200 mg/kg bw/d from day 13 - Positive control:
- Not applicable
Examinations
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice a day including weekends
- Cage side observations were checked for mortality and morbidity
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: animals weighed at the start of the study and then weekly and at necropsy (see table 1)
FOOD CONSUMPTION
- Food consumption for each cage was determined weekly and mean diet consumption was calculated as g food/animal/week (see table 2)
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: only once, 2 h after dosing, during week 4 of treatment
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: no data
- Animals fasted: overnight
- How many animals: all surviving animals
- Parameters checked: haemoglobin concentration, red blood cell count, packed cell volume, mean cell volume, mean cell haemoglobin, mean cell haemoglobin concentration, total leucocyte count, platelet count, leucocyte differential count, reticulocyte count (smear prepared but not read)
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: only once, 2 h after dosing, during week 4 of treatment
- Animals fasted: overnight
- How many animals: all surviving animals
- Parameters checked were blood urea nitrogen, glucose, alkaline phosphatase, alanine amino transferase, aspartate amino transferase, total protein, albumin, albumin/globulin ratio, sodium, potassium, calcium, chloride, inorganic phosphorous, cholesterol, triglycerides, total bilirubin, gamma glutamyl transferase and creatinine. - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: all animals were weighed and examined externally. A macroscopic examination was then performed by opening the cranial, toracic and visceral cavities and by observing tissues in situ. The following organs were weighed for all animals: adrenals, kidneys, liver and testes.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: gross lesions as well as adrenals, heart, kidneys, liver and spleen in the control and the highest dose groups were examined microscopically. Because of histopathological lesions, stomach and gross lesions were examined for all animals. - Other examinations:
- no data
- Statistics:
- Bodyweight gain, haematological and organ weight data were evaluated by analysis of variance and, if a between groups difference significant at the 5% level occurred, by pairwise t-tests between the control and treatment groups.
Biochemistry and haematology data were tested using the Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis of variance by ranks test at the 5% (0.05) significance level. If a significant Kruskal-Wallis value was obtained, the control group was compared with the test groups using multiple comparison techniques, to determine if the significant differences was between the control group and one or more of the test groups.
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Details on results:
- CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
There were 5 deaths at the highest dose (3 males at 300 mg/kg bw/d, 1 male and 1 female at 200 mg/kg bw/d). Clinical signs prior to death were noisy and irregular/fast respiration.
Rough coat, piloerection and post dose salivation observed in all animals of the highest dose group. Rough coat and piloerection was also noted in the 100mg/kg/day group.
BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN (See table 1)
A slight (13-14%) reduction in bodyweight gain over the treatment period as a whole, was noted for males from the highest dose group and females from 100 mg/kg/d group. Other treated groups had bodyweight gains similar to controls throughout the treatment period. Bodyweight gain for males from the highest dose group was also reduced during the treatment-free period, when compared to controls (16%). Females from the highest dose group had bodyweight gains slightly superior to controls during the treatment-free period.
FOOD CONSUMPTION (See table 2)
Food consumption was reduced slightly for males from the highest dose group. This was concomittant with the reduction in bodyweight observed for this group. The reduction was apparent in both the treatment and treatment-free period. All other treated groups had food consumption values similar to controls throughout the treatment period.
HAEMATOLOGY
No significant changes were observed in haematology.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
Statistically significant changes observed in blood chemical parameters were within the normal range found in the laboratory and were considered to be unrelated to test article administration.
ORGAN WEIGHTS
Absolute and bodyweight-related organ weights were unaffected.
GROSS PATHOLOGY
A dose-related increase in abnormalities of the stomach (abnormal shape, colour and consistency) was noted for animals of both sexes from 100 and 300/200 mg/kg bw/d groups. This was still present in some animals following the treatment-free period.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: NON-NEOPLASTIC (See table 3)
Hyperplasia of the non-glandular stomach was observed for both sexes from the highest dose group; this was accompanied by chronic inflammation and ulceration. Similar but less severe hyperplastic lesions were observed in one male from the 100 mg/kg bw/d group and all recovery animals of the highest dose group.
Effect levels
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Remarks:
- for local effect
- Effect level:
- 30 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Remarks:
- Effect level not specified (migrated information)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Remarks:
- for systemic effect
- Effect level:
- > 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No systemic effect observed in males and females up to the highest dose bearable for the animals, i.e. without mortality or without severe gastro-intestinal tract irritation.
Target system / organ toxicity
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Bodyweights and body weight gains (g) - group mean values
Group and sex |
Week number |
Gain |
Week 5 |
|
|
Gain |
|||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1-5 |
recovery |
6 |
7 |
5-7 |
|
Control Males |
Mean S.D. |
142 8.8 |
193 14.9 |
242 22.7 |
263 22.6 |
309 30.2 |
167 27.5 |
307 44.4 |
338 6.8 |
374 48.6 |
67 12.2 |
10 mg/kg bw/d Males |
Mean S.D. |
145 5.9 |
181 27.8 |
233 31.4 |
254 34.5 |
300 36.1 |
155 34.5 |
|
- - |
- - |
- - |
30 mg/kg bw/d Males |
Mean S.D. |
145 10.3 |
198 17.9 |
247 26.8 |
268 29.8 |
317 35.2 |
172 25.5 |
|
- - |
- - |
- - |
100 mg/kg bw/d Males |
Mean S.D. |
139 9.4 |
182 14.5 |
229 18.7 |
253 28.8 |
298 37.0 |
160 32.6 |
|
- - |
- - |
- - |
300/200 mg/kg bw/d Males |
Mean S.D. |
136 7.0 |
179 17.5 |
226 18.5 |
245 24.4 |
281 21.4 |
146 17.8 |
267 6.1 |
288 7.2 |
323 7.6 |
56 5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control Females |
Mean S.D. |
131 10.5 |
165 7.4 |
191 10.0 |
199 12.7 |
232 14.5 |
101 13.4 |
232 8.8 |
242 10.2 |
266 11.1 |
33 7.9 |
10 mg/kg bw/d Females |
Mean S.D. |
133 9.3 |
165 13.3 |
192 12.1 |
197 11.8 |
231 17.5 |
99 11.1 |
|
- - |
- - |
- - |
30 mg/kg bw/d Females |
Mean S.D. |
129 13.0 |
160 9.8 |
185 12.0 |
193 10.0 |
230 14.0 |
101 6.5 |
|
- - |
- - |
- - |
100 mg/kg bw/d Females |
Mean S.D. |
127 16.2 |
154 12.3 |
178 14.8 |
188 11.5 |
214 11.0 |
87 8.2 |
|
- - |
- - |
- - |
300/200 mg/kg bw/d Females |
Mean S.D. |
128 8.6 |
156 13.0 |
182 18.4 |
199 15.0 |
225 18.3 |
96 16.4 |
223 16.0 |
234 20.1 |
261 20.0 |
38 4.7 |
Table 2: Food consumption (g/animal /week) - group mean values
Group and sex |
Week number |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Total food eaten Weeks 1-4 |
% of control |
5 |
6 |
Total food eaten weeks 5-6 |
% of control |
Control males |
Mean S.D. |
169 |
191 3.5 |
179 2.1 |
182 2.8 |
721 - |
- - |
218 - |
216 - |
434 - |
- - |
10 mg/kg bw/d males |
Mean |
157 |
196 |
187 |
185 |
725 |
101 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
30 mg/kg bw/d males |
Mean |
170 |
196 |
177 |
182 |
725 |
101 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
100 mg/kg bw/d males |
Mean |
150 |
184 |
170 |
182 |
686 |
95 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
300/200 mg/kg bw/d males |
Mean S.D. |
153 14.8 |
160 19.1 |
166 10.6 |
171 7.1 |
650 - |
90 - |
196 - |
194 - |
390 - |
90 - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control females |
Mean S.D. |
139 6.4 |
149 7.1 |
137 7.1 |
149 7.8 |
574 -
|
- - |
158 - |
157 - |
315 - |
- - |
10 mg/kg bw/d females |
Mean |
142 |
153 |
136 |
144 |
575 |
100 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
30 mg/kg bw/d females |
Mean |
135 |
141 |
128 |
145 |
549 |
96 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
100 mg/kg bw/d females |
Mean |
134 |
141 |
126 |
139 |
540 |
94 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
300/200 mg/kg bw/d females |
Mean S.D. |
137 5.7 |
147 3.5 |
131 7.1 |
142 2.8 |
557 - |
97 - |
176 - |
169 - |
345 - |
110 - |
Table 3: Microscopic pathology
Group |
Control males |
Control recovery males |
10 mg/kg bw/d males |
30 mg/kg bw/d males |
100 mg/kg bw/d males |
300/200 mg/kg bw/d males |
300/200 mg/kg bw/d recovery males |
|
Control females |
Control recovery females |
10 mg/kg bw/d females |
30 mg/kg bw/d females |
100 mg/kg bw/d females |
300/200 mg/kg bw/d females |
300/200 mg/kg bw/d recovery females |
No. examined |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
7 |
3 |
|
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Squamous epithelial hyperplasia |
|||||||||||||||
Slight |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
moderate |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
marked |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
|
|||||||||||||||
Chronic inflammation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
Ulceration |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions of this study, severe local effects were observed in the non-glandular stomach of rats administered 300/200 mg/kg bw/d and at 100 mg/kg bw/d with less severity. At lower doses (10 and 30 mg/kg bw/d), no local effects were observed in any animals. No systemic effect was observed at any doses up to the highest dose bearable for the animals corresponding to 100 mg/kg bw/d. Hence, NOEL for local effect was 30 mg/kg bw/d while NOEL for systemic effect was higher than 100 mg/kg bw/d considered as the highest dose exposure that it was ethically acceptable to use.
- Executive summary:
In a 4 week oral toxicity study performed in accordance with OECD guideline n° 407 and in compliance with GLP, Mexoryl SAB was administered through gavage to groups of 5 Crl:CD (SD) rats/sex/dose mixed in polyethylene glycol (PEG 300) at dose levels of 0, 10, 30, 100 and 300 (then 200) mg/kg bw/day for 4 weeks. 2 recovery groups of 5 animals/sex/group (for control and the highest dose groups) were maintained undosed for further 14 days after the 4-week treatment. The dose level of the high dose group was dropped from 300 to 200 mg/kg bw/day on day 13 of the treatment period because of adverse clinical signs, including death.
Animals were observed daily, bodyweights and food consumption were recorded weekly. Blood samples were obtained from all surviving animals during week 4. At termination all animals were subjected to a detailed necropsy during which the weights of several organs were recorded and a wide range of tissues was preserved. A microscopic examination of specified tissues was performed for all control and high dose animals scheduled to be killed at the end of the treatment period. Gross lesions were examined from all animals killed at the end of the treatment period, together with stomachs from all dose groups including the recovery animals.
There were 5 deaths in the highest dose group during treatment. Rough coat, piloerection and post dose salivation were noted in the highest dose group. Bodyweight gain was reduced slightly (13-14 %) for males of the highest dose group during the treatment and treatment-free periods and for females given 100 mg/kg bw/day during the treatment period only. Males given the highest dose had reduced food consumption during both the treatment and treatment-free period. Haematology and blood chemistry examinations did not reveal any effects. Macroscopic observations at necropsy revealed a dose-related increased incidence of stomach abnormalities for animals given 100 and 300/200 mg/kg bw/day at the end of both the treatment and treatment-free period. Microscopic pathology revealed hyperplasia of the non-glandular stomach for animals given 300/200 mg/kg bw/day, accompanied by chronic inflammation and ulceration. One male given 100 mg/kg bw/day also showed hyperplasia. Similar but less severe hyperplastic lesions were also observed for the recovery animals previously given 300/200mg/kg bw/day. The hyperplasia of the non glandular mucosa of the stomach was less severe at the end of the treatment-free period indicating that some recovery had taken place. Also, reversibility was shown and the effects are limited to the non-glandular stomach, therefore they are of doubtful relevance to humans.
Hence, the results showed severe local effects in the non-glandular stomach of animals administered 300/200 mg/kg bw/d and at 100 mg/kg bw/d with less severity (one male). At lower doses (10 and 30 mg/kg bw/d), no local effects were observed. No systemic effect was observed at any doses up to the highest dose bearable for the animals corresponding to 100 mg/kg bw/d (no severe non-glandular stomach irritation leading to death). Hence, NOEL for local effect was 30 mg/kg bw/d while NOEL for systemic effect was higher to 100 mg/kg bw/d considered as the highest dose bearable for the animals.
Under the test conditions of this study, NOEL for local effect was 30 mg/kg bw/d and the NOEL for systemic effect was higher than 100 mg/kg bw/d. This dose was considered as the highest exposure that it was ethically acceptable to use.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.