Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 417-790-1 | CAS number: 78418-01-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- No data
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study similar to OECD guideline 474 with minor deviations: data about test substance purity, no certificate of analysis, animal bodyweight not followed, standard deviations not reported in the results.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no data about test substance purity; no certificate of analysis; animal bodyweight not followed; standard deviations not reported in the results
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Limited, Margate, U.K.
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: in groups of 5 per cage
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): SQC rat and mouse maintenance diet no. 1 (Special Diets Services Limited, Witham, England), ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 20
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 h/12 h - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: test substance: carboxymethylcellulose (CMC); positive control: 0.9% sterile saline
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: test substance: 0.5%; positive control: 0.4 mg/mL - Details on exposure:
- No data
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Single administration
- Frequency of treatment:
- Single administration
- Post exposure period:
- Range finding study: 3 days
Main study: 24, 48 and 72 h - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
250 mg/kg bw
Basis:
actual ingested - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
500 mg/kg bw
Basis:
actual ingested - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
1000 mg/kg bw
Basis:
actual ingested - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Mitomycin C
- Route of administration: intraperitoneal injection
- Doses / concentrations: 4 mg/kg - Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: based on the range finding study where animals exposed at 1000 mg/kg (highest dose tested) had no critical signs of toxicity
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields): for each dose group, 5 males and 5 females were sacrified at 24, 48 and 72 h after dosing
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
Marrow cells were centrifuged at 800 rpm for 5 min, the supernatant withdrawn, and the cells re-suspended in a minimal volume of foetal calf serum. One drop of cell suspension was placed on each of 2 slides and was left to air dry for 24 hours before staining based on the method of Gollapudi and Kamra. Cells were fixed for 5 min in methanol, rinsed twice in deionised water, stained for 10 min in Giemsa and rinsed several times in tap water and finally in deionised water.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: A minimum of 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE), including micronucleated PCE, were counted for each animal. - Evaluation criteria:
- Based on statistical analysis and the toxicity shown by PCE/NCE ratio.
- Statistics:
- Analysis of micronucleus counts to determine the significance of differences between control and Mexoryl SAB treated groups was carried out by the Mann-Whitney U test.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Decrease of PCE/NCE ratio for 1000 mg/kg at 24 h
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range: 50, 320 and 1000 mg/kg
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals: no severe toxic events
- Evidence of cytotoxicity in tissue analyzed: not examined
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- Induction of micronuclei (for Micronucleus assay): after 24 h at 1000 mg/kg
- Ratio of PCE/NCE (for Micronucleus assay): 0.52 (males and females) at 24 h
- Appropriateness of dose levels and route: acceptable
- Statistical evaluation: Mann-Whitney U test - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Under these test conditions, Mexoryl SAB was found not to be clastogenic in vivo on bone marrow cells of mice. - Executive summary:
In an in vivo micronucleus test similar to OECD guideline 474 and in compliance with GLP, mice were exposed to Mexoryl SAB. In a range finding assay, pairs of male mice were orally exposed to Mexoryl SAB at concentrations of 50, 320 and 1000 mg/kg without any critical sign of toxicity. Then, 5 animals/sex/dose/time of sacrifice were given single dose of 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg of Mexoryl SAB by oral gavage and were sacrificed at 24, 48 and 72 h after dosing. Then bone marrow cells were harvested, stained with Giemsa and analysed for micronuclei.
Positive controls (mitomycin C at 4 mg/kg intraperitoneally) induced an appropriate increase in the number of polychromatic erythrocytes. Micronuclei were not induced at any tested concentrations and at any time of sacrifice in control and in Meroxyl SAB-treated mice despite a decrease in polychromatic erythrocytes/normochromatic erythrocytes for 1000 mg/kg at 24 h.
Under the test conditions, Mexoryl SAB was found not to be clastogenic in vivo in mice.
Reference
Table 1: group means for animals sacrificed at 24 h
|
|
Mean |
Mean |
Mean |
Ratio |
Mean % |
Group |
|
PCE |
MN-PCE |
MN-NCE |
PCE/NCE |
MN-PCE |
CONTROL |
M |
1031.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.83 |
0.00 |
CONTROL |
F |
1004.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.88 |
0.00 |
CONTROL |
M+F |
1017.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.86 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 mg/kg |
M |
1018.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.06 |
0.00 |
250 mg/kg |
F |
1047.2 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
1.26 |
0.02 |
250 mg/kg |
M+F |
1032.8 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
1.16 |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 mg/kg |
M |
1027.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.08 |
0.00 |
500 mg/kg |
F |
1023.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.14 |
0.00 |
500 mg/kg |
M+F |
1025.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.11 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1000 mg/kg |
M |
1018.2 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.60 |
0.00 |
1000 mg/kg |
F |
1036.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.44 |
0.02 |
1000 mg/kg |
M+F |
1027.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.52 |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mitomycin C |
M |
1024.2 |
8.4 |
0.2 |
1.23 |
0.82 |
Mitomycin C |
F |
1064.8 |
12.6 |
0.6 |
1.22 |
1.19 |
Mitomycin C |
M+F |
1044.5 |
10.5 |
0.4 |
1.23 |
1.01 |
Table 2: group means for animals sacrificed at 48 h
|
|
Mean |
Mean |
Mean |
Ratio |
Mean % |
Group |
|
PCE |
MN-PCE |
MN-NCE |
PCE/NCE |
MN-PCE |
CONTROL |
M |
1006.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.26 |
0.00 |
CONTROL |
F |
1018.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.44 |
0.00 |
CONTROL |
M+F |
1012.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.35 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 mg/kg |
M |
1010.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.97 |
0.00 |
250 mg/kg |
F |
1034.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.90 |
0.00 |
250 mg/kg |
M+F |
1022.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.93 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 mg/kg |
M |
1011.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.05 |
0.00 |
500 mg/kg |
F |
1053.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.06 |
0.00 |
500 mg/kg |
M+F |
1032.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.06 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1000 mg/kg |
M |
1041.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.14 |
0.00 |
1000 mg/kg |
F |
1046.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.27 |
0.00 |
1000 mg/kg |
M+F |
1044.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.21 |
0.00 |
Table 3: group means for animals sacrificed at 72 h
|
|
Mean |
Mean |
Mean |
Ratio |
Mean % |
Group |
|
PCE |
MN-PCE |
MN-NCE |
PCE/NCE |
MN-PCE |
CONTROL |
M |
1006.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.26 |
0.00 |
CONTROL |
F |
1018.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.44 |
0.00 |
CONTROL |
M+F |
1012.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.35 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 mg/kg |
M |
1010.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.97 |
0.00 |
250 mg/kg |
F |
1034.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.90 |
0.00 |
250 mg/kg |
M+F |
1022.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.93 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 mg/kg |
M |
1011.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.05 |
0.00 |
500 mg/kg |
F |
1053.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.06 |
0.00 |
500 mg/kg |
M+F |
1032.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.06 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1000 mg/kg |
M |
1041.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.14 |
0.00 |
1000 mg/kg |
F |
1046.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.27 |
0.00 |
1000 mg/kg |
M+F |
1044.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.21 |
0.00 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
In a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria, performed similarly to the OECD guideline 471, in compliance with GLP, MEXORYL SAB was not mutagenic in S. typhimurium (TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 100 and TA 98) and one Escherichia coli strain (WP2 uvrA).
In an in vitro chromosome aberration test performed in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells according to OECD guideline 473 and in compliance with GLP, MEXORYL SAB induced an increase in chromosome aberrations only in presence of metabolic activation.
In an in vivo micronucleus test performed in mice, similar to OECD guideline 474 and in compliance with GLP, micronuclei were not induced at any tested concentrations and at any time of sacrifice in control and in MEXORYL SAB-treated mice despite a decrease in polychromatic erythrocytes/normochromatic erythrocytes for 1000 mg/kg at 24 h.
Also, in a GLP study conducted in compliance with OECD guideline 486, MEXORYL SAB did not induce unscheduled DNA synthesis in primary rat hepatocytes after in vivo treatment up to 2000 mg/kg bw.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Despite an induction of chromosome aberrations in presence of metabolic activation, MEXORYL SAB was negative in two in vivo tests (micronulceus test in mice and UDS in rats hepatocytesafter in vivo treatment) and was not mutagenic in several bacterial strains. Therefore, MEXORYL SAB is not classified as mutagenic according to Directive 67/548/EEC and in CLP Regulation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.