Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 219-470-5 | CAS number: 2440-22-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2006-2007
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 007
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-p-cresol
- EC Number:
- 219-470-5
- EC Name:
- 2-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-p-cresol
- Cas Number:
- 2440-22-4
- Molecular formula:
- C13H11N3O
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-(2H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-2-yl)-4-methylphenol
- Test material form:
- solid
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Crl:CD(SD)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Japan, Inc. (Atsugi Breeding Center)
- Age at study initiation: 10 -11 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 370 to 422 g in males, 225 to 263 g in females
- Fasting period before study: none
- Housing: individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 23 ± 2°C
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 15%
- Air changes (per hr): 15 to 17
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- olive oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The dosing samples were prepared once a week based on the results of the 8-day stability study conducted at the Japan Bioassay Research Center and stored in a dark place at room temperature and were used within 7 days after preparation.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): The substance is not soluble in water, but suspendable in olive oil
- Concentration in vehicle: adjusted to volume of 5 ml/kg bw
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5 ml/kg bw - Details on mating procedure:
- The males and females of the same group were mated by cohabitation in 1:1 sex ratio every day for 14 days at the longest starting from Day 15 of treatment. Copulation was confirmed by the presence of vaginal plug in the vagina or presence of sperms in the vaginal smear and the day when these were found was defined as Day 0 of gestation. The females with establishment of copulation were promptly separated from males and housed individually.
The time to copulation (number of days taken from the start of mating to establishment of copulation) and the copulation rate [(number of pairs that established copulation / number of pairs mated) x 100] were calculated based on the results of mating. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The stability of the test substance was checked by comparing the chromatograms determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (Hewlett Packard 1090) before and after use. The concentration and uniformity of the test substance in the dosing samples were checked by the measurement using high-performance liquid chromatography (Hewlett Packard 1090) at the time of the initial preparation.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Males, 42 days
Females, from 14 days before mating to day 4 of lactation
Females (satellite), 42 days - Frequency of treatment:
- daily
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 30 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Males, 12 (5 for recovery)
Females, 12; satellite females, 5 - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Dose selection rationale: The doses in this study were determined based on the results of the preliminary study. The dose levels in the preliminary study were determined by setting 1000 mg/kg as the highest dose level as specified in the OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals, followed by 300 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg, and 30 mg/kg.
Five each of male and female Crl:CD(SD) rats aged 10 weeks per group received 2-(2’-hydroxy-5’-methylphenyl) benzotriazole orally for 14 consecutive days and were autopsied on the day after completion of administration. As a result, the test substance had no effect on the body weight or general health condition of the males and females in all treatment groups. Both the males and females given 100 mg/kg and higher showed an increase in liver weight and the females also showed an increase in total cholesterol. Increased phospholipid was also noted in the females given 300 mg/kg and higher. Based on these results, 300 mg/kg was selected as the high dose level in this study followed by 100 mg/kg as the intermediate dose level and 30 mg/kg as the low dose level. - Positive control:
- not required
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: once a week
In the observation of females in Week 6 of treatment, however, only the satellite animals were observed to reduce the burden on the animals due to parturition and nursing.
The animals were observed for contact reaction, vocality and easiness of taking out when they were taken out from cages, easiness for handling, body temperature, fur condition, skin color, eye condition and salivation after taking out from cages, posture, activity, alert/searching behavior, gait condition, stereotypical behavior, respiration, and tremor/spasm as well as numbers of events of urination and defecation, grooming and face washing per minute on the work table.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: The males were weighed on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36 and 42 of treatment, and the recovery animals were weighed on Days 1, 8 and 14 of recovery.
All the females were weighed on Days 1, 8 and 15 of treatment before mating. After the start of mating, they were weighed on Days 0, 7, 14 and 20 of gestation, on the parturition day and Day 4 after parturition (day 0 and 4 of nursing). The satellite females were weighed on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36 of treatment and Days 1, 8 and 14 of recovery.
On the autopsy day, the body weight was measured in all animals after fasting.
Food consumption: Yes
For the males, food consumption was measured between Days 1 and 8, 8 and 15, 29 and 36, and 36 and 42 in the treatment period and between Days 1 and 8, and 8 and 14 in the recovery period.
For the females, food consumption was measured for all animals before mating between Days 1 and 8, and 8 and 15. After the start of mating, food consumption was measured between Days 0 and 7, 7 and 14, 14 and 20 of gestation and between Days 0 and 4 of nursing. For the satellite females, food consumption was measured between Days 1 and 8, 8 and 15, 29 and 36, and 36 and 43 of treatment and between Days 1 and 8, and 8 and 14 of recovery.
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: at autopsy
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes (ether)
- Animals fasted: No data
- How many animals: all
- Parameters checked: Red blood cell count, platelet count, reticulocyte ratio, white blood cell count, mean corpuscular volume (the light scattering method, hereinbefore), hemoglobin concentration (cyanmethemoglobin method), hematocrit, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (by calculation, hereinbefore) were determined by the general hematology system (ADVIA 120: Bayer), differential leukocyte classification (by Wright’s stain) using the automatic blood cell analyzer (MICROXHEG-120NA: Omron), and prothrombin time (Quick one-step method) and activated partial thromboplastin time (ellagic acid activation method) using the full automatic blood coagulation tester (Sysmex CA-5000: Sysmex).
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: at autopsy
- How many animals: all
- Parameters checked: for total protein (biuret method), albumin (BCG method), A/G ratio (calculation), total bilirubin (azobilirubin method), glucose (GlcK・G-6-PDH method), total cholesterol (CE・COD・POD method), triglyceride (MGLP・GK・GPO・POD method), phospholipid (PLD・ChOD・POD method), AST, ALT, γ-GTP, CK (JSCC method, hereinbefore), LDH (SFBC method), ALP (GSCC method), urea nitrogen (urease GLDH method), creatinine (Jaffé method), sodium, potassium, chlorine (ion-selective electrode method, hereinbefore), calcium (OCPC method) and inorganic phosphorus (PNP・XOD・POD method) using an automatic analyzer (Hitachi 7080: Hitachi, Ltd.).
URINALYSIS: Yes
Fresh urine was collected before administration from all males and satellite females in Week 6 and pH, protein, glucose, ketone bodies, bilirubin, occult blood and urobilinogen were tested using a urine test paper (Multistix, Bayer).
Urinalysis was also performed for all male and female recovery animals in Week 2 of recovery as changes suspected of the effect of the test substance administration were found in the males given 100 mg/kg and higher.
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: All the males were tested in Week 6 of treatment. As for the females, 5 animals that underwent parturition on the same day or closer days were selected in each group and the tests were performed on the day before autopsy in the combined repeated-dose oral toxicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity study (day 4 after parturition).
- Battery of functions tested: sensory activity, grip strength and motor activity
In the reactivity test, vision, hearing, pain sensation, pupil reflex and aerial righting reflex were examined.
Grip strength was measured using a grip strength meter (MK-380CM, Muromachi Kikai Co., Ltd.). Both the forelimbs and hindlimbs were measured twice and the means were defined as the grip strengths of the individuals.
Locomotor activity was measured for 60 minutes per animal using a locomotor measuring instrument (SCANET MV-10, Melquest). - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- Vaginal smears were collected from all the females (excluding satellite females) every morning from the start of treatment to the first day of mating (day 15 of treatment), stained with Giemsa stain, and observed for sex cycle under a light microscope.
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- none
- Litter observations:
- The body weight of pups was measured per dam (litter) on Days 0 and 4 of nursing by the units of males and females and the mean per pup was calculated.
PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in offspring:
number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, postnatal mortality, presence of gross anomalies, weight gain, physical or behavioural abnormalities
GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS:
yes, for external and internal abnormalities; possible cause of death was not determined for pups born or found dead. - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- The ovaries were excised from copulated females at the time of autopsy and the number of corpus luteum verum was counted under a stereomicroscope. In addition, the uterus was excised, stained with 10% ammonium sulfate solution, and implantation sites were counted on the following day.
The implantation rate [(number of implantation sites / number of corpus luteum verum) x 100] was calculated based on these results.
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
Autopsy was performed for the males excluding recovery animals on the day after Day 42 of treatment and for the recovery animals on the day after Day 14 of recovery. The females that underwent parturition were autopsied on Day 5 after parturition and those that did not give parturition were autopsied on the day corresponding to Day 26 of gestation to check presence or absence of conception. The satellite females were autopsied on the day after Day 14 of recovery.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
The testes, epididymides, seminal vesicles/coagulating gland, prostate (ventral lobe) and ovaries of all animals and trachea, lungs, bone marrow (femur), lymph nodes (axillary, peritoneal, etc.), thymus, spleen, heart, stomach, small intestines (including duodenum), large intestines, liver, kidneys, bladder, pituitary body, thyroid gland, parathyroid gland, adrenal glands, uterus (only in the satellite females), vagina, mammary glands, brain, spinal cord, peripheral nerve (sciatic nerve), muscle, and bone (femur) of 5 animals in each group (in the ascending order of animal numbers, excluding infertile females) and recovery animals were excised, embedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained in hematoxylin and eosin, and observed under a light microscope. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- GROSS NECROPSY
All the pups that survived on Day 4 of nursing were laparotomied under ether anesthesia, exsanguinated by cutting the abdominal aorta, and autopsied. The pups that died in the course were also autopsied. - Statistics:
- The chi-square test was performed for the copulation rate, conception rate, birth rate, urinalysis and histopathology results between the control group and each of the treated groups.
For the numeric data obtained in other tests, equal variation was examined preliminary by the Bartlett method using the control group as the basis. The one-way analysis of variance was performed if equal variation was shown and the Dunnett’s multiple comparison was performed for testing the means when a significant difference was detected between the groups. If the variation was not equal, the measured values were ranked across the groups and the Kruskal-Wallis rank test was performed followed by the Dunnett-type multiple comparison if a significant difference was detected between the groups. In the statistical analysis of the numeric data in the recovery animals, the F-test was performed first followed by the Student’s t-test if there was no difference in distribution and by the Aspin-Welch’s t-test if the distribution showed a difference.
The significance level was set at 5% and 1% on both sides and 5% significance level was set as the judgment criteria for the effect of the test substance - Reproductive indices:
- Copulation index = (No. of copulated pairs / No. of mated pairs) × 100.
Fertility index = (No. of pregnant females / No. of copulated pairs) × 100.
Gestation index = (No. of pregnant females with live pups / No. of pregnant females) × 100.
Implantation index = (No. of implantations / No. of corpora lutea) × 100.
Delivery index = (No. of pups born / No. of implantations) × 100. - Offspring viability indices:
- Viability index = (No. of live pups on day 4 / No. of live pups on day 0) × 100.
Birth index = (No. of live pups on day 0 / No. of implantations) × 100.
Live birth index = (No. of live pups on day 0 / No. of pups born) × 100.
Sex ratio on day 0 = No. of male live pups on day 0 / No. of live pups on day 0.
Sex ratio on day 4 = No. of male live pups on day 4 / No. of live pups on day 4.
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
Details on results (P0)
No adverse effects on reproductive performance was observed for parental animals at the highest tested dose of 300 mg/kg bw.
Effect levels (P0)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- >= 30 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: effects on liver at clincial chemistry observed in dose-range finding study at 1000 mg/kg bw
Target system / organ toxicity (P0)
- Critical effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- System:
- hepatobiliary
- Organ:
- kidney
- liver
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
Details on results (F1)
Effect levels (F1)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- >= 300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: as far as F1 can be assessed in a screening study.
Target system / organ toxicity (F1)
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Estrous cycle and reproductive performance
Dose (mg/kg) | 0 | 30 | 100 | 300 |
Estrous cycle | ||||
No. of animals examined | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Type of cycle | ||||
4-day | 10 | 9 | 9 | 12 |
5-day | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Others Length (day)a) |
0 4.2±0.4 |
1 4.2±0.4 |
2 4.2±0.4 |
0 4.0±0.0 |
Reproductive performance | ||||
No. of mated pairs | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
No. of copulated pairs | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Copulation index (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
No. of pregnant females | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Fertility index (%) Pairing days until copulationa) |
100 2.3±1.1 |
100 4.0±3.1 |
100 2.3±1.2 |
100 2.4±1.2 |
Parturition and lactation | ||||
Non-remarkable | 12 | 12 | 12 | 11 |
Abnormal lactation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
a) Data represent mean ± S.D.
Copulation index = (No. of copulated pairs / No. of mated pairs) × 100.
Fertility index = (No. of pregnant females / No. of copulated pairs) × 100.
Table 2 Summary of development of pups from dams treated orally with 2-(2'-hydroxy-5'-methylphenyl)benzotriazole in the combined repeated dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test
Dose (mg/kg) | 0 | 30 | 100 | 300 | ||||
No. of pregnant females | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | ||||
No. of pregnant females with live pups | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | ||||
Gestation index (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
Gestation length (days) | 21.9±0.5 | (12) | 21.9±0.3 | (12) | 22.1±0.3 | (12) | 21.9±0.3 | (12) |
No. of corpora lutea | 16.0±1.3 | (12) | 16.2±1.2 | (12) | 16.0±2.0 | (12) | 16.3±1.7 | (12) |
No. of implantations | 15.3±1.5 | (12) | 14.7±1.8 | (12) | 15.0±1.3 | (12) | 15.4±1.4 | (12) |
Implantation index (%) | 95.2±2.9 | (12) | 90.8±9.5 | (12) | 94.5±9.3 | (12) | 95.1±5.5 | (12) |
Day 0 of lactation | ||||||||
No. of pups born | 14.4±1.4 | (12) | 13.6±2.0 | (12) | 13.5±2.8 | (12) | 14.0±1.4 | (12) |
Delivery index (%) | 94.7±6.5 | (12) | 92.8±9.5 | (12) | 90.0±17.0 | (12) | 91.0±6.8 | (12) |
No. of live pups | 14.3±1.5 | (12) | 13.5±2.0 | (12) | 13.4±3.1 | (12) | 13.8±1.5 | (12) |
Birth index (%) | 93.6±8.0 | (12) | 92.2±9.3 | (12) | 89.4±18.8 | (12) | 89.5±9.0 | (12) |
Live birth index (%) | 98.7±3.0 | (12) | 99.4±2.0 | (12) | 98.6±4.8 | (12) | 98.2±3.3 | (12) |
Pups weight (g) | ||||||||
Male | 6.6±0.4 | (12) | 6.5±0.5 | (12) | 6.8±0.5 | (12) | 6.8±0.5 | (12) |
Female | 6.3±0.5 | (12) | 6.1±0.4 | (12) | 6.5±0.4 | (12) | 6.4±0.4 | (12) |
Sex ratio on day 0 | 0.56±0.12 | (12) | 0.48±0.10 | (12) | 0.50±0.16 | (12) | 0.50±0.10 | (12) |
Day 4 of lactation | ||||||||
No. of live pups | 14.2±1.6 | (12) | 13.3±2.2 | (12) | 13.2±2.9 | (12) | 12.6±3.9 | (12) |
Viability index (%) | 99.4±2.2 | (12) | 98.0±4.9 | (12) | 98.4±3.9 | (12) | 91.7±26.7 | (12) |
Pups weight (g) Male | 10.3±1.0 | (12) | 10.5±1.2 | (12) | 10.8±1.6 | (12) | 10.5±0.8 | (11) |
Female | 9.9±1.1 | (12) | 9.9±1.2 | (12) | 10.4±1.5 | (12) | 9.5±1.8 | (12) |
Sex ratio on day 4 | 0.56±0.12 | (12) | 0.48±0.11 | (12) | 0.50±0.16 | (12) | 0.46±0.18 | (12) |
Data represent mean ± S.D.
Parentheses represent the number of litters examined.
Gestation index = (No. of pregnant females with live pups / No. of pregnant females) × 100.
Implantation index = (No. of implantations / No. of corpora lutea) × 100.
Delivery index = (No. of pups born / No. of implantations) × 100.
Birth index = (No. of live pups on day 0 / No. of implantations) × 100.
Live birth index = (No. of live pups on day 0 / No. of pups born) × 100.
Sex ratio on day 0 = No. of male live pups on day 0 / No. of live pups on day 0.
Viability index = (No. of live pups on day 4 / No. of live pups on day 0) × 100.
Sex ratio on day 4 = No. of male live pups on day 4 / No. of live pups on day 4.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- No indication of reproductive toxicity by the oral route was identified in this screening study.
- Executive summary:
No effect of the compound was observed on the reproductive performances, such as the estrous cycle, copulation, fertility, delivery and lactation. No effect of the compound was observed on the implantation, the number of pups, sex ratio of pups, viability of the pups during 4 days of lactation and weights of the pups. No external abnormalities or macroscopic findings were detected in any pup.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.