Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 246-495-9 | CAS number: 24851-98-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Oral LD50 > 5 g/kg (US-FHSA), limit test in rats
Oral LD50 ~ 10 g/kg (OECD 401), limit test in rats
Oral LD50 < 10 g/kg, (OECD 401), limit test in rats
Dermal LD50 > 5 mg/kg (U.S.- FHSA), limit test in rabbits
Inhalation LC50 > 4.96 mg/l (OECD 403), limit test in rats
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 5 000 mg/kg bw
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Value:
- 4 930 mg/m³ air
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 5 000 mg/kg bw
Additional information
Table1: Acute Toxicity Tests Performed (limit tests)
Test n° |
Test Guideline |
Test Substance isomer composition |
Number of animals tested |
Number of deaths |
Concentration tested |
LD(C)50 |
Recovery of clinicalsigns after14 days? |
Acute Oral Toxicity |
|||||||
1 |
US-FHSA |
90% trans- 10%cis- |
10 |
0 |
5g/kg |
> 5g/kg |
N.A. (no clinical signs observed) |
2 |
OECD 401 |
90% trans- 10%cis- |
20 |
3/20 |
10g/kg |
> 10g/kg |
Yes* |
3 |
OECD 401 |
70 % trans 30 %cis- |
10 |
4/10 |
10g/kg |
~ 10g/kg |
Yes |
4 |
OECD 401 |
30 % trans- 70 %cis- |
10 |
9/10 |
10g/kg |
< 10g/kg |
Yes |
* Excepted hair loss observed in one female |
|||||||
Acute Dermal Toxicity |
|||||||
5 |
US-FHSA |
90% trans- 10%cis- |
10 |
0 |
5g/kg |
> 5g/kg |
N.A. (no clinical signs observed) |
Acute Inhalation Toxicity |
|||||||
6 |
OECD 403 |
90% trans- 10%cis- |
10 |
0 |
5mg/l/4h |
>4.93 mg/l/4h |
Yes |
Acute Oral Toxicity
Four limit tests performed with different qualities of the test substance were carried out according to the OECD TG 401 “Acute Oral Toxicity” using a limit test concentration of 10 g/kg or according to US-FHSA test guideline using a limit test concentration of 5 g/kg (see table above). Test substance was administrated to rats by gavage. All the tests were selected as key studies as different test qualities and concentrations were tested in these limit tests. High test concentrations were tested in all of these tests in comparison with current test guidelines (i.e. OECD TG 423) which now recommend testing of a concentration of 2 g/kg in limit tests.
Test n°1 and 2 (see table) were performed with high trans isomers qualities (~90% trans). Less than 20 % of tested animal died at the limit test concentration of 10 g/kg and surviving animals totally recovered from clinical signs in less than 7 days. No death occurred at the limit test concentration of 5.0 g/kg and no relevant clinical signs were observed. Therefore the LD50 can be estimated to be greater than 10 g/kg for high trans isomers qualities.
Test n°3 and 4 were performed on qualities having higher cis isomers content (30 % and 70 % respectively). An LD50 of ~10 g/kg was determined with a 30 % cis content quality whereas higher cis content quality (70%) indicate than LD50 is lower than 10 g/kg.
In view of these results made with different qualities of the substance, it can be assumed than the oral LD50 of the substance is greater than 5 g/kg and smaller than 10 g/kg. The substance is therefore not classified according to both DSD and CLP as the test substance LD50 is well above the minimal concentration to be classified (≤ 2000 mg/l).
Acute dermal toxicity. A limit test was performed was carried out on New Zealand White Rabbits according to FHSA test guideline using a test concentration of 5 mg/kg. The FHSA test guideline used to determine acute dermal toxicity (48 h substance application on abraded skin in occlusive conditions), is more severe than classical guidelines like OECD TG Guideline 402 (4 hours application on shaved skin in semi-occlusive conditions). Animals were observed for 14 days for mortality, clinical signs and bodyweight changes. A necropsy was performed on all animals at the end of the study. No relevant clinical signs were observed, bodyweight changes were normal and no abnormalities were noted during the necropsy.
The dermal LD50 was therefore determined to greater than 5 g/kg and the test material is classified as non toxic according to FHSA and would also not be classified according to DSD and CLP.
Acute inhalation toxicity. A limit test study was performed on ten Sprague-Dawleyrats to assess the acute inhalation toxicity of the test material according to the OECD TG (1981) No. 403 "Acute Inhalation Toxicity". The animals were exposed for four hours to a unique dose of 5 mg/l as an aerosol atmosphere using a nose only exposure system, followed by a fourteen day observation period.
Animals recovered steadily to common abnormalities and appeared to be normal from Days 3 - 6. Normal bodyweight development was noted during the study and with the exception of a single instance of dark foci on thelungs,no abnormalities were detected at necropsy. No deaths occurred in a group of ten rats exposed to a mean achieved atmosphere concentration of 4.93 mg/l.The dermal LC50 was therefore determined to be much greater than 4.93 mg/l as no death occurred as this concentration. We can therefore conclude that it is therefore not classified according to DSD and CLP.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Oral LD50 of the substance is greater than 5 g/kg and smaller than 10 g/kg is therefore not classified according to both FHSA and CLP.
Dermal LD50 was determined to greater than 5 g/kg; the test material is not classified according to both FHSA and CLP.
Inhalation LC50 was determined to be much greater than 4.93 mg/l as no death occurred as this concentration. It is therefore not classified according to CLP.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.