Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-664-3 | CAS number: 67-68-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 29 September 2006 - 23 January 2011
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 011
- Report date:
- 2011
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 421 (Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Dimethyl sulfoxide
- EC Number:
- 200-664-3
- EC Name:
- Dimethyl sulfoxide
- Cas Number:
- 67-68-5
- Molecular formula:
- C2H6OS
- IUPAC Name:
- dimethyl sulfoxide
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- Chemical registery number : CAS 67-68-5 / EC 200-664-3
Chemical name : dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- ANIMALS
- Strain : Sprague-Dawley Crl CD (SD) IGS BR
- Breeder: Charles River Laboratories France, L'Arbresle, France
- Age at the beginning of the treatment period: 10 weeks old
- Weight at the beginning of the treatment period: 372 g (range: 333 g to 396 g) for the males and 241 g (range: 211 g to 280 g) for the females
- Acclimation: 6-days before the beginning of the treatment period
- Housing: the males were individually housed, except during pairing, in wire-mesh cages (43.0 x 21.5 x 18.0 cm). The females were individually housed, except during pairing and lactation, in polycarbonate cages (43.0 x 21.5 x 20.0 cm) containing autoclaved sawdust. Autoclaved wood shavings were provided as nesting material, a few days before delivery and during the lactation period.
- Food: SSNIFF R/M-H pelleted maintenance diet ad libitum
- Water: filtered (0.22 µm filter) tap water ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature : 22 ± 2°C
- Relative humidity : 50 ± 20%
- Light/dark cycle : 12h/12h (7:00 - 19:00)
- Ventilation : about 12 cycles/hour of filtered, non-recycled air.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- - Dosage form preparation: The test item was administered as a solution in the vehicle. The test item was mixed with the required quantity of vehicle in order to achieve the concentrations of 20, 60 and 200 mg/mL and then homogenized using a magnetic stirrer. The test item dosage forms were prepared for up to 9 days use (based on available stability information (stability for up to 9 days at +4°C, under nitrogen atmosphere), and were stored in glass bottles at +4°C and under nitrogen atmosphere until treatment.
- Treatment volume: 5 ml/kg - Details on mating procedure:
- one female was placed with one male from the same dose-level group.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The concentration of the test item was determined by Gas Liquid Chromatography with Flame Ionisation Detection in samples taken from each dosage form (including the control) prepared for use in weeks 1, 4 and 9.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- - in the males: 15 days before mating, during the mating period (2 weeks) and until sacrifice (i.e. at least 4 weeks in total),
- in the females: 15 days before mating, during the mating period (2 weeks), during pregnancy and during lactation until day 21 post-partum inclusive. - Frequency of treatment:
- 7 days per week
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 12
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CLINICAL EXAMINATIONS
- Morbidity and mortality: at least twice a day
- Clinical signs: at least once a day
- Body weight:
. Males: on day 1, then once a week until sacrifice
. Females: on day 1, then once a week until mated, then on days 0, 7, 14 and 20 pc and on days 1 and 4 pp and then weekly until day 21 pp.
- Food consumption
. Males: once a week (except during the mating period) until sacrifice
. Females: once a week during the pre-mating period and then on the following intervals: days 0-7, 7-14, 14-20 pc, and days 1-7, 7-14 and 14-21 pp.
PARTURITION
Females were allowed to drop their litters normally and rear their progeny until sacrifice. - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- The oestrous cycle stage was determined from a fresh vaginal lavage (stained with methylene blue), each morning during the mating period, until the females mated.
- Litter observations:
- - Litter size: total litter size and numbers of pups of each sex were recorded as soon as possible after birth. The litters were observed daily.
- Clinical signs: daily
- Body weight: days 1 and 4 pp and then weekly until day 21 pp - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- - Sacrifice
. Males: after the end of the mating period,
. Females: on day 22 pp,
. Females which had not delivered by day 25 pc: on day 25 pc
. Females which did not mate: 24 days after the end of the mating period.
- Organ weights: Epididymides, kidneys, Liver, Prostate, Seminal vesicles and Testes
- Macroscopic post-mortem examination: on all parent animals. In all females, the number of implantation sites and corpora lutea was recorded.
- Preservation of tissues: ovaries, prostate, seminal vesicles, uterus (horns and cervix), vagina, liver and kidneys, in 10% buffered formalin. Testes and epididymides, in Bouin's fluid
-Microscopic examination: ovaries, testes and epididymides of all males and females in the control and high-dose groups. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- - Sacrifice
. Pups: on day 22 pp, gross external examination before sacrifice - Statistics:
- - Data other than organ weights
Mean values were compared by one-way variance analysis and Dunnett test, (mean values being considered as normally distributed, variances being considered as homogeneous). Percentage values were compared by Fisher exact probability test.
- Organ weights
See attached document
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- All treated female groups had slightly lower body weight gains than the controls during the pre-pairing period but there were no effects during gestation or lactation and no effects on food consumption.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- All treated female groups had slightly lower body weight gains than the controls during the pre-pairing period but there were no effects during gestation or lactation and no effects on food consumption.
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- not examined
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
Details on results (P0)
- Concentration: satisfactory agreement (± 8%) between the nominal and actual concentrations
CLINICAL EXAMINATIONS
- Mortality
. Males: no deaths in any group.
. Females: no deaths in any group.
One female treated at 300 mg/kg/day was sacrificed after the end of the pairing period as no evidence of mating has been observed.
Two mated females, one treated at 300 mg/kg/day and one treated at 1000 mg/kg/day were sacrificed after no delivery.
- Clinical symptoms
No treatment-related clinical signs were observed during the study in males and females.
- Body weight
. Males: no effect related to treatment
. Females: at all dose-levels, they gained slightly less weight (-11%, -26%, -22%) during the pre-pairing period than the controls, although weight gains during gestation and lactation were similar to the controls (see table 1 below).
- Food consumption: no change in food consumption
MATING AND FERTILITY DATA
- Mating index: no treatment-related effect
- Fertility index: no treatment-related effect
- Duration of gestation: no treatment-related effect
- Delivery data: no treatment-related effect
PATHOLOGY
- Organ weights
Minor differences, considered to be of no toxicological significance, were observed in the weights of liver between males given 1000 mg/kg/day and controls and of prostate and testis (see table 2 below).
- Macroscopic post-mortem examination:
No treatment-related effect
- Microscopic examination:
. Testicular Staging: No treatment-related changes were observed.
. Ovaries: No treatment-related changes were observed.
Effect levels (P0)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- parental toxicity
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- mortality
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- reproductive performance (mating and fertility)
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- reproductive performance
Target system / organ toxicity (P0)
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- no effects observed
Details on results (F1)
At 100 mg/kg/day, the number of pups dying between days 1 and 4 post-partum was statistically significantly higher than control values. The dead pups were distributed among six litters although as the number of dead pups in the groups treated at 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day was not significantly increased and as the viability index was still 93% and as there were no more deaths after day 4 post-partum, this was considered not to be related to treatment.
- Clinical signs:
No treatment-related effect
- Pup body weight:
No treatment-related effect
- Sex ratio:
No treatment-related effect
PATHOLOGY
Pup necropsy findings were limited to a highest incidence of pups with dilated renal pelvis in the group treated at 1000 mg/kg/day (see table 3 below). However, this effect was not statistically significant, in the range of the historical values (see table 4 below) and there was no dose-relationship between the groups treated at 100 or 300 mg/kg/d.
Effect levels (F1)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- effects on the progeny
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- mortality
- body weight and weight gain
- gross pathology
Target system / organ toxicity (F1)
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Body weight
The main differences in mean body weight gain (in grams) are summarized as follows:
Sex |
Male |
Female |
||||||
Dose-level (mg/kg/day) |
0 |
100 |
300 |
1000 |
0 |
100 |
300 |
1000 |
Pre-mating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days 1-15 |
+73 |
+75 (+3%) |
+77 (+5%) |
+75 (+3%) |
+27 |
+24 (-11%) |
+20 (-26%) |
+21 (-22%) |
Gestation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days 0-20p.c. |
/ |
/ |
/ |
/ |
+157 |
+154 (-2%) |
+159 (+1%) |
+149 (-5%) |
Lactation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days 1-21p.p. |
/ |
/ |
/ |
/ |
+21 |
+27 (+29%) |
+29 (+38%) |
+25 (+19%) |
/: not recorded,p.c.:post-coitum, p.p:post-partum.
Table 2: Organ weights
The principal differences (expressed in %) noted between test item-treated and control animals for the absolute and relative organ weights are given in the table below:
Sex |
Male |
Female |
||||
Group |
2 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Dose-level (mg/kg/day) |
100 |
300 |
1000 |
100 |
300 |
1000 |
Body weight |
+2 |
+4 |
+2 |
+4 |
+1 |
0 |
- Liver |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. absolute |
+6 |
+5 |
+10* |
+6 |
+4 |
+7 |
. relative |
+3 |
+1 |
+8 |
+3 |
+3 |
+6 |
- Prostate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. absolute |
+4 |
+13 |
+9 |
|
|
|
. relative |
+2 |
+8 |
+7 |
|
|
|
- Testes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. absolute |
-5 |
-10* |
-4 |
|
|
|
. relative |
-7 |
-14* |
-6 |
|
|
|
Statistically significant from controls: *: p<0.05.
The significance concerned the organ weights values and not the percentages.
Table 3: Number of pups or litters presenting dilated renal pelvis
Dose-level (mg/kg) |
0 |
100 |
300 |
1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
# pups evaluated |
94 |
96 |
76 |
88 |
# pups affected (%)(a) |
2 (2,1) |
4 (4,2) |
2 (2,6) |
8 (9,1) |
|
|
|
|
|
# Litters evaluated |
12 |
12 |
10 |
1 |
# Litters affected (%)(a) |
2 (16,7) |
3 (25,0) |
2 (20,0) |
4 (36,4) |
|
|
|
|
|
Except where stated: no statistical significance |
|
|
||
(a) Fisher exact test |
|
|
|
|
Table
4: Historical control values for the distended renal pelvis:
Foetal incidence (%) |
|
Litter incidence (%) |
||||
AVG |
SD |
MAX |
|
AVG |
SD |
MAX |
1,149 |
2,06 |
12,64 |
|
6,966 |
11,3 |
68,18 |
MARTA (1993) Historical Control Data for Development and Reproductive Toxicity Studies using the CrI:CD®BR Rat. Charles River laboratories:
http://www.criver.com/flex_content_area/documents/rm_rm_r_tox_studies_crlc d_br_rat.pdf).
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The oral administration of DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE (DMSO) at 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day to male and female Sprague Dawley rats, was well tolerated at all dose-levels. There were no substance-induced effects on the male and female reproductive performance, nor on the progeny of the parental rats up to 1000 mg/kg/day. The no observed effect level (NOEL) for parental toxicity, reproductive performance (mating and fertility) and for toxic effects on the progeny is considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day.
- Executive summary:
The potential toxic effects of Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) on male and female reproductive performance, such as gonadal function, mating behavior, conception, development of the conceptus and parturition was evaluated in a reproduction/developmental screening study according to the OECD Guideline No. 421 (27th July 1995). Four groups of Sprague Dawley rats (12 males and 12 females) were treated with DMSO at 0, 100, 300, 1000 mg/kg/d as follows: * Males: during 2w before mating, the mating period (2w) and until sacrifice. * Females: during 2w before mating, the mating period (2w), pregnancy (3w), and lactation until day 21 pp inclusive Mortality and clinical signs were checked twice daily. Body weight and food consumption were recorded at regular intervals. Females were paired with males from the same dose-level group until mating occurred. Gestation was monitored. Females were allowed to deliver normally and to rear their progeny until day 21 post-partum. During the lactation period, the pups were examined daily for survival, external abnormalities and clinical signs. At final sacrifice, the pups were examined for gross external abnormalities and then discarded. At final sacrifice of the parent, the testis and epididymides were weighed for the males and a complete macroscopic post-mortem examination was performed for both gender. A microscopic examination was performed on the ovaries, testes and epididymides of females and males, respectively. No death was observed in the parental generation. One female treated at 300 mg/kg/day was sacrificed after the end of the pairing period as no evidence of mating has been observed. No treatment-related clinical signs were observed during the study in males and females. Females of all dose-levels gained slightly less weight (-11%, -26%, -22%) during the pre-pairing period than the controls, although weight gains during gestation and lactation were similar to the controls. No treatment-related effect was observed on mating index, fertility index, duration of gestation and delivery data.
At 100 mg/kg/day, the number of pups dying between days 1 and 4 post-partum was statistically significantly higher than control values. The dead pups were distributed among six litters although as the number of dead pups in the groups treated at 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day was not significantly increased and as the viability index was still 93% and as there were no more deaths after day 4 post-partum, this was considered not to be related to treatment.
Pup necropsy findings were limited to a highest incidence of pups with dilated renal pelvis in the group treated at 1000 mg/kg/day. However, this effect was not statistically significant, in the range of the historical values and there was no dose-relationship between the groups treated at 100 or 300 mg/kg/d.No effects on mating and fertility or on pre-weaning development of the progeny. The NOAEL for parental toxicity was 1000 mg/kg/day, the NOEL for reproductive performance and for toxic effects on the progeny was 1000 mg/kg/day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.