Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 269-057-9 | CAS number: 68186-95-8 An inorganic pigment that is the reaction product of high temperature calcination in which zirconium (IV) oxide, silicon oxide, and vanadium (IV) oxide in varying amounts are homogeneously and ionically interdiffused to form a crystalline matrix of zircon. Its composition may include any one or a combination of the modifiers alkali or alkaline earth halides.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation: not irritating (OECD 404 (1981); GLP compliant)
Eye irritation: not irritating (OECD 405 (1987); GLP compliant)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study reliable without restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 1981-05-12
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- fur clipped at least 15 h before test begin; examination for erythema & oedema at 30 - 60 min. after test patch removal & 24 h, 48 h, 72 h after the beginning of application; modified Draize scoring system; reading skin reaction at 30 - 60 min. missing.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: male: 2.81 kg; females: 2.53 kg and 2.72 kg
- Housing: cage made of stainless steel with wire mesh walk floors, floor area: 40 cm X 51 cm; no bedding in the cages; sawdust in the waste trays; rabbits were housed singly.
- Diet (about 130 g per animal per day): Kliba 341, 4 mm; Firma Klingentalmuehle AG, CH-4303 Kaiseraugst, Switzerland
- Water (about 250 mL per animal per day): tap water
- Acclimation period: at least 8 days before the beginning of the study; same housing conditions as during the study
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS - animals were housed in fully air-conditioned rooms.
- Temperature: 20 - 24 °C
- Relative humidity: 30 - 70 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
No further information on the test animals was stated. - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: clipped
- Vehicle:
- water
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 g of the unchanged test substance
No further information on the amount/concentration applied was stated. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- 30 - 60 minutes after removal of the test patches and 24, 48 and 72 hours after the beginning of the application
- Number of animals:
- 1 male / 2 females
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: at least 15 hours before the beginning of the study the upper third of the back or flanks were clipped. The application area was 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm. The test patch (2.5 cm x 2.5 cm) was covered with a dose of the unchanged test substance and has been moistened with aqua bidest.. Because of the natural moisture of the skin, distilled water was used so that the test has been carried out under as physiological conditions as possible.
- Type of wrap if used: test patches were secured in position with a porous dressing (four layers of absorbent gauze + porous bandage).
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Time after start of exposure: at the end of the exposure period
- Washing: with lutrol and lutrol/water (1:1)
SCORING SYSTEM: according to a modified Draize scale
Evaluation of erythema and oedema:
0 = none
1 = very slight
2 = well-defined
3 = moderate to severe
4 = severe to very severe
OBSERVATIONS:
Shortly before application of the test substance the weight of the rabbits was determined. Symptoms were recorded.
No further information on the study design was stated. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Very slight erythema was observed in one animal at the 4 hour observation.
No erythema or oedema was observed in any animal at the 24, 48 and 72 hour observations. - Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Sicocer F Tuerkis 2504 is not irritating to the skin.
According to the EC-Commission directive 67/548/EEC and its subsequent amendments, the test substance is not classified as skin irritant.
According to the EC-Regulation 1272/2008 and subsequent regulations, the test item is not classified as skin irritant.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study reliable without restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 1987-02-24
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- : scoring according to modified Draize system (different wording); it was not stated, if the eyes were examined within 24 hours before testing started; it was not stated, if the eyelids were held together after application of the test substance.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 2.60 kg - 2.82 kg
- Housing: cage made of stainless steel with wire mesh walk floors; floor area: 40 cm x 51 cm; no bedding in the cages; sawdust in the waste trays; rabbits were housed singly
- Diet (about 130 g per animal per day): Kliba 341, 4 mm; Firma Klingentalmuehle AG, CH-4303 Kaiseraugst, Switzerland
- Water (about 250 mL per animal per day): tap water
- Acclimation period: at least 8 days before the beginning of the study; same housing conditions as during the study
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS - animals were housed in fully air-conditioned rooms.
- Temperature: 20 - 24 °C
- Relative humidity: 30 - 70 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
No further information on the test animals was stated. - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): a single application of 0.1 mL bulk volume (about 138 mg of the comminuted test substance) was applied to the conjunctival sac of the right eyelid. The untreated eye served as control.
No further information on the amount/concentration applied was stated. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- not applicable
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after application
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 females
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: the substance was not washed out.
SCORING SYSTEM: according to a modified Draize scale.
Chemosis and cornea (opacity-degree of density):
0 = none
1 = slight
2 = well-defined
3 = severe
4 = very severe
Conjunctivae redness:
0 = normal
1 = slight
2 = well-defined
3 = severe
Iris:
0 = normal
1 = circum-corneal injection
2 = iritis
Area of cornea involved:
1 = > 0; < 1/4
2 = >= 1/4; < 1/2
3 = >= 1/2; < 3/4
4 = >= 3/4
Discharge:
0 = normal
1 = slightly increased
2 = clearly increased
3 = distinctly increased
OBSERVATIONS:
Weight determination: shortly before application of the test substance.
Symptoms were recorded.
No further information on the study design was stated. - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Slight conjunctivae redness was observed in all animals at the 1 hour observation and in two animals at the 24 hour observation. Well-defined conjunctivae redness was observed in one animal at the 24 hour observation. Conjunctivae redness had fully reversed in all animals at the 48 hour observation.
Slightly increased discharge was only observed in all animals at the 1 hour observation. - Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Sicocer F Tuerkis 2504 is not irritating to the eye.
According to the criteria specified by Directive 67/548/EEC and subsequent regulations, the test item is not classified as eye irritant.
According to the EC Regulation No. 1272/2008 and subsequent regulations, the test item is not classified as eye irritant.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Additional information
Skin irritation
One reliable in vivo study described by Rossbacher (1992)(OECD 404 (1981); GLP compliant) is considered to be reliable without restrictions. The substance was determined to be not irritating to the skin.
Eye irritation
One reliable in vivo study described by Rossbacher (1992) (OECD 405 (1987); GLP compliant) is considered to be reliable without restrictions. The substance was determined to be not irritating to the eyes.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
One reliable in vivo study described by Rossbacher (1992)(OECD 404 (1981); GLP compliant) is considered to be reliable without restrictions. The substance was determined to be not irritating to the skin.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
One reliable in vivo study described by Rossbacher (1992) (OECD 405 (1987); GLP compliant) is considered to be reliable without restrictions. The substance was determined to be not irritating to the eyes.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin irritation
Reference Rossbacher (1992) is considered as the key study for in vivo skin irritation and will be used for classification. The skin irritation was scored according to a modified Draize scale. The mean score (24, 48, 72h after beginning of application) for erythema and oedema was 0 for all animals. The study was terminated after the 72 hour observation. According to regulation (EC) 1272/2008 and subsequent amendments the substance will not be classified as skin irritant.
Eye irritation
Reference Rossbacher (1992) is considered as the key study for in vivo eye irritation and will be used for classification. During the study the test item was applied to one eye of three animals each and the eye irritation was scored according to a modified Draize scale.The corneae and irises were not affected by instillation of the test item. The conjunctivae of all animals were affected by the instillation (mean score (24, 48 and 72 hours): 0.33, 0.67, and 0.33, respectively). The ocular effects were fully reversible within 48 hours. Thus, according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 and subsequent amendments the substance will not be classified as irritating to the eyes.
Respiratory irritation
The classification as respiratory irritant is normally covered under the endpoint specific target organ toxicity- single exposure and repeated exposure. Please refer to the endpoint summaries on acute toxicity (endpoint 7.2) for further information.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.