Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-902-6 | CAS number: 75-79-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to a guideline study; not GLP. There was no indication of toxicity of test substance to bone marrow, so it cannot be confirmed that the test substance reached the target organ, so this study is not key.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 982
- Report date:
- 1982
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Rodent Bone Marrow Cytogenetic Assay as recommended by the Ad Hoc Committee on Chromosome Methodologies in Mutagen Testing (TAP 22: 269-275, 1972) with modifications per the EPA Gene-Tox Program Cytogenetics Committee (12/3 to 12/5, 1980), Washington, D.C.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Trichloro(methyl)silane
- EC Number:
- 200-902-6
- EC Name:
- Trichloro(methyl)silane
- Cas Number:
- 75-79-6
- Molecular formula:
- CH3Cl3Si
- IUPAC Name:
- trichloro(methyl)silane
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Weight/Age at study initiation: 280-440 g (7-12 weeks)
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- Paraffin oil
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 6, 24 or 48 hours
- Frequency of treatment:
- Frequency of treatment: One injection/rat
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
12, 16 and 23 mg/kg
Basis:
other: i.p. injection
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- No. of animals per dose: Cytogenetic study: 5 animals/dose group/time point; only 3 dose groups were used for the chromosomal analysis
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Positive: Cyclophosphamide
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Organs examined at necropsy (macroscopic and microscopic): Bone marrow collected from one femur of each animal
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: Not provided
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields): For the cytogenetic studies, four doses of trichloromethylsilane were used, but only the following three dose groups wee used for cytogenetic analysis: 12, 16, and 23 mg/kg. Animals were sacrificed at 6, 24, or 48 hours after injection. The negative control, paraffin oil, was used in each assay, but the positive control, cyclophosphamide (22 mg/kg) was included only in the 24-hour group. Colchicine was injected 2 to 2.5 hours before sacrifice at a final dose of approximately 1.5 mg/kg. Rats were sacrificed at the scheduled times and bone marrow was aspirated from the femur.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: Approximately four slides were prepared from each animal. Slides were fixed, stained and permanently mounted. Suitable cells were photographed using a 100X objective. Suitable cell spreads were those with both properly condensed and well-spread chromosomes. In general, a minimum of 100 metaphase cells was analyzed per animal, and 5 animals were analyzed for each dose.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: A comparison of the expected and observed distribution values was performed using the Chi2 test as a measure of “goodness of fit”. The Wilcoxon test was used as a non parametric test to compare the distribution of breaks per animal between the negative controls and the highest dose animals. - Statistics:
- Statistical method: A comparison of the expected and observed distribution values was performed using the Chi2 test as a measure of "goodness of fit". The Wilcoxon test was used as a non parametric test to compare the distribution of breaks per animal between the negative controls and the highest dose animals.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- There was no evidence that trichloromethylsilane induced chromosomal damage in rats following IP injection. No complex rearrangements such as quardriradicals, triradicals or ring chromosomes were detected in the test substance dosed animals. A comparison of the frequency of breaks for the trichloromethylsilane dose groups and the negative controls at 3 time points showed no significant differences. Animals injected with the positive control had both a large number of breaks and complex rearrangements.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Appropriate concurrent negative and positive controls were included, and the expected responses were observed. The test substance, trimethylchlorosilane (CAS No. 75-79-6), did not cause an increase in the frequency of chromosomal breaks or aberrations in bone marrow cells of rats. There was no substance related effect on the mitotic index, so it was not demonstrated that the test substance reached the target organ.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.