Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-598-3 | CAS number: 7647-14-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- other: publication
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1988
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The publication contains sufficient information for the interpretation of study results.
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 988
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: mouse lymphoma assay [Clive et al., 1979; Jotz and Mitchell, 1981; Oberly et al., 1984]
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- none
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium chloride
- EC Number:
- 231-598-3
- EC Name:
- Sodium chloride
- Cas Number:
- 7647-14-5
- Molecular formula:
- ClNa
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium chloride
- Reference substance name:
- 231-589-3
- IUPAC Name:
- 231-589-3
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Sodium chloride
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): NaCI
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Method
- Target gene:
- thymidine kinase (tk) locus
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Cells were maintained in culture according to the procedures of Turner et al. [1984].
Cells were maintained in log-phase growth for a 2-day expression period and then cloned with TFT for selection (1 lig/m1) and without TFT for determination of viability in Fischer's medium containing 0.22% Baltimore Biological Laboratory (BBL) agar.
- Properly maintained: no data - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1
0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 mg/ml
Experiment 2
4.75, 4.86, 4.97, 5.08, 5.19, 5.30, 5.49, 5.52, 5.63, 5.74
Experiment 3
4.75, 4.86, 4.97, 5.08, 5.19, 5.30, 5.49, 5.52, 5.63, 5.74, 5.85 - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: water
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- not specified
- Positive control substance:
- not specified
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- not specified in the report
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): After 9-11 days of incubation at 37°C, colonies were counted
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: not specified
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: not specified
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency - Evaluation criteria:
- This assay measures forward mutation at the functionally heterozygous thymidine kinase (tk) locus based on resistance to trifluorothymidine (TFT). We have been investigating factors that may impact test design and also influence the interpretation of test results. Factors that effect the magnitude of the quantitated mutant frequency include expression time [Moore and Clive, 1982] and both the growth medium [Moore and Howard, 1982] and the agar used in the cloning medium [Meyer et al., 1986].
- Statistics:
- no data
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: no data
- Effects of osmolality:
- Evaporation from medium: no data
- Water solubility: yes
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: no data
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: no data
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: In the first experiment, there was insufficient cytotoxicity to reach a 10-20% survival range, and the mutant frequency (and number of mutants) showed only a very small dose-related increase. It was judged a "no test"—that is, there was insufficient information to make a decision. The second and third* experiments included slightly higher concentrations. Both experiments showed a dose-related increase in both mutant frequency and mutant number. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
In the first experiment, there was insufficient cytotoxicity to reach a 10-20% survival range, andthe mutant frequency (and number of mutants) showed only a very small dose-relatedincrease. It was judged a "no test"—that is, there was insufficient information to make a decision. The second and third experiments included slightly higher concentrations. Both experiments showed a dose-related increase in both mutant frequency and mutant number.
Colony sizing was performed for selected doses.
Colony sizing for weakresponses is some what difficult to interpret. The majority of induced mutant colonieswere small colonies (data not shown), which is consistent with the report by Gallowayet al. [1987] and Ashby and Ishidate [1986] that high-salt concentrations induce chromosome aberrations.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
other: Cells were maintained in culture according to the procedures of Turner et al.[1984]. L5178Y/TICH--3.7.2C cells were treated with sodium chloride for 4 hr inthe absence of exogenous metabolic activation according to procedures described by Turner et al., 1
This experiment with sodium chloride demonstrates the importance of carefully evaluating weak mutagenic responses observed with high concentrations of test compounds. The positive mutagenicity probably is due not to a direct interaction with DNA but to some indirect mechanism resulting from the extremely nonphysiological condition of the test. - Executive summary:
High Concentrations of Sodium Chloride was evaluated for a "Positive" Response at the TK Locus of L5178Y/TK+/- Mouse Lymphoma Cells.
Cells were maintained in culture according to the procedures of Turner et al.[1984]. L5178Y/TICH--3.7.2C cells were treated with sodium chloride for 4 hr inthe absence of exogenous metabolic activation according to procedures described byTurner et al., 1984. Cells were maintained in log-phase growth for a2-day expression period and then cloned with TFT for selection (1 lig/m1) and without TFT for determination of viability in Fischer's medium containing 0.22% BaltimoreBiological Laboratory (BBL)agar. After 9-11 days of incubation at 37°C, colonie swere counted.
Test results generated for the mouse lymphoma assay, the magnitude of the induced mutant frequency is relatively low,and the concentration of test agent required to obtain the response is enormous.
This experiment with sodium chloride demonstrates the importance of carefully evaluating weak mutagenic responses observed with high concentrations of test compounds. The positive mutagenicity probably is due not to a direct interaction with DNA but to some indirect mechanism resulting from the extremely nonphysiological condition of the test.the colony-size distribution determined by an Artek model 880automatic colony counter modified with a 10-turn potentiometer [Moore et al., 1985].
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.