Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 216-699-2 | CAS number: 1643-19-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Data is from peer reviewed journal
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from peer reviewed journal
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Refer below principle
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Standard Method:-
Tests were conducted in 15-ml Petri dishes over 96 h. In petri dish approximately two fronds of L. minor (a single colony) with roots cut to less than 1 mm was added . Then the root length was measured and the number of new fronds were counted at the end of the experiment.For each Petri dish,
the combined root length was divided by the number of fronds to calculate the mean root length per frond, which were used as metric of root growth.Root growth was normalized to frond number since roots must grow from fronds and because preliminary tests showed that this parameter was
sensitive to concentrations of chemicals below the concentration that would cause effects on frond number. The cultures were maintained and tests was conducted in continuous light from four 122- cm, wide-spectrum General Electric (Cleveland, OH, USA) plant and aquarium bulbs suspended 20 cm above the fronds. - GLP compliance:
- no
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Test organisms (species):
- Lemna minor
- Details on test organisms:
- Lemna minor strain number 492 from the University of Toronto Culture Collection (derived from Landolt 7730). Prior to tests, cultures were maintained for one month in growth medium. No sexual reproduction was observed in the cultures.
- Test type:
- not specified
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Details on test conditions:
- fronds with roots cut to <1 mm placed in Petri dish; exposed to title comp. under continuous lighting for 96 h;
- Reference substance (positive control):
- not specified
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 51.4 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (not specified)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- frond number
- Remarks on result:
- other: Range of EC50- 35.62–91.62 mg/L
- Details on results:
- Frond growth is the number of new fronds produced per replicate during the test.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- After the exposure of test chemical for 96 hrs, EC50 was observed to be at 51.4 mg/l. Hence, it is said to have low toxicity for aquatic plants in aquatic chronic category 3.
- Executive summary:
Tests were conducted in 15-ml Petri dishes over 96 h. In petri dish approximately two fronds of L. minor (a single colony) with roots cut to less than 1 mm was added . Then the root length was measured and the number of new fronds were counted at the end of the experiment.For each Petri dish, the combined root length was divided by the number of fronds to calculate the mean root length per frond, which were used as metric of root growth.Root growth was normalized to frond number since roots must grow from fronds and because preliminary tests showed that this parameter was sensitive to concentrations of chemicals below the concentration that would cause effects on frond number. The cultures were maintained and tests was conducted in continuous light from four 122- cm, wide-spectrum General Electric plant and aquarium bulbs suspended 20 cm above the fronds. Lemna minor strain number 492 from the University of Toronto Culture Collection. Prior to tests, cultures were maintained for one month in growth medium. No sexual reproduction was observed in the cultures. The concentration (and 95% confidence interval) at which a 50% reduction in growth (the EC50) occurred was calculated for both frond growth (measured as number of new fronds) and root length per frond using the sigmoidal dose–response (variable slope) equation in the ligand-binding response macro for Sigmaplot 7.0. After the exposure of test chemical for 96 hrs, EC50 was observed to be at 51.4 mg/l. Hence, it is said to have low toxicity for aquatic plants in aquatic chronic category 3.
Reference
Description of key information
Tests were conducted in 15-ml Petri dishes over 96 h. In petri dish approximately two fronds of L. minor (a single colony) with roots cut to less than 1 mm was added . Then the root length was measured and the number of new fronds were counted at the end of the experiment. For each Petri dish, the combined root length was divided by the number of fronds to calculate the mean root length per frond, which were used as metric of root growth. Root growth was normalized to frond number since roots must grow from fronds and because preliminary tests showed that this parameter was sensitive to concentrations of chemicals below the concentration that would cause effects on frond number. The cultures were maintained and tests was conducted in continuous light from four 122- cm, wide-spectrum General Electric plant and aquarium bulbs suspended 20 cm above the fronds. Lemna minor strain number 492 from the University of Toronto Culture Collection. Prior to tests, cultures were maintained for one month in growth medium. No sexual reproduction was observed in the cultures. The concentration (and 95% confidence interval) at which a 50% reduction in growth (the EC50) occurred was calculated for both frond growth (measured as number of new fronds) and root length per frond using the sigmoidal dose–response (variable slope) equation in the ligand-binding response macro for Sigmaplot 7.0. After the exposure of test chemical for 96 hrs, EC50 was observed to be at 51.4 mg/l. Hence, it is said to have low toxicity for aquatic plants in aquatic chronic category 3.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater plants:
- 51.4 mg/L
Additional information
Based on the various experimental data for the target chemical study have been reviewed to determine the nature of test chemical on the growth of aquatic plants. The studies are as mentioned below:
In the first experimental study from peer reviewed journal toxicity were measured. Tests were conducted in 15-ml Petri dishes over 96 h. In petri dish approximately two fronds of L. minor (a single colony) with roots cut to less than 1 mm was added. Then the root length was measured and the number of new fronds were counted at the end of the experiment. For each Petri dish, the combined root length was divided by the number of fronds to calculate the mean root length per frond, which were used as metric of root growth. Root growth was normalized to frond number since roots must grow from fronds and because preliminary tests showed that this parameter was sensitive to concentrations of chemicals below the concentration that would cause effects on frond number. The cultures were maintained and tests was conducted in continuous light from four 122- cm, wide-spectrum General Electric plant and aquarium bulbs suspended 20 cm above the fronds. Lemna minor strain number 492 from the University of Toronto Culture Collection. Prior to tests, cultures were maintained for one month in growth medium. No sexual reproduction was observed in the cultures. The concentration (and 95% confidence interval) at which a 50% reduction in growth (the EC50) occurred was calculated for both frond growth (measured as number of new fronds) and root length per frond using the sigmoidal dose–response (variable slope) equation in the ligand-binding response macro for Sigmaplot 7.0. After the exposure of test chemical for 96 hrs, EC50 was observed to be at 51.4 mg/l. Hence, it is said to have low toxicity for aquatic plants in aquatic chronic category 3.
Above study was supported by the second study from peer reviewed journal 2008. Toxicity value of test cheimical in terms of root length per frond to Lemna minor is EC50: 32.66 mg/L. Hence, the substance is said to have low toxicity to aquatic plants in aquatic chronic category 3.
Thus based on the above studies, chemical consider to be toxic and classified as aquatic chronic 3 as per the CLP classification criteria.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.