Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-411-0 | CAS number: 140-31-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Not applicable
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: 1a: GLP guideline study
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Evaluation of the genotoxic potential of alkyleneamines.
- Author:
- Leung, H.W.
- Year:
- 1 994
- Bibliographic source:
- Mutation Research 320:31-43.
- Report date:
- 1994
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 987
- Report date:
- 1987
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- No information
- Author:
- Slesinski, R.S., et al.
- Year:
- 1 984
- Bibliographic source:
- The Toxicologist 4:35
- Report date:
- 1984
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Followed EPA report 560/6-83-001
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Union Carbide Bushy Run Research Center, R.D. 4, Mellon road, Export, Pennsylvania 15632 USA
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-piperazin-1-ylethylamine
- EC Number:
- 205-411-0
- EC Name:
- 2-piperazin-1-ylethylamine
- Cas Number:
- 140-31-8
- Molecular formula:
- C6H15N3
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-piperazin-1-ylethanamine
- Details on test material:
- Purity of the test material was not reported. Solutions of the test material were pH adjusted prior to dosing animals.
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- Swiss Webster
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Five-week old, Swiss-Webster mice were used for all preliminary and definitive tests and were obtained from Charles Rivers Laboratories, Portage,
MI. Swiss-Webster mice were used because of this laboratory's toxicological experience with this strain. For preliminary range-finding tests to determine approximate toxicity, 30 male mice were obtained on February 3, 1987. For the toxicity tests, performed to select test concentrations for the definitive micronucleus determination, 64 male and 64 female mice were obtained on March 3, 1987. For the definitive micronucleus test, 44 male and 43 female mice were obtained on March 17, 1987. Following the protocol, only the animals used for the definitive micronucleus test were randomized by weight and animals outside a range of two standard deviations from the mean were not used. Upon arrival, animals were examined for general health status and were identified with unique BRRC animal numbers using monel ear tags. An acclimation period of 5 to 6 days prior to dosing was used for all studies. All animals used for these tests appeared healthy. For the definitive tests, animals were weighed and randomized on the day prior to dosing.
Five mice/sex/cage were housed in shoe-box type plastic cages, measuring 30 x 20 x 12.5 cm. Each cage was labeled with animal I.D. numbers, sex and treatment doses. Ab-Sorb-DriQD bedding (Garfield, HJ) was placed in the cages and changed weekly. Mice were fed ad libitum with a basic diet of Agway PROLAB@ Animal Diet (Rat/Mouse/Harnster 3000), Agway Inc., Syracuse, NY. Water was supplied by the Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County (Greensburg, PA) and was available libitum. Feed and water analyses are kept on file at the BRRC. The animal room temperature and humidity was contrblled and room lights were automatically timed for a 12-hr light/dark cycle. Room temperature and relative humidity yere monitored continuously by a Cole Parmer monitoring apparatus.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- Water
- Details on exposure:
- The definitive toxicity study was conducted using 5 males and 5 females per dosage group. Animals were dosed with the test and control materials by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection. I.P. injection is a typical route of dosing for this test system, and it was used because this route achieves accurate and rapid delivery of the test chemical. Toxicity was assessed by determining the incidence of deaths produced by dosages of AEP ranging from 434 to 900 mg/kg which was identified as an appropriate range in preliminary testing. The pooled LD50 value (700 mg/kg) for male and female Swiss-Webster mice was used to set dosages for the definitive micronucleus test because of the similarity of the respective male and female LD50s.
The PCE/NCE ratio was determined for the vehicle control animals and for the highest dose group in which at least 3 animals survived for 48 hr. Determination of the PCE/NCE ratio for only these groups of animals with partial mortality was performed to evaluate the possibility of bone marrow cytotoxicity from the test chemical.
The definitive micronucleus test employed a minimum of 5 male and 5 female mice/treatment group. Three additional animals were added to the highest dosage group because toxicity was expected to decrease survival. Animals were randomized separately by sex into various treatment and control groups using a computer generated randomization system. Mice with weights different from the group mean by over two standard deviations were not used for the study and were discarded. The body weights of the male mice dosed in the definitive study ranged from 24.5 g to 27.5 g and body weights of the female mice ranged from 20.2 g to 23.7 g.
Three dose levels of approximately 80%, 50% and 25% of the pooled LD50 value were evaluated for effects upon the incidence of micronuclei. Blood
samples were taken at 3 time periods at approximately 30, 48 and 72 hr after dosing. These sampling times have provided the maximum sensitivity
for detecting clastogenic effects for the peripheral blood micronucleus method . - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Mice are dosed once ip and observed for up to 72 hours.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once
- Post exposure period:
- Animals were housed for
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
175, 350 or 560 mg/kg
Basis:
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Triethylenemelamine
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Micronuclei in peripheral, polychromatic erythrocytes were examined
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- One or two blood smear slides were prepared for each animal per sampling time. Micronuclei in peripheral, polychromatic erythrocytes were stained with Gurr's R-66 Giemsa diluted in phosphate buffer. Slides were coded by animal number only and read blindly to prevent bias. A minimum of 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes was examined microscopically for each animal per sample time, unless cytotoxicity of the test material prevented this goal. The po1ychromatic:normochromatic erythrocyte ratio for approximately 1000 total cells was calculated and recorded and these data are summarized in the final report as an estimate of cytotoxicity of the test agent. Micronuclei were identified as darkly-stained, spherical, inclusions in polychromatic erythrocytes. Polychromatic erythrocytes were identified by the pale-bluish staining of the cytoplasm in contrast to the lack of blue stain for normochromatic erythrocytes.
- Evaluation criteria:
- See statistic section
- Statistics:
- Data were compared for significant differences from the vehicle control frequencies using the Fisher's Exact Test (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981). Data for
males and females sampled at 48 hr and 72 hr were combined for analyses because statistical tests showed that there was no significant difference in micronuclei frequencies between sexes. However, micronucleus frequencies from PCEs sampled 30 hr after treatment were analyzed separately by sex since AOV testing showed that there was a sex-related difference between the responses for male and female mice at this sample time. A positive result in the micronucleus test was concluded if at least one statistically significant (p I 0.01) increase above the vehicle control was observed with an indication of a dose-related effect (Linear Regression Analysis) of treatment. A test was considered to be inconclusive if only one dose produced effects statistically different from the control and a dose-effect relationship was apparent. A test result was considered to be negative if no statistically significant differences were apparent between the vehicle control and groups of animals treated with AEP.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
Probe study:
The LD50 dose for both sexes combined was approximately 700 mg/kg (634
to 777: 95%
fiducial limits).
Definitive micronucleus study: did
not produce positive increases in the incidence of micronuclei in
peripheral blood polychromatic erythrocytes of the test animals sampled
at either the 48 or 72 hour sample periods. One
dose level (350 mg/kg), sampled 30 hours after injection, produced a
single statistically significant increase in numbers of micronuclei in
the female mice. Since
there was no evidence of a statistically significant dose-related
increase in numbers of micronuclei at this sample period, this test was
considered to be inconclusive for determining the clastogenic activity
under the criteria for evaluating results from this test system at BRRC. However,
since the incidence of micronuclei was within the range of variability
typically observed at BRRC, the single increase observed in this test is
not likely to be of biological significance. Data
from the positive and negative control groups of animals demonstrated
the appropriate responses for the animals in the test system consistent
with a valid test.
Table
1
Micronucleus
Test: Summary
of Frequencies
mg/kg | Sex | # PCE observed | % PCE with Micronucleus |
30 hr sample | |||
0 -water | M | 5000 | 0.42 |
F | 5000 | 0.14 | |
175 | M | 5000 | 0.30 |
F | 5000 | 0.20 | |
350 | M | 5000 | 0.50 |
F | 5000 | 0.40* | |
560 | M | 5000 | 0.28 |
F | 5000 | 0.18 | |
0.3 mg/kg TEM | M | 5000 | 2.40 |
F | 5000 | 1.70 | |
48 -hour sample | |||
0 -water | C | 10,000 | 0.21 |
175 | C | 10,000 | 0.33 |
350 | C | 10,000 | 0.24 |
560 | C | 10,000 | 0.13 |
72 -hour sample | |||
0 -water | C | 10,000 | 0.18 |
175 | C | 10,000 | 0.30 |
350 | C | 10,000 | 0.18 |
560 | C | 10,000 | 0.22 |
C
- Combined sexes
aSignnificantly different from control, p<0.01.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- N-Aminoethylpiperazine (AEP) was evaluated for potential clastogenic (chromosome-damaging) activity with the in vivo micronucleus test system employing both male and female Swiss-Webster mice. In this study, no clastogenic effect was observed in the highest dose examined.
- Executive summary:
N-Aminoethylpiperazine (AEP) was evaluated for potential clastogenic (chromosome-damaging) activity with the in vivo micronucleus test system employing both male and female Swiss-Webster mice. Test doses for the micronucleus test were chosen from data obtained in a preliminary toxicity study with mice. Five doses of AEP ranging from 434 mg/kg to 900 mg/kg were administered as a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection. The LD50 dose was calculated from the cumulative mortality observed during a three day period after dosing. To select dose levels for the definitive micronucleus test, a combined LD50 value of approximately 700 mg/kg (634 to 777 mg/kg; 95% fiducial limits) was calculated by pooling the total number of deaths for males and females.
For the definitive micronucleus test, doses of 175 mg/kg, 350 mg/kg and 560 mg/kg were tested with both male and female Swiss-Webster mice. Concurrent positive (triethylenemelamine) and negative (water) control agents, administered by i.p. injection, were used to demonstrate the reliability and sensitivity of the micronucleus test system. Results from the micronucleus determination demonstrated that AEP did not produce positive increases in the incidence of micronuclei in peripheral blood polychromatic erythrocytes of the test animals sampled at either the 48 or 72 hour sample periods. One dose level (350 mg/kg), sampled at the 30 hours interval after injection, produced a single statistically significant increase in numbers of micronuclei in the female mice. Since there was no evidence of a statistically significant, dose-related increase in numbers of micronuclei at this sample period, this test was considered to be inconclusive for determining the clastogenic activity of AEP under the criteria for evaluating results from this test system at BRRC. However, since the incidence of micronuclei was within the range of variability typically observed at BRRC, the single increase observed in this test is not likely to be of biological significance. Data from the positive and negative control groups of animals demonstrated the appropriate responses for the animals in the test system consistent with a valid test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.