Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-578-6 | CAS number: 64-17-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian germ cell study: cytogenicity / chromosome aberration
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1982
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: This is a highly reliable study that reports the result of an interlaboratory study to the OECD protocol.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Analysis of results from a collaborative study of the dominant lethal assay.
- Author:
- James, D.A. & Smith, D.M.
- Year:
- 1 982
- Bibliographic source:
- Mutation Res. 97:303-314.
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 478 (Genetic Toxicology: Rodent Dominant Lethal Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method: other
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- rodent dominant lethal assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Ethanol
- EC Number:
- 200-578-6
- EC Name:
- Ethanol
- Cas Number:
- 64-17-5
- Molecular formula:
- C2H6O
- IUPAC Name:
- ethanol
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): no data
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: CFLP and Alderley Park
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 10 days at dosing, 10-12 weeks at mating
- Source: variable across test laboratories
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- Water
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: 40% in water
Gavage volume 2mls/kg - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Mice dosed with ethanol in distilled water on 5 consecutive days.
- Frequency of treatment:
- once per day
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
10 or 40% ethanol in water
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 15 per group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide 80mg/kg/day (MTD) and 20mg/kg/day (MTDx0.25) by gavage 5 consecutive daily doses
Examinations
- Statistics:
- Three different methods used for analysis:
Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric analysis of variance
An analogue of analysis of variance based on comparison by F-test of chi-square values from between and within study groups
A comparison of beta-binomial distributions by likelihood ratio test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- ambiguous
- Toxicity:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
No effect on pregnancy rate. Occasional positive results with regard to preimplantation loss during weeks 7 and 8 (reduction in the number of implants/male). It was suggested that in most cases this was due to a lower number of implants in the corresponding control groups. There were also occasional increases in the number of postimplantation deaths/male although the majority of the post implantation results were not significant.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Ethanol is unlikely to be a dominant lethal mutagen, at least up to the maximum tolerated dose.
- Executive summary:
In a collaborative a cross laboratory study of the dominant lethal assay conducted by the British Pharmaceutical Industry, three laboratories conducted studies using the same guideline protocol. Male mice received 0.16g/kg/day (MTD) or 0.63g/kg/day (MTD x0.25) by gavage for 5 consecutive days. After completion of the schedule the animals were paired with untreated virgin females, each week, for 8 consecutive weeks. All females were killed and examined 18 days after first being paired with males. Although there were occasional increases in the number of postimplantation deaths per male, the majority of post implantation results were not significant and it confirmed that ethanol is unlikely to produce a dominant lethal effect up to the maximum tolerated dose. On the other hand, administration of cyclophosphamide, a known dominant lethal mutagen, consistently produced a significant increase in post-implantation death in the first two weeks of mating. The authors of the study concluded that ethanol is unlikely to produce a dominant lethal effect up to the maximum tolerated dose.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.