Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 257-196-8 | CAS number: 51422-54-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
The test substance is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium/Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay. Under the experimental conditions described, the test item is considered not to have a chromosome-damaging (clastogenic) effect nor to induce numerical chromosomal aberrations (aneugenic activity) under in vitro conditions in V79 cells in the absence and the presence of metabolic activation. The test item showed no biologically relevant increase of mutants in the in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test after treatment with the test item (with and without metabolic activation).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2013-08-29 to 2013-09-20
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP and guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Version / remarks:
- 1998
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor-induced rat liver S-9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 5 mg/plate or 5 μL/plate were generally selected as maximum test dose.
1st experiment: 0; 33; 100; 333; 1 000; 2 500 and 5 000 μg/plate
2nd experiment: 0; 33; 100; 333; 1 000; 2 500 and 5 000 μg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation: 2-aminoanthracene; without metabolic activation: N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, 4-nitro-o-phenylendiamine, 9-aminoacridine and 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Standard Plate Test and Preincubation Test both with and without metabolic activation
METHOD OF APPLICATION: Standard plate test based on the method of Ames et al. + Preincubation test based on the method described by Yahagi et al. and Matsushima et al.
Conditions
- Preincubation period: 20 minutes using a shaker
- Exposure duration: 48 - 72 hours
- Temperatur: Incubation at 37 °C
Titer determination
- The titer was determined only in the experimental parts with S9 mix both for the negative controls (vehicle only) and for the two highest doses in all experiments.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
Toxicity detected by a
- decrease in the number of revertants
- clearing or diminution of the background lawn (= reduced his- or trp- background growth)
- reduction in the titer was recorded for all test groups both with and without S9 mix in all experiments and indicated
in the tables. - Evaluation criteria:
- The test chemical is considered positive in this assay if the following criteria are met:
- A dose-related and reproducible increase in the number of revertant colonies, i.e. about doubling of the spontaneous mutation rate in at least one tester strain either without S-9 mix or after adding a metabolizing system. A test substance is generally considered nonmutagenic in this test if:
- The number of revertants for all tester strains were within the historical negative control range under all experimental conditions in two experiments carried out independently of each other. - Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Reference
Standard plate test |
Preincubation test |
||||||||||
TA1535 |
TA1535 |
|
|||||||||
Dose (µg) |
Without S9 Mix |
With S9 Mix |
Dose (µg) |
Without S9 Mix |
With S9 Mix |
|
|||||
DMSO |
11 |
11 |
DMSO |
11 |
11 |
|
|||||
33 |
13 |
12 |
33 |
10 |
11 |
|
|||||
100 |
11 |
11 |
100 |
11 |
13 |
|
|||||
333 |
12 |
11 |
333 |
10 |
12 |
|
|||||
1000 |
12 |
11 |
1000 |
12 |
9 |
|
|||||
2500 |
11 |
10 |
2500 |
11 |
10 |
|
|||||
5000 |
12 |
11 |
5000 |
10 |
11 |
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||
MNNG |
1130 |
MNNG |
1198 |
|
|||||||
2-AA |
362 |
2-AA |
453 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
TA100 |
TA100 |
|
|||||||||
Dose (µg) |
Without S9 Mix |
With S9 Mix |
Dose (µg) |
Without S9 Mix |
With S9 Mix |
|
|||||
DMSO |
48 |
55 |
DMSO |
59 |
63 |
|
|||||
33 |
48 |
52 |
33 |
59 |
67 |
|
|||||
100 |
49 |
47 |
100 |
56 |
65 |
|
|||||
333 |
51 |
52 |
333 |
58 |
64 |
|
|||||
1000 |
50 |
50 |
1000 |
59 |
63 |
|
|||||
2500 |
52 |
48 |
2500 |
61 |
64 |
|
|||||
5000 |
50 |
50 |
5000 |
59 |
62 |
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||
MNNG |
1201 |
MNNG |
1477 |
|
|||||||
2-AA |
1339 |
2-AA |
1606 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
TA1537 |
TA1537 |
|
|||||||||
Dose (µg) |
Without S9 Mix |
With S9 Mix |
Dose (µg) |
Without S9 Mix |
With S9 Mix |
|
|||||
DMSO |
5 |
7 |
DMSO |
6 |
7 |
|
|||||
33 |
6 |
6 |
33 |
6 |
7 |
|
|||||
100 |
7 |
7 |
100 |
6 |
7 |
|
|||||
333 |
6 |
5 |
333 |
6 |
6 |
|
|||||
1000 |
6 |
6 |
1000 |
6 |
7 |
|
|||||
2500 |
6 |
7 |
2500 |
6 |
6 |
|
|||||
5000 |
5 |
8 |
5000 |
7 |
7 |
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||
AAC |
559 |
AAC |
547 |
|
|||||||
2-AA |
234 |
2-AA |
229 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
TA98 |
TA98 |
|
|||||||||
Dose (µg) |
Without S9 Mix |
With S9 Mix |
Dose (µg) |
Without S9 Mix |
With S9 Mix |
|
|||||
DMSO |
18 |
22 |
DMSO |
16 |
18 |
|
|||||
33 |
20 |
24 |
33 |
16 |
19 |
|
|||||
100 |
17 |
24 |
100 |
14 |
17 |
|
|||||
333 |
19 |
27 |
333 |
15 |
19 |
|
|||||
1000 |
16 |
28 |
1000 |
16 |
17 |
|
|||||
2500 |
15 |
21 |
2500 |
15 |
19 |
|
|||||
5000 |
20 |
22 |
5000 |
15 |
17 |
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||
NOPD |
510 |
NOPD |
864 |
|
|||||||
2-AA |
1239 |
2-AA |
1153 |
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
E.coli |
E.coli |
|
|||||||||
Dose (µg) |
Without S9 Mix |
With S9 Mix |
Dose (µg) |
Without S9 Mix |
With S9 Mix |
|
|||||
DMSO |
74 |
63 |
DMSO |
34 |
32 |
|
|||||
33 |
66 |
65 |
33 |
34 |
29 |
|
|||||
100 |
65 |
66 |
100 |
35 |
32 |
|
|||||
333 |
64 |
70 |
333 |
34 |
33 |
|
|||||
1000 |
80 |
68 |
1000 |
34 |
31 |
|
|||||
2500 |
65 |
67 |
2500 |
36 |
30 |
|
|||||
5000 |
69 |
66 |
5000 |
35 |
29 |
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||
4-NQO |
824 |
4-NQO |
1278 |
|
|||||||
2-AA |
554 |
2-AA |
434 |
|
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Additional information from genetic toxicity in vitro:
Ames-Test
The test substance was tested for its mutagenic potential based on the ability to induce point mutations in selected loci of several bacterial strains, i.e. Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli, in a reverse mutation assay according to OECD guideline 471, EU method B.13/14 and EPA OPPTS 870.5100. The dose range tested was 33 µg/plate - 5000 µg/plate (Standard plate test and preincubation test) with and without metabolic activation. A biologically relevant increase in the number of his+ or trp+ revertants was not observed in the standard plate test or in the preincubation test either without S9 mix or after the addition of a metabolizing system. Thus, under the experimental conditions of this study, the test substance is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium/Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay in the absence and the presence of metabolic activation.
In vitro Micronucleus Test
The substance was assessed for its potential to induce micronuclei in V79 cells in vitro (clastogenic or aneugenic activity). Two independent experiments were carried out, both with and without the addition of liver S9 mix from induced rats (exogenous metabolic activation). According to an initial range-finding cytotoxicity test for the determination of the experimental doses, the following concentrations were tested. The test groups printed in bold type were evaluated.
1st Experiment
4 hours exposure; 24 hours harvest time; without S9 mix:
0; 187.50; 375.00; 750.00; 1500.00 μg/mL
4 hours exposure, 24 hours harvest time, with S9 mix:
0; 187.50; 375.00; 750.00; 1500.00 μg/mL
2nd Experiment
24 hours exposure, 24 hours harvest time, without S9 mix
0; 187.50; 375.00; 750.00; 1500.00 μg/mL
4 hours exposure, 44 hours harvest time, with S9 mix
0; 187.50; 375.00; 750.00; 1500.00 μg/mL
A sample of at least 1000 cells for each culture were analyzed for micronuclei, i.e. 2000 cells for each test group. The negative controls gave frequencies of micronucleated cells within our historical negative control data range for V79 cells. Both positive control substances, EMS and cyclophosphamide, led to the expected increase in the number of cells containing micronuclei. In this study, no clear cytotoxicity indicated by reduced cell counts or proliferation index (CBPI) was observed up to the highest required test substance concentration. On the basis of the results of the present study, the test substance did not cause any biologically relevant increase in the number of cells containing micronuclei either without S9 mix or after adding a metabolizing system. Thus, under the experimental conditions described, the test item is considered not to have a chromosome-damaging (clastogenic) effect nor to induce numerical chromosomal aberrations (aneugenic activity) under in vitro conditions in V79 cells in the absence and the presence of metabolic activation.
In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test (HPRT Locus)
The test item was assessed for its potential to induce mutations at the HPRT locus using V79 cells of the Chinese Hamster. The selection of the concentrations was based on data from the pre-experiment. Experiment I and II with and without metabolic activation were performed as a 4 h short-term exposure assay. The test item was investigated in duplicate cultures at the following concentrations:
Experiment I
with and without metabolic activation:
0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0 mM (1460 μg/mL)
Experiment II
with and without metabolic activation:
0.75, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0 mM (1460 μg/mL)
No precipitation of the test item was noted in the experiments. Biologically relevant growth inhibition (reduction of relative growth below 70%) was observed in experiment I and II without metabolic activation. In experiment I without metabolic activation the relative growth was 44. 1 % ( culture A) and 47.1% (culture B) for the highest concentration (10.0 mM) evaluated. The highest biologically relevant concentration evaluated with metabolic activation was 10.0 mM with a relative growth of 87.0% (culture A) and 80.9% (culture B). In experiment II without metabolic activation the relative growth was 69.9% (culture A) and 64.3% ( culture B) for the highest concentration (10.0 mM) evaluated. The highest concentration evaluated with metabolic activation was 10.0 mM with a relative growth of72.2% (culture A) and 70.1% (culture B). In both experiments no biologically relevant increase of mutants was found after treatment with the test item (with and without metabolic activation). No dose-response relationship was observed. DMBA and EMS were used as positive controls and showed distinct and biologically relevant effects in mutation frequency.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008:
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. As a result the substance is not considered to be classified under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as amended for the sixth time in Regulation No 605/2014.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.