Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-003-2 | CAS number: 130-95-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
The read across substance quinine sulphate is not carcinogenic in this test system.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Carcinogenicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Carcinogenicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Carcinogenicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- carcinogenicity
- Remarks:
- other: injected intravaginally
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study is not done according to OECD guideline, but it is a well documented study.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Each mouse was injected intravaginally twice a week with 0.1 ml of the test substance dissolved or suspended in gum tragacanth. Injection was made by Luer-type tuberculin syringe to the end of which was attached a record-needle adaptor. A single, initially sterile, syringe and adaptor was used for each treatment group on each occasion that treatment was given. Mice were examined post mortem between 14th & 20th month of the experiment.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- Balb/c
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS- Age at study initiation: 5-6 week old - Housing: They were housed 5 to a cage in zinc boxes- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): fed Diet 41 B- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Route of administration:
- other: injected intravaginally
- Vehicle:
- other: gum tragacanth
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Number of injections: 80 (twice a week)
- Frequency of treatment:
- twice a week with 0.1 ml of the test substance dissolved in gum tragacanth (80 injections)
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:0.1 ml of 0.3 % Quinine sulphate solutionBasis:nominal conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 20 animals for quinine sulphate 0.3%, 30 animals for vehicle control, 30 animals for untreated control and 20 animals for positive control (7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene)
- Control animals:
- yes
- Positive control:
- 20 animals for positive control with 0.3% 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA)
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- Post mortem examination for tumour
- Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes (see table) HISTOPATHOLOGY: No
- Clinical signs:
- not examined
- Mortality:
- not examined
- Body weight and weight changes:
- not examined
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- see table
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Details on results:
- Neoplasms and Hyperplastic Lesions of Corpus Uteri, Cervix Uteri, Vagina and Perineal Skin:75% of the mice in the positive control group (treatment with DMBA) developed malignant tumours of the vagina and/or perineal skin. No mice developed genital tract tumours after intravaginal injection of quinine sulphate or gum tragacanth. Quinine sulphate is not carcinogenic.Incidence of tumours at other sites:In the post mortem examination between 14th & 20th month of the experiment 6 of 19 animals developed lung adenoma or adenocarcinoma and 2 of the 19 animals developed malignant lymphoma or reticulin cell sarcoma after treatment with quinine sulphate. However, 9 of 20 animals in the untreated control group developed lung adenoma or adenocarcinoma and 3 of the 20 animals developed malignant lymphoma or reticulin cell sarcoma. 6 of 24 animals in the gum tragacanth group developed lung adenoma or adenocarcinoma and 2 of the 24 animals developed malignant lymphoma or reticulin cell sarcoma.
- Relevance of carcinogenic effects / potential:
- No neoplasms and hyperplastic lesions of Corpus Uteri, Cervix Uteri, Vagina and Perineal Skin in mouse arose in response to quinine sulphate.
- Conclusions:
- The read across substance quinine sulphate is not carcinogenic in this test system.
- Executive summary:
In the publication of Boyland et al., 1966 the carcinogenicity of the read across substance quinine sulphate is shown. The experiment was started with 20 female mice 5-6 week old. Each mouse was injected intravaginally twice a week with 0.3 % quinine sulphate. During the monitoring up to 20 month or till the mice died none of the animals developed tumour at the site of the injection. In this study quinine sulphate did not show carcinogenic activity. We conclude that quinine is not carcinogenic.
Reference
Neoplasms and Hyperplastic Lesions of Corpus Uteri, Cervix Uteri, Vagina and Perineal Skin
Deaths with and without hyperplastic or neoplastic genital lesion* Time of death (months) | |||||||||||
Test substance | 0-4 | 4-6 | 6-8 | 8-10 | 10-12 | 12-14 | 14-16 | 16-18 | 18-20 | Total | |
No treatment | with tumour | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1(A) | 1(A) |
without tumour | 2 | 3 | - | - | 2 | 1 | - | 8 | 13 | 29 | |
Gum tragacanth (Vehicle control) | with tumour | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
without tumour | 3 | - | 2 | - | 1 | - | 2 | 5 | 17 | 30 | |
DMBA (positive control) | with tumour | - | 4(C) | 11(C) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15(C) |
without tumour | 1 | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | |
Quinine sulphate | with tumour | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
without tumour | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 10 | 9 | - | 20 |
* A-Corpus uteri and uterine horns, B-Cervix uteri, C-Vagina + perineal skin
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Species:
- mouse
Justification for classification or non-classification
From the results if the read across substance quinine sulphate it can be conclude that quinine is not carcinogenic and does not need to be classified.
Additional information
In the publication of Boyland et al., 1966 the carcinogenicity of the read across substance quinine sulphate is shown. The experiment was started with 20 female mice 5-6 week old. Each mouse was injected intravaginally twice a week with 0.3 % quinine sulphate. During the monitoring up to 20 month or till the mice died none of the animals developed tumour at the site of the injection. In this study quinine sulphate did not show carcinogenic activity. We conclude that quinine is not carcinogenic.
Justification for selection of carcinogenicity via dermal route endpoint:
The study is not done according to OECD guideline, but it is a well documented publication.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.