Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 237-457-2 | CAS number: 13811-50-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2014-10-15 to 2015-07-14
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP and guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
- Report date:
- 2015
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1,3-divinylimidazolidin-2-one
- EC Number:
- 237-457-2
- EC Name:
- 1,3-divinylimidazolidin-2-one
- Cas Number:
- 13811-50-2
- Molecular formula:
- C7H10N2O
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,3-diethenylimidazolidin-2-one
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 1,3-divinylimidazolidin-2-one
- Test item No.: 14/0450-1
- Physical state: Colourless to yellow solid
- Homogeneity: The test item appeared to be homogenous
- Analytical purity: 99.8 corr. area-%
- Lot/batch No.: P53/13
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 11 August 2015
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CBA
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Envigo RMS B.V. Inc. Postbus 6174 5960 AD Horst / The Netherlands
- Age at study initiation: Pre-test: 9 - 10 weeks: Main study: 10 - 11 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: Pre-test: 20.8 - 21.6 g; Main study: 20.1 - 20.4g
- Housing: grouped by test groups, Makrolon Type II (pre-test) / III (main study), with wire mesh top
- Diet: ad libitum 2018C Teklad Global 18 % protein rodent diet
- Water: ad libitum tap water
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2 (except for several hours)
- Humidity (%): 45-65 (except for several hours)
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- dimethylformamide
- Concentration:
- 10, 25, 50 %
- No. of animals per dose:
- 5
- Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Compound solubility: experiment was performed according to the recommendations given by OECD 429
- Irritation: 2 animals treated with 25 and 50 % on 3 consecutive days
- Lymph node proliferation response: no
MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method: LLNA
- Criteria used to consider a positive response:
a) exposure to at least one concentration of the test item resulted in an incorporation of 3HTdR at
least 3-fold or greater than that recorded in control mice, as indicated by the Stimulation Index
b) data are compatible with a conventional dose response, although allowance must be made (especially at high topical concentrations) for either
local toxicity or immunological suppression.
TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
- Animals were treated topically on the dorsal surface of each ear (25 μL/ear/day) on 3 consecutive days
- 5 days after first application 78.2 μCi/mL 3HTdR were injected
- 5 h after injection animals were sacrificed - Positive control substance(s):
- hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
- Statistics:
- The mean values and standard deviations were calculated in the body weight tables, for the ear weights, the lymph node weights and lymph node cell
count, and for the DPM values (group mean DPM ± standard deviation).
A statistical analysis was conducted on the DPM values, the ear weights, the lymph node weights and the lymph node cell count to assess whether the difference was statistically significant between the test item groups and negative control group. For all statistical calculations validated statistical
program R Script DecisionTree_2.Rnw was used. Statistical significance was set at the five per cent level (p < 0.05).
The Dean-Dixon-Test and the Grubb’s test were used for detection of possible outliers (performed with validated statistical program R Script Outlier.Rnw). No outlier was detected.
However, both biological and statistical significance were considered together.
Results and discussion
In vivo (LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks on result:
- other: - Vehicle control: 1.0 - 10 %: 1.16 - 25 %: 1.24 - 50 %: 1.41
- Parameter:
- other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
- Remarks on result:
- other: Mean DPM per animal (2 lymph nodes) - Vehicle control: 1264.1 ± 171.1 - 10 %: 1470.1 ± 273.0 - 25 %: 1568.5 ± 864.8 - 50 %: 1786.7 ± 737.6
Any other information on results incl. tables
Viability / Mortality
No deaths occurred during the study period.
Clinical Signs
No cases of mortality were observed. On day 3, 24 h after the second application, the animals treated with 50% of the test item showed reduced spontaneous activity, ruffled fur and an erythema of the ear skin (score: 1). One hour after the third application, three animals treated with
25% of the test item and all animals treated with 50% of the test item showed an erythema of the ear skin (score 1), and ruffled fur. Except for animal 12, all animals treated with 25 and 50% showed reduced spontaneous activity. Furthermore, the animals treated with 50% of the test item transiently showed partially closed eyes, tippy-toe walk and sunken flanks. On day 4, 24 h after the third application, all animals treated with 50% of the test item showed an erythema of the ear skin (score 1), as well as slightly reduced spontaneous activity, tippy-toe walk and hunched posture. The animals treated with 25% and 10% of the test item did not show any clinical symptoms. On day 5, the animals treated with 50% of the test item showed a very slight erythema of the ear skin (score 1).
Body Weights
The body weight of the animals, recorded prior to the first application and prior to treatment with 3HTdR, was within the range commonly recorded for animals of this strain and age. No relevant body weight loss was observed in any dose group over the course of the study.
Lymph Node Weights and Cell Counts
The measured lymph node weights and –cell counts of all animals treated were recorded after sacrifice. A statistically significant or biologically relevant increase in lymph node weights or – cell counts was not observed in any of the test item treated groups in comparison to the vehicle
control group. For BALB/c mice, a cut-off value for the lymph node cell count index of 1.55 was reported for a positive response. The indices determined for the lymph node cell count did not reach or exceed this threshold.
Ear Weights
The measured ear weight of all animals treated was recorded on test day 6 (after necropsy). A biologically relevant or statistically significant increase in ear weights was not observed. Furthermore, the cut-off value (1.1) of the ear weight index for a positive response regarding ear skin irritation reported for BALB/c mice was not reached or exceeded in any of the treated groups.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- The test item 1,3-divinylimidazolidin-2-one was not a skin sensitizer under the test conditions of this study.
- Executive summary:
In order to study a possible skin sensitising potential of 1,3-divinylimidazolidin-2-one, three groups each of five female mice were treated once daily with the test item at concentrations of 10, 25, and 50% in DMF by topical application to the dorsum of each ear for three consecutive days. The test item could be dissolved in the vehicle. The appropriateness of the used concentrations
was previously assessed by a pre-experiment. A control group of five mice was treated with the vehicle DMF only. Five days after the first topical application the mice were injected intravenously into a tail vein with radio-labelled thymidine (3H-methyl thymidine). Approximately five hours after intravenous injection, the mice were sacrificed, the draining auricular lymph nodes excised, pooled per animal and immediately weighed. Furthermore, after excision of the lymph nodes, both ears of the mice were punched at the apical area using a biopsy punch and were immediately weighed pooled per animal using an analytical balance. Afterwards single cell suspensions of lymph node cells were prepared from pooled lymph nodes per animal. An aliquot of each cell suspension was used for determination of lymph node cell count. Subsequently the suspensions were washed and incubated with trichloroacetic acid overnight. The proliferative capacity of pooled lymph node cells was determined by the incorporation of 3H-methyl thymidine measured in a
β-scintillation counter.
No cases of mortality were observed. On day 3, 24 h after the second application, the animals treated with 50% of the test item showed reduced spontaneous activity, ruffled fur and an erythema of the ear skin (score: 1). One hour after the third application, three animals treated with 25% of the test item and all animals treated with 50% of the test item showed an erythema of the ear skin (score 1), ruffled fur and burrowed themselves in the bedding. Except for animal 12, all animals treated with 25 and 50% showed reduced spontaneous activity. Furthermore, the animals treated with 50% of the test item transiently showed partially closed eyes, tippy-toe walk and sunken flanks. On day 4, 24 h after the third application, all animals treated with 50% of the test item showed an erythema of the ear skin (score 1), as well as slightly reduced spontaneous activity , tippy-toe walk and hunched posture. The animals treated with 25% and 10% of the test item did not show any clinical symptoms. On day 5, the animals treated with 50% of the test item showed a very slight erythema of the ear skin (score 1). However, no relevant body weight loss was observed in any dose group over the course of the study.
No statistically significant increase in ear weights was observed in any dose group in comparison to the vehicle control group. Furthermore, for BALB/c mice, a cut-off value of 1.1 for the ear weight index was reported for a positive response regarding ear skin irritation. None of the indices determined for the test item treated groups reached or exceeded this threshold.
A test item is regarded as a sensitiser in the LLNA if exposure to one or more test item concentration results in a 3-fold or greater increase in incorporation of 3HTdR compared with concurrent controls, as indicated by the Stimulation Index (S.I.). The estimated test item concentration required to produce a S.I. of 3 is referred to as the EC3 value. In this study Stimulation Indices (S.I.) of 1.16, 1.24 and 1.41 were determined with the test item at concentrations of 10, 25, and 50% in DMF, respectively.
In the mid dose group, for animal 11 and 12, only one lymph node per animal could be harvested. However, this was considered to be not relevant for the outcome of the study, since these two values were not detected as statistical outliers in two outlier tests. Furthermore, when these two DPM values were excluded to calculate the S.I. of the mid dose group, the S.I. of the mid dose
group did not change substantially (1.64 instead of 1.24) and still remained well below the threshold index of 3 for a positive response. Furthermore, the S.I. determined for the high dose group was well below 3.
No statistically significant increase in DPM value and also in lymph node cell count and lymph node weights was observed in any dose group in comparison to the vehicle control group. Furthermore, the cut-off value of 1.55 for a positive response regarding the lymph node cell count index reported for BALB/c mice was not reached or exceeded in any dose group.
The EC3 value could not be calculated, since none of the tested concentrations induced a S.I. greater than the threshold value of 3.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.