Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-673-7 | CAS number: 132638-45-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to microorganisms
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 11-01-2012 to 25-01-2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study performed under GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 209 (Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.11 (Biodegradation: Activated Sludge Respiration Inhibition Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- inspected: July 2011; signature: August 2011
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: 5, 16, 50, 160, 500 mg of test item were each separately dispersed in approximately 200 mL dionised reverse osmosis water and subjected to ultrasonication for approximately 15 minutes followed by magnetic stirring for 24 house in order to maximise the dissolved test item concentration. All test vessels were shielded from light during mixing. Synthetic sewage (16 mL), activated sludge (250 mL) and water were added to a final volume of 500 ml to give the required concentrations of 10, 32, 100, 320 and 1000 mg/L.
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc): At concentrations of 10 and 32 mg/L, no undissolved test item was visible. At concentrations of 100 mg/L few small particles of test item was visible on surface. At concentrations of 320 mg/L and 1000 mg/L, particles of test item were visible on surface and dispersed throughout. - Test organisms (species):
- activated sludge of a predominantly domestic sewage
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source: A mixed population of activated sewage sludge microorganisms was obtained on 12 January 2012 for the range-finding test and on 24 January 2012 for the definitive test from the aeration stage of the sewage treatment plant at Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK, which treats predominantly domestic sewage.
- Preparation of inoculum for exposure: The activated sewage sludge sample was maintained on continuous aeration in the laboratory at a temperature of approximately 21°C overnight prior to use in the test. On the day of collection, the activated sludge (10 litres) was fed synthetic sewage sludge (500 mL). The pH of the sample on the day of the test was 7.2.
- Pretreatment: The test item was dispersed in reverse osmosis water and subjected to ultrasonication for 15 minutes and magnetic stirring for 24 hours to maximise dissolved test item concentrations. All vessels were shielded from light. The reference item was similarly ultrasonicated and dispersed for 20 minutes prior to exposure.
- Initial biomass concentration: The suspended solids concentration was determined to be 3.0 g/L prior to use. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 3 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- As each vessel reached 3 hours contact time, an aliquot was removed from the conical flask and poured into the measuring vessel (250 mL darkened glass Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) bottle) and the rate of respiration measured using a Yellow Springs dissolved oxygen meter fitted with a BOD probe. The contents of the measuring vessel were stirred constantly by magnetic stirrer. The rate of respiration for each flask was measured over the linear portion of the oxygen consumption trace (where possible between approximately 7.0 mg O2/L and 2.0 mg O2/L). In the case of a rapid oxygen consumption, measurements may have been outside this range but the oxygen consumption was always within the linear portion of the respiration curve. In the case of the low oxygen consumption, the rate was determined over an approximate 10 minute period.
- Test temperature:
- 20 ± 2 °C
- pH:
- 0 hours: control: 6.7 - 7.1 and test groups: 6.7 - 6.8 and reference item: 6.8 - 6.9
3 hours: control: 7.0 - 7.2 and test groups: 7.3 - 7.6 and reference item: 7.2 - 7.5 - Dissolved oxygen:
- 30 minutes hours: control: 5.0 - 7.0 mgO2/L and test groups: 4.4 - 6.5 mgO2/L and reference item: 5.8 - 8.2 mgO2/L
In some instances, the initial and final dissolved oxygen concentrations were below those recommended in the test guidelines (7.0 mg 02/L and 2.0 mg 02/L respectively). This was considered to have had no adverse effect on the results of the study. - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Range-finder: nominal: 0 (control) 10, 100, 1000 mg/L (in single vessels, three replicates for 1000 mg/L and four for control).
Definitive test: nominal: 0 (control) 10, 32, 100, 320 and 1000 mg/L (in three replicates; six for control)
Reference item was completed: nominal: 3.2, 10, 32 mg/L - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 500 mL darkened glass conical BOD flasks
- Type (delete if not applicable): Open, vessel continuously aerated with seal.
- Aeration: The mixture was aerated with clean, oil-free compressed air via narrow bore glass tubes at a rate of approximately 0.5 - 1 litre per minute.
- Type of flow-through (e.g. peristaltic or proportional diluter): Not reported.
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): None.
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): Three
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): Six (negative) and three (reference item)
- Nitrification inhibitor used (delete if not applicable): Not applicable.
- - Biomass loading rate: See table.
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: The test water used for the range-finding and definitive tests was deionised reverse osmosis water containing less than 1 mg/L Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC). Synthetic sewage was subsequently prepared.
- Culture medium different from test medium: Not applicable.
- Intervals of water quality measurement: pH and temperature were determined in all test media and controls; prior to and at the end of the 3 hour incubation period. Dissolved oxygen values were determined in all vessels 30 minutes after incubation had initiated.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: The pH of the test item dispersions was measured and adjusted to between pH 7.0 and 8.0, if necessary. Note was not reported as necessary.
- Light intensity: The test was conducted under normal laboratory lighting
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : Biological Oxygen Demand. Monitor the oxygen consumed by the test and control mixtures following a 3-hour exposure phase.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Test concentrations: Definitive study: 0, (control) 10, 32, 100, 320, 1000 mg/L (nominal)
- Range finding study: 0, (control) 10, 100, 1000 mg/L (nominal)
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: Yes. No statistically significant toxic effects were shown at the test concentration of 10 mg/L, however, statistically significant toxic effects were shown at the test concentrations of 100 and 1000 mg/L. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 3,5-dichlorophenol
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 270 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Remarks:
- respiration rate
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EC20
- Effect conc.:
- 14 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Remarks:
- respiration rate
- Details on results:
- In some instances, the initial and final dissolved oxygen concentrations were below those recommended in the test guidelines (7.0 mg O2/L and 2.0 mg O2/L, respectively). This was considered to have had no adverse effect on the results of the study given that in all cases the oxygen consumption rate was determined over the linear portion of the oxygen consumption trace.
Validity Criteria:
1. The mean specific respiration rate of the blank controls was 29.05 mg oxygen per gram dry weight of sludge per hour (i.e. was > 20 mg oxygen per gram dry weight of sludge per hour).
2. The coefficient of variation of the oxygen uptake rate in the control replicates was 5.0% (i.e. < 30%).
3. The reference substance results were valid, the EC50 for 3,5-dichlorophenol was: total respiration: actual 8.8 (C.I. 7.0 – 11.0) mg/L. This was within the expected range: 2 to 25 mg/L.
Therefore, the validity criteria was met. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid?: Yes.
- Relevant effect levels: the EC50 for 3,5-dichlorophenol was: total respiration: actual 8.8 (C.I. 7.0 – 11.0) mg/L. This was within the expected range: 2 to 25 mg/L. Full information is provided in the full study report. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- 95% confidence limits were calculated for the reference item EC50 value using the method of Litchfield and Wilcoxon.
Analysis of variance incorporating Bartlett's test for homogeneity of variance and Dunnett's multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control was carried out on the oxygen consumption data after 3 hours for the control and all test concentrations to determine any statistically significant differences between the test and control groups. All statistical analysis were performed using the SAS computer software package. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the study, the 3 hour EC50 for total inhibition was 270 mg/L. The EC20 was 14 mg/L. All effect levels were based on nominal test item concentrations.
- Executive summary:
The effect on respiration rate of activate sludge was examined using a method according to OECD TG 209 in accordance with GLP. Following a preliminary range finding test at 10, 100 and 1000 mg/L concentration, a definitive test was conducted examining total respiration only was carried out under static conditions. The test item concentrations were 10, 32, 100, 320, 1000 mg/L (three replicates per test concentration) for a period of three hours at a temperature of 20 ± 2 °C with the addition of synthetic sewage as respiratory substrate. The respiration rates of the control, reference item (3,5-dichlorophenol) and test item replicates were measured after a contact time of three hours, and the inhibitory effects of the test and reference item were determined in comparison to the control respiration rates. The coefficient of variation of oxygen uptake in the control vessels was 5.0% and the specific respiration rate of the controls was 29.05 mg oxygen per gram dry weight of sludge per hour. In some instances, the initial and final dissolved oxygen concentrations were below those recommended in the test guidelines (7.0 mg 02/L and 2.0 mg 02/L respectively). This was considered to have had no adverse effect on the results of the study given that in all cases the oxygen consumption rate was determined over the linear portion of the oxygen consumption trace. The three-hour 50% effect concentration for 3,5-DCP was estimated to be EC50 8.8 (C.I. 7.0 – 11) mg/L. All validity criteria were considered to have been satisfied. The test item total respiration EC20 was 14 mg/L, EC50 was 270 mg/L. The EC80 was determined to be > 1000 mg/L (the highest concentration tested). All effect levels were based on nominal test item concentrations.
Reference
Table 1: Range-finding test: Control, reference substance and test substance oxygen concentration, oxygen consumption rate and percentage inhibition of the respiration rate.
Flask |
Loading rate (mg/L) |
Oxygen consumption (mg O2/L/h) |
% Inhibition respiration rate |
Control R1 |
- |
36.00 |
- |
Control R2 |
- |
36.00 |
- |
Control R3 |
- |
38.00 |
- |
Control R4 |
- |
34.50 |
- |
|
|
|
|
Test item |
10 |
36.00 |
0 |
Test item |
100 |
18.00 |
50 |
Test item R1 |
1000 |
14.40 |
60 |
Test item R2 |
1000 |
13.80 |
62 |
Test item R3 |
1000 |
12.00 |
67 |
|
|
|
|
Reference |
3.2 |
27.00 |
25 |
Reference |
10 |
15.60 |
57 |
Reference |
32 |
4.80 |
87 |
Table 2: Definitive test: Control, reference substance and test substance oxygen concentration, oxygen consumption rate and percentage inhibition of the respiration rate
Flask |
Loading rate (mg/L) |
Oxygen consumption (mg O2/L/h) |
% Inhibition respiration rate |
Control R1 |
- |
43.50 |
- |
Control R2 |
- |
43.50 |
- |
Control R3 |
- |
40.50 |
- |
Control R4 |
- |
42.00 |
- |
Control R5 |
- |
46.00 |
- |
Control R6 |
- |
46.00 |
- |
|
|
|
|
Test item R1 |
10 |
38.40 |
12 |
Test item R2 |
10 |
37.00 |
15 |
Test item R3 |
10 |
39.00 |
11 |
Test item R1 |
32 |
30.00 |
31 |
Test item R2 |
32 |
28.50 |
35 |
Test item R3 |
32 |
27.00 |
38 |
Test item R1 |
100 |
26.40 |
39 |
Test item R2 |
100 |
22.80 |
48 |
Test item R3 |
100 |
25.20 |
42 |
Test item R1 |
320 |
22.20 |
49 |
Test item R2 |
320 |
22.80 |
48 |
Test item R3 |
320 |
22.80 |
48 |
Test item R1 |
1000 |
20.40 |
53 |
Test item R2 |
1000 |
18.67 |
57 |
Test item R3 |
1000 |
16.80 |
61 |
|
|
|
|
Reference |
3.2 |
34.50 |
21 |
Reference |
10 |
20.67 |
53 |
Reference |
32 |
5.40 |
88 |
Description of key information
ASRIT: EC50 = 270 mg/L (nominal), 20 ± 2°C °C, OECD TG 209, 2012
ASRIT: EC80 = > 1000 mg/L (nominal, 20 ± 2°C °C, OECD TG 209, 2012
ASRIT: EC20 = 14 mg/L (nominal), 20 ± 2°C °C, OECD TG 209, 2012
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for microorganisms:
- 270 mg/L
Additional information
The effect on respiration rate of activate sludge was examined using a method according to OECD TG 209 in accordance with GLP. Following a preliminary range finding test at 10, 100 and 1000 mg/L concentration, a definitive test was conducted examining total respiration only was carried out under static conditions. The test item concentrations were 10, 32, 100, 320, 1000 mg/L (three replicates per test concentration) for a period of three hours at a temperature of 20 ± 2 °C with the addition of synthetic sewage as respiratory substrate. The respiration rates of the control, reference item (3,5-dichlorophenol) and test item replicates were measured after a contact time of three hours, and the inhibitory effects of the test and reference item were determined in comparison to the control respiration rates. The coefficient of variation of oxygen uptake in the control vessels was 5.0% and the specific respiration rate of the controls was 29.05 mg oxygen per gram dry weight of sludge per hour. In some instances, the initial and final dissolved oxygen concentrations were below those recommended in the test guidelines (7.0 mg 02/L and 2.0 mg 02/L respectively). This was considered to have had no adverse effect on the results of the study given that in all cases the oxygen consumption rate was determined over the linear portion of the oxygen consumption trace. The three-hour 50% effect concentration for 3,5-DCP was estimated to be EC50 8.8 (C.I. 7.0 – 11) mg/L. All validity criteria were considered to have been satisfied. The test item total respiration EC20 was 14 mg/L, EC50 was 270 mg/L. The EC80 was determined to be > 1000 mg/L (the highest concentration tested). All effect levels were based on nominal test item concentrations.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.