Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-539-6 | CAS number: 84-54-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to fish
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to fish
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Remarks:
- of read across substance
- Justification for type of information:
- Data for the target chemical is summarized based on the structurally similar read across chemicals
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- WoE report is based on two short term toxicity study of fish for the test chemical :
2. and 3. To evaluate short term toxicity of test material on fish Ciprinus carpio - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Analytical monitoring:
- not specified
- Test organisms (species):
- Cyprinus carpio
- Details on test organisms:
- 2.- Source: Lu-Kan Fish Culture Station, Taiwan Fisheries Research Institute, Taichung, Taiwan
- Length at study initiation: 2 – 6 cm
- Food type: yeast
- Acclimation period: 2 weeks
- Acclimation conditions : acclimatized in 224 (diameter)46 (height)-cm circular plastic pool - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
- Hardness:
- 215 mg/L as CaCO3
- Test temperature:
- 25±1°C
- pH:
- 6.6
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 4.9 mg/L
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- 2) 10, 50, 100, 200, and 500 mg/l
- Details on test conditions:
- 2) - Test vessel: 10-L beaker
- fill volume: 5L
- No. of organisms per vessel: 4 carp each for 5 different concentration
-For each test, 90% of the incubation medium was renewed with same
concentration of test chemical after 48 h of incubation - Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- 0.045 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- 0.22 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Details on results:
- 2) (LC50) values were calculated by the trimmed Spearman}Karber method
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The test chemical is not likely to be toxic to fish atleast in the dose range of 0.022-0.045 mg/l
- Executive summary:
Data available for the structurally similar read across chemicals has been reviewed to determine the short term toxicity of fish of the test chemical .The studies are as mentioned below:
For the structurally similar read across substance , short term toxicity test was performed to evaluate the effect of test material on fish Ciprinus carpio.The test animals were fed with yeast in a 224 (diameter)46 (height)-cm circular plastic pool. Before the experiment, the test organisms were acclimatized in aquaria for 2 weeks under conditions similar to those under which the tests were performed.
Four carp 2 to 6 cm in size, were introduced to each 10-L beaker containing 5 L of different concentrations of test chemical. Five different concentrations were 10, 50, 100, 200, and 500 mg/l.48 h of incubation. Sublethal concentration (LC50) values were calculated by the trimmed Spearman}Karber method.The effect concentration (LC50)of test material on Ciprinus carpio after 48 h was observed to be 0.045 mg/l.
In another study for structurally similar read across substance,short term toxicity test was performed to evaluate the effect of test material on fish Ciprinus carpio. The test animals were fed with yeast in a 224 (diameter)46 (height)-cm circular plastic pool. Before the experiment, the test organisms were acclimatized in aquaria for 2 weeks under conditions similar to those under which the tests were performed. Four carp 2 to 6 cm in size, were introduced to each 10-L beaker containing 5 L of different concentrations of test chemical. Five different concentrations were 10, 50, 100, 200, and 500 mg/l. After 48 h of incubation Sublethal concentration (LC50) values were calculated by the trimmed Spearman} Karber method.The effect concentration (LC50) of test material on Ciprinus carpio after 48 h was observed to be 0.022 mg/l.
Based on the LC50 value, chemical consider to be toxic and classified as aquatic acute 1/ chronic 1 as per the CLP classification criteria.
Reference
Description of key information
Short-term toxicity to fish:
Data available for the structurally similar read across chemicals has been reviewed to determine the short term toxicity of fish of the test chemical .The studies are as mentioned below:
For the structurally similar read across substance , short term toxicity test was performed to evaluate the effect of test material on fish Ciprinus carpio.The test animals were fed with yeast in a 224 (diameter)46 (height)-cm circular plastic pool. Before the experiment, the test organisms were acclimatized in aquaria for 2 weeks under conditions similar to those under which the tests were performed.
Four carp 2 to 6 cm in size, were introduced to each 10-L beaker containing 5 L of different concentrations of test chemical. Five different concentrations were 10, 50, 100, 200, and 500 mg/l.48 h of incubation. Sublethal concentration (LC50) values were calculated by the trimmed Spearman}Karber method.The effect concentration (LC50)of test material on Ciprinus carpio after 48 h was observed to be 0.045 mg/l.
In another study for structurally similar read across substance,short term toxicity test was performed to evaluate the effect of test material on fish Ciprinus carpio. The test animals were fed with yeast in a 224 (diameter)46 (height)-cm circular plastic pool. Before the experiment, the test organisms were acclimatized in aquaria for 2 weeks under conditions similar to those under which the tests were performed. Four carp 2 to 6 cm in size, were introduced to each 10-L beaker containing 5 L of different concentrations of test chemical. Five different concentrations were 10, 50, 100, 200, and 500 mg/l. After 48 h of incubation Sublethal concentration (LC50) values were calculated by the trimmed Spearman} Karber method.The effect concentration (LC50) of test material on Ciprinus carpio after 48 h was observed to be 0.022 mg/l.
Based on the LC50 value, chemical consider to be toxic and classified as aquatic acute 1/ chronic 1 as per the CLP classification criteria.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Short-term toxicity to fish:
Data available for the structurally similar read across chemicals has been reviewed to determine the short term toxicity of fish of the test chemical .The studies are as mentioned below:
For the structurally similar read across substance , short term toxicity test was performed to evaluate the effect of test material on fish Ciprinus carpio.The test animals were fed with yeast in a 224 (diameter)46 (height)-cm circular plastic pool. Before the experiment, the test organisms were acclimatized in aquaria for 2 weeks under conditions similar to those under which the tests were performed.
Four carp 2 to 6 cm in size, were introduced to each 10-L beaker containing 5 L of different concentrations of test chemical. Five different concentrations were 10, 50, 100, 200, and 500 mg/l.48 h of incubation. Sublethal concentration (LC50) values were calculated by the trimmed Spearman}Karber method.The effect concentration (LC50)of test material on Ciprinus carpio after 48 h was observed to be 0.045 mg/l.
In another study for structurally similar read across substance,short term toxicity test was performed to evaluate the effect of test material on fish Ciprinus carpio. The test animals were fed with yeast in a 224 (diameter)46 (height)-cm circular plastic pool. Before the experiment, the test organisms were acclimatized in aquaria for 2 weeks under conditions similar to those under which the tests were performed. Four carp 2 to 6 cm in size, were introduced to each 10-L beaker containing 5 L of different concentrations of test chemical. Five different concentrations were 10, 50, 100, 200, and 500 mg/l. After 48 h of incubation Sublethal concentration (LC50) values were calculated by the trimmed Spearman} Karber method.The effect concentration (LC50) of test material on Ciprinus carpio after 48 h was observed to be 0.022 mg/l.
Based on the LC50 value, chemical consider to be toxic and classified as aquatic acute 1/ chronic 1 as per the CLP classification criteria.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.