Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Ames test
The mutagenic activity of the substance was evaluated in accordance with OECD 471 (1987), EU Method B.13/14 (2000) and according to GLP principles. The test was performed in two independent experiments, at first a direct plate assay was performed and secondly a preincubation assay, both in the absence and presence of S9-mix. Adequate negative and positive controls were included. The 5 strains tested were S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102.
In both experiments, the substance did not induce a significant increase in the number of revertant colonies in any of the 5 strains at any concentration, up to 5000 µg/plate, neither in the presence nor in the absence of metabolic activation. Based on the results of this study it is concluded that the substance is not mutagenic in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay.
Chromosome aberration test (in vitro)
In accordance with OECD 473 (1998) and according to GLP principles, a chromosome aberration study with the substance was performed in cultured peripheral human lymphocytes in two independent experiments with and without metabolic activation. Adequate solvent and positive controls were included. The substance was tested up to and above precipitating concentrations.
The substance did not induce a statistically significant or biologically relevant increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations in the absence and presence of S9-mix, in either of the two independently repeated experiments. No effects of the substance on the number of polyploid cells and cells with endoreduplicated chromosomes were observed both in the absence and presence of S9-mix. Based on the results of this study, it is concluded that the substance does not disturb mitotic processes and cell cycle progression and does not induce numerical chromosome aberrations. The substance is not clastogenic in human lymphocytes under the experimental conditions of the study.
Mouse lymphoma assay
The mouse lymphoma assay with L 130 was conducted according to OECD 476 guideline and GLP principles.
No toxicity was observed up to and including the highest tested precipitated dose levels in both experiments in the absence and presence of S9-mix. In the absence of S9-mix, L 130 did not induce a significant increase in the mutation frequency in the first experiment. This result was confirmed in an independent repeat experiment with modifications in the duration of treatment time. In the presence of S9-mix, L 130 did not induce a significant increase in the mutation frequency in one experiment. Positive control chemicals, methyl methane sulfonate and cyclophosphamide induced appropriate responses. It is concluded that L 130 is not mutagenic in the TK mutation test system under the experimental conditions described in the absence and presence of S9 -mix.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
No single study was selected as key study, as the endpoint conclusion is derived by weight-of-evidence using three in vitro studies.
Short description of key information:
Three in vitro studies are available with the substance. In all studies, the substance was negative with and without metabolic activation.
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available information, the substance does not need to be classified for genetic toxicity in accordance with the CLP Regulation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.