Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 295-985-9 | CAS number: 92201-55-3 Extractives and their physically modified derivatives such as tinctures, concretes, absolutes, essential oils, oleoresins, terpenes, terpene-free fractions, distillates, residues, etc., obtained from Cedrus atlantica, Pinaceae.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 05-03-2015 to 31-03-2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- in accordance with GLP
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA OCSPP harmonized guideline 870.5100
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Version / remarks:
- Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Cedarwood Atlas oil
- Target gene:
- Histidine and tryptophan locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Vogel-Bonner Minimal Plates, Top Agar.
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for viability, spontaneous reversion rate characteristics. - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1: 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 5000 µg/plate
Experiment 2: 15, 50, 150, 500, 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Acetone
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: immiscible in sterile distilled water and dimethyl sulphoxide at 50 mg/mL but fully miscible in Acetone at 100 mg/mL - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (2, 3 and 5 µg/plate), 9-aminoacridine (80 µg/plate) and 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (0.2µg/plate) without S9 -mix. Benzo(a)pyrene (µg/plate) and 2-Aminoanthracene (1, 2 and 10 µg/plate) with S9-mix
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
Experiment 1: direct plate incorporation methodology (in agar)
Experiment 2: pre-incubation methodology
DURATION
- Preincubation period: with and without S9-mix 20 minutes (prior to exposure in experiment 2 only)
- Exposure duration: 48 hours (experiment 1 and 2)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
-Test for mutagenicity (exp 1 and 2): in triplicate - Evaluation criteria:
- 1. A dose-related increase in mutant frequency over the dose range tested
2. A reproducible increase at one or more concentrations
3. Biological relevance against in-house historical control ranges
4. Statistical analysis of data as determined by UKEMS
5. Fold increase greater than two times the concurrent solvent control for any tester strain.
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
- All bacterial strains must have demonstrated required characteristics as determined by their respective strains according to Ames et al. (1975)
- Tester strain cultures should exhibit characteristic number of spontaneous revertants per plate in the vehicle and untreated controls.
- Tester strain culture density should be in the range of 0.9 to 9x10E9 bacteria/mL
- Positive control values must demonstrate intrinsic sensitivity of the test strains and integrity of the S9-mix
- A minimum of four non-toxic test item dose levels is required
- No evidence of excessive contamination - Species / strain:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- Direct plate incorporation method (exp 1)
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- Pre incubation method (exp 2)
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON TEST RESULTS
There were no significant increase in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without S9-mix in exp 1 (direct plate method). There were no significant increase in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without S9-mix in exp 2 (pre-incubation method).
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
A test item precipitate (light and globular in appearance) was noted under an inverted microscope at 5000 µg/plate. This observation did not prevent the scoring of revertant colonies.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY
In exp 1 (direct plate method) there was no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn at any dose level, either in the presence of absence of S9-mix.
In exp 2 (pre-incubation method) a visible reduction of the bacterial background lawns of all Salmonella strains was observed from 1500 µg/plate without S9-mix and at 5000 µg/plate with S9-mix. The toxicity of the test item did not interfere with the test outcome. In the E. coli strain no toxicity was noted. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Conclusions:
- No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation in exp 1 (direct plate method) and exp 2 (pre-incubation method). Therefore the test item Cedarwood Atlas oil was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.
- Executive summary:
The genotoxicity of the test substance Cedarwood Atlas oil was tested in bacteria strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvr A according to OECD guideline 471 (Ames test) and under GLP conditions. Two experiments (using the plate incorporation methodology and the pre-incubation methodology) were performed with concentrations of the test substance ranging from 1.5 - 5000 µg/plate, with and without metabolic activation. Negative, vehicle and positive controls were included as well. The frequency of revertant colonies was recorded.
The positive and negative control were valid: all positive control chemicals induced increase in frequency of revertant colonies and the increase observed for the negative control substance was considered acceptable. Cytotoxicity was observed only in experiment 2 by a reduction in growth of the bacterial background lawns from 1500 µg/plate (-S9) and at 5000 µg/plate (+S9) in the TA strains only, but this did not interfere with the outcome of the test. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation or exposure method.
Under the conditions of this study, the test item Cedarwood Atlas oil was considered to be non-mutagenic and hence, it does not need to be classified for mutagenicity, according to the classification criteria outlined in Annex I of 1272/2008/EC (CLP).
Reference
Details on the results can be found in the attached document below.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
The genotoxicity of Cedarwood Atlas oil was examined in bacterial strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvr A (OECD 471, GLP). The concentrations applied were ranging from 1.5 - 5000 µg/plate, with and without metabolic activation. Negative, vehicle and positive controls were determined as valid. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation, indicating that the test substance is not mutagenic under the conditions of this test
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available negative result from this Ames test, Cedarwood Atlas oil shall be considered as non-mutagenic and should not be classified according to the classification criteria outlined in Annex I of 1272/2008/EC (CLP).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.