Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 441-020-3 | CAS number: 3335-98-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Start : 19 December 2001 Completed : 8 May 2002
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: There are no deviations from the recommended guidelines.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: Cultured peripheral human lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor-1254 indticed rat liver S9-mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Dose range finding test:
10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000 µg Phenyloxindole/ml culture medium with and without S9-mix.
First cytogenetic assay:
Without S9-mix : 33, 100, 333, 375 and 420 µg Phenyloxindole/ml culture medium (3 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time).
With S9-mix : 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 µg Phenyloxindole/ml culture medium (3 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time). Part of this experiment was repeated with the following dose levels:
Experiment 1 A
With S9-mix : 200, 300 and 420 µg Phenyloxindole/ml culture medium (3 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time).
Second cytogenetic assay:
Without S9-mix : 10, 15, 20, 25, 33, 42, 56, 75 and 100 µg Phenyloxindole/ml culture medium (24 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time)
10, 15, 18, 20, 22, 25, 28 and 33 µg Phenyloxindole/ml culture medium (48 h exposure time, 48 h fixation time)
With S9-mix: 200, 300, 375 and 420 µg Phenyloxindole/ml culture medium (3 h exposure time, 48 h fixation time)
Part of this second experiment was repeated with the following dose levels:
Experiment 2A:
Without S9-mix : l0, 20, 33, 56, 75, 100, 200, 300 and 420 µg Phenyloxindole/ml culture medium (48 h exposure time, 48 h fixation time). - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO.
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- 0.5 µg/ml for a 3 h exposure period, 0.2 µg/ml for a 24 h exposure period and 0.1 µg/ml for a 48 h exposure period.
Migrated to IUCLID6: Without metabolic activation - Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- 15 µg/ml for a 3 h exposure period (24 h fixation time).
Migrated to IUCLID6: With metabolic activation - Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
Whole blood treated with an anti-coagulant (heparin) obtained from healthy rnale subjects was cultured in the presence of a mitogen (phytohaemagglutinin). These stimulated human lymphocytes were used because they are sensitive indicators of clastogenic activity of a broad range of chemicals.
Within 4 h after blood collection, lymphocyte cultures were started. Whole blood (0.4 ml) treated with heparin was added to 5 ml or 4.8 ml F10 complete culture medium (in the absence and presence of S9-mix respectively). Per culture 0.1 ml (9 mg/ml) phytohaemagglutinin was added.
All incubations were carried out in a humid atmosphere (80-100%) containing 5 ± 0.5% C02 in air in the dark at 37 ± 1°C. The temperature, humidity and CO2-percentage were monitored throughout the experiment.
Lymphocyte cultures were cultured for 48 h and thereafter exposed to selected doses. Phenyloxindole was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. Stock solutions above 42 mg/ml were treated with ultrasonic waves until Phenyloxindole had completely dissolved. Stock solutions of 42 mg/ml and lower were dissolved by vortexing only. Phenyloxindole concentrations were prepared directly prior to use. The final concentration of the solvent in the culture medium amounted 1.0 % (v/v).
DURATION
- Exposure duration:
Range finding: 3 h, 24 h and 48 h in the absence of S9-mix or for 3 h in the presence of S9-mix.
First cytogenetic assay: 3 h in the absence and presence of S9-mix.
Second cytogenetic assay: 24 h and 48 h in the absence of S9-mix or for 3 h in the presence of S9-mix.
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells):
Range finding: 24 h fixation time (3 h and 24 h exposure ) and 48 h fixation time (48 h exposure).
First cytogenectic assay: 24 h fixation time.
Second cytogenetic assay: 48 h fixation time (3 h exposure ), 24 h fixation time (24 h exposure) and 48 h fixation time (48 h exposure).
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colchicine
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): for 10-30 min with 5% (v/v) Giemsa solution in tap water.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: First and second assays: Lymphocyte cultures were exposed in duplicate.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: At least 100 metaphase chromosome spreads per culture w ere examined by light microscopy for chromosome aberrations. In case the number of aberrant cells, gaps excluded, was ≥ 25 in 50 metaphases no more metaphases were examined. Only metaphases containing 46 ± 2 centromeres (chromosomes) were analysed. The number of cells with aberrations and the number of aberrations were calculated.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: The mitotic index of each culture was determined by counting the number of metaphases per 1000 cells. At least three analysable concentrations were used. Chromosomes of metaphase spreads were analysed of those cultures with an inhibition of the mitotic index of about 50% or
greater whereas the mitotic index of the lowest dose level was approximately the same as the mitotic index of the solvent control. Also cultures treated with an intermediate dose were examined for chromosome aberrations.
- Evaluation criteria:
- A test substance w as considered positive (clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if:
a) it induced a dose-related statistically significant (Chi-square test, P <0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.
b) a statistically significant increase in the frequencies of the number of cells with chromosome aberrations was observed in the absence of a clear dose-response relationship.
A test substance was considered negative (not clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if none of the tested concentrations induced a statistically significant (Chi-square test, P <0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations. - Statistics:
- Chi-square test
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: Cultured peripheral human lymphocytes.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation:
Dose range finding study: At a concentration of 1000 µg/ml Phenyloxindole precipitated in the culture medium. Therefore, a concentration of 1000 µg/ml was used as the highest concentration
First cytogenetic assay: a concentration of 420 µg/ml already precipitated in the culture medium. Therefore, a concentration of 420 µg/ml was used as the highest concentration.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
Dose range finding study:
age 23, AGT = 16.8 h (Dec. 2001 )
First cytogenetic assay:
age 29, AGT = 17.6 h (Dec. 2001) (without S9-mix)
age 27, AGT = 17.3 h (Dec. 2001) (with S9-mix)
Second cytogenetic assay:
age 26, AGT = 16.6 h (Dec. 2001)
age 36, AGT = 16.6 h (Dec. 2001) (48 h without S9-mix)
(AGT= Average Generation Time of the cells).
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
It is concluded that this test is valid and that Phenyloxindole is not clastogenic in human lymphocytes under the experimental conditions described in this report. - Executive summary:
This study describes the effect of Phenyloxindole on the number of chromosome aberrations in cultured peripheral human lymphocytes in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system. In the first cytogenetic assay, Phenyloxindole was tested up to 420 µg/ml for a 3 h exposure time with a 24 h fixation time in the absence and presence of S9-mix. In the second cytogenetic assay, Phenyloxindole was tested up to 100 µg/ml for a 24 h continuous exposure time with a 24 h fixation time and up to 75 µg/ml for a 48 h continuous exposure time in the absence of S9-mix. Appropriate toxicity was reached at these dose levels. In the presence of 1.8% (v/v) S9-fraction Phenyloxindole was tested up to 420 µg/ml for a 3 h exposure time with a 48 h fixation time. Positive control substances, mitomycin C and cyclophosphamide, both produced a statistically significant increase in the incidence of cells with chromosome aberrations, indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system (S9-mix) functioned properly. Phenyloxindole did not induce a statistically significant or biologically relevant increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations in the absence and in the presence of S9-mix, in two independently repeated experiments. It is concluded that this test is valid and that Phenyloxindole is not clastogenic in human lymphocytes under the experimental conditions described in this report.
Reference
The number of cells with chromosome aberrations found in the solvent control cultures were within the laboratory historical control data range. At the 24 h continuous exposure time, in culture A of the DMSO-treated cultures 6 aberrant cells were observed when gaps were included, and 3 aberrant cells when gaps were excluded. Since the number of aberrant cells was just within our historical control data range, additional 100 cells were scored to confirm that the results of the blank were within the historical control data range. In the additional 100 cells, 4 aberrant cells were observed when gaps were included.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Key study: OECD guideline 476 and EU method B.10. GLP study.
The test substance is not clastogenic in human lymphocytes under the experimental conditions described in the test.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
Only one study available. Klimisch 1. This study was carried out in accordance with internationally valid GLP principles.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data, the substance is not classified for genetic toxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.