Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 207-924-5 | CAS number: 501-52-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
The gene mutation study was conducted according toL5178Y TK+/-Mouse Lymphoma Mutagenicity Assay to determine the mutagenic nature of the test compound 3-Phenylpropionic acid.
The Cells at a concentration of 1.2 X 107cells/mL were exposed for 4 h to a range of concentrations from 500 -8091 µg/mL. The cells were then washed, resuspended in growth medium, and incubated at 37°C for 48h to allow recovery and mutant expression. Cells in the cultures were adjusted to 3 X 105/mL at 24 h intervals. They were then cloned (1 X 106cells/plate for mutant selection and 200 cells/plate for viable count determinations) in soft agar medium containing Fischer’s medium, 20% horse serum, 2 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.02% pluronic F-68, and 0.23% granulated agar. Resistance to trifluorothymidine (TFT) was determined by adding TFT (final concentration, 3µg/mL) to the cloning medium for mutant selection. The 100X stock solution of TFT in saline was stored at -70 °C and was thawed immediately before use. Plates were incubated at 37 ( 1 °C in 5% CO2 in air for 10-12 days and then counted with an Artek automated colony Counter. Only colonies larger than ~ 0.2 mm in diameter were counted. Mutant frequencies were expressed as mutants per 106surviving cells.
3-Phenylpropionic acid failed to induce a doubling of the mutant frequency both in the presence and absence of S9 activation system and hence is not likely to be gene mutant in vitro.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from peer reviewed publication
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The gene mutation study was conducted according to L5178Y TK+/- Mouse Lymphoma Mutagenicity Assay to determine the mutagenic nature of 3-Phenylpropionic acid
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- other: Mouse lymphoma assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material: 3-Phenylpropionic acid
- IUPAC name: 3-phenylpropanoic acid
- Molecular formula: C9H10O2
- Molecular weight: 150.176 g/mol
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: No data available.
- Purity: No data available
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): No data available - Target gene:
- Thymidine kinase
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Remarks:
- TK+/- 3.7.C
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media:
The cells were grown in Fischer’s medium for leukemic cells of mice supplemented with 10% horse serum and 0.02% pluronic F-68.
- Properly maintained: No data available
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: Yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: No data available
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: No data available - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- No data
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- liver S9 prepared from Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague- Dawley rats.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 500 - 8091 µg/mL
- Vehicle / solvent:
- No data available
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: ethyl methylsulfonate, 3-methylcholanthrene and dimethylbenz[a]- anthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: No data available
- Exposure duration: 4 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium):48 h
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data available
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No data available
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 1×106 cells/plate for mutant selection
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No data available
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): No data available
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Duplicate
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 1X 106 cells/plate for mutant selection and 200
cells/plate for viable count determinations
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: No data available
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: No data available
- Determination of endoreplication: No data available
- Other: No data available
OTHER: No data available - Rationale for test conditions:
- No data
- Evaluation criteria:
- Results were interpreted using a doubling of the mutant frequency over the concurrent solvent-treated control value as an indication of a positive effect, together with evidence of a dose-related increase. Doubling of the mutant frequency was previously reported as representing a positive effect. Only doses yielding total growth values of 10% were used in the analysis of induced mutant frequency. Doses yielding less than 10% total growth were used in determining dose response.
- Statistics:
- No data
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Remarks:
- TK+/- 3.7.C
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: No data available
- Effects of osmolality: No data available
- Evaporation from medium: No data available
- Water solubility: No data available
- Precipitation: No data available
- Other confounding effects: No data available
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: No data available
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: No data available
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: The doses of chemical selected for testing were within the range yielding approximately 0-90% cytotoxicity. - Conclusions:
- 3-Phenylpropionic acid failed to induce a doubling of the mutant frequency both in the presence and absence of S9 activation system and hence is not likely to be gene mutant in vitro.
- Executive summary:
The gene mutation study was conducted according toL5178Y TK+/-Mouse Lymphoma Mutagenicity Assay to determine the mutagenic nature of the test compound 3-Phenylpropionic acid.
The Cells at a concentration of 1.2 X 107cells/mL were exposed for 4 h to a range of concentrations from 500 -8091 µg/mL. The cells were then washed, resuspended in growth medium, and incubated at 37°C for 48h to allow recovery and mutant expression. Cells in the cultures were adjusted to 3 X 105/mL at 24 h intervals. They were then cloned (1 X 106cells/plate for mutant selection and 200 cells/plate for viable count determinations) in soft agar medium containing Fischer’s medium, 20% horse serum, 2 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.02% pluronic F-68, and 0.23% granulated agar. Resistance to trifluorothymidine (TFT) was determined by adding TFT (final concentration, 3µg/mL) to the cloning medium for mutant selection. The 100X stock solution of TFT in saline was stored at -70 °C and was thawed immediately before use. Plates were incubated at 37 ( 1 °C in 5% CO2 in air for 10-12 days and then counted with an Artek automated colony Counter. Only colonies larger than ~ 0.2 mm in diameter were counted. Mutant frequencies were expressed as mutants per 106surviving cells.
3-Phenylpropionic acid failed to induce a doubling of the mutant frequency both in the presence and absence of S9 activation system and hence is not likely to be gene mutant in vitro.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Gene mutatioin in vitro:
Variuos peer reviewed publications for the target chemical and its read across and prediction based data for the target chemical were reviewed to determine the mutagenic nature of 3-Phenylpropionic acid . The studies are as mentioned below:
The gene mutation study was conducted by Seifried et al ( Chem. Res. Toxicol., 2006) according toL5178Y TK+/-Mouse Lymphoma Mutagenicity Assay to determine the mutagenic nature of the test compound 3-Phenylpropionic acid (CAS no 501 -52 -0). The Cells at a concentration of 1.2 X 107cells/mL were exposed for 4 h to a range of concentrations from 500 -8091 µg/mL. The cells were then washed, resuspended in growth medium, and incubated at 37°C for 48h to allow recovery and mutant expression. Cells in the cultures were adjusted to 3 X 105/mL at 24 h intervals. They were then cloned (1 X 106cells/plate for mutant selection and 200 cells/plate for viable count determinations) in soft agar medium containing Fischer’s medium, 20% horse serum, 2 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.02% pluronic F-68, and 0.23% granulated agar. Resistance to trifluorothymidine (TFT) was determined by adding TFT (final concentration, 3µg/mL) to the cloning medium for mutant selection. The 100X stock solution of TFT in saline was stored at -70 °C and was thawed immediately before use. Plates were incubated at 37 ( 1 °C in 5% CO2 in air for 10-12 days and then counted with an Artek automated colony Counter. Only colonies larger than ~ 0.2 mm in diameter were counted. Mutant frequencies were expressed as mutants per 106surviving cells. 3-Phenylpropionic acid failed to induce a doubling of the mutant frequency both in the presence and absence of S9 activation system and hence is not likely to be gene mutant in vitro.
Gene mutation toxicity was predicted for 3-Phenylpropionic acid (CAS no 501 -52 -0) using the battery approach from Danish QSAR database (2017). The study assumed the use of Salmonella typhimurium bacteria in the Ames test. The end point for gene mutation has been modeled in the Danish QSAR using the three software systems Leadscope, CASE Ultra and SciQSAR. Based on predictions from these three systems, a fourth and overall battery prediction is made. The battery prediction is made using the so called Battery algorithm. With the battery approach it is in many cases possible to reduce “noise” from the individual model estimates and thereby improve accuracy and/or broaden the applicability domain. 3-Phenylpropionic acid was assumed to not induce mutation in Salmonella typhimurium by the Ames assay performed and hence the chemical is predicted to not classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
In another study by Zeiger et al (1988) for 50 -60% structurally similar read across chemical, Acetylsalicylic acid (RA CAS no 50 -78 -2; IUPAC name: 2-acetoxybenzoic acid) was studied for its ability to induce gene mutations in strains of Salmonella typhimurium. The test compound was tested at concentration of 0, 33, 100, 333, 1000 or 2000 µg/plate using Salmonella typhimurium TA100, TA1535, TA97 and TA98 in the presence and absence of 10 % and 30 % rat and hamster liver S9 metabolic activation system. Preincubation assay was performed. Concurrent solvent and vehicle control were incorporated in the study. The plates were observed an increase in the number of revertants. Acetylsalicylic acid did not induce an increase in the number of revertants and hence is not mutagenic to the Salmonella typhimurium TA100, TA1535, TA97 and TA98 in the presence and absence of rat and hamster liver S9 metabolic activation system.
Gene mutation toxicity study was performed by Zeiger et al (1992) to determine the mutagenic nature of 50 -60% structurally and functionally similar read across chemical Phthalic acid (RA CAS no 88 -99 -3; IUPAC name: Phthalic acid) . The study was performed using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA97, TA98, TA100, TA1535 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system. The chemical was dissolved in DMSO and used at dose levels of 0, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3333 or 10000 µg/plate by the preincubation method. Concurrent solvent and postive control chemicals were used in the study. The plates were observed for a dose dependent increase in the number of Histidine- independent (his+) colonies. Phthalic acid failed to induce mutation a dose dependent increase in the number of revertants in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA97, TA98, TA100, TA1535 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.)
Based on the available data for the target chemical and its read across, 3-Phenylpropionic acid does not exhibit gene mutation is vitro. Thus, the chemical is not likely to classify as a gene mutant as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data for the target chemical and its read across, 3-Phenylpropionic acid does not exhibit gene mutation is vitro. Thus, the chemical is not likely to classify as a gene mutant as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.