Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-620-1 | CAS number: 108-83-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 11.2009 - 04.2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Test Material Name: Diisobutyl Ketone
Chemical Name; 2,6-Dimethyl-4-heptanone
Synonyms: DIBK
Supplier, City, State (Lot, Reference Number): The Dow Chemical Company, Freeport, Texas (Lot# XA2355T643) - Target gene:
- Hypoxanthine-guanine-phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT)
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CHO-K1-BH4
The cells are routinely maintained in Ham's F-12 nutrient mix supplemented with 5% (V/V) heat-inactivated (56°C, 30 minute), dialyzed fetal bovine serum, antibiotics, and antimycotics (penicillin G, 100 units/ml; streptomycin sulfate, 0.1 mg/ml; fungizone, 0.25 µg/ml), and an additional 2 mM L-glutamine. The selection medium used for the detection of HGPRT- mutants will be Ham's F-12 nutrient mix without hypoxanthine, supplemented with 10 µM 6-thioguanine and 5% serum and the above-mentioned antibiotics. - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- preliminary toxicity assay: 0 (solvent control), 5.7, 11.3, 22.7, 45.3, 90.6, 181.3, 362.5, 725, and 1450 μg/ml
mutagenicity assay: 0 (solvent control), 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, and 1450 μg/ml in the absence of S9 and 0 (solvent control), 100, 200, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, and 1000 μg/ml in the presence of S9 - Vehicle / solvent:
- The test material was first dissolved in DMSO and further diluted (1:100) with the treatment medium to obtain the desired concentrations.
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 20-methylcholanthrene
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 8 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 7 to 9 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 6-thioguanine
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency / colony formation - Evaluation criteria:
- For an assay to be acceptable, the mutant frequency in positive controls should have been significantly higher than the solvent controls. An additional criteria was that the mutant frequency in the solvent controls should have been within reasonable limits of the laboratory historical control values and literature values. The test chemical was considered positive if it induced a statistically significant, dose related, reproducible increase in mutant frequency. The final interpretation of the data took into consideration such factors as the mutant frequency and cloning efficiencies in the solvent controls.
- Statistics:
- The frequency of mutants per 106 clonable cells was statistically evaluated using a weighted analysis of variance; weights were derived from the inverse of the mutant frequency variance. The actual plate counts are assumed to follow a Poisson distribution therefore the mean plate count was used as an estimate of variance. If the analysis of variance was significant at alpha = 0.05, a Dunnett's t-test was conducted, comparing each treated group and the positive control to the solvent control (alpha = 0.05, one-sided). Linear dose-related trend tests were performed
if any of the pairwise comparisons of test material with the solvent control yielded significant differences. - Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The pH and osmolality of treatment medium containing approximately 2589 μg/ml of the test material and medium containing 1% DMSO were determined using a Denver Basic pH meter (Denver Instrument Co., Arvada, Colorado) and an OSMETTE A freezing point osmometer (Precision Systems, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts). Alterations in the pH and osmolality of the culture medium have been shown to induce false positive responses in in vitro genotoxicity assays. There was no appreciable change in the pH at this concentration as compared to the culture medium with solvent alone and the slight drop in the osmolality was interpreted to be inconsequential to the conduct of the assay (culture medium with the test material, pH = 7.38, osmolality = 435 mOsm/kgH2O; culture medium with 1% DMSO, pH = 7.39, osmolality = 463 mOsm/kgH2O).
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The results of the CHO/HGPRT forward gene mutation assay with diisobutyl ketone indicated that under the conditions of this study, the test article was non-mutagenic when evaluated in the absence or presence of an externally supplied metabolic activation (S9) system. - Executive summary:
Diisobutyl ketone (2,6 dimethyl-4-heptanone) was evaluated in the in vitro Chinese hamster ovary cell/hypoxanthine-guanine-phosphoribosyl transferase (CHO/HGPRT) forward gene mutation assay. The genotoxic potential of the test material was assessed in two independent assays in the absence and presence of an externally supplied metabolic activation (S9) system. The concentrations ranged from 200 to 1450 μg/ml in the absence of S9 and from 100 to 1000 μg/ml in the presence of S9. The highest concentration for each activation system was based on the initial toxicity assay, where these concentrations resulted or exceeded relative cell survivals of 10-20%. The adequacy of the experimental conditions for detection of induced mutations was confirmed by employing positive control chemicals, ethyl methanesulfonate for assays in the absence of S9 and 20-methylcholanthrene for assays in the presence of S9. Solvent control cultures were treated with the solvent used to dissolve the test material (i.e. dimethyl sulfoxide). The results of the CHO/HGPRT forward gene mutation assay with diisobutyl ketone indicated that under the conditions of this study, the test article was non-mutagenic when evaluated in the absence or presence of an externally supplied metabolic activation (S9) system.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1985
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Di-lsobutyl ketone (DIBK)
- Physical state: Colourless, clear liquid
- Analytical purity: 2:1 mixture of 2,6-dimethyl-4-heptanone and 4,6-dimethyl-2-heptanone, water 0.2%
maximum
- Lot/batch No.: INDENT 9200/9943 - Target gene:
- Histidine operon for Salmonella typhimurium, Tryptophan operon for Escherichia coli
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver microsomal activation system (S9-mix)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, 500, 1000, 2000 or 4000µg/mL
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Solubility of test material - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- TA 1535 Migrated to IUCLID6: 2.5µL/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100 Migrated to IUCLID6: 10µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Potassium dichromate 10µg/plate
- Remarks:
- E.coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Neutral red 10µg/plate
- Remarks:
- TA 1537
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: Preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 30min
- Exposure duration: 48-72h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: other: colony count - Evaluation criteria:
- No data
- Statistics:
- No data
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- At concentrations >500µg/mL
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- At concentrations >500µg/mL
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: The test compound, DIBK, produced no evidence of precipitation in the top agar up to 8000µg/ml showing that it was completely miscible in the aqueous test system at these concentrations.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: In a preliminary cytotoxicity assay with Salmonella typhimurium TA 100, DIBK was cytotoxic at concentrations above 500µg/ml in both the presence and in the absence of rat liver S9 fraction. Microscopical examination of the background lawn in the bacterial mutation assays showed some variation in cytotoxicity between the strains but, in general agreed with the observations using TA 100.
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The addition of Diisobutyl Ketone (DIBK) at concentrations up to 4000 µg/ml to cultures of Escherichia coli. WP2 uvr A pkm 101, Salmonella typhimurium TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98 or TA100 did not lead to any increase in the reverse gene mutation rate of these strains either in the presence or in the absence of rat liver S9 fraction under the conditions of this study. - Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1985
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- only tested without metabolic activation
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Di-lsobutyl ketone (DIBK)
- Physical state: Colourless, clear liquid
- Analytical purity: 2:1 mixture of 2,6-dimethyl-4-heptanone and 4,6-dimethyl-2-heptanone, water 0.2%
m/m maximum
- Lot/batch No.: INDENT 9200/9943 - Target gene:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mammalian cell line, other: rat liver RL4 cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- not available
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 62.5, 125, 250 and 500µg/mL
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Solubility of test material in culture medium - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- Remarks:
- without S9 Migrated to IUCLID6: 1µg/mL
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 300
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: Yes - Evaluation criteria:
- No data
- Statistics:
- No data
- Species / strain:
- mammalian cell line, other: Rat liver RL4 cells
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- At concentrations >400µg/mL as tested in range finding test
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The only findings of note were two chromatid exchanges in one culture exposed to 125 µg/mL DIBK and a very small, apparently dose-related
increase in the frequency of chromatid gaps, but this is not considered to represent a compound-related effect, as the frequency of gaps was low
throughout. These observations are consistent with the amount of damage normally recorded in control cultures. The recorded incidence of polyploidy was high and variable in cultures. Although DIBK did not appear to affect this end point, it is considered that the changes would need to be large under these circumstances, and, therefore, the conclusions drawn from these results relate to structural chromosome aberrations only. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
DIBK did not induce in increase in chromosome aberrations in rat liver cells.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Maximum number of revertants for each strain compared to controls:
|
Maximum number of revertants (dose level [µg/mL]) |
|||||
solvent Control |
positive control |
DIBK treatment |
||||
Strain |
With S9 |
Without S9 |
With S9 |
Without S9 |
With S9 |
Without S9 |
TA 98 |
30 |
14 |
331 |
20 |
31 (250) |
15 (250) |
TA 100 |
88 |
78 |
360 |
81 |
91 (62.5) |
82 (31.25) |
TA 1535 |
12 |
10 |
240 |
546 |
10 (125) |
13 (500) |
TA 1537 |
20 |
10 |
58 |
16 |
27 (250) |
12 (62.5) |
TA 1538 |
27 |
17 |
116 |
15 |
30 (250) |
20 (62.5) |
E. coli WP2 |
33 |
47 |
68 |
216 |
39 (62.5) |
52 (125) |
The addition of Diisobutyl Ketone (DIBK) at concentrations up to 4000 µg/ml to cultures of Escherichia coli. WP2 uvr A pkm 101, Salmonella typhimurium TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98 or TA100 did not lead to any increase in the reverse gene mutation rate of these strains either in the presence or in the absence of rat liver S9 fraction under the conditions of this study.
Table 1: Metaphase chromosome analysis:
Conc. µg/mL |
% Cells showing |
|||||
Polyploidy |
Chromatid gaps |
Multiple aberrations |
Severe damage |
Chromatid aberrations |
Chromosome aberrations |
|
0 |
5.7 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0 |
0.3 |
0 |
125 |
7.7 |
0.3 |
0 |
0 |
0.7 |
0 |
250 |
8.0 |
0.7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
500 |
4.3 |
1.3 |
0 |
0 |
0.3 |
0 |
pos. control |
4.5 |
13.5 |
2.0 |
2.5 |
10.0 |
0 |
The results show that Diisobutyl Ketone (DIBK) did not induce chromosome damage in rat liver(RL4)cells under the experimental conditions described. In the same experiment the positive control 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene (DMBA) induced chromatid aberrations and acentric fragments. DIBK is non clastogenic to mammalian cells.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
All in vitro genotoxicity studies conducted with DIBK showed clearly negative results. DIBK did not induce gene mutation in bacteria nor in mammalian cells and DIBK did also not induce chromosome aberrations in mammalian cells.
No in vivo genotoxicity studies are available with DIBK.
Short description of key information:
GLP-studies according to or equivalent to OECD guidelines 471, 473
and 476 are available for diisibutylketone.
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
All in vitro genotoxicity studies conducted with DIBK showed clearly negative results. Hence, no classification for genotoxicity is applicable for DIBK.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.