Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 210-540-0 | CAS number: 618-03-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Based on the prediction done using the OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with log kow as the primary descriptor and considering the five closest read across substances, repeated dose toxicity was predicted for 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid. The study assumed the use of male and female Sprague Dawley rats in a 18 days toxicity study. Since no significant treatment related effects were observed at the mentioned dose level, hence the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid is predicted to be 948.0 mg/Kg bw/day.
Based on this value it can be concluded that the substance is considered to not toxic as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from OECD QSAR Toolbox version 3.4 and the supporting QMRF report has been attached
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Refer below principle
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Prediction is done using OECD QSAR Toolbox version 3.4, 2018
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (IUPAC name): 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid
- Molecular formula: C7H9NO3S
- Molecular weight: 187.218 g/mol
- Smiles notation: O=S(=O)(O)c1ccc(c(N)c1)C
- InChl: 1S/C7H9NO3S/c1-5-2-3-6(4-7(5)8)12(9,10)11/h2-4H,8H2,1H3,(H,9,10,11)
- Substance type: Organic - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on species / strain selection:
- No data
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- No data
- Route of administration:
- oral: unspecified
- Details on route of administration:
- No data
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Details on oral exposure:
- No data
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- No data
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 18 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Remarks:
- No data
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- No data
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- No data
- Positive control:
- No data
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- No data
- Sacrifice and pathology:
- No data
- Other examinations:
- No data
- Statistics:
- No data
- Clinical signs:
- not specified
- Mortality:
- not specified
- Body weight and weight changes:
- not specified
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- not specified
- Neuropathological findings:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Details on results:
- No data
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 948 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No significant alterations were noted at the mentioned dose level
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid is predicted to be 948.0 mg/Kg bw/day.
- Executive summary:
Based on the prediction done using the OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with log kow as the primary descriptor and considering the five closest read across substances, repeated dose toxicity was predicted for 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid. The study assumed the use of male and female Sprague Dawley rats in a 18 days toxicity study. Since no significant treatment related effects were observed at the mentioned dose level, hence the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid is predicted to be 948.0 mg/Kg bw/day.
Based on this value it can be concluded that the substance is considered to not toxic as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Reference
The
prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following
descriptors: NOAEL
Estimation method: Takes average value from the 5 nearest neighbours
Domain logical expression:Result: In Domain
((((((((("a"
or "b" or "c" or "d" or "e" )
or "f" )
and ("g"
and (
not "h")
)
)
and ("i"
and (
not "j")
)
)
and ("k"
and (
not "l")
)
)
and ("m"
and (
not "n")
)
)
and "o" )
and ("p"
and (
not "q")
)
)
and ("r"
and "s" )
)
Domain
logical expression index: "a"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Anilines (Acute toxicity) by
US-EPA New Chemical Categories
Domain
logical expression index: "b"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Radical AND Radical >> Radical
mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) AND Radical >> Radical mechanism
via ROS formation (indirect) >> Single-Ring Substituted Primary Aromatic
Amines AND SN1 AND SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after nitrenium ion
formation AND SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after nitrenium ion formation
>> Single-Ring Substituted Primary Aromatic Amines by DNA binding by
OASIS v.1.4
Domain
logical expression index: "c"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Moderate binder, NH2 group by
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "d"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as AN2 AND AN2 >> Michael-type
addition to quinoid structures AND AN2 >> Michael-type addition to
quinoid structures >> Substituted Anilines by Protein binding by OASIS
v1.4
Domain
logical expression index: "e"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Acid moiety AND Anilines
(Hindered) by Aquatic toxicity classification by ECOSAR
Domain
logical expression index: "f"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Benzene/ Naphthalene sulfonic
acids (Less susceptible) Rank C by Repeated dose (HESS)
Domain
logical expression index: "g"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Moderate binder, NH2 group by
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "h"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Non binder, impaired OH or NH2
group OR Non binder, MW>500 by Estrogen Receptor Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "i"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alkyl arenes AND Aniline AND
Aryl AND Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups
Domain
logical expression index: "j"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aliphatic Amine, primary OR
Alkane, branched with tertiary carbon by Organic Functional groups
Domain
logical expression index: "k"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alkyl arenes AND Aniline AND
Aryl AND Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups
Domain
logical expression index: "l"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aminoaniline, meta OR
Aminoaniline, ortho by Organic Functional groups
Domain
logical expression index: "m"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alkyl arenes AND Aniline AND
Aryl AND Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups
Domain
logical expression index: "n"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Surfactants - Anionic by Organic
Functional groups
Domain
logical expression index: "o"
Similarity
boundary:Target:
Cc1ccc(S(O)(=O)=O)cc1N
Threshold=40%,
Dice(Atom centered fragments)
Atom type; Count H attached; Hybridization
Domain
logical expression index: "p"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Amine AND Aromatic compound AND
Primary amine AND Primary aromatic amine AND Sulfonic acid AND Sulfonic
acid derivative by Organic functional groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol)
Domain
logical expression index: "q"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Carboxylic acid by Organic
functional groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol)
Domain
logical expression index: "r"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= -3.28
Domain
logical expression index: "s"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= 0.244
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 948 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is from K2 QSAR prediiction database
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Repeated dose toxicity: Oral
Prediction model based estimation and data from read across chemicals have been reviewed to determine the mutagenic nature of
2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid. The studies are as mentioned below:
Based on the prediction done using the OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with log kow as the primary descriptor and considering the five closest read across substances, repeated dose toxicity was predicted for 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid. The study assumed the use of male and female Sprague Dawley rats in a 18 days toxicity study. Since no significant treatment related effects were observed at the mentioned dose level, hence the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid is predicted to be 948.0 mg/Kg bw/day.
The predicted data for the target chemical is further supported by the data from read across chemicals as mentoined below:
Repeated dose toxicity study was performed to evaluate the toxic nature of 80 -90% structurally similar read across chemical 2-amino-5-methyl benzene sulfonic acid (RA CAS no 88 -44 -8) (J-check, 2018) using male and female Crj: CD (SD) rats. The test chemical was dissolved in sesame oil and used at dose levels of 0, 30, 300 or 1000 mg/Kg/day. The treated animals were observed for clinical signs, mortality, changes in body weight and food consumption, and the animals were subjected to gross and histopathology. In both males and females, there was no effect of administration of test substance on change in general condition and body weight.In males, the mean daily food intake for the 8 to 15 days in the 1000 mg / kg group showed a statistically significant high value, and the cumulative food consumption from 1 to 15 days of administration showed a high value. In females, there was no difference between the control group and each test substance-administered group over the administration period. In males, no difference was observed between the control group and each test substance-administered group throughout the administration period. In females, at 100 and 1000 mg / kg group, the statistically significant low values were observed only on the 4th day of nursing compared to the control group. However, since there was no obvious difference on the other measurement day and it was a change only for 1 day, and since there was no obvious change in body weight gain during the nursing period, the influence of administration of the test substance It was not thought to be an accidental change. In the 300 mg / kg group, the actual weight of the epididymis showed a statistically significant lower value than the control group, but there was no difference in the relative weight, and a similar change was observed in the 1000 mg / kg group. There was no difference between the control group and each test substance administered group for testicular weight. No findings that could be attributed to the administration of the test substance were observed in any of the animals. In males, black lesions of the lungs were observed in the control group and 1 group in the 300 mg / kg group in the male, 1 red subject in the liver and white spots in the 300 mg / kg group, 1 in the same individual, testis and epididymal atrophy was observed in one group of the same individual in the 300 mg / kg group, and one in each group in the 300 and 1000 mg / kg group of thinning of the coat. No abnormal findings were observed in one female in the 100 mg / kg group that did not mate. Tissue findings showed seminiferous tubular atrophy in male. However, although it is suggested that it may be a factor of mating failure, it was judged that there is no relation with the administration of the test substance from the frequency of occurrence. Based on the observations made, the No observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) was considered to be 1000mg/kg/day for 2-amino-5-methyl benzene sulfonic acid in male and female Crj: CD (SD) rats during subchronic repeated dose toxicity study.
50 -60% structurally and functionally similar read across chemical 2-phenyl-1H-benzimidazole-5-sulphonic acid (RA CAS no 27503 -81 -7) was administered orally to male and female Wistar rats 7 days/week for 13 weeks (SCCP, 2006). The study was conducted according to OECD guideline 408. The dosage was 0, 100, 330 and 1000 mg/kg bw, and the vehicle (5% aqueous tylose) administration group was provided as a control. Animals were examined with respect to in-life-observations (viz. mortalities and clinical signs of toxicity, body weight and food-/water consumption were recorded.), clinical pathology (viz. haematology, clinical chemistry and urinalysis) and anatomic pathology (viz. organ weights, necropsy, histopathology.). Three mortalities (1♂, week 5, control group; 1♀, week 13, 330 mg/kg-group; 1♀, week 6, 1000 mg/kg-group) occurred intercurrently but were not substance related. No clinical signs of toxicity were seen in any group. Food- and water consumption were the same in test- and control groups. Haematology results (total and differential blood count) of test animals did not differ from controls throughout the experiment. The same holds for clinico-chemical parameters, except for protein content in serum in females of the 1000 mg/kg-group, which was increased as compared to controls. However, the level found was within the biological variability range on record for female rats of this age and was therefore not considered substance related. Necropsy-findings in the animals which had died intercurrently, revealed no pathological changes attributable to the test substance. Neither did the animals which were sacrificed pursuant to protocol at the end of the study exhibit any such changes. Differences in organ weights, if observable at all (e.g. spleen in♀'s), were small and not dose dependent. Histopathology did not reveal any organ change or –damage in any one of the dose groups. Based on the above study, the toxicologically no adverse effect amount by repetitive oral administration of 2-phenyl-1H-benzimidazole-5-sulphonic acid ( Novantisol saure) (CAS No. 27503 -81 -7) for 13 weeks was observed and hence under this test condition NOAEL was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Based on the data available for the target chemical and its read across, 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid is not likely to be toxic upon repeated exposure by oral route as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the data available for the target chemical and its read across, 2-aminotoluene-4-sulphonic acid (CAS no 618 -03 -1) is not likely to be toxic upon repeated exposure by oral route as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.