Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 208-580-9 | CAS number: 533-96-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study was conducted before the implementation of GLP according to a method similar to OECD Testing Guideline 471. Sufficient information is provided in the study report on the methods and materials used and the results and conclusions.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- plate incorporation method
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- S. typhimurium TA1538 was used instead of E. coli WP2 uvrA, or E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101), or S. typhimurium TA102. Highest concentration tested during the study was above the highest concentration recommended by OECD 471
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The strains used in this study varied from those suggested in the OECD 471 test guideline. S. typhimurium histTA1538 was used in place of E. coli WP2 uvrA, or E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101), or S. typhimurium TA102. This deviation is not expected to affect the results of the study as E. coli WP2 uvrA, or E. coli WP2 uvrA (pKM101), or S. typhimurium TA102 are recommended for detecting mutation in hydrazine or oxidising substances and cross-linking agent which may not be detected in the other recommended S. typhimurium strains. Sodium sesquicarbinate is not expected to be oxidising or to function as a cross-linking agent. Further, the highest concentration tested during the study was above the highest concentration recommended by OECD 471.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- The target genes were not named in the study. The strains used has three mutations; histidine mutation to make the strain auxotrophic to histidine, a mutation which effects losses of the excision repair mechanism and a mutation which effects losses to the lippopolysacharide portion of cell walls.
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: LT2
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: LT2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver S9 (Arcoclor 1254 induced)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Mutagenicity spot testing: 50 μg/plate with and without metabolic activation in all strains
Plate incorporation testing: 50 μg/plate with and without metabolic activation in all strains plus addition of a 0.1 ml solution containing 50 μg of a known mutagen added over the surface of the agar - Vehicle / solvent:
- Sterile, double distilled water
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- other: 2-amino-anthracene and 4-nitro-o-phenylene diamine
- Remarks:
- Made with both the spot test and plate incorporation test
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- The agar plates used in the study were Vogel Bonner Medium E minmial agar plates.
Mutagenicity spot testing was conducted as an initial screening test. Post-mitochondrial preparations (S9) from the livers of male Sprague-Dawley rats (150 - 200 g) from Charles River Laboratories were made. The rat livers were induced with 500 mg/kg Aroclor 1254 in corn oil, administered in one dose on day one. The liver extracts were prepared after the rats were killed on day 6. The liver homogenate supernatent was stored in 1 ml aliquots at -70°C and was checked for bacterial contamination. The S9 activation system was checked by assessing the reversion of all strains by 5 μg/plate of 2-aminoanthracene, a known mutagen.
The spot test was conducted using 50 μg of sodium sesquicarbonate in all strains with and without S9 mixture, with the S9 mixture present at 50 μl/plate. Plates were incubated for 2 days at 37°C in the dark.
A plate incorporation test was conducted under similar conditions as the spot test other than the sodium sesquicarbonate being added to the top agar before the bacteria and S9 mix. The agar and S9 mix were prepared in the same way as in the spot test. 0.05 mg/plate, 0.5 mg/plate and 5 mg/plate of sodium sesquicarbinare was tested in duplicate against each strain in at least six independent tests. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 2 days and counted using a Quebec colony counter.
Each plate was examined for 'background lawn' and positive and negative controls, along with sterility controls, were run for each test.
Negative controls included plates containing only bacteria and plaes containing bacteria and the solvent to be used in the test, in each case both with and without S9 mix.
Positive controls with known mutagens were used. The plates were prepared using the same procedure as for the spot test with the addition of 0.1 ml of a solution containing 50 μg of the teh mutagen. The solution was added over the surface of the agar. The substances used as positive controls were: 2-aminoanthracene in DMSO, 4-nitro-o-phenylene diamine in DMSO, sodium azide in water and 9-aminoacridine in ethanol.
Sterility control plates were also examined for the sodium sesquicarbonate, the solvent (water), top agar and the S9 mix.
All experimental plates and control plates were prepared at least in duplicate. - Evaluation criteria:
- The mutagenic toxicity of the sodium sesquicarbonate was assessed based on either a clearing of the bacterial lawn or the appearance of pinpoint colonies. Plate counts were performed before and after exposure to sodium sesquicarbonate to determine the percentage survival of colony-forming units per complete growth medium plate. If there was a significant increase i.e. a reproducible dose related increase in the number of revertent colonies in the number of colonies on the plate when compared with the negative control plate and the sodium sesquicarbonate plate then the test substance was considered to be mutagenic.
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The results provided above relate to the plate incorporation test using sodium sesquicarbonate. The substance had previously been shown to be positive for genotoxicity in the spot test on TA100 without metabolic activation, however, in the plate incorporation test sodium sesquicarbonate was found to be negative for genotoxicity for all strains tested both with and without S9 mix.
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation
Sodium sesquicarbonate was found to be negative for genotoxicity in five mutated strains of Salmonella typhimurium up to a concentration of 5 mg/plate both with and without metabolic activation. - Executive summary:
A study was carried out using a method equivalent to the OECD Testing Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test) to determine the mutagenicity of 25 cosmetic product ingredients including sodium sesquicarbonate. Five mutated strains of Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium LT2 hisTA98, hisTA100, hisTA1535, hisTA1537 and hisTA1538) were exposed to sodium sesquicarbonate first in a spot test for screening and subsequently in a plate incorporation test. The test substance was found to be positive for genotoxicity in the spot test on TA100 without metabolic activation, however, in the plate incorporation test sodium sesquicarbonate was found to be negative for genotoxicity for all strains tested both with and without S9 mix. Positive and negative controls, along with sterility controls, were conducted and all were found to be valid.
Reference
In the plate incorporation test sodium sesquicarbonate was found to be negative for genotoxicity for all strains tested both with and without S9 mix. A negative result in the plate incorporation test was defined as the absence of a reproducible increase in revertants where at least 5 mg per plate or the maximum non-inhibitory level has been tested.
Sodium sesquibarbonate gave a tow- to three-fold increase over the solvent control count in strain TA1538 with metabolic activation, and a two-fold increase over the solvent control count in TA1538. However, these increases were not dose-related and therefore were not considered to demonstrate genotoxicity of the substance.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
A study was carried out using a method equivalent to the OECD Testing Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test) to determine the mutagenicity of 25 cosmetic product ingredients including sodium sesquicarbonate. Five mutated strains of Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium LT2 hisTA98, hisTA100, hisTA1535, hisTA1537 and hisTA1538) were exposed to sodium sesquicarbonate first in a spot test for screening and subsequently in a plate incorporation test. The test substance was found to be positive for genotoxicity in the spot test on TA100 without metabolic activation, however, in the plate incorporation test sodium sesquicarbonate was found to be negative for genotoxicity for all strains tested both with and without S9 mix. Positive and negative controls, along with sterility controls, were conducted and all were found to be valid. This negative result was supported by the results of limited but well documented and reliable studies found in the scientific literature.
No study was found in the literature on the potential of trisodium hydrogendicarbonate to induce either chromosome aberration in mammalian cells or gene mutation in mammalian cells. The substance is expected to dissociate into its constituent parts - sodium hydrogencarbonate and sodium carbonate - in the typical pH range of mammalian cells; based on this, QSAR predictions were carried out for the in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity of the substance and its constituents. All predictions were found to be negative; this was further supported by a study identified in the literature which found sodium hydrogencarbonate to be negative for chromosomal aberration in mammalian cells.
No literature information on the potential of the substance or its constituents to induce gene mutation in mammalian cells was identified, however, considering the weight of evidence available for the geneotoxic potential of trisodium hydrogendicarbonate, it is considered the case that an experimental study on the potential of the substance to induce gene mutation in mammalian cells is not necessary since it is unlikely to provide additional relevant data about the in vivo mutagenicity potential of the substance. This is in accordance with ECHA’s Endpoint Specific Guidance on Genotoxicity (ECHA, 2015), which states that the potential of a substance to induce gene mutation in mammalian cells does not need to be evaluated, if it can be demonstrated that it will not provide any further useful information about the potential in vivo mutagenicity of a substance
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
This study was performed on the registered substance Trisodium Hydrogendicarbonate. The study was well documented and considered equivalent to OECD 471, therefore, the negative result is considered to be representative of the genotoxicity of Trisodium Hydrogendicarbonate.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available information, the substance is not classified according to EU CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.