Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 278-093-4 | CAS number: 75173-68-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- reproductive toxicity, other
- Remarks:
- Long term study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from peer-reviewed journal
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Long-term toxicity study of carmoisine in rats using animals exposed in utero
- Author:
- G. P. FORD, B. I. STEVENSON and J. G. EVANS
- Year:
- 1 987
- Bibliographic source:
- Fd Chem. Toxic. Vol. 25, No. 12, pp. 919-925, 1987
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Combined repeated dose & carcinogenicity
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Combined repeated dose & carcinogenicity Test of Carmoisine in male and female Wistar rats.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Disodium 4-hydroxy-3-[(4-sulphonatonaphthyl)azo]naphthalenesulphonate
- EC Number:
- 222-657-4
- EC Name:
- Disodium 4-hydroxy-3-[(4-sulphonatonaphthyl)azo]naphthalenesulphonate
- Cas Number:
- 3567-69-9
- Molecular formula:
- C20H14N2O7S2.2Na
- IUPAC Name:
- Disodium 4-hydroxy-3-[(4-sulphonatonaphthyl)azo]naphthalene sulphonate
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material: Carmoisine
- Molecular formula: C20H14N2O7S2.2Na
- Molecular weight: 502.4338 g/mol
- Substance type: organic
- Physical state: No data available
- Purity 85% dye
- Impurities (identity and concentrations):
15.0 %NaCI
>0 1% subsidiary colors
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material: Carmoisine
- Molecular formula: C20H14N2O7S2.2Na
- Molecular weight: 502.4338 g/mol
- Substance type: organic
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- - Source: Olac (1976) Ltd, Bicester, Oxon
- Age at study initiation: (P) x wks; No data available. (F1) x wks
- Weight at study initiation: (P) Males: x-x g; Females: x-x g; (F1) Males: x-x g; Females: x-x g- No data available
- Fasting period before study: No data available.
- Housing: Housed six to a cage in an air-conditioned room.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Spratt's Laboratory Animal Diet No. 2 (Spratt's Patent, Barking, Essex) ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: No data available
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20°C
- Humidity (%):40-70%
- Air changes (per hr): No data available.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 14/10-hr light/dark cycle in phase with the natural light.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- other: Spratt's Laboratory Animal Diet No. 2
- Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: 13 days
- Proof of pregnancy: [vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear] referred to as [day 0 / day 1] of pregnancy No data available.
- After … days of unsuccessful pairing replacement of first male by another male with proven fertility. No data available.
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: [no / yes (explain)] No data available.
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): The females were housed individually.
- Any other deviations from standard protocol: Sibling mating was avoided. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- For male
115 weeks
For female
110 weeks - Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Details on study schedule:
- Groups of 114 (control) or 66 (treated) rats of each sex were fed diets providing 0 (control), 100, 400 or 1200 mg carmoisine/kg body weight/day for 9 wk. Within each group the animals were mated monogamously. Treatment continued uninterrupted until the young were randomly selected (where possible one/sex/litter) from each of the litters to provide groups of 90 (control) and 54 (treated) rats of each sex. These received the same treatment as their parents for up to 110 wk for females or 115 wk for males. They were observed for mortality, clinical sign, body weight, food intake and water intake, hematology, clinical chemistry, urine analysis, gross pathology and histopathology.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 400 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 200 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Total no .of animals-624
P group
0mg/kg/day-114 male and 114 female rats
100 mg/kg/day- 66 male and 66 female rats
400 mg/kg/day- 66 male and 66 female rats
1200 mg/kg/day- 66 male and 66 female rats
Total no.of anomals-504
F1 generation
0mg/kg/day-90 male and 90 female rats
100 mg/kg/day- 54 male and 54female rats
400 mg/kg/day- 54 male and 54female rats
1200 mg/kg/day- 54 male and 54female rats
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- not specified
- Positive control:
- not specified
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- Survival, clinical sign, body weight food intake, water intake, haematology, clinical chestry and Urine analysis were examined.
- Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- not specified
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- not specified
- Litter observations:
- Survival, clinical sign, body weight food intake, water intake, haematology, clinical chestry and Urine analysis were examined.
- Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- Organ wieght, gross pathology and histopathology were examined.
- Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- Organ wieght, gross pathology and histopathology were examined.
- Statistics:
- All data were subject to the appropriate statistical tests (see tables) and a probability level of 0.05 or less was taken as statistically significant.
- Reproductive indices:
- not specified
- Offspring viability indices:
- not specified
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant change of carmoisine on the condition or behaviour of the animals, apart from coloration of the fur, urine and faeces with an intensity increasing with dose.
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- No effect on survival of treated rats were observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- not specified
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not specified
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not specified
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not specified
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No effect on mating, pregnancy, lactation and weaning of reated rats as compared to control.
Effect levels (P0)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 200 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- mortality
- reproductive performance
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effect observed
Target system / organ toxicity (P0)
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- System:
- other: not specified
- Organ:
- not specified
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Effect like coloration of the fur, urine and faeces with an intensity increasing with dose . But no significant change were observed in animals behaviour and condition in treated group compare to control.
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant change were observed in the mortality in treated group compare to control.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Significant change were observed in the body weights of F1 males receiving either 400 and 1200 mg carmoisine/kg/day were lower than those of the controls throughout the study.
Females receiving 1200 mg/kg/day weighed significantly less than the controls from wk 32 onwards. In both sexes the magnitude of the observed differences increased with time. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Significant change was observed in the food intakes of the1200 mg carmoisine/kg/day males was observed compare to control.
Even in female 1200 mg carmoisine/kg/day groups were greater than those of the controls, but the differences in females was unrelated to dose. - Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Water intakes of treated animals showed some inconsistency during the study. For the first 12 months there was a dose-related higher intake in both sexes receiving 400 or 1200 mg carmoisine /kg/day. During the second year the water intake of males receiving 1200mg/kg/day or of females receiving 400mg/ kg/day was no longer different from that of the controls.
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant change were observed in at all dose level 100, 400 or 1200 mg /kg body weight/day of treated group compare to control.
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Lower glucose concentrations was observed in males at dose level of 1200 mg/kg/day compare to control.
While a Lower glucose concentration was observed in females at dose level of 400 and 1200 mg/kg/day compare to control. - Urinalysis findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Semi-quantitative analyses of urine were hindered in treated animals, particularly at the 1200 mg/kg/day, by the colour of the urine which obscured the colour reaction of the reagent test strips. Despite these limitations, which meant that some samples obtained from 1200 mg/kg/day animals were not usable, a higher proportion of samples from the from 1200 mg/kg/day females showed a high level of protein at both 18 and 24 months.
- Sexual maturation:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant change were observed in any organ except caecum weight. The caecum was the only organ whose weight and relative weight (g/100 g body weight) showed changes associated with treatment. At 1200 and 400 mg/kg/day dose level in males both weight and relative weight of the caecum, with and without contents, were greater than the control values, although the increases were only statistically significant at the1200 mg /kg body weight/day. In females at the dose level of 1200 mg /kg body weight/day only the relative weight of the empty caecum was significantly greater than that of the controls. The changes in caecum weight were accompanied by observations at autopsy that the caecum wall was thicker in the treated animals
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Significant thickness was observed in caecum wall at 1200 mg /kg body weight/day group of treated animals compare to control .
- Histopathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Non neoplastic- Age-related changes to be expected in rats of the strain used. Some of the changes recorded showed a positive dose-related trend together with a significantly higher incidence when individual groups were compared with the controls. These were, pupillary hyperplasia of the bladder in males and blood/fibrin cysts of the adrenal gland and internal hyperplasia / medial hypertrophy of the pancreatic blood vessels in females.
Neoplastic- The total incidences of benign or malignant tumours showed no treatment-related differences. There were no differences between the treated and control groups in the incidences of individual types of tumour apart from adrenal phaeochromocytoma which showed a statistically significant treatment-related difference in males based on four tumours in the 1200 mg/kg/day group compare to controls. A similar difference was not observed in females. - Other effects:
- not specified
Developmental neurotoxicity (F1)
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
Developmental immunotoxicity (F1)
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not specified
Effect levels (F1)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 400 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- viability
- clinical signs
- mortality
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
- water consumption and compound intake
- haematology
- clinical biochemistry
- urinalysis
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- histopathology: neoplastic
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effect observed
Target system / organ toxicity (F1)
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- System:
- other: not specified
- Organ:
- not specified
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Relation to other toxic effects:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- NOAEL was considered to be 1200 mg/kg bw for P generation and 400 mg/kg bw for F1 generation when Wistar male and female rats were treated with Carmoisine orally in feed for 115 weeks.
- Executive summary:
In a long term toxicity study, Wistar male and female rats were treated with Carmoisine in the concentration of 0 (control), 100, 400 or 1200 mg /kg body weight/day orally in feed for 115 weeks. No significant change of carmoisine on the condition or behaviour of the animals, apart from coloration of the fur, urine and faeces with an intensity increasing with dose. No effect on survival of treated rats was observed. No effect on mating, pregnancy, lactation and weaning of P treated rats as compared to control. In addition, Effect like coloration of the fur, urine and faeces with an intensity increasing with dose in F1 pups. But no significant change was observed in animals behaviour and condition in treated group compare to control. No significant change was observed in the survival of F1 treated group compare to control. Significant change was observed in the body weights of F1 males receiving 400 and 1200 mg/kg/day were lower than those of the controls throughout the study. Females receiving 1200 mg/kg/day weighed significantly less than the controls from week 32 onwards. In both sexes the magnitude of the observed differences increased with time. Significant change was observed in the food intakes of the1200 mg /kg/day males was observed compare to control. Even in female 1200 mg/kg/day were greater than those of the controls, but the differences in females was unrelated to dose. Water intakes of treated animals showed some inconsistency during the study. For the first 12 months there was a dose-related higher intake in both sexes receiving 400 or 1200 mg /kg/day. During the second year the water intake of males receiving 1200mg/kg/day or of females receiving 400 mg/ kg/day was no longer different from that of the controls. No significant change was observed at all dose level 100, 400 or 1200 mg /kg body weight/day of treated group compare to control. Lower glucose concentrations were observed in males at dose level of 1200 mg/kg/day compare to control. While a Lower glucose concentration was observed in females at dose level of 400 and 1200 mg/kg/day compare to control. Semi-quantitative analyses of urine were hindered in treated animals, particularly at the 1200 mg/kg/day, by the colour of the urine which obscured the colour reaction of the reagent test strips. Despite these limitations, which meant that some samples obtained from 1200 mg/kg/day animals were not usable, a higher proportion of samples from the 1200 mg/kg/day females showed a high level of protein at both 18 and 24 months. No significant change was observed in any organ except caecum weight. The caecum was the only organ whose weight and relative weight (g/100 g body weight) showed changes associated with treatment. At 1200 and 400 mg/kg/day dose level in males both weight and relative weight of the caecum, with and without contents, were greater than the control values, although the increases were only statistically significant at the1200 mg /kg body weight/day. In females at the dose level of 1200 mg /kg body weight/day only the relative weight of the empty caecum was significantly greater than that of the controls. The changes in caecum weight were accompanied by observations at autopsy that the caecum wall was thicker in the treated animals. Similarly, significant thickness was observed in caecum wall at 1200 mg /kg body weight/day group of treated animals compare to control. Age-related changes to be expected in rats of the strain used. Some of the changes recorded showed a positive dose-related trend together with a significantly higher incidence when individual groups were compared with the controls. These were pupillary hyperplasia of the bladder in males and blood/fibrin cysts of the adrenal gland and internal hyperplasia / medial hypertrophy of the pancreatic blood vessels in females. The total incidences of benign or malignant tumours showed no treatment-related differences. There were no differences between the treated and control groups in the incidences of individual types of tumour apart from adrenal phaeochromocytoma which showed a statistically significant treatment-related difference in males based on four tumours in the 1200 mg/kg/day group compare to controls. A similar difference was not observed in females. Therefore, NOAEL was considered to be 1200 mg/kg bw for P generation and 400 mg/kg bw for F1 generation when Wistar male and female rats were treated with Carmoisine orally in feed for 115 weeks.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.