Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 220-120-9 | CAS number: 2634-33-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- two-generation reproductive toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 002
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3800 (Reproduction and Fertility Effects)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1,2-benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one
- EC Number:
- 220-120-9
- EC Name:
- 1,2-benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one
- Cas Number:
- 2634-33-5
- Molecular formula:
- C7H5NOS
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,2-benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one
- Test material form:
- solid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Proxel Press Paste
Batch Numbers 103 and 344.
Purity
Batch No. 103: 93.1%
Batch No. 344: 92.7 ± 1.1%
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: WI(Glx/BRL/Han)BR
- Sex:
- female
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Exposure period: P generation: Max of 18 weeks, F1 generation: Max of 19 weeks
Premating exposure period (females): 10 weeks
Duration of test: Total Duration: 38 weeks - Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Details on study schedule:
- IUCLID4 Number of generation studies: 1
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
P generation: 250, 500 and 1000 ppm with calculated intake of 27.0, 54.2 and 112.0 mg/kg bw/day
F1 generation: 250, 500 and 1000 ppm with calculated intake of 28.2, 56.6 and 114.8 mg/kg bw/day
- Control animals:
- other: Yes, fed diet only
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
Details on results (P0)
Effect levels (P0)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 112 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- body weight and weight gain
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 112 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- reproductive function (oestrous cycle)
- reproductive function (sperm measures)
- reproductive performance
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Sexual maturation:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
Details on results (F1)
Effect levels (F1)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 56.6 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
Results: F2 generation
Effect levels (F2)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F2a
- Effect level:
- 56.6 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- viability
- body weight and weight gain
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Materials and methods
The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of the test article, PROXEL Press Paste (1,2-Benzisothiazolin-3-one, aka BIT), on the integrity and performance of the male and female reproductive systems including gonadal function, the oestrous cycle, mating behaviour, conception, pregnancy, parturition, lactation, weaning and the growth and development of the offspring when administered orally, by diet, to two successive generations. The study was designed to meet the known requirements of the EPA Health Effects Test Guidelines OPPTS 870.3800 (1998).
Groups of 24 male and 24 female parental rats (P generation) were given PROXEL Press Paste by admixture with the diet at dose levels of 250, 500 or 1000 ppm. A similar group received the control diet only. The animals received the test diet for 10 weeks before pairing for two weeks. The dosing continued during this pairing period and throughout the resulting pregnancies. The P generation females were allowed to litter and rear their offspring (F1a) to weaning. Administration of the test article continued throughout the weaning of the F1 offspring until necropsy.
Twenty-four animals of each sex were randomly selected from each group to form the filial (F1) generation. Direct treatment of the F1 generation continued during their maturation period (10 weeks), the mating period (up to two weeks) and throughout the resulting pregnancies and weaning of the F2 offspring up until necropsy. All F1 females were allowed to litter and rear their offspring (F2a) to weaning.
Results and discussion
P Generation
Clinical observations, body weights and food intakes were unaffected by treatment.
Mating data, duration of gestation, numbers of implantations, numbers of pups born and pup survival were similar in all groups.
Mean pup weight gain of the high dose pups was slightly lower than control over the first week post partum. However, over the whole lactation period, mean pup weight gain was similar in all groups.
There were no adverse effects of treatment on the seminology data.
In the high dose group, mean liver weight of the males was slightly higher than, and mean testes weight slightly lower than, control. Neither of these findings was considered to represent adverse effects of treatment.
Minor limiting ridge hyperplasia in the stomach was noted in some intermediate and many high dose animals. Squamous cell hyperplasia and forestomach gastritis were also seen in a few animals.
F1 Generation
Males in the high dose group gained slightly less weight than the controls during the study and the high dose females gained slightly less weight during the pre-pairing period, only.
Clinical observations and food intakes were unaffected by treatment.
Physical development of the F1 generation, mating data, duration of gestation and F2a pup sex ratio were unaffected by treatment. Pup survival to Day 4 post partum and mean pup weight gain were slightly lower in the high dose group compared to control.
Seminology investigations, organ weights and ovarian follicle counts were unaffected by treatment.
In the intermediate and high dose groups, limiting ridge hyperplasia in the stomach was noted. This was most prominent in the high dose females where there was also squamous cell hyperplasia, forestomach gastritis, hyperkeratosis and erosion/ulcer.
Conclusion
Dietary administration of 1000 ppm PROXEL Press Paste to rats for two generations produced slight adult toxicity in the F1 generation in terms of lower body weight gain, and in both generations, limiting ridge hyperplasia of the stomach together with incidences of squamous cell hyperplasia, forestomach gastritis, keratosis and erosion/ulcer. At this concentration, the growth of the offspring was slightly impaired and in the F2a offspring, there was a slight reduction in pup survival.
At the 500 ppm dose level there were incidences of limiting ridge hyperplasia in the stomach.
There were no adverse effects of treatment at 250 ppm, equivalent to an approximate overall mean intake of 24 mg/kg/day.
LO(A)EL
Parent males LO(A)EL: 500 ppm (mean dose of 37.2 mg/kg/day) based on hyperplasia of the limiting ridge of the stomach
Parent females LO(A)EL: 500 ppm (mean dose of 54.2 mg/kg/day) based on hyperplasia of the limiting ridge of the stomach
F1 males LO(A)EL: 1000 ppm (mean dose of 97.8 mg/kg/day) based on impaired growth and survival of pups
F1 females LO(A)EL: 1000 ppm (mean dose rate of 114.8 mg/kg/day) based on impaired growth and survival of pups
NO(A)EL
Parent males 250 ppm (mean dose rate of 18.5 mg/kg/day)
Parent females 250 ppm (mean dose rate of 27.0 mg/kg/day)
F1 males 500 ppm (mean dose rate of 48.0 mg/kg/day)
F1 females 500 ppm (mean dose rate of 56.6 mg/kg/day) - Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the reproductive toxicity of the substance in rats according to US EPA Guideline OPPTS 870.3800. Groups of 24 male and 24 female rats (P generation) were administered the test substance by diet at dose levels of 250, 500 or 1000 ppm (equivalent to 27.0, 54.2 and 112.0 mg/kg bw/day). A similar group received the control diet only. The animals received the test diet for 10 weeks before pairing for two weeks. The dosing continued during this pairing period and throughout the resulting pregnancies. The P generation females were allowed to litter and rear their offspring (F1a) to weaning. Administration of the test substance continued throughout the weaning of the F1 offspring until necropsy. 24 animals of each sex were randomly selected from each group to form the F1 generation. Treatment of the F1 generation at dose levels of 250, 500 and 1000 ppm (equivalent to 28.2, 56.6 and 114.8 mg/kg/day) through diet continued during their maturation period (10 weeks), the mating period (up to two weeks) and throughout the resulting pregnancies and weaning of the F2 offspring up until necropsy. All F1 females were allowed to litter and rear their offspring (F2a) to weaning. Clinical observations, body weights and food intake of the P generation were unaffected by treatment. Mating data, duration of gestation, numbers of implantations, numbers of pups born and pup survival were similar in all groups. In F1, the mean pup weight gain of the high dose pups was slightly lower than control over the first week post-partum. However, over the whole lactation period, mean pup weight gain was similar in all groups. There were no adverse effects of treatment on the seminology data. Minor limiting ridge hyperplasia in the stomach was noted in some intermediate and many high dose F1 animals. Squamous cell hyperplasia and forestomach gastritis were also seen in few animals. F1 males in the high dose group gained slightly less body weight than the controls during the study and the high dose females gained slightly less body weight during the pre-pairing period only. Clinical observations and food intake of F1 were unaffected by treatment. Physical development of the F1 generation, mating data, duration of gestation and F2a pup sex ratio were unaffected by treatment. Pup survival till Day 4 post-partum and mean pup weight gain were slightly lower in the high dose group compared to control. Seminology investigations, organ weights and ovarian follicle counts were unaffected by treatment. In the intermediate and high dose F1 animals, limiting ridge hyperplasia in the stomach was noted. This was most prominent in the high dose females where there was also squamous cell hyperplasia, forestomach gastritis, hyperkeratosis and erosion/ulcer. Based on the study results, it was concluded that, dietary administration of the test substance at 1000 ppm to rats for two generations produced toxicity in the F1 generation in terms of lower body weight gain, and in both generations, limiting ridge hyperplasia of the stomach together with incidences of squamous cell hyperplasia, forestomach gastritis, keratosis and erosion/ulcer. At this dose, the growth of the offspring was slightly impaired and in the F2a generation, there was a slight reduction in pup survival probably as a consequence of maternal toxicity. Under the study conditions, the systemic NOAEL of the substance in rats was considered to be 112 mg/kg/day in P generation, 56.6 mg/kg/day in F1 generation and 56.6 mg/kg/day in the F2 generation considering the local nature of the gastric irritation produced by the test substance administration. The NOAEL for reproductive toxicity of the substance in rats was considered to be 112 mg/kg/day (Clode, 2002).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.