Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 222-793-4 | CAS number: 3615-41-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
In Vitro (Mutagenic effects - bacterial): QSAR; Bacterial reverse mutation assay. Negative. Reliability = 2.
In Vitro (Clastogenic effects - mammalian): QSAR; Chromosome aberrations. Negative. Reliability = 2.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Times v.2.27.17.6 in QSAR Toolbox
Toolbox prediction report is attached in IUCLID. - GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SMILES: CC{P+}(O)C{P+}(O)C{P-}(O)C{P-}(O)C=O
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other:
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks on result:
- no mutagenic potential (based on QSAR/QSPR prediction)
- Conclusions:
- Negative with metabolic activation
- Executive summary:
The Times model for in vitro bacterial cell mutagenicity was used within the QSAR Toolbox. The prediction was negative with activation. Additional supporting documentation is provided in the prediction report attached in IUCLID.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Times v.2.27.17.6 in QSAR Toolbox
Toolbox prediction report is attached in IUCLID. - GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SMILES: CC{P+}(O)C{P+}(O)C{P-}(O)C{P-}(O)C=O
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other:
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks on result:
- no mutagenic potential (based on QSAR/QSPR prediction)
- Conclusions:
- Negative without metabolic activation
- Executive summary:
The Times model for in vitro bacterial cell mutagenicity was used within the QSAR Toolbox. The prediction was negative without activation. Additional supporting documentation is provided in the prediction report attached in IUCLID.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Times v.2.27.17.6 in QSAR Toolbox
Toolbox prediction report is attached in IUCLID. - GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SMILES: CC{P+}(O)C{P+}(O)C{P-}(O)C{P-}(O)C=O
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- other: CHO and CHL cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks on result:
- no mutagenic potential (based on QSAR/QSPR prediction)
- Conclusions:
- Negative with metabolic activation
- Executive summary:
The Times model for in vitro chromosome aberrations was used within the QSAR Toolbox. The prediction was negative with activation. Additional supporting documentation is provided in the prediction report attached in IUCLID.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Times v.2.27.17.6 in QSAR Toolbox
Toolbox prediction report is attached in IUCLID. - GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SMILES: CC{P+}(O)C{P+}(O)C{P-}(O)C{P-}(O)C=O
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- other: CHO and CHL cells
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks on result:
- no mutagenic potential (based on QSAR/QSPR prediction)
- Conclusions:
- Negative without metabolic activation
- Executive summary:
The Times model for in vitro chromosome aberrations was used within the QSAR Toolbox. The prediction was negative without activation. Additional supporting documentation is provided in the prediction report attached in IUCLID.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- This study is used for read-across and therefore has been assigned a reliability of 2 (reliable with restrictions). Otherwise the study has a reliability of 1 (reliable without restriction).
- Justification for type of information:
- Additional documentation, provided within the IUCLID Assessment Reports (Section 13), supports the read-across approach.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Initial toxicity-mutation assay: 1.5, 5.0, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate
Confirmatory mutagenicity assay: 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- Water
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- The BRMA assay was conducted using the plate incorporation method.
- Statistics:
- Not reported
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Neither precipitate nor toxicity was observed. Treatment with the positive control agents resulted in significant increases in the number of revertant colonies. All negative and positive control results were within the range of historical values.
- Conclusions:
- Negative with and without activation
- Executive summary:
A bacterial reverse mutation assay was used to evaluate the mutagenic potential of the test usbstance. The study was conducted in accordance with OECD Guideline 471 using the pate incorporation method. The assay was conducted using Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537, and Escherichia coli tester strain WP2 uvra. The initial toxicity-mutation assay was conducted in duplicate at concentrations of 1.5, 5.0, 50, 150, 500, and 5000 µg/plate. Duplicates of water (vehicle control) and positive controls were also tested. The confirmatory mutagenicity assay was conducted 50, 150, 500 and 5000 µg/plate. A vehicle control and positive controls were also tested in triplicate. No positive mutagenic responses were observed in any strain in the presence or absence of S9 activation. Neither precipitate nor toxicity was observed during the study. Therefore, based on the results of the study, the test substance is negative for mutagenicity in bacterial cells.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Data taken from accepted publication with limited details on methods and results.
- Justification for type of information:
- Additional documentation, provided within the IUCLID Assessment Reports (Section 13), supports the read-across approach.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 487 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human peripheral blood
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 500, 1000, 1642 µg/mL
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- other: Vinblastine sulfate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Human peripheral blood lymphocytes were obtained from a healthy non-smoking 26-year-old adult male with no recent history of radiotherapy, viral infection, or drug administration. The highest concentration analysed in each treatment condition (1642 µg/mL) is equivalent to 10 mM as recommended by the test guideline. Cells were incubated with the test substance, negative control, or positive control for 4 hours in the presence or absence of activation and for 24 continuous hours in the absence of activation. All cultures were prepared in duplicate. At the end of the short-term exposures, cells were treated with the cytokinesis inhibitor cytochalasin B and incubated for an additional 20 hours. For cell cultures under long-term exposure, cytochalasin B was added at the beginning of treatment. At the end of the 24-hour incubation period, the cells were fixed, resuspended, and applied on clean microscope slides, which were then dried and stained with acridine orange. The cytokinesis-blocked proliferation index and percentage of cytostasis were calculated from 500 cells per culture. The presence of micronuclei was scored for slides from three Neu5Ac treatment groups per exposure condition. The percent frequency of micronucleated binucleated cells in 2000 binucleated cells per concentration (minimum of 1000 binucleated cells from each culture) was calculated.
- Evaluation criteria:
- A response was categorized as positive in the micronucleus test if the frequency of micronucleated binucleated cells was statistically significantly increased compared to the negative control value at one or more concentrations.
- Statistics:
- Data on the percent frequency of micronucleated binucleated cells were subjected to Fisher’s exact test (one-sided tail) for pair-wise comparisons, and significance analyzed at the 0.05 significance level.
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human peripheral blood
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human peripheral blood
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No significant differences were observed in the percentage of micronucleated binucleated cells between any of the test concentrations analysed and the negative control. Treatment with the positive control agents resulted in significant increases in the percentage of micronucleated binucleated cells compared to the negative control. All negative and positive control results were within the range of historical values.
- Remarks on result:
- other: 4-hour exposure
- Conclusions:
- Negative with and without activation (4-hour exposure)
Negative without activation (24-hour exposure) - Executive summary:
Human peripheral blood lymphocytes were exposed to the test substance at concentrations of 500, 1000, and 1642 µg/mL for 4-hours with activation and 4 or 24 hours without activation in accordance with OECD Guideline 487. No significant differences were observed in the percentage of micronucleated binucleated cells between any of the test concentrations analysed and the negative control. Under the conditions of this study, the test substance was considered negative for the induction of micronuclei in vitro in human peripheral blood lymphocytes.
Referenceopen allclose all
Concentration (µg/plate) |
Revertant colonies per plate (mean ± standard deviation) |
|||||||||
|
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
WPuvrA |
|||||
|
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
Initial toxicity-mutation assay |
||||||||||
Negative control (water) |
23 ± 1 |
39 ± 6 |
117 ± 13 |
142 ± 5 |
17 ± 3 |
12 ± 4 |
7 ± 4 |
6 ± 0 |
29 ± 3 |
40 ± 17 |
1.5 |
16±3 |
30± 5 |
101± 14 |
120± 4 |
115± 3 |
17± 4 |
5± 1 |
7± 3 |
31± 9 |
34± 1 |
5.0 |
22± 2 |
30± 10 |
118± 17 |
121± 6 |
12± 4 |
14± 5 |
6± 3 |
6± 4 |
30± 9 |
34± 6 |
15 |
27± 1 |
30± 16 |
110± 17 |
129± 13 |
14± 4 |
18± 1 |
9± 6 |
6± 6 |
36± 7 |
37± 8 |
50 |
25± 4 |
28± 2 |
114± 30 |
126± 7 |
16± 2 |
15± 1 |
5± 1 |
5± 1 |
36± 3 |
31± 7 |
150 |
17± 2 |
25± 1 |
113± 8 |
128± 10 |
16± 6 |
12± 3 |
5± 1 |
2± 1 |
31± 3 |
27± 1 |
500 |
24± 6 |
26± 3 |
119± 15 |
113± 16 |
11± 3 |
11± 0 |
7± 5 |
5± 0 |
25± 2 |
39± 3 |
1500 |
20± 4 |
28± 7 |
112± 5 |
105± 5 |
10± 1 |
11± 3 |
2± 1 |
4± 4 |
31± 4 |
41± 6 |
5000 |
18± 6 |
34± 1 |
123± 14 |
121± 27 |
15± 1 |
12± 5 |
5± 5 |
6± 4 |
30± 10 |
39± 23 |
Positive controla,b |
191± 17 |
256± 20 |
568± 15 |
432± 25 |
444± 62 |
57± 7 |
322± 187 |
32± 4 |
197± 14 |
294± 28 |
Confirmatory mutagenicity assay |
||||||||||
Negative control (water) |
20± 6 |
20± 2 |
106± 17 |
114± 3 |
17± 4 |
10± 2 |
3± 1 |
4± 1 |
32± 3 |
34± 7 |
50 |
17± 3 |
14± 7 |
119± 8 |
110± 9 |
10± 4 |
8± 3 |
5± 5 |
4± 3 |
37± 14 |
32± 1 |
150 |
22± 6 |
21± 6 |
115± 8 |
134± 5 |
21± 4 |
9± 4 |
7± 3 |
6± 2 |
33± 6 |
28± 5 |
500 |
13± 7 |
12± 7 |
122± 14 |
133± 13 |
13± 2 |
12± 3 |
6± 2 |
5± 1 |
34± 3 |
34± 2 |
1500 |
17± 4 |
15± 4 |
116± 7 |
134± 9 |
12± 2 |
9± 2 |
3± 1 |
8± 2 |
23± 8 |
32± 5 |
5000 |
19± 5 |
14± 5 |
93± 8 |
108± 7 |
11± 2 |
12± 7 |
5± 4 |
7± 4 |
24± 4 |
29± 2 |
Positive controla,b |
129± 37 |
477± 51 |
628± 85 |
848± 45 |
532± 31 |
96± 30 |
168± 47 |
17± 3 |
345± 29 |
258± 23 |
aPostivie controls -S9: TA98 = 1.0 µg/plate 2-NF; TA100 and TA1535 1.0 µg/plate naN3; TA1537 = 75 µg/plate 9-AA; WP2uvrA = 1000 µg/plate MMS. bPositive controls +S9: TA98, TA1535, and TA1537 = 1.0 µg/plate 2-AA; Ta100 = 2.0 µg/plate 2-AA; WP2uvrA = 15 µg/plate 2-AA |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
In Vivo (Clastogenic effects - mammalian): QSAR; in vivo mouse micronucleus study; Negative. Reliability = 2.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- genetic toxicity in vivo, other
- Remarks:
- in vivo micronucleus QSAR
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Times v.2.27.17.6 in QSAR Toolbox
Toolbox prediction report is attached in IUCLID - GLP compliance:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SMILES: CC{P+}(O)C{P+}(O)C{P-}(O)C{P-}(O)C=O
- Key result
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- Mammalian erythrocytes and/or peripheral blood
- Remarks on result:
- other: no mutagenic potential (based on QSAR/QSPR prediction)
- Conclusions:
- Negative
- Executive summary:
The Times model for in vivo micronucleus assay was used within the QSAR Toolbox. The prediction was negative. Additional supporting documentation is provided in the prediction report attached in IUCLID.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Qualitative structure activity relationships (QSAR), documented in QMRF/QPRF, predict no alerts to indicate likely mutagenic potential. The test substance is expected to be non-mutagenic in Ames with or without metabolic activation, negative for chromosomal aberrations with or without activation, and negative for in vivo micronuclei. In addition, supporting data on a structurally-related chemical (L-fucose), produced negative results in in vitro assay (bacterial reverse mutation and micronucleus assay).
Justification for classification or non-classification
The test substance is not predicted to have the potential to be mutagenic or clastogenic in vitro or in vivo based on assay-specific model predictions. Additionally, data on a structurally-related chemical (L-fucose) support this conclusion. Therefore, the substance does not need to be classified for mutagenicity according to EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.