Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 288-098-3 | CAS number: 85650-88-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 05.02.2018 - 08.03.2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2006
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- The test samples of the test item were analyzed for test item concentration at the start (0 hours) and for stability at the end of the treatment (72 hours) both during range finding study and limit test.
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- Stock solution was prepared in the OECD alga medium. Stock solution was prepared by weighing required quantity of test item in a beaker, to this small volume of OECD alga media was added and stirred well using a glass rod, after complete solubility, test formulation was transferred to measuring cylinder, the beaker was rinsed with OECD alga media and transferred again to measuring cylinder, rinsing process was repeated until the complete transfer of test contents. The required test concentrations were prepared by adding appropriate amount of stock solutions and make up to required volume using OECD alga medium. A homogeneous distribution of the test item within the stock solution was achieved by means of vortexing shortly before preparation of the test vessels.
- Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Strain: ATCC 22662
- Source: American Type Culture Collection
- Method of cultivation: in OECD alga medium
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period:no
- Culturing media and conditions: same as test
- Any deformed or abnormal cells observed: no - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Test temperature:
- 22.1 to 22.9°C
- pH:
- 8.08 to 8.18
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentration: 100 mg/L
Measured concentration: 116.71 mg/L - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Erlenmeyer flasks
- Material, fill volume: glass, 250 mL
- Initial cells density: 41025 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: 869000 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 6
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes, OECD algae medium
TEST MEDIUM PARAMETERS
- Preparation of dilution water: OECD algae medium as described in OECD guideline 201
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Light intensity and quality: 5190 to 5651 Lux
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED
- Determination of cell concentrations: with counting chamber after 24, 48 and 72 h
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Range finding study: yes
- Test concentrations: 1, 10, 50 and 100 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: yes - Reference substance (positive control):
- not required
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: yield
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control: yes
- Observation of abnormalities: no
- Any stimulation of growth found in any treatment: no
- Any observations that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: no - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The 72 hour EC50 and ErC10 of the test item on Raphidocelis subcapitata is >100 mg/L. The 72 hours NOEC is 100 mg/L and the Lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC) is >100 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
The test item was assessed on Raphidocelis subcapitata for Growth Inhibition Test as per the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals Guideline No. 201. A range finding study was conducted with six concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, 50.0 and 100.0 mg/L along with control, each concentration contains 2 replicates except control possessing 3 replicates. The algal growth (cell density) was assessed at 24, 48 and 72 hours of post-exposure during the test. During the range finding study, exponentially growing cells were exposed to range of selected concentrations. The growth rate inhibition of maximal 0.53% was observed in the tested concentrations. Based on the results of range finding study, a limit test was conducted at the concentration of 100 mg/L along with control (each 6 replicates). The algal growth (cell density) was assessed at 24, 48 and 72 hours post-exposure. Exponentially growing alga cells were exposed to the limit concentration. A growth rate inhibition of 0.71% was observed in the tested concentration of 100 mg/L respectively as compared with the control. Similarly, inhibition in yield of 3.5% was observed in the tested concentration of 100 mg/L. The present alga growth inhibition study fulfills the validity criteria of the test. The test samples were analyzed for test item concentration at the start (0 hours) and for stability at the end of the treatment (72 hours) both during range finding study and limit test, and were found to be within the acceptable range of ± 20% recovery to the nominal concentrations. Therefore, the results are based on the nominal concentrations. From the experiment conducted under standard experimental conditions, the 72 hour ErC50 and ErC10 (growth rate) and EyC50 and EyC10 (yield) of the test item on Raphidocelis subcapitata is >100 mg/L. The 72 hours No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) is 100 mg/L and the Lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC) is >100 mg/L.
Reference
Description of key information
The 72 hour EC50 and ErC10 of the test item on Raphidocelis subcapitata is >100 mg/L. The 72 hours NOEC is 100 mg/L and the Lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC) is >100 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
- 100 mg/L
Additional information
The test item was assessed on Raphidocelis subcapitata for Growth Inhibition Test as per the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals Guideline No. 201. A range finding study was conducted with six concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, 50.0 and 100.0 mg/L along with control, each concentration contains 2 replicates except control possessing 3 replicates. The algal growth (cell density) was assessed at 24, 48 and 72 hours of post-exposure during the test. During the range finding study, exponentially growing cells were exposed to range of selected concentrations. The growth rate inhibition of maximal 0.53% was observed in the tested concentrations. Based on the results of range finding study, a limit test was conducted at the concentration of 100 mg/L along with control (each 6 replicates). The algal growth (cell density) was assessed at 24, 48 and 72 hours post-exposure. Exponentially growing alga cells were exposed to the limit concentration. A growth rate inhibition of 0.71% was observed in the tested concentration of 100 mg/L respectively as compared with the control. Similarly, inhibition in yield of 3.5% was observed in the tested concentration of 100 mg/L. The present alga growth inhibition study fulfills the validity criteria of the test. The test samples were analyzed for test item concentration at the start (0 hours) and for stability at the end of the treatment (72 hours) both during range finding study and limit test, and were found to be within the acceptable range of ± 20% recovery to the nominal concentrations. Therefore, the results are based on the nominal concentrations. From the experiment conducted under standard experimental conditions, the 72 hour ErC50 and ErC10 (growth rate) and EyC50 and EyC10 (yield) of the test item on Raphidocelis subcapitata is >100 mg/L. The 72 hours No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) is 100 mg/L and the Lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC) is >100 mg/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.