Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-415-7 | CAS number: 7540-51-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to fish
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to fish
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- disregarded due to major methodological deficiencies
- Reliability:
- 3 (not reliable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Scientifically acceptable publication, however only a summary is available in english.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Acute toxicity to fish
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Analytical monitoring:
- not specified
- Test organisms (species):
- Cyprinus auratus
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Test temperature:
- 20 °C
- Duration:
- 1 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: TT
- Effect conc.:
- 8.6 mg/L
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to fish
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Test procedures in compliance with German national standards, however no chemical analysis of the test substance in the test medium was carried out. Non-GLP study.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: German standard DIN 38 412, part L15.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: The test solution was prepared by adding the test item to the test media without any pre-treatment. Subsequently the fish were placed into the test aquaria. - Test organisms (species):
- Leuciscus idus
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Golden orfe
- Source: Fish farm Paul Eggers, 2354 Hohenwestedt, Germany
- Length at study initiation (length definition, mean, range and SD): 6.7 cm (range 6.0 - 7.2 cm)
- Weight at study initiation (mean and range, SD): 2.8 g (range 2.0 - 3.6 g)
- Method of breeding: oil-free aerated and charcoal filtered tap water, flow-through system Water temperature: 19 - 21 °C Duration of housing: about 3 months Mortality during the last 2 weeks of housing: 0.08 %; Medical treatment: Twice with 0.05 mg/l malachite green chloride, once with 10 mg/l tetracycline hydrochloride
Corpulence factor of the test fish batch: 0.9
- Feeding during test: 1 day before and during exposure.
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 3 days
- Type and amount of food: Growing feed F/B 50, ad libitum.
- Health during acclimation (any mortality observed): no mortality observed - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Hardness:
- 2.5 mmol/l
- Test temperature:
- 20 - 21 °C
- pH:
- 7.3 - 7.7
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 7.8 - 8.6 mg/l
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal test concentrations (mg/l):
4.64, 10, 21.5, 46.4, 100, control - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: glass aquaria (30 x 22 x 24 cm)
- Fill volume: 10 l
- Aeration: Continuous aeration with oil-free air
- No. of organisms per vessel: 10
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 1
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 1
- Biomass loading rate: 2.8 g fish/l test water
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: reconstituted freshwater according to DIN 38412, Part II, 1982; prepared from fully demineralised tap water (conductivity: max 10 micro MHO) by adding: 294.0 mg/l CaCl2 * 2 H2O 123.3 mg/l MgSO4 + 7 H2O 63.0 mg/l NaHCO3 5.5 mg/l KCl
- Ca/mg ratio: 4 : 1
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: 16 : 8 hours day-night regime
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
Mortality and symptoms of intoxication after 1, 4, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours - Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 4.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC0
- Effect conc.:
- 10 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- 14.66 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC100
- Effect conc.:
- 21.5 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- 48 h-LC50 of the positive control chloroacetamide: about 32 mg/l (corresponds to normal sensitivity).
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The LC50 value was calculated as the geometrical mean of LC0 (10 mg/l) and LC100 (21.5 mg7l) nominal values.
- Sublethal observations / clinical signs:
- During the 96 h exposure to citronellol, mortalities were as follows:
Nominal test / Cumulative mortality (%) after x hours
concentration / 1 / 4 / 24 / 48 / 72 / 96 /
(mg/l)
Control / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 /
4.64 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 /
10.0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 /
21.5 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 /
46.4 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 /
100.0 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 /
Symptoms of intoxication:
Nominal test / Symptoms of intoxication after x hours
concentration / 1 / 4 / 24 / 48 / 72 / 96 /
(mg/l)
Control / - / - / - / - / - / - /
4.64 / - / - / - / - / - / - /
10.0 / A / A / A / - / - / - /
21.5 / + / + / + / + / + / + /
46.4 / + / + / + / + / + / + /
100.0 / + / + / + / + / + / + /
Definitions of Symptoms:
-: No symptoms
A: Apathy
+: All fish dead
Chemical Analysis
No analytical dose-verification of the test item was carried out. Therefore all biological results refer to nominal test concentrations of Citronellol. - Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to fish
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- disregarded due to major methodological deficiencies
- Reliability:
- 3 (not reliable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Scientifically acceptable publication, however only a summary is available in english.
- Justification for type of information:
- ANALOGUE APPROACH
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
This read-across is based on the hypothesis that source substances and target substance have similar physical-chemical properties and (eco)toxicological properties because they are either stereoisomers of the target substance, are hydrolysed to the same substance or their chemical structure differs only by an additional double bond. This prediction is supported by data on the substances themselves.
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
The target substance, L-Citronellol, is a mono-constituent substance (EC No. 231-415-7, CAS no. 7540-51-4 consisting of a C8 carbon backbone, methyl substituents at C3 and C7, one double bond and a hydroxyl group. The substance is optically active, comprising a single, pure enantiomeric laevo form.
The source substance, DL-Citronellol, is a mono-constituent substance (EC No. 203-375-0, CAS no. 106-22-9, consisting of a C8 carbon backbone, methyl substituents at C3 and C7, one double bond and a hydroxyl group. The substance is an equimolar mixture of two optical isomers (enantiomers).
The source substance, citronellyl acetate, is a mono-constituent substance (EC No. 205-775-0, CAS no. 150-84-5) consisting of a C8 carbon backbone, methyl substituents at C3 and C7, one double bond and an acetate group.
The source substance, geraniol and it’s isomer, consist of a C8 carbon backbone, methyl substituents at C3 and C7, two double bonds and a hydroxyl group. The only difference between the isomers is the position of the first double bond.
The source substance, geraniol and nerol, is a multi-constituent substance of E/Z isomers (EC No. 906-125-5). The constituents consist of a C8 carbon backbone, methyl substituents at C3 and C7, two double bonds and a hydroxyl group.
The source substance, geraniol, is a mono-constituent substance (EC No. 203-377-1, CAS no. 106-24-1), consisting of a C8 carbon backbone, methyl substituents at C3 and C7, two double bonds and a hydroxyl group. Geraniol is a pure form of the E-isomer.
The source substance, nerol, is a mono-constituent substance (EC No. 203-378-7, CAS no. 106-25-2), consisting of a C8 carbon backbone, methyl substituents at C3 and C7, two double bonds and a hydroxyl group. Nerol is a pure form of the Z-isomer.
The source and target substances are both of high purity with a low concentration of impurities.
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
The read across hypothesis is based on structural similarity where the source substances only differ in the enantiomeric ratio or an additional double bond. Another source substance is expected to be hydrolysed to the same structure as the target substance.
In a non-chiral environment the target and source chemical DL-Citronellol will have identical properties, but in the chiral environment of living organisms the enantiomers may possess different carcinogenicity and teratogenicity (in a chiral environment, stereoisomers might experience selective absorption, protein binding, transport, enzyme interactions and metabolism, receptor interactions, and DNA binding). All endpoints read-across from DL-Citronellol are considered to be acceptable for this substance assuming that 50% of the target compound is available in the test material.
The source substance citronellyl acetate is read-across from as part of a weight of evidence approach in the repeated dose toxicity endpoint. As this substance is hydrolysed to Citronellol within 2 hours, this read-across endpoint is acceptable in the weight of evidence approach used.
The source substances geraniol, nerol and the reaction mass of geraniol/nerol differ from the target substance only by an additional double bond at C2. These structures are considered to represent a worst case scenario due to the additional potential reactive feature of the second double bond. The genotoxicity, repeated dose and reproductive toxicity endpoints read-across from these substances are therefore acceptable as a worst case assumption.
4. DATA MATRIX
Please refer to the data matrix included in the read-across justification document attached in Section 13.2. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Acute toxicity to fish
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Analytical monitoring:
- not specified
- Test organisms (species):
- Cyprinus auratus
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Test temperature:
- 20 °C
- Duration:
- 1 h
- Dose descriptor:
- other: TT
- Effect conc.:
- 8.6 mg/L
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to fish
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Test procedures in compliance with German national standards, however no chemical analysis of the test substance in the test medium was carried out. Non-GLP study.
- Justification for type of information:
- ANALOGUE APPROACH
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
This read-across is based on the hypothesis that source substances and target substance have similar physical-chemical properties and (eco)toxicological properties because they are either stereoisomers of the target substance, are hydrolysed to the same substance or their chemical structure differs only by an additional double bond. This prediction is supported by data on the substances themselves.
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
The target substance, L-Citronellol, is a mono-constituent substance (EC No. 231-415-7, CAS no. 7540-51-4 consisting of a C8 carbon backbone, methyl substituents at C3 and C7, one double bond and a hydroxyl group. The substance is optically active, comprising a single, pure enantiomeric laevo form.
The source substance, DL-Citronellol, is a mono-constituent substance (EC No. 203-375-0, CAS no. 106-22-9, consisting of a C8 carbon backbone, methyl substituents at C3 and C7, one double bond and a hydroxyl group. The substance is an equimolar mixture of two optical isomers (enantiomers).
The source substance, citronellyl acetate, is a mono-constituent substance (EC No. 205-775-0, CAS no. 150-84-5) consisting of a C8 carbon backbone, methyl substituents at C3 and C7, one double bond and an acetate group.
The source substance, geraniol and it’s isomer, consist of a C8 carbon backbone, methyl substituents at C3 and C7, two double bonds and a hydroxyl group. The only difference between the isomers is the position of the first double bond.
The source substance, geraniol and nerol, is a multi-constituent substance of E/Z isomers (EC No. 906-125-5). The constituents consist of a C8 carbon backbone, methyl substituents at C3 and C7, two double bonds and a hydroxyl group.
The source substance, geraniol, is a mono-constituent substance (EC No. 203-377-1, CAS no. 106-24-1), consisting of a C8 carbon backbone, methyl substituents at C3 and C7, two double bonds and a hydroxyl group. Geraniol is a pure form of the E-isomer.
The source substance, nerol, is a mono-constituent substance (EC No. 203-378-7, CAS no. 106-25-2), consisting of a C8 carbon backbone, methyl substituents at C3 and C7, two double bonds and a hydroxyl group. Nerol is a pure form of the Z-isomer.
The source and target substances are both of high purity with a low concentration of impurities.
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
The read across hypothesis is based on structural similarity where the source substances only differ in the enantiomeric ratio or an additional double bond. Another source substance is expected to be hydrolysed to the same structure as the target substance.
In a non-chiral environment the target and source chemical DL-Citronellol will have identical properties, but in the chiral environment of living organisms the enantiomers may possess different carcinogenicity and teratogenicity (in a chiral environment, stereoisomers might experience selective absorption, protein binding, transport, enzyme interactions and metabolism, receptor interactions, and DNA binding). All endpoints read-across from DL-Citronellol are considered to be acceptable for this substance assuming that 50% of the target compound is available in the test material.
The source substance citronellyl acetate is read-across from as part of a weight of evidence approach in the repeated dose toxicity endpoint. As this substance is hydrolysed to Citronellol within 2 hours, this read-across endpoint is acceptable in the weight of evidence approach used.
The source substances geraniol, nerol and the reaction mass of geraniol/nerol differ from the target substance only by an additional double bond at C2. These structures are considered to represent a worst case scenario due to the additional potential reactive feature of the second double bond. The genotoxicity, repeated dose and reproductive toxicity endpoints read-across from these substances are therefore acceptable as a worst case assumption.
4. DATA MATRIX
Please refer to the data matrix included in the read-across justification document attached in Section 13.2. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: German standard DIN 38 412, part L15.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: The test solution was prepared by adding the test item to the test media without any pre-treatment. Subsequently the fish were placed into the test aquaria. - Test organisms (species):
- Leuciscus idus
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Golden orfe
- Source: Fish farm Paul Eggers, 2354 Hohenwestedt, Germany
- Length at study initiation (length definition, mean, range and SD): 6.7 cm (range 6.0 - 7.2 cm)
- Weight at study initiation (mean and range, SD): 2.8 g (range 2.0 - 3.6 g)
- Method of breeding: oil-free aerated and charcoal filtered tap water, flow-through system Water temperature: 19 - 21 °C Duration of housing: about 3 months Mortality during the last 2 weeks of housing: 0.08 %; Medical treatment: Twice with 0.05 mg/l malachite green chloride, once with 10 mg/l tetracycline hydrochloride
Corpulence factor of the test fish batch: 0.9
- Feeding during test: 1 day before and during exposure.
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 3 days
- Type and amount of food: Growing feed F/B 50, ad libitum.
- Health during acclimation (any mortality observed): no mortality observed - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 96 h
- Hardness:
- 2.5 mmol/l
- Test temperature:
- 20 - 21 °C
- pH:
- 7.3 - 7.7
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 7.8 - 8.6 mg/l
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal test concentrations (mg/l):
4.64, 10, 21.5, 46.4, 100, control - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: glass aquaria (30 x 22 x 24 cm)
- Fill volume: 10 l
- Aeration: Continuous aeration with oil-free air
- No. of organisms per vessel: 10
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 1
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 1
- Biomass loading rate: 2.8 g fish/l test water
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: reconstituted freshwater according to DIN 38412, Part II, 1982; prepared from fully demineralised tap water (conductivity: max 10 micro MHO) by adding: 294.0 mg/l CaCl2 * 2 H2O 123.3 mg/l MgSO4 + 7 H2O 63.0 mg/l NaHCO3 5.5 mg/l KCl
- Ca/mg ratio: 4 : 1
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: 16 : 8 hours day-night regime
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
Mortality and symptoms of intoxication after 1, 4, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours - Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 4.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC0
- Effect conc.:
- 10 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- 14.66 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Duration:
- 96 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LC100
- Effect conc.:
- 21.5 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality (fish)
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- 48 h-LC50 of the positive control chloroacetamide: about 32 mg/l (corresponds to normal sensitivity).
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The LC50 value was calculated as the geometrical mean of LC0 (10 mg/l) and LC100 (21.5 mg7l) nominal values.
- Sublethal observations / clinical signs:
- During the 96 h exposure to citronellol, mortalities were as follows:
Nominal test / Cumulative mortality (%) after x hours
concentration / 1 / 4 / 24 / 48 / 72 / 96 /
(mg/l)
Control / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 /
4.64 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 /
10.0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 /
21.5 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 /
46.4 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 /
100.0 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 / 100 /
Symptoms of intoxication:
Nominal test / Symptoms of intoxication after x hours
concentration / 1 / 4 / 24 / 48 / 72 / 96 /
(mg/l)
Control / - / - / - / - / - / - /
4.64 / - / - / - / - / - / - /
10.0 / A / A / A / - / - / - /
21.5 / + / + / + / + / + / + /
46.4 / + / + / + / + / + / + /
100.0 / + / + / + / + / + / + /
Definitions of Symptoms:
-: No symptoms
A: Apathy
+: All fish dead
Chemical Analysis
No analytical dose-verification of the test item was carried out. Therefore all biological results refer to nominal test concentrations of Citronellol.
Referenceopen allclose all
Description of key information
This endpoint was read across from Citronellol (3,7-dimethyl-6-Octen-1-ol, CAS 106 -22 -9).
A guideline study following German standard DIN 38 412, part L15 investigated the acute toxicity of citronellol to fish. Test fish of the species Leuciscus idus were exposed to Citronellol for 96 hours and a LC50 of 14.66 mg/l was determined at test termination (BASF AG, 1989). A second study tested the acute toxicity of the substance in Cyprinus auratus and detected a toxic threshold concentration of 8.6 mg/l after 1 hour (Binet, 1972).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water fish
Fresh water fish
- Effect concentration:
- 14.66 mg/L
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.