Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 607-239-5 | CAS number: 23495-64-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 2017-04-06 to 2017-04-21
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Version / remarks:
- 2013
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 10-Methoxy-9,10-dihydrolysergic methylester
- Cas Number:
- 23495-64-9
- Molecular formula:
- C18 H22 N2 O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 10-Methoxy-9,10-dihydrolysergic methylester
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Batch No.: 16023LS4B5
Purity: 98.3%
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- cattle
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: from the slaughterhouse
- Transport: Eyes were collected and transported in physiological saline in a suitable container under cooled conditions.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 301.3 to 427.9 mg - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 240 ± 10 minutes
- Details on study design:
- SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS
- Preparation of Corneas: The isolated corneas were stored in a petri dish with cMEM (Earle’s Minimum Essential Medium) containing 1% (v/v) L-glutamine and 1% (v/v) Fetal Bovine Serum). The isolated corneas were mounted in a corneal holder (one cornea per holder) with the endothelial side against the O-ring of the posterior half of the holder. The anterior half of the holder was positioned on top of the cornea and tightened with screws. The compartments of the corneal holder were filled with cMEM of 32 ± 1°C. The corneas were incubated for the minimum of 1 hour at 32 ± 1°C.
- Cornea Selection: After the incubation period, the medium was removed from both compartments and replaced with fresh cMEM. Opacity determinations were performed on each of the corneas using an opacitometer. The opacity of each cornea was read against a cMEM filled chamber, and the initial opacity reading thus determined was recorded. Corneas that had an initial opacity reading higher than 7 were not used. Three corneas were selected at random for each treatment group.
QUALITY CHECK OF THE ISOLATED CORNEAS
The eyes were checked for unacceptable defects, such as opacity, scratches, pigmentation and neovascularization by removing them from the physiological saline and holding them in the light. Those exhibiting defects were discarded.
NUMBER OF REPLICATES
Two experiments were performed. 3 for each treatment group
NEGATIVE CONTROL USED
- Negative Control: physiological saline
POSITIVE CONTROL USED
- Positive Control: 20% (w/v) Imidazole solution prepared in physiological saline
APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME
- Application dose: 750 μL of the negative control and positive control, 301.3 to 427.9 mg for test item
- Exposure time: 240 ± 10 minutes
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Number of washing steps after exposure period: After the incubation the solutions and the test compound were removed and the epithelium was washed at least three times with MEM with phenol red
METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: measured by the diminution of light passing through the cornea.
- Corneal permeability: passage of sodium fluorescein dye measured with the aid of microtiter plate reader (OD490)
SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)
DECISION CRITERIA: The decision criteria as indicated in the TG was used.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Value:
- >= 38 - <= 62
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
In both experiments, the corneas were clear after the 240 minutes of treatment with the test item. The corneal membranes were detached. No pH effect of the test item was observed on the rinsing medium.
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes
Any other information on results incl. tables
The corneas treated with the test item showed opacity values ranging from -1.6 to -1.0 and permeability values ranging from 2.895 to 4.815. Hence, the in vitro irritancy scores ranged from 42 to 71 after 240 minutes of treatment with the test item.
Since the individual in vitro irritancy scores were spread over 2 categories (42, 48 and 71), a repeat experiment was performed.
In experiment 2, the corneas treated with the test item showed opacity values ranging from 0.1 to 2.7 and permeability values ranging from 2.351 to 4.127. Hence, the in vitro irritancy scores ranged from 38 to 62 after 240 minutes of treatment with the test item.
The individual in vitro irritancy scores were spread over 2 categories (38, 41 and 62).
In both experiments it was observed that the cornea membranes were detached, resulting in a clear cornea and no effect on opacity. Therefore it is concluded that this substance should be labelled category 1.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, test item should be classified category 1 according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations.
- Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the eye hazard potential of test item as measured by its ability to induce opacity and increase permeability in an isolated bovine cornea using the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test (BCOP test) based on the most recent OECD guideline 437.
This report describes the potency of chemicals to induce serious eye damage using isolated bovine corneas. The eye damage of the test item was tested through topical application for approximately 240 minutes.
The test item was used as delivered and added pure on top of the corneas.
In the first experiment, the mean in vitro irritancy score was 54 after 240 minutes of treatment with the test item. Since the individual in vitro irritancy scores were spread over 2 categories (42, 48 and 71), a repeat experiment was performed.
In the second experiment, the mean in vitro irritancy score was 47 after 240 minutes of treatment with the test item. The in vitro irritancy score values were, like in the first experiment spread, over 2 categories (38, 41 and 62). However, since in both experiments it was observed that the cornea membranes were detached resulting in a clear cornea (and no effect on opacity), it is concluded that this substance should be labelled category 1.
In conclusion, test item should be classified category 1 according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.