Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 261-351-5 | CAS number: 58594-72-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Repeated dose toxicity: oral
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- chronic toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1982-05-25 - 1982-11-24
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
- Remarks:
- Protocol for an oral chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity study with Imazalil base-R 23979 in rats.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 983
- Report date:
- 1983
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.33 (Combined Chronic Toxicity / Carcinogenicity Test)
- Version / remarks:
- Protocol for an oral chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity study with Imazalil base-R 23979 in rats.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1-[2-(allyloxy)-2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-1H-imidazole
- EC Number:
- 252-615-0
- EC Name:
- 1-[2-(allyloxy)-2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-1H-imidazole
- Cas Number:
- 35554-44-0
- Molecular formula:
- C14H14Cl2N2O
- IUPAC Name:
- (±)-1-(β-allyloxy-2,4-dichloro-phenylethyl) imidazole / (±)-allyl 1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-imidazol-1-ylethyl ether
- Test material form:
- solid: crystalline
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: crystalline solid
- Appearance: Yellow to brown crystalline solid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: D 4103, dated October 14, 1980
- Purity: 98.1%
- Appearance: slightly yellow to brown crytalline mass (soldified oil)
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: In the dark at room temperature.
- Stability under test conditions: Unlimited
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: no data
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: none
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Remarks:
- SPF (Cpb:WU; Wistar random)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Central Institute for the Breeding of Laboratory Animals TNO, Zeist, The Netherlands
- Age at study initiation: 3.5 weeks at delivery
- Weight at study initiation: 35 to 50 grams.
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: Conventional conditions, five per sex per cage, in suspended, stainless steel cages, fitted with wire mesh floors and fronts.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Institute's powdered basal diet. Diet was available ad libitum.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Automatic watering system, ad libitum. Because of malfunction of the system in weeks 1 and 15, water was also supplied in glass botles which were filled daily with fresh tap water except for the weekend.
- Acclimation period: 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 23 ± 1°C
- Humidity (%): 40-70%
- Air changes (per hr): 8 - 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours / 12 hours dark (light between 06.00 a.m.and 6:00 p.m.)
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on oral exposure:
- - PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The top-dose diet was prepared first; the lower dose diets were prepared by diluting it with stock diet. Homogeneity was achieved by mixing in a mechanical blender (Stephan) for 2 minutes.
- DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): Fresh batches of the test diets were prepared once every two weeks. Approximately once a month samples were taken from each of the diets immediately after preparation, and subsequently stored at -20°C.
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): The test item was added to the diet at various levels to provide concentrations of 0, 25, 100 or 500 ppm.
- Storage temperature of food: no data
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- From the batches of diets prepared on May 24, 1982 and July 26, 1982, five samples, taken at different places in each feed container, were analysed for the content and the homogeneous distribution of the test item in the diets. One sample of each test diet of the batch of July 26 was re-analysed after storage at room temperature for 4 weeks to obtain information on the stability of the test item in the diets.
The set of samples taken on September 6, 1982 were analysed to control the Imazalil content. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 6 months
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Control
- Dose / conc.:
- 1.25 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- 25 ppm in diet
- Dose / conc.:
- 5 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- 100 ppm in diet
- Dose / conc.:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- 400 ppm in diet
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: The test item was administered in the diet at 0, 25, 100 or 400 ppm. The levels were selected on the basis of the results of a carcinogenicity study in rats (experiment 667-79-04.20) conducted by the sponsor.
Examinations
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
The general condition and behaviour of all animals were checked daily. All signs of ill health or reaction to treatment were recorded.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Before exposure, then weekly for the first 12 weeks and subsequently once every two weeks.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes
Food intake was measured per cage (5 animals) weekly. The efficiency of food utilization was calculated over the period of rapid growth (week 0-10) and expressed as gram weight gain per gram food consumed.
FOOD EFFICIENCY: YES
Food intake was measured per cage (5 animals) weekly. The efficiency of food utilization was calculated over the period of rapid growth (week 0-10) and expressed as gram weight gain per gram food consumed.
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: Males: Day 174; Females Day 175
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes (identity) / No / Not specified
- Animals fasted: Not specified
- How many animals: No data
- The following hematology parameters were determined: hemoglobin, packed cell volume, red blood cells, thrombocytes, white blood cells, differential white blood cell count, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC)
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: At autopsy (on day 183 for males and 184 for females)
- Animals fasted: Yes. Overnight fasting.
- How many animals: All
- The following clinical biochemistry parameters were determined: glucose (plasma), total protein, albumin, haptoglobin, alkaline phoshatase (ALP), glutamic-oxalacetic-transaminase (GOT), glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (GPT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), urea, creatinine, bilirubin total, cholesterol, inorganic phosphate, calcium (Ca), chloride (Cl), potassium (K), sodium (Na)
URINALYSIS: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of urine: Day 177
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: Not specified
- Animals fasted: Yes. On Day 177, all rats were deprived of water for 24 hours and of food for 16 hours. Urine was collected from individual animals during the last 16 hours of the deprivation period.
- The following parameter were determined for individual samples: volume, density.
The following semi-quantitative observations were made in pooled sampes (one sample/sex/group): appearance, pH, protein, glucose, occult blood, ketones, uribilinogen, bilirubin, sediment: erythocyes, leucocytes, epithelial cells, amorph material, crystals, casta, bacteria, sperm cells and worm eggs.
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No
IMMUNOLOGY: No - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
- Sacrifice: On day 183 all male rats and on day 184 all females rats were killed in such a way that on the average the time of killing for each group was about the same. The animals, killed under ether anaesthesia by bleeding the aorta were examned grossly for pathological changes. The following organs were weighed: adrenals, brain, heart, kidneys, liver, lungs (with mainstem bronchi), ovaries, pancreas, pituary, spleen, testes, thymus, thyroid (with parathyroids).
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
Detailed microscopic examinations were carried out on all male and female rats of the top-dose group and on all control rats. The following organs and tissues were examined: adrenals, aorta, axillary lymph nodes, brain (brain stem, cerebrum and cerebellum), caecum, cervical lymph nodes, coagulating glands, colon, duodenum, epididymides, external auditory canal (Zimbal glands), extra orbital lachrymal glands, eyes, heart, ileum, jejunum, kidneys, larynx, liver, lungs with mainstem bronchi, mammary gland (female only), mesenteric lymph nodes, nostrils (nasal cavity), oesophagus, ovaries, pancreas, paratid salivary glands, pituary, preputial glands, prostate, rectum, sciatic nerve, seminal vesicles, skeletal muscle (thigh), skin (flank), spinal cord (two levels), spleen, sternum (with bone marrow), stomach (cardia, fundus and pylorus), sublingual salivary glands, submaxillary salivary glands, tongue, testes, thymus, thyroid with parathyroids, trachea, urinary bladder, uterus with cervix.
They were embedded in paraffin wax and sections were cut at 5 µm; the sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Microscopic examination of the kidneys were extended to the males and females of the mid-and low-dose group. - Statistics:
- Data on body weight, food intake, red blood cell parameters, volume and density of urine, clinical chemistry values and organ weights were evaluated by analysis of (co-)variance followed by multiple comparison tests (Dunnett) or the L.S.D. test (for food intake and food efficiency). Total and differential white blood counts were analysed by the mann/Whitney U-test. The histopathological changes were examined by the Fisher's exact probability test.
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related changes in general condition or behaviour were noted in any of the animals employed in the study.
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Mean body weights of the males in the top-dose group were slightly, but not statistically significantly, lower than those of the controls throughout the study. Otherwise there were no consistent changes in growth rate in any of the groups.
The relatively low terminal body weights in all test groups and in controls are attributed to weighing the animals after overnight fasting prior to autopsy. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no noticeable changes in food intake in any of the groups, other than those in week 1 and 15. The later changes were considered artifacts attributable to the failure of the automatic watering system.
(In week 1 and 15, the automatic drinking water system malfunctioned, which resulted in irregulaties in growth rate, food intake and food conversion efficiency in the affected cages.) - Food efficiency:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no consistent changes in food conversion efficiency in any of the groups, other than those in week 1 and 15. The later changes were considered artifacts attributable to the failure of the automatic watering system.
(In week 1 and 15, the automatic drinking water system malfunctioned, which resulted in irregulaties in growth rate, food intake and food conversion efficiency in the affected cages.) - Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There was an isolated, slight increase in haemoglobin concentration in females of the low-dose group. Total white blood cell count was relatively high in both sexes of all dose groups, but the differences with the controls were statistically significant in males of the top-dose group only and there was no evidence of a dose-related response. Moreover, the values in controls were relatively low as compared to the values of historical controls at the same stage (males 13.8 +/- 13.6; females 11.4 +/- 4.0). Futhermore, there were no changes of any significance in differential white blood cell count. Therefore, no toxicological significance is attached to these slight changes in total white blood count.
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Lactate-dehydrogenase activity was increased in females of the top-dose group.
Plasma urea level was relatively high in females of the low- and top-dose group but not in the mid-dose group, therefore this finding is considered fortuitous and not related to treatment. Glucose concentration was increased in females of all dose groups, but there was not dose-reponse relationship.
An isolated increase in haptoglobin concentration was found in males of the mid-dose group. - Urinalysis findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no changes in any significance in the values for the volume and density of the urine.
The composition of the urine, with respect to appearance, pH, protein, glucose, ketones, occult blood, urobilinogen, bilirubin and microscopy of the urinary sediment was comparable in all groups. - Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In the top-dose group statistically significant increases were seen in the relative weight of the kidneys in males, and in the absolute- and relative weights of the kidneys and liver in females.
The absolute weight of the thymus and the relative weight of the lungs were slightly, though significantly increased in females of the top-dose group. - Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Gross examination at autopsy did not reveal any abnormality that could be ascribed to the administration of the test item.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The presence of a thymoma in the thymus of one low-dose female was the only tumour found.
The degree and incidence of all histopathological changes observed were similar in the test groups and the controls or the lesions occurred only in a single animal. None of these abnormalities, which are common finds in rats of this strain and age could, therefore, be ascribed to the feeding of the test item. - Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
Effect levels
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 5 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
Target system / organ toxicity
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
Results of analytical verification:
The mean actual levels of Imazalil in the batches of diets prepared on May 24, 1982 and July 26, 1982 were lower than the intended levels in the mid-and top-dose diet. In the batches prepared on September 6, 1982 the actual levels were lower than the intended levels in all dose groups.
The high coefficient of variation in the low-and mid-dose diets preapred on May 24, 1982, is indicative of a poor homogeneity of the test item in the diets. A better homogeneity was found in the diets prepared later on.
There was no noticable loss of Imazalil after a storage period of 4 weeks at room temperature.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The feeding study of Imazalil base-R-23979 to rats at levels of up to 400 ppm resulted in some minor changes in the top-dose group. No significant effects on general health, behaviour, survival, food intake, food efficiency, haematology and urinalysis. The slight differenes seen did not suggest a relationship with treatment.
Growth of male rats of the top-dose group was somewhat lower than that of the control animals but food intake and food efficiency were not noticeably different.
The increased plasma LDH activity, seen only in females of the top-dose group, was not associated with any histopathological abnormality. Since, moreover, there is a large variation in normal values for this unspecific parameter no toxicological significance is attached to this finding.
The increased weight of the lungs in females ofo the top-dose group ws not accomplished by treatment-related microscopic changes. Therefore, it is doubtful whether any toxicological significance may be attached to this finding.
The increased weight of the lungs in females of the top-dose group was not accompanied by treatmtne-related microscopic changes. Therefore, it is doubtful whether any toxicological signifiance may be attached to this finding.
The increased relative weights of the kidneys in the top-dose group were not accompanied by detecable changes in urine parameter or in macroscopic or microscopic pathology of the kidneys. So, there is at the present time no explanation for these findings. Further evaluation will be awaited until the results of the 18 and 30 months studies are available.
Thienpont et. al. (1981) reported that Imazalil fed at dietary levels of 800 ppm to rats for 2 years caused slight liver changes consisting of slight centrilobular swelling, an increased amount of glycogen in the centrilobular area and an increased fatty surcharge of the hepatocytes. In the 6-month study a dietary level of 400 ppm induced neither similar alterations nor any other treatment-related histopathological changes in the liver, although the liver weight was increased in females at this dietary level.
Based on the results of the study, the no-effect level for imazalil base R-23979 was 100 ppm in rats after 6-month oral exposure. This level is equivalent to a nominal intake of about 5 mg/kg b.w./day. No major abnormalities were observed at the next higher level of 400 ppm. The test substance is therefore classified as STOT RE 2 according to the CLP Regulation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.