Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 258-847-9 | CAS number: 53894-23-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Genetic toxicity in-vitro: Negative
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From September 2009 to October 2007
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- A maximum dose-level of 5000 ug/plate and four lower concentrations of 1580, 500, 158 and 50.0 ug/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Solvent used: Ethanol
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- Strains TA100 and TA1535; -S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- Strain TA1537; -S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- Remarks:
- Strain TA98; -S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- All strains; +S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- Strain WP2uvrA; -S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium; in agar (plate incorporation) - Assay 1; preincubation - Assay 2
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 30 minutes
- Exposure duration: 72 hours
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): Histidine (S. typhimurium); tryptophan (E. coli)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Reduced number of spontaneous revertants, microcolony formation, thinning of background lawn - Evaluation criteria:
- For the test item to be considered mutagenic, two-fold (or more) increases in mean revertant numbers must be observed at two consecutive dose-levels or at the highest practicable dose-level only. In addition, there must be evidence of a dose-response relationship showing increasing numbers of mutant colonies with increasing dose-levels
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- In the initial toxicity test no toxicity was observed at any dose-level with any tester strain in the absence or presence of S9 metabolism at concentrations up to a maximum of 5000 ug/plate.
No precipitation was observed. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
It is concluded that the substance does not induce reverse mutation in Salmonella typhimurium or Escherichia coli under the reported experimental conditions. - Executive summary:
A bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test) has been undertaken following OECD/EU test methods.
The substance does not induce reverse mutation in Salmonella typhimurium or Escherichia coli.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From October 25,2007 to January 16,2008
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Osmolarity only determined for cultures from the short treatment in the absence of S9. This was considered not to have affected the integrity of the study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Osmolarity only determined for cultures from the short treatment in the absence of S9. This was considered not to have affected the integrity of the study
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Whole blood was collected from a healthy male, non-smoking, volunteer donor not receiving any medication prior to the time of sampling.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- A maximum dose-level of 5000 micrograms/plate and four lower concentrations of 2500, 1250, 625 and 313 micrograms/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Solvent used: Ethanol
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- untreated cultures
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- untreated cultures
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Two independent assays for chromosomal damage were performed.
For the first experiment, both in the absence and presence of S9 metabolism, the treatment time was 3 hours after which the cells were allowed to recover prior to harvesting. The harvest time of 24 hours, corresponding to approximately 1.5 cell cycle, was used.
As negative results were obtained, a second experiment was performed in the absence of S9 metabolism using a continuous treatment in the absence of S9 metabolism until harvest at 24 hours.
S9 tissue homogenate was prepared from the livers of five young male Sprague-Dawley rats which had received prior treatment with phenobarbital and betanaphthoflavone to induce high levels of xenobiotic metabolising enzymes.
For both assays, dose levels of 5000, 2500, 1250, 625, 313, 156, 78.1 and 39.1 µg/ml were used both in the absence and presence of S9 metabolism. Solutions were prepared immediately before use in ethanol.
Appropriate negative and positive control cultures were included in each experiment. Positive control treated cultures received Mitomycin-C in the absence of S9 metabolism at dose levels of 0.75 and 0.50 µg/ml in the first main assay. For the second assay, cultures received Mitomycin-C at dose levels of 0.45 and 0.30 µg/ml. In the presence of S9 metabolism cultures received Cyclophosphamide at dose levels of 18.0 and 23.0 µg/ml.
Two cultures were prepared at each test point. Air-dried slides were prepared from each culture and stained with 3% Giemsa.
Following treatment, the pH and osmolality of the treatment media at higher dose levels (short treatment in the absence of S9) were determined.
No remarkable variation of pH was observed. Slight dose-related reductions of osmolality were observed at the higher dose levels selected for treatment (5000 and 2500 µg/ml).
- Evaluation criteria:
- Criterion for outcome
In this assay, the test item is considered to have clastogenic properties if the following criteria are all fulfilled:
(i) Statistically significant increases in the incidence of cells bearing aberrations are observed at any dose-level over the concurrent control.
(ii) The increases are reproduced in both replicate cultures and must be observed in both experiments.
(iii) The increases must exceed historical controls. Any significant increase over the concurrent negative controls is therefore compared with historical control.
The evaluation is based on the set of results which excludes gaps. A more detailed explanation of the criteria for evaluation of the results is given in the Study Protocol.
Evaluation
On the basis of the above mentioned results and in accordance with the criteria for outcome of the study, the test item was not considered to induce chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes cultured in vitro.
Statistically significant increases in aberrant cells compared with the relevant control values were seen in cultures treated with the positive controlsMitomycin-C and Cyclophosphamide, indicating the correct functioning of the assay system. - Statistics:
- For the statistical analysis, Fisher's Exact Test is used to compare the number of cells bearing aberrations (assumed to be Poisson distributed) in control and treated cultures. The analysis is performed using sets of data either including or excluding gaps.Following treatment with the test item, no statistically significant increase in the incidence of cells bearing aberrations including or excluding gaps over the control values, was observed in any treatment series at any sampling time.
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: Human
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- One hundred metaphase spreads were scored for chromosomal aberrations from each culture.
In the first experiment, following treatment in the absence of S9 metabolism, no remarkable toxicity was observed at any dose-level selected for treatment. In the presence of S9 metabolism, mild or slight toxicity was observed over the whole dose-range (mitotic indexes between 73-92% of the control) with the exception of the two lower dose levels of 78.1 and 39.1 micrograms/ml where no remarkable toxicity was observed.
In the second experiment, following the continuous treatment in the absence of S9 metabolism, moderate toxicity was observed at the three higher dose levels (5000, 2500 and 1250 microg/ml) where the mitotic indexes were reduced in the range between 64-68% of the control. Mild toxicity was observed at the dose levels of 625, 313, 156 and 78.1 micrograms/ml where the mitotic indexes were reduced in the range between 74-78% of the control. Slight toxicity was observed at the lowest dose of 39.1 micrograms/ml where the mitotic index was 86% of the control.
The highest dose level selected for the scoring of aberrations should be a concentration causing moderate toxicity (ideally the reduction of mitotic index should be approximately 50%) and treatments reducing the mitotic index to below 20% should not be scored. In the absence of toxicity the highest treatment level will be selected as the highest dose for scoring. On the basis of the observed toxicity the treatment-levels selected for the scoring of aberrations were 5000, 2500 and 1250 micrograms/ml
Following treatment with the substance, no relevant increase in the incidence of cells bearing aberrations including or excluding gaps over the control values, was observed at any dose level in the absence or presence of S9 metabolism.
Marked increases in the frequency of cells bearing aberrations (including and excluding gaps) were seen in the cultures treated with the positive control substance, Mitomycin-C and Cyclophosphamide indicating the correct functioning of the assay system. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
It is concluded that DIPLAST TM/MG does not induce chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes after in vitro treatment, under the reported experimental conditions. - Executive summary:
The test item, DIPLAST TM/MG, was assayed for the ability to cause chromosomal damage in cultured human lymphocytes, following in-vitro treatment in the absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation.
The substance did not induce chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes after in-vitro treatment
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From October 16,2007 to February 15,2008
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- L5178Y TK+/- (Clone 3.7.2C) mouse lymphoma cells obtained from American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Maryland (ATCC code: CRL 9518).
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 78.1, 156, 313, 625, 1250 and 2500 µg/mL used in the cytogenetic assay.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Solvent used: Ethanol
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- -S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- +S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- S9 metabolising system
S9 tissue homogenate was prepared from the livers of five young male Sprague-Dawley rats which had received treatment with phenobarbital and betanaphthoflavone to induce high levels of xenobiotic metabolising enzymes.
Preparation of test cell cultures
A cell suspension (1E6 cells/ml) in complete medium was prepared. A common pool was used for each experiment to prepare the test cultures. The cultures were incubated at 37°C. At the end of the incubation period, the treatment medium was removed and the cultures centrifuged and washed twice with Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS).
Cytotoxicity assay
A preliminary cytotoxicity test was performed in order to select appropriate dose levels for the mutation assays. In this test a wide range of dose levels of the test item was used and the survival of the cells was subsequently determined.
Treatments were performed in the absence and in the presence of S9 metabolic activation for 3 hours and for 24 hours only in the absence of S9 metabolic activation. A single culture was used at each test point. After washing in PBS, cells were resuspended in 20 ml RPMI minimal medium. Cell concentrations were adjusted to 8 cells/ml using complete medium (20%) and, for each dose level, 0.2 ml was plated into 96 microtitre wells. The plates were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere (100% nominal relative humidity) for 8 days. Wells containing viable clones were identified by eye using background illumination and then counted.
Mutation assay
Treatment of cell cultures
Experiments were performed including vehicle and positive controls, in the absence and presence of S9 metabolising system.
Duplicate cultures were prepared at each test point, with the exception of the positive controls which were prepared in a single culture.
In the first experiment, the cells were exposed to the test item for a short treatment time (3 hours). Since negative results were obtained in this experiment without metabolic activation, the second experiment in the absence of S9 metabolism, was performed using a long treatment time (24 hours).
After washing in PBS, cells were resuspended in fresh complete medium (10%) and cell densities were determined. The number of cells was adjusted to give 2E5 cells/ml. The cultures were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere (100% nominal relative humidity) to allow for expression of the mutant phenotype.
Determination of survival
Following adjustment of the cell densities, samples of the cultures were diluted to 8 cell/ml using complete medium (20%). A 0.2 ml aliquot of each diluted culture was placed into each well of two 96-well plates. The plates were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere (100% nominal relative humidity) for 8 days. After incubation, wells containing viable clones were identified by eye using background illumination and then counted.
Expression period
During the expression period (two days after treatment) the cell populations were subcultured in order to maintain them in exponential growth. At the end of this period the cell densities of each culture were determined and adjusted to give 2E5 cells/ml.
Plating for 5-trifluorothymidine resistance
After dilution, the cell suspensions in complete medium B (20%) were supplemented with trifluorothymidine (final concentration 3.0 µg/ml) and an estimated 2E3 cells were plated in each well of four 96-well plates.
Plates were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere (100% nominal relative humidity) for 14 days and wells containing clones were identified . In addition, the number of wells containing large colonies and the number containing small colonies were scored.
Plating for viability
After dilution, in complete medium (20%), an estimated 1.6 cells/well were plated in each well of two 96-well plates. These plates were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere (100% nominal relative humidity) for 14 days and wells containing clones were identified as above and counted. - Evaluation criteria:
- The assay was considered valid if the following criteria were met:
(i) The cloning efficiencies at Day 2 in the untreated control cultures in the absence of S9 metabolic activation fell within the range of 65-120%.
(ii) The untreated control growth factor in the absence of S9 metabolic activation over 2 days fell within the range of 8 – 32.
(iii) The mutant frequencies in the untreated control cultures fell within the range of 50 200 x 106 viable cells.
(iv) The positive control chemicals induced a clear increase in mutant frequency (the difference between the positive and negative control mutant frequencies was greater than half the historical mean value). - Statistics:
- Statistical analysis was performed according to UKEMS guidelines (Robinson W.D., 1990).
See "any other information" for details - Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Cytotoxicity test
Both in the absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation, the test substance was assayed at a maximum dose level of 5000 µg/ml and at lower dose levels: 2500, 1250, 625, 313, 156, 78.1, 39.1 and 19.5 µg/ml.
Slight decreases in relative survival were observed at intermediate dose levels, both in the absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation, using a 3 hour treatment time. No relevant toxicity was observed using a long treatment time in the absence of S9 metabolic activation.
Mutation assays
Two independent assays for mutation to trifluorothymidine resistance were performed.
The mutant frequencies in the solvent control cultures fell within the normal range (5E7 2E8 viable cells). The positive control chemicals induced clear increases in mutant frequency (the difference between the positive and negative control mutant frequencies was greater than half the historical mean value).
The cloning efficiencies at Day 2 in the negative control cultures fell within the range of 65-120% and the control growth factor over 2 days fell within the range of 8 – 32 in both experiments.
In the absence of S9 metabolic activation, using the 3-hour treatment time, slight toxicity was observed at the highest dose level (2500 µg/ml) reducing survival to 72% of the concurrent negative control value. The relative total growth was reduced to 78% at the same concentration. Using a long treatment time, no relevant toxicity was observed at any dose level.
In the presence of S9 metabolic activation, no relevant toxicity was observed in the first experiment, while in the second experiment, a slight decrease in relative total growth (60%) was observed only at the intermediate dose level of 313mg/ml.
In Experiment 1, in the presence of S9 metabolic activation, the heterogeneity between replicate cultures for survival at the end of treatment, at the concentration of 625 µg/ml, was higher than usual and thus excluded from the determination of overall heterogeneity. In addition, in the second experiment, in the absence of S9, a slight but statistically significant difference between replicate plates was observed for culture A treated at 625 µg/ml.These results have not affected the validity of the study.
No statistically significant increases in mutant frequency were observed in the absence or presence of S9 metabolic activation, following treatment with the test substance at any concentration level.
Osmolality and pH
The test substance did not have any obvious effect on the osmolality or pH of the treatment medium. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
It is concluded that DIPLAST TM/MG does not induce mutation at the TK locus of L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells in vitro in the absence or presence of S9 metabolic activation, under the reported experimental conditions. - Executive summary:
The substance has been examined for mutagenic activity by assaying for the induction of 5‑trifluorothymidine resistant mutants in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells afterin vitrotreatment, in the absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation, using a fluctuation method.
The substance does not induce mutation in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells after in vitro treatment in the absence or presence of S9 metabolic activation, under the reported experimental conditions
Referenceopen allclose all
In Assay 1, using the plate incorporation method, the substance was tested at the maximum concentration of 5000 μg/plate and at four lower concentrations. No relevant toxicity was observed with any tester strain at any dose-level. No relevant increase in revertant numbers was observed at any concentration tested. A pre-incubation step was included for all treatments of Assay 2 in which the same concentrations were employed. No toxicity was observed at any dose-level with any tester strain.
No precipitation of the test item was observed at the end of the incubation period at any concentration in the plate incorporation experiment or in the pre-incubation experiment.
The substance did not induce increases in the number of revertant colonies in the plate incorporation or pre-incubation assay, at any dose-level, in any tester strain, in the absence or presence of S9 metabolism.
The sterility of the S9 mix and the test solutions was confirmed by the absence of colonies on additional agar plates spread separately with these solutions. Marked increases in revertant numbers were obtained in these tests following treatment with the positive control items, indicating that the assay system was functioning correctly.
TABLE 1 - Mitotic index results - Without metabolic activation
MAIN ASSAY: 1
SOLVENT: ETHANOL
TREATMENT TIME: 3 hours
SAMPLING TIME: 24 hours
_____________________________________________________________________
Treatment Dose level Culture Cells Metaphases Mean Relative
(µg/ml) No. Scored MI(%) MI(%)
_____________________________________________________________________
Untreated - 1 1000 40 4.1 95
2 1000 42
_____________________________________________________________________
Solvent 1% 3 1000 44 4.3 100
4 1000 42
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 39.1 19 1000 45 4.3 100
20 1000 41
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 78.1 17 1000 40 4.2 97
18 1000 43
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 156 15 1000 38 4.2 97
16 1000 45
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 313 13 1000 37 3.9 91
14 1000 41
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 625 11 1000 43 4.2 97
12 1000 40
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 1250 9 1000 41 4.0 92
10 1000 38
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 2500 7 1000 40 4.3 99
8 1000 45
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 5000 5 1000 43 4.1 95
6 1000 39
_____________________________________________________________________
Mitomycin-C 0.50 21 1000 20 1.9 46
22 1000 18
_____________________________________________________________________
Mitomycin-C 0.75 23 1000 18 1.8 43
24 1000 17
_____________________________________________________________________
TABLE 2 - Mitotic index results - With metabolic activation
MAIN ASSAY: 1
SOLVENT: DMSO
TREATMENT TIME: 3 hours
SAMPLING TIME: 24 hours
_____________________________________________________________________
Treatment Dose level Culture Cells Metaphases Mean Relative
(µg/ml) No. Scored MI(%) MI(%)
_____________________________________________________________________
Untreated - 73 1000 56 5.6 114
74 1000 55
_____________________________________________________________________
Solvent 1% 75 1000 49 4.9 100
76 1000 48
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 39.1 91 1000 49 5.1 104
92 1000 52
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 78.1 89 1000 46 4.7 97
90 1000 48
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 156 87 1000 35 3.6 74
88 1000 37
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 313 85 1000 42 4.3 88
86 1000 43
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 625 83 1000 44 4.4 90
84 1000 43
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 1250 81 1000 35 3.6 73
82 1000 36
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 2500 79 1000 42 4.5 92
80 1000 47
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 5000 77 1000 37 3.8 78
78 1000 39
_____________________________________________________________________
Cyclophosphamide 18.0 93 1000 28 2.9 52
94 1000 30
_____________________________________________________________________
Cyclophosphamide 23.0 95 1000 22 2.3 41
96 1000 24
_____________________________________________________________________
TABLE 3 - Mitotic index results - Without metabolic activation
MAIN ASSAY: 2
SOLVENT: DMSO
TREATMENT TIME: 24 hours
SAMPLING TIME: 24 hours
_____________________________________________________________________
Treatment Dose level Culture Cells Metaphases Mean Relative
(µg/ml) No. Scored MI(%) MI(%)
_____________________________________________________________________
Untreated - 49 1000 54 5.3 98
50 1000 51
_____________________________________________________________________
Solvent 1% 51 1000 50 5.4 100
52 1000 57
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 39.1 67 1000 45 4.6 86
68 1000 47
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 78.1 65 1000 42 4.2 78
66 1000 41
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 156 63 1000 41 4.0 75
64 1000 39
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 313 61 1000 39 4.0 74
62 1000 40
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 625 59 1000 38 4.0 75
60 1000 42
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 1250 57 1000 38 3.7 68
58 1000 35
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 2500 55 1000 36 3.5 64
56 1000 33
_____________________________________________________________________
Test Item 5000 53 1000 35 3.6 67
54 1000 37
_____________________________________________________________________
Mitomycin-C 0.30 69 1000 27 2.9 54
70 1000 30
_____________________________________________________________________
Mitomycin-C 0.45 71 1000 22 2.3 44
72 1000 24
_____________________________________________________________________
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Potential genotoxicity has been extensively investigated in structurally similar trimellitate, tri(2 -ethylhexyl)trimellitate (TOTM), as follows:
Bacterial reverse mutation assays (Ames test) have shown the substance not to induce reverse mutation in Salmonella typhimurium or Escherichia coli.
The ability to cause chromosomal damage in cultured human lymphocytes, following in-vitro treatment has been investigated and the substance found not to induce chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes after in-vitro treatment.
Potential mutagenic activity has been examined by assaying for the induction of 5‑trifluorothymidine resistant mutants in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells after in vitro treatment. The substance does not induce mutation in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells.
The substance was not mutagenic in a dominant lethal assay conducted in the mouse and does not induce unscheduled DNA synthesis in primary rat hepatocytes
REACH Regulation 1907/2006 (Annex VIII, 8.4 Column 2) states that appropriate in-vivo mutagenicity studies should be considered in those cases of a positive result in any of the in vitro genotoxicity studies. In vitro investigations were negative and in vivo studies are therefore regarded as inappropriate and not in line with current concerns regarding animal welfare and the use of animals in scientific experiments.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Non-classification is justified on the basis of negative findings in 3 separate in-vitro tests for gene mutation / mutagenicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.