Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 258-847-9 | CAS number: 53894-23-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2000-2001
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP compliant study conducted according to internationally recognised test methods
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- A study to support regulatory submission assessing effects of tri(2-ethylhexyl)trimellitate (TEHTM) upon pre and post-natal development in the rat, with a comparative group receiving di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) included
- Author:
- Renaut SD and Whiteley M
- Year:
- 2 017
- Bibliographic source:
- Reproductive Toxicology 74: 59-69, 2017
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
- Reference Type:
- secondary source
- Title:
- TEHTM Study for effects on embryo-fetal and pre- and post-natal development in CD rat by oral gavage administration
- Author:
- Anon.
- Year:
- 2 002
- Bibliographic source:
- EPA TSCATS low detail report
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Tri-(2-ethylhexyl)trimellitate (TEHTM)
- IUPAC Name:
- Tri-(2-ethylhexyl)trimellitate (TEHTM)
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Tri-(2-ethylhexyl)trimellitate (TEHTM)
- Analytical purity: 98.93%
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River (UK) Ltd.
- Age at study initiation: 10 - 11 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 218 - 266 g
- Fasting period before study: No
- Housing: Individually caged
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Pelleted rodent diet, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Municipal supply, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Approximately 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 - 23 deg C
- Humidity (%): 40 - 70%
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Corn oil
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 20, 100 and 210 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5 mL/kg bw - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Homogeneity - Stable for 2 days at 21 deg C and 14 days at 4 deg C
Concentration - Formulations prepared during the first and last weeks of dosing checked with mean achieved concentration ranging from 94.2% to 100.0% of nominal. - Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- M/F ratio per cage: 1 / 1
- Verification of same strain and source of both sexes: Yes
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- Any other deviations from standard protocol: No - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Gestation days 6-19 (prenatal development)
Gestation day 6 - post-partum day 20 (post-natal development) - Frequency of treatment:
- Daily from gestation day 6, except day of parturition for animals allowed to litter
- Duration of test:
- Approximately 40 days (to lactation day 20)
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 050 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 35 females/group - 20 for pre-natal development; 15 for post-natal development
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Random
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: No data
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No data
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Gestation days 0, 3, 6, 10, 14, 17 and 20, then daily until parturition, and on lactations days 1, 4, 7, 11, 14, 18 and 21.
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Gestation days 6-9, 10-13, 14-17, 18-19; lactations days 1-3, 4-6, 7-10, 11-13
WATER CONSUMPTION: No data
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 20 - Organs examined: Evaluation of uterine content. Liver weighed - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes / No / No data
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: No data
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Head examinations: No data - Statistics:
- ANOVA followed by William’s test, or Kruskal-WaIlis/Hollander & Wolfe followed by Shirley’s test, Steel’s test, Cochran-Armitage, Fisher’s exact test.
- Indices:
- Implantations
Resorptions
Total implantation loss
Litter size
Litter weight
Sex ratio - Historical control data:
- No data
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Neuropathological findings:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Number of abortions:
- no effects observed
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- no effects observed
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- No mortalities or significant clinical signs occurred and treatment had no obvious effect on body weight gain during gestation or lactation. Food consumption during gestation and lactation was unaffected by treatment. Necropsy of dams sacrificed on gestation day 20 revealed no macroscopic changes associated with treatment and all females were pregnant with a live litter. Numbers of corpora lutea, implantations, pre-implantation loss, embryo-foetal survival (as assessed by post-implantation loss) and litter size were unaffected by treatment. Gestation length, litter size and offspring survival were unaffected by treatment. A slightly low group mean survival of offspring (viability index) from lactation day 1 through to weaning amongst females treated at 1050 mg/kg bw/day was the result of one litter which was killed on post-natal day 2 because the pups were cold, unfed and underactive.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 050 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
Maternal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- no effects observed
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Skeletal malformations:
- no effects observed
- Visceral malformations:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Detailed foetal examinations revealed no clear treatment related effects. Sex ratio (% males) was unaffected by treatment and offspring bodyweight was not significantly affected. Values of ano-genital distance were consistent across all treatment groups, including concurrent controls.
Post-natal development
The general condition of maturing pups (F1) animals was unaffected by maternal treatment and body weight gain was unaffected. Offspring auditory and visual function (as assessed by startle response to a sudden noise and pupil closure response of dark-adapted eyes on post-natal day 20) were unaffected by treatment. A number of males from the group treated at a level of 1050 mg/kg bw/day showed a few retained areolar regions but the incidence was very low (10 males from 6 litters with areolar regions visible). No dark areolar regions were noted when affected pups were re-examined at post-natal day 18.
Sexual maturation (vaginal opening) of F1 females revealed no clear adverse effects of maternal treatment. The mean age at completion for animals in the 500 and 1050 mg/kg bw/day treatment groups was marginally later (0.6 and 0.3 days, respectively) than the vehicle control. Sexual maturation of males, as assessed by the start and completion of balano-preputial separation showed no obvious adverse effects of maternal treatment. In the 1050 mg/kg bw/day treatment group, mean age at completion was 0.8 days younger than the vehicle controls and bodyweight was slightly lower. As the mean delay was less than 1 day, and with observations performed once per day, this finding was considered unlikely to reflect a treatment related effect and timing of completion of balano-preputial separation was similar to historical control values.
Necropsy examination of F1 females at approximately 6 weeks of age revealed no findings considered to be related to maternal treatment. Necropsy of F1 males at approximately 15 weeks of age also revealed no findings which were considered to be related to maternal treatment. There was no indication of any reduction in the weights of reproductive organs. Histopathological examination of the left testis from males of all groups and the right testes from the control and the highest (1050mg/kg bw/day) treatment group of the F1 generation revealed no abnormalities.
Effect levels (fetuses)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 050 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Lack of significant effects on foetus
- Remarks on result:
- other: Pre-natal developmental toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: retained areolar region PND 13, no longer present PND 18
- Remarks on result:
- other: Post-natal developmental toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 050 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: retained areolar region PND 13, no longer present PND 18
- Remarks on result:
- other: Post-natal developmental toxicity
Fetal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Overall developmental toxicity
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 1 050 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Any other information on results incl. tables
Post-natal development examinations did not reveal any significant differences relative to controls for survival of offspring, sex ratio, bodyweight or bodyweight gain, auditory startle and pupil closure
responses, age at vaginal opening or preputial separation.
At necropsy, there were no effects attributable to treatment in either females (6 weeks of age) or males (15 weeks of age). Assessment included morphology of the male and female reproductive tract organs, weight of the male reproductive organs or microscopic pathology of the testis.
There was a slight but statistically significant (P<0.05) increase in the number of male animals with retained areolar regions on evaluation at post-natal Day 13 at 1050 mg/kg/day. Affected animals had
only one or two more sites than those in the control group. The areolae present at post-natal Day 13 were no longer present on re-examination on post-natal Day 18. In the absence of any other supporting data, this finding was regarded as being of questionable toxicological significance.
There was a higher incidence of displaced testes in foetuses from the group treated at 1050 mg/kg/day when compared with controls. However, the incidence was within the range of recent historical control data of the test facility for this endpoint. No displaced testes were noted in any of the foetuses undergoing less rigorous examination prior to preparation for skeletal examination. There was no difference in the incidence of non-scrotal testes between males of treatment and control groups at 15 weeks of age.
The incidence of renal cavitation was higher controls in foetuses that were macroscopically assessed prior to skeletal examination. Again, this finding was within the range of recent historical control values,
and was not found during examination of foetuses by the more rigorous serial sectioning technique.
The incidence of effects in the testes and kidneys appear to be related to the low incidence of these findings in the concurrent control group compared to the range of historical control values. The observed
incidences of these findings in treated groups were within the range of historical controls from recent studies at the test facility and they were not supported by complimentary observations made in foetuses
or offspring. They were therefore considered not to be related to treatment.
Body weight gain (g) of dams during gestation and lactation - Group mean data
|
|
Treatment |
|||
|
|
Control |
100 mg/kg |
500 mg/kg |
1050 mg/kg |
Bodyweight on GD 0 |
Mean |
246 |
246 |
246 |
247 |
|
SD |
10 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
|
n |
34 |
35 |
35 |
34 |
Bodyweight gain GD 6–20 |
Mean |
138 |
134 |
136 |
142 |
|
SD |
19 |
17 |
16 |
24 |
|
n |
34 |
35 |
35 |
34 |
Bodyweight gain adjusted for gravid |
Mean |
50.8 |
47.6 |
43.6 |
50.0 |
uterus weight (g) GD 6–20 |
SD |
13.4 |
12.3 |
10.1 |
17.5 |
|
n |
18 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Bodyweight on lactation day 1 |
Mean |
335 |
320 |
322 |
319 |
|
SD |
26 |
26 |
24 |
17 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
13 |
Bodyweight gain lactation day 1–21 |
Mean |
27 |
34 |
38 |
38 |
|
SD |
17 |
14 |
18 |
13 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
13 |
Food consumption (g/animal/day) of dams during gestation and lactation - Group mean data
|
|
Treatment |
|||
|
|
Control |
100 mg/kg |
500 mg/kg |
1050 mg/kg |
Gestation days 6–9 |
Mean |
29 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
|
SD |
3 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
|
n |
34 |
35 |
35 |
34 |
Gestation days 10–13 |
Mean |
31 |
29 |
29 |
30 |
|
SD |
3 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
|
n |
34 |
35 |
35 |
34 |
Gestation days 14–17 |
Mean |
32 |
31 |
31 |
32 |
|
SD |
3 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
|
n |
34 |
35 |
35 |
34 |
Gestation days 18–19 |
Mean |
29 |
29 |
28 |
30 |
|
SD |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
|
n |
34 |
35 |
35 |
34 |
Lactation days 1–3 |
Mean |
38 |
37 |
36 |
37 |
|
SD |
3 |
6 |
4 |
7 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
13 |
Lactation days 4–6 |
Mean |
58 |
56 |
56 |
58 |
|
SD |
6 |
8 |
4 |
6 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
13 |
Lactation days 7–10 |
Mean |
74 |
72 |
72 |
73 |
|
SD |
6 |
9 |
5 |
6 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
13 |
Lactation days 11–13 |
Mean |
83 |
79 |
80 |
82 |
|
SD |
7 |
10 |
5 |
7 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
13 |
Pre-natal developmental toxicity - Litter data, foetal and litter weight on GD 20 - Group mean data
|
|
Treatment |
|||
|
|
Control |
100 mg/kg |
500 mg/kg |
1050 mg/kg |
Implantations |
Mean |
15.4 |
15.6 |
16.1 |
16.4 |
|
SD |
2.0 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
2.1 |
|
n |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Total resorptions |
Mean |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
|
n |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Sex ratio |
Mean |
54.8 |
55.2 |
52.3 |
50.9 |
|
n |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Post-implantation loss (%) |
Mean |
5.2 |
5.2 |
1.8 |
2.9 |
|
n |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Litter size (total live young) |
Mean |
14.7 |
14.8 |
15.8 |
15.9 |
|
SD |
2.3 |
2.2 |
1.7 |
1.9 |
|
n |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Overall fetal weight (g) |
Mean |
3.83 |
3.89 |
3.88 |
3.80 |
|
SD |
0.24 |
0.15 |
0.20 |
0.15 |
|
n |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Litter weight (g) |
Mean |
56.01 |
57.54 |
61.18 |
60.39 |
|
SD |
9.21 |
8.27 |
6.90 |
7.37 |
|
n |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Anogenital distance (mm) for males |
Mean |
4.24 |
4.30 |
4.33 |
4.28 |
|
SD |
0.17 |
0.15 |
0.20 |
0.17 |
|
n |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
AGD/cube root of male foetal weight |
Mean |
2.69 |
2.71 |
2.73 |
2.72 |
|
SD |
0.10 |
0.08 |
0.11 |
0.10 |
|
n |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Pre-natal developmental toxicity - Foetal visceral examination - Group incidence
|
Foetuses |
|
Litters |
||||||
Treatment: |
Control |
100 mg/kg |
500 mg/kg |
1050 mg/kg |
|
Control |
100 mg/kg |
500 mg/kg |
1050 mg/kg |
Total Number examined |
146 |
151 |
160 |
159 |
|
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Total Number affected |
22 |
28 |
25 |
28 |
|
15 |
15 |
13 |
14 |
Ventricular septal defect, small |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
|
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
Kidney(s) rudimentary/absent papilla |
1 |
2 |
1 |
- |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
- |
Testis(es) displaced |
4 |
3 |
3 |
9 |
|
3 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
Pre-natal developmental toxicity - Foetal skeletal examination - Group incidence
|
Foetuses |
|
Litters |
||||||
Treatment: |
Control |
100 mg/kg |
500 mg/kg |
1050 mg/kg |
|
Control |
100 mg/kg |
500 mg/kg |
1050 mg/kg |
Total Number examined |
147 |
145 |
156 |
159 |
|
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
thoracic (1 or 2 elements) |
1 |
2 |
1 |
- |
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
- |
Incomplete ossification, sternebrae 5th and/or 6th |
66 |
77 |
62 |
81 |
|
18 |
18 |
15 |
20 |
Incomplete ossification, other |
3 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
|
3 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
Number with 13/14 or 14/14 ribs |
19 |
31 |
22 |
18 |
|
9 |
11 |
10 |
13 |
Complete 14th rib |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
|
1 |
- |
- |
- |
Cervical rib |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
|
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
Prenatal developmental toxicity - Gestation length, litter data, survival indices and sex ratio – Incidence and group mean data
|
|
Treatment |
|||
|
|
Control |
100 mg/kg |
500 mg/kg |
1050 mg/kg |
Number (%) of females with a |
21.5 days |
0 |
0 |
3 (20) |
1 (7) |
gestation length of: |
22 days |
7 (50) |
6 (40) |
8 (53) |
6 (43) |
|
22.5 days |
7 (50) |
8 (53) |
4 (27) |
6 (43) |
|
23 days |
0 |
1 (7) |
0 |
1 (7) |
|
23.5 days |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
No.post-partumimplantation sites |
Mean |
15.6 |
15.4 |
15.7 |
16.0 |
|
SD |
1.9 |
2.0 |
1.6 |
1.7 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
14 |
Total litter size |
Mean |
14.6 (14) |
14.5 (15) |
14.9 (15) |
15.1 (14) |
|
SD |
2.1 |
2.0 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
14 |
Live litter size at weaning on Day 21 of age |
Mean |
14.3 (14) |
14.3 (15) |
14.7 (15) |
14.7 (13) |
|
SD |
2.1 |
2.0 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
13 |
Sex ratio (%M) on Day 1 of age |
Mean |
47.1 |
49.1 |
52.2 |
49.0 |
|
SD |
11.7 |
15.7 |
7.4 |
14.6 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
14 |
Post-implantation survival (%) |
|
93.2 |
93.9 |
95.0 |
94.8 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
14 |
Live birth index (%) |
|
99.1 |
100.0 |
99.6 |
98.5 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
14 |
Viability index (%) Day 21 |
|
99.0 |
99.1 |
99.2 |
90.7 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
14 |
Postnatal developmental toxicity - Body weight (g) - Group mean data
|
|
Treatment |
|||
|
|
Control |
100 mg/kg |
500 mg/kg |
1050 mg/kg |
Males: |
|
|
|
|
|
Offspring body weight (g) on PND 1 |
Mean |
6.9 |
6.8 |
6.5 |
6.7 |
|
SD |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
14 |
Offspring body weight (g) on PND 21 |
Mean |
47.1 |
44.7 |
42.2 |
44.3 |
|
SD |
6.0 |
4.3 |
4.5 |
5.9 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
13 |
Offspring body weight gain (g) PND 1-21 |
Mean |
40.2 |
37.8 |
35.7 |
37.5 |
|
SD |
5.7 |
4.1 |
4.2 |
5.6 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
13 |
Females: |
|
|
|
|
|
Offspring body weight (g) on PND 1 |
Mean |
6.4 |
6.5 |
6.3 |
6.3 |
|
SD |
0.7 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
14 |
Offspring body weight (g) on PND 21 |
Mean |
44.5 |
43.1 |
40.7 |
42.6 |
|
SD |
6.2 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
5.9 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
13 |
Offspring body weight gain (g) PND 1-21 |
Mean |
38.1 |
36.6 |
34.5 |
36.2 |
|
SD |
5.8 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
5.6 |
|
n |
14 |
15 |
15 |
13 |
Postnatal developmental toxicity - incidences of auditory and visual function of pups - Group mean data
|
Treatment |
|||
|
Control |
100 mg/kg |
500 mg/kg |
1050 mg/kg |
Number of offspring (litters): |
|
|
|
|
Number examined |
200 (14) |
215 (15) |
221 (15) |
191 (13) |
Normal auditory startle reflex |
200 (14) |
215 (15) |
221 (15) |
191 (13) |
Normal pupil closure responsea |
199 (14) |
212 (15) |
220 (15) |
190 (13) |
Pupils failed to dilate |
1 (1) |
- |
- |
- |
Opacity in right eye; unable to assess pupil response |
- |
3 (1) |
- |
- |
Eyes closed in response to light; unable to assess |
- |
- |
- |
1 (1) |
Post-natal developmental toxicity - Nipple regression for male offspring at PND 13/14 - Group data
|
Treatment |
|||
|
Control |
100 mg/kg |
500 mg/kg |
1050 mg/kg |
Total number of offspring |
96 |
104 |
114 |
92 |
No. areolar regions visible PND 13/14 |
% pups with areolar regions visible |
|||
0 |
97.9 |
97.1 |
98.2 |
89.1 |
1 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
5.4 |
2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
4.3 |
3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
4 |
1.0 |
1.9 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
7 or more |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
No. of male offspring with areolar regions visible |
2 |
3 |
2 |
10 |
No. litters affected |
2 |
2 |
2 |
6 * |
Post-natal developmental toxicity - Post-weaning body weight (g) - Group mean data
|
|
Treatment |
|||
|
|
Control |
100 mg/kg |
500 mg/kg |
1050 mg/kg |
Males: |
|
|
|
|
|
Body weight on Day 1 of the F1 generation @ |
Mean |
93 |
89 |
85** |
86** |
|
SD |
17 |
16 |
15 |
13 |
|
n |
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
Bodyweight gain during Weeks: |
|
|
|
|
|
1 - 3 |
Mean |
121 |
120 |
120 |
118 |
|
SD |
11 |
14 |
11 |
12 |
|
n |
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
1 - 4 |
Mean |
186 |
184 |
182 |
181 |
|
SD |
16 |
18 |
15 |
16 |
|
n |
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
1 - 12 |
Mean |
451 |
451 |
450 |
443 |
|
SD |
55 |
48 |
41 |
42 |
|
n |
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
Females: |
|
|
|
|
|
Body weight on Day 1 of the F1 generation @ |
Mean |
82 |
80 |
78 |
80 |
|
SD |
16 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
|
n |
104 |
111 |
107 |
100 |
Body weight gain during Weeks: |
|
|
|
|
|
1 - 3 |
Mean |
79 |
83* |
8 |
82* |
|
SD |
9 |
10 |
8 |
6 |
|
n |
104 |
111 |
107 |
100 |
@ = Day 1 corresponds to approximately 4 weeks of age (post-natal day 25-30)
Post-natal developmental toxicity - Sexual maturation - Group mean data
|
|
Treatment |
|||
|
|
Control |
100 mg/kg |
500 mg/kg |
1050 mg/kg |
Females - Vaginal opening: |
|
|
|
|
|
Age at completion (days) |
Mean |
33.8 |
33.7 |
34.4* |
34.1* |
|
SD |
1.9 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
1.9 |
|
n |
104 |
111 |
107 |
100 |
Body weight at completion (g) |
Mean |
108.4 |
109.3 |
108.9 |
109.1 |
|
SD |
12.3 |
10.3 |
12.3 |
13.4 |
|
n |
104 |
111 |
107 |
100 |
Males - Balano preputial separation: |
|
|
|
|
|
Age at start (days) |
Mean |
36.5 |
37.3 |
37.4** |
36.8 |
|
SD |
1.0 |
1.1 |
1.7 |
1.2 |
|
n |
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
Body weight at start (g) |
Mean |
153.4 |
157.0 |
152.6 |
148.4 * |
|
SD |
15.2 |
16.4 |
15.1 |
16.1 |
|
n |
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
Age at completion (days) |
Mean |
45.0 |
45.1 |
44.8 |
44.2 * |
|
SD |
2.4 |
1.8 |
2.1 |
2.4 |
|
n |
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
Body weight at completion (g) |
Mean |
231.3 |
226.5 |
218.6** |
215.0** |
|
SD |
27.6 |
22.6 |
18.6 |
20.5 |
|
n |
95 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
Post-natal developmental toxicity - Macroscopic findings - Group incidence
|
|
Treatment |
|||
|
|
Control |
100 mg/kg |
500 mg/kg |
1050 mg/kg |
Males: |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of animals examined |
|
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
Testis left: |
inguinal |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
abdominal |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
small |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
|
blue |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
flaccid |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
Testis right: |
inguinal |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
abdominal |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
small |
1 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
|
blue |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
flaccid |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Epididymis left: |
small |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
Epididymis right: |
small |
1 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
Prostate: |
small |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
Females: |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of animals examined |
|
104 |
111 |
107 |
100 |
Uterus and cervix: |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
Vagina: |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
Post-natal developmental toxicity - Organ weight (g) of males - Group mean data
|
|
Treatment |
|||
|
|
Control |
100 mg/kg |
500 mg/kg |
1050 mg/kg |
Terminal bodyweight (g) |
Mean |
547.7 |
543.0 |
538.0 |
532.4* |
|
SD |
59.2 |
52.6 |
46.0 |
48.7 |
|
n |
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
Absolute organ weights: |
|||||
Testes |
Mean |
3.51 |
3.48 |
3.36 b |
3.48 |
|
SD |
0.38 |
0.32 |
0.30 |
0.31 |
|
n |
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
Epididymides |
Mean |
1.126 |
1.146 |
1.113 |
1.167** |
|
SD |
0.101 |
0.110 |
0.101 |
0.080 |
|
n |
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
Prostate |
Mean |
0.647 |
0.610 |
0.619 |
0.612 |
|
SD |
0.296 |
0.155 |
0.151 |
0.131 |
|
n |
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
Seminal vesicles |
Mean |
2.205 |
2.355** |
2.300** |
2.376 ** |
|
SD |
0.267 |
0.298 |
0.282 |
0.292 |
|
n |
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
Relative (to body weight) organ weights (%): |
|||||
Testes |
Mean |
0.648 |
0.645 |
0.628 |
0.658 |
|
SD |
0.092 |
0.071 |
0.069 |
0.069 |
|
n |
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
Epididymides |
Mean |
0.2075 |
0.2129 |
0.2078 |
0.2206 |
|
SD |
0.0247 |
0.0282 |
0.0204 |
0.0204 |
|
n |
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
Prostate |
Mean |
0.1185 |
0.1132 |
0.1152 |
0.1158 |
|
SD |
0.0499 |
0.0299 |
0.0273 |
0.0264 |
|
n |
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
Seminal vesicles |
Mean |
0.4054 |
0.4365** |
0.4297** |
0.4496** |
|
SD |
0.0529 |
0.0609 |
0.0571 |
0.0661 |
|
n |
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
Post-natal developmental toxicity - Microscopic pathology in the testis of males - Group incidence
|
Treatment |
|
Treatment |
||||||
|
Control |
100 mg/kg |
500 mg/kg |
1050 mg/kg |
|
Control |
100 mg/kg |
500 mg/kg |
1050 mg/kg |
|
Left testis: |
|
Right testis: |
||||||
Number of animals examined |
96 |
104 |
114 |
91 |
|
96 |
|
|
91 |
Degeneration of tubular germinal epithelium |
2 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
Rete tubular dilatation |
24 |
25 |
33 |
16 |
|
22 |
|
|
16 |
Multinucleate giant cells |
1 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
Interstitial cell hyperplasia |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
Interstitial oedema |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
Seminiferous tubular dilatation |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
3 |
Seminiferous tubular mineralisation |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
Aplasia |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
Capsular thickening |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
Perivascular lymphocyte infiltration |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
Seminiferous tubular vacuolation |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
2 |
Ectopic seminiferous tubules within tunica albuginea |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
Interstitial inflammatory infiltrate |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
Key to tables
GD = Gestation day
LD = Lactation day
PND = Post-natal day
* = p < 0.05: Significantly different from controls
** = p < 0.01: Significantly different from controls
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- A developmental toxicity study in the rat, extended to permit an assessment of post-natal development, found no treatment-related effects indicative of maternal toxicity. No effects on offspring body weights or litter viability were observed. No developmental (teratogenic) effects were observed and there were no effects upon sexual maturation or development of the reproductive tract in male or female offspring that were attributed to treatment.
NOEL maternal toxicity: 1050 mg/kg/day
NOEL pre-natal developmental toxicity: 1050 mg/kg/day
NOEL post-natal evaluation of offspring: 500 mg/kg/day; LOAEL: 1050 mg/kg/day - Executive summary:
A developmental toxicity study in the rat, extended to permit an assessment of post-natal development, found no treatment-related effects indicative of maternal toxicity. No effects on offspring body weights or litter viability were observed. No developmental (teratogenic) effects were observed and there were no effects upon sexual maturation or development of the reproductive tract in male or female offspring that were attributed to treatment.
NOEL maternal toxicity: 1050 mg/kg/day
NOEL pre-natal developmental toxicity: 1050 mg/kg/day
NOEL post-natal evaluation of offspring: 500 mg/kg/day; LOAEL: 1050 mg/kg/day
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.