Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 406-670-4 | CAS number: 61203-83-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Ames test: The test item was not mutagenic in Salmonella typhimurium TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537, and TA 1538 with or without addition of S9 mix (reference 7.6.1 -1).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- May 16, to July 13, 1990
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1981
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Due to migration, the value was transferred to one of the current document's attachments
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1st series of experiments:
5, 10, 50, 250, 500, and 750 µg/plate
2nd and additional series of experiments:
1, 5, 10, 50, 250, and 375 µg/plate (TA 98, TA 1535, TA 1537, and TA 1538)
1, 5, 10, 50, 250, and 500 µg/plate (TA 100)
The test material concentrations used were selected according to the OECD Guideline for this test system. They were chosen to cover a broad concentration range including, if possible, also a toxic concentration. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: The test material was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO).
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 4-Nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Daunomycin
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- with S9 mix
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: 4
- Number of independent experiments : 3
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Test substance added in agar (plate incorporation)
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 48 h
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: reduction in the number of spontaneous revertants, clearing of the background lawn, reduced survival of treated cultures - Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 500 µg/plate with and without S9 mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 500 µg/plate with and without S9 mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- from 500 µg/plate onwards with and without S9 mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 500 µg/plate with and without S9 mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 375 µg/plate with and without S9 mix
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: In a range finding test (using S.typh. TA 100 and TA 1535 without metabolic activation) toxicity was investigated in a wide range of test material concentrations (50 - 10000 µg/plate). Toxicity normally becomes evident by a reduction in the number of spontaneous revertants, a clearing of the background lawn, or by reduced survival of treated cultures. These effects were observed with the test item in the range finding test at concentrations > 500 µg/plate.
Thus, in the first series of experiments the following concentrations were tested:
5, 10, 50, 250, 500, and 750 µg/plate.
As for the highest concentrations tested strong cytotoxic effects still were observed during the first series of experiments, the second and additional series of experiments were performed using the following concentrations:
TA 98, TA 1535, TA 1537, and TA 1538: 1, 5, 10, 50, 250, and 375 µg/plate
TA 100: 1, 5, 10, 50, 250, and 500 µg/plate
- Signs of toxicity
Because of cytotoxic effects only four concentrations were valid in the first series of experiments (except TA 100). As, however, five concentrations are recommended in the OECD- and EEC- Guidelines, an additional series of experiments was performed, using the same concentrations as in the second series.
- Individual plate counts
see table 1-4
- Mean number of revertant colonies per plate and standard deviation
see table 1-4
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions used, the test item was not mutagenic in Salmonella typhimurium TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537, and TA 1538 with or without addition of S9 mix.
- Executive summary:
The investigations for mutagenic potential were performed according OECD TG 471 using Salmonella typhimurium TA 100, TA 98, TA 1535, TA 1537, and TA 1538 as tester strains. The plate incorporation test with and without addition of rat liver S-9 fraction (Aroclor-induced) was used.
The substance was tested in three series of experiments at the following concentrations:
First series of experiments: 5, 10, 50, 250, 500, and 750 µg/plate
Second and additional series of experiments:
1, 5, 10, 50, 250, and 375 µg/plate (TA 98, TA 1535, TA 1537, and TA 1538)
1, 5, 10, 50, 250, and 500 µg/plate (TA 100)
9-Aminoacridine, daunomycin, 1-ethyl-2-nitro-3-nitrosoguanidine, methyl methanesulfonate, 2-nitrofluorene, 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine, and sodium azide served as positive control compounds for testing the bacteria. 2-Aminoanthracene was used for testing the bacteria and the activity of the S-9 preparation.
The positive controls showed normal reversion properties of all strains and good metabolic activity of the S-9 mix used.
With and without addition of S-9 as the metabolizing system, the substance did not show any mutagenic activity in the concentration range used.
Reference
Table 1: Results of second series (TA100)
Without S-9 Mix
Conc.(µg/pl) |
Individual Values |
n |
Mean |
SD |
Pc |
Bg |
||||
|
0.0 |
124 |
127 |
140 |
144 |
4 |
134 |
9.7 |
- |
- |
|
1.0 |
113 |
144 |
135 |
137 |
4 |
132 |
13.4 |
- |
- |
|
5.0 |
123 |
123 |
120 |
125 |
4 |
123 |
2.1 |
- |
- |
|
10.0 |
139 |
148 |
154 |
149 |
4 |
148 |
6.2 |
- |
- |
|
50.0 |
153 |
162 |
152 |
163 |
4 |
158 |
5.8 |
- |
- |
|
250.0 |
118 |
120 |
108 |
117 |
4 |
116 |
5.3 |
- |
- |
|
500.0 |
55 |
74 |
70 |
59 |
4 |
65 |
9.0 |
- |
+ |
|
0.0 |
153 |
149 |
140 |
152 |
4 |
149 |
5.9 |
- |
- |
2-AA |
1.0 |
150 |
140 |
138 |
163 |
4 |
148 |
11.4 |
- |
- |
MMS |
500.0 |
1276 |
1295 |
1202 |
1128 |
4 |
1225 |
76.2 |
- |
- |
ENNG |
4.0 |
906 |
866 |
721 |
855 |
4 |
837 |
80.4 |
- |
- |
With S-9 Mix
Conc.(µg/pl) |
Individual Values |
n |
Mean |
SD |
Pc |
Bg |
||||
|
0.0 |
192 |
164 |
192 |
213 |
4 |
190 |
20.1 |
- |
- |
|
1.0 |
170 |
174 |
189 |
166 |
4 |
175 |
10.0 |
- |
- |
|
5.0 |
189 |
226 |
200 |
208 |
4 |
206 |
15.6 |
- |
- |
|
10.0 |
190 |
166 |
162 |
178 |
4 |
174 |
12.6 |
- |
- |
|
50.0 |
165 |
194 |
217 |
162 |
4 |
185 |
26.0 |
- |
- |
|
250.0 |
161 |
153 |
175 |
177 |
4 |
167 |
11.5 |
- |
- |
|
500.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
+ |
|
0.0 |
201 |
190 |
166 |
179 |
4 |
184 |
15.0 |
- |
- |
2-AA |
1.0 |
541 |
624 |
528 |
637 |
4 |
583 |
55.9 |
- |
- |
Table 2: Results of second series (TA1535)
Without S-9 Mix
Conc.(µg/pl) |
Individual Values |
n |
Mean |
SD |
Pc |
Bg |
||||
|
0.0 |
7 |
16 |
13 |
19 |
4 |
14 |
5.1 |
- |
- |
|
1.0 |
19 |
9 |
16 |
8 |
4 |
13 |
5.4 |
- |
- |
|
5.0 |
26 |
21 |
18 |
13 |
4 |
20 |
5.4 |
- |
- |
|
10.0 |
20 |
20 |
18 |
20 |
4 |
20 |
1.0 |
- |
- |
|
50.0 |
16 |
28 |
8 |
7 |
4 |
15 |
9.7 |
- |
- |
|
250.0 |
7 |
9 |
6 |
17 |
4 |
10 |
5.0 |
- |
- |
|
375.0 |
2 |
9 |
8 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
4.1 |
- |
+ |
|
0.0 |
19 |
16 |
16 |
15 |
4 |
17 |
1.7 |
- |
- |
2-AA |
1.0 |
13 |
17 |
21 |
27 |
4 |
20 |
6.0 |
- |
- |
ENNG |
10.0 |
863 |
815 |
814 |
798 |
4 |
823 |
28.1 |
- |
- |
Ve-H2O |
|
17 |
17 |
17 |
18 |
4 |
17 |
0.5 |
- |
- |
NaN3 |
1.0 |
448 |
479 |
463 |
378 |
4 |
442 |
44.5 |
- |
- |
With S-9 Mix
Conc.(µg/pl) |
Individual Values |
n |
Mean |
SD |
Pc |
Bg |
||||
|
0.0 |
15 |
14 |
13 |
16 |
4 |
15 |
1.3 |
- |
- |
|
1.0 |
21 |
18 |
20 |
17 |
4 |
19 |
1.8 |
- |
- |
|
5.0 |
14 |
18 |
27 |
22 |
4 |
20 |
5.6 |
- |
- |
|
10.0 |
15 |
14 |
15 |
20 |
4 |
16 |
2.7 |
- |
- |
|
50.0 |
20 |
9 |
14 |
13 |
4 |
14 |
4.5 |
- |
- |
|
250.0 |
19 |
16 |
15 |
16 |
4 |
17 |
1.7 |
- |
- |
|
375.0 |
9 |
7 |
5 |
7 |
4 |
7 |
1.6 |
- |
+ |
|
0.0 |
21 |
7 |
26 |
15 |
4 |
17 |
8.2 |
- |
- |
2-AA |
1.0 |
141 |
122 |
118 |
137 |
4 |
130 |
11.2 |
- |
- |
Table 3: Results of second series (TA1537)
Without S-9 Mix
Conc.(µg/pl) |
Individual Values |
n |
Mean |
SD |
Pc |
Bg |
||||
|
0.0 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
1.3 |
- |
- |
|
1.0 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
0.8 |
- |
- |
|
5.0 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
1.7 |
- |
- |
|
10.0 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
1.0 |
- |
- |
|
50.0 |
6 |
7 |
7 |
10 |
4 |
8 |
1.7 |
- |
- |
|
250.0 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
1.6 |
- |
- |
|
375.0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
0.8 |
- |
+ |
|
0.0 |
4 |
6 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
1.2 |
- |
- |
2-AA |
1.0 |
5 |
7 |
8 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
1.5 |
- |
- |
EtOH |
|
4 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
0.6 |
- |
- |
9-AA |
20 |
30 |
35 |
43 |
42 |
4 |
38 |
6.1 |
- |
- |
9-AA |
50 |
556 |
574 |
426 |
517 |
4 |
518 |
65.9 |
- |
- |
With S-9 Mix
Conc.(µg/pl) |
Individual Values |
n |
Mean |
SD |
Pc |
Bg |
||||
|
0.0 |
5 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
1.4 |
- |
- |
|
1.0 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
14 |
4 |
7 |
4.6 |
- |
- |
|
5.0 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
0.6 |
- |
- |
|
10.0 |
7 |
13 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
5.0 |
- |
- |
|
50.0 |
2 |
5 |
14 |
5 |
4 |
7 |
5.2 |
- |
- |
|
250.0 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
1.5 |
- |
- |
|
375.0 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
2.2 |
- |
+ |
|
0.0 |
9 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
2.4 |
- |
- |
2-AA |
1.0 |
41 |
55 |
61 |
44 |
4 |
50 |
9.4 |
- |
- |
Table 4: Results of second series (TA1538)
Without S-9 Mix
Conc.(µg/pl) |
Individual Values |
n |
Mean |
SD |
Pc |
Bg |
||||
|
0.0 |
5 |
2 |
9 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
2.9 |
- |
- |
|
1.0 |
8 |
6 |
3 |
7 |
4 |
6 |
2.2 |
- |
- |
|
5.0 |
5 |
3 |
9 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
2.8 |
- |
- |
|
10.0 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
4 |
5 |
2.5 |
- |
- |
|
50.0 |
6 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
1.9 |
- |
- |
|
250.0 |
3 |
7 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
2.1 |
- |
- |
|
375.0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
1.0 |
- |
+ |
|
0.0 |
6 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
2.2 |
- |
- |
2-AA |
1.0 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
6 |
4 |
7 |
1.0 |
- |
- |
4-NP |
10.0 |
1299 |
1320 |
1205 |
1177 |
4 |
1250 |
69.9 |
- |
- |
2-NF |
5.0 |
783 |
741 |
543 |
388 |
4 |
614 |
183.3 |
- |
- |
With S-9 Mix
Conc.(µg/pl) |
Individual Values |
n |
Mean |
SD |
Pc |
Bg |
||||
|
0.0 |
14 |
14 |
21 |
8 |
4 |
14 |
5.3 |
- |
- |
|
1.0 |
7 |
14 |
7 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
4.2 |
- |
- |
|
5.0 |
9 |
9 |
16 |
5 |
4 |
10 |
4.6 |
- |
- |
|
10.0 |
c |
c |
c |
c |
0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
50.0 |
5 |
9 |
8 |
5 |
4 |
7 |
2.1 |
- |
- |
|
250.0 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
8 |
4 |
7 |
1.3 |
- |
- |
|
375.0 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3.3 |
- |
+ |
|
0.0 |
15 |
18 |
14 |
15 |
4 |
16 |
1.7 |
- |
- |
2-AA |
1.0 |
287 |
315 |
310 |
274 |
4 |
297 |
19.3 |
- |
- |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
In vivo micronucleus test: In a study according OECD TG 474, the test article did not induce micronuclei as determined by the micronucleus test with bone marrow cells of the mouse. The test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in this micronucleus assay (reference 7.6.2 -1).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- May 14, 1990 - July 17, 1990
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted May 26, 1983
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EEC Directive 84/449, L 251, B 12, p. 137 - 139 Updating of Toxicological Methods Annex V of the Council Directive 79/831/EEC; Part B
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Environmental Protection Agency, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Subpart F-Genetic Toxicity, Revision July 1, 1986 "In vivo mammalian bone marrow cytogenetics tests: Micronucleus assay."
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: BRL Tierfarm Fullinsdorf, CH-4414 Fullinsdorf/Basel, Switzerland
- Age at study initiation: minimum 10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: approximately 30 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Fasting period before study: approximately 18 hours before treatment with the test article the animals received no food but water ad libitum
- Housing: single, Makrolon Type I, with wire mesh top
- Diet: ad libitum, pelleted standard diet (ALTROMIN)
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: minimum 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 + 3
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: polyethylene glycol PEG 400
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: On the day of the experiment, the test article was suspended in PEG 400. The vehicle was chosen to its relative non-toxicity for the animals. All animals received a single standard dose volume of 10 mL/kg body weight orally. - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Solution were prepared on the day of administration. All animals received a single standard dose volume of 10 mL/kg body weight orally.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 h or 48 h
- Frequency of treatment:
- once
- Dose / conc.:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- 24 h sampling time
- Dose / conc.:
- 670 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- 24 h sampling time
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- 24 and 48 h sampling time
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 6
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide
- Route of administration: orally, once
- Doses / concentrations: 20 and 40 mg/kg b.w. (two groups; only 20 mg/kg b.w. dosing is reported) - Tissues and cell types examined:
- bone marrow/erythrocytes
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: It is generally recommended to use the maximum tolerated dose or the highest dose that can be formulated and administered reproducibly. The volume to be administered should be compatible with physiological space available.
The maximum tolerated dose level was determined to be the dose that caused toxic reactions without having major effects on survival within 48 hours.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES: Sampling of the bone marrow was done 24 and 48 hours after treatment.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: The animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The femora were removed, the epiphyses were cut off and the marrow was flushed out with fetal calf serum, using a 5 ml syringe. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 5 minutes and the supernatant was discarded. A small drop of the resuspended cell pellet was spread on a slide. The smear was air-dried and then stained with May-Grünwald (MERCK, D-6100 Darmstadt, F.R.G.)/Giemsa (Gurr, BDH Limited Poole, Great Britain). Cover slips were mounted with EUKITT (KINDLER, D-7800 Freiburg F.R.G.). At least one slide was made from each bone marrow sample.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: Evaluation of the slides was performed using NIKON microscopes with 100x oil immersion objectives. 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) were analysed per animal for micronuclei. To describe a cytotoxic effect the ratio between polychromatic and normochromatic erythrocytes was determined in same sample and expressed in normochromatic erythrocytes per 2000 PCEs. The analysis was performed with coded slides. Five animals per sex and group were evaluated as described. The remaining animal of each test group was evaluated in case an animal had died in its test group spontaneously or due to gavage error.
- Evaluation criteria:
- A test article is classified as mutagenic if it induces either a statistically significant dose-related increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes or a reproducible statistically significant positive response for at least one of the test points.
A test article producing neither a statistically significant dose-related increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes nor a statistically significant and reproducible positive response at anyone of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system. - Statistics:
- Statistical significance at the five per cent level (p < 0.05) was evaluated by means of the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test.
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
In a first pre-experiment 4 animals (2 males, 2 females) received orally a single dose of 2000 mg/kg b.w.test substance suspended in PEG 400
All treated animals expressed toxic reactions: reduction of spontaneous activity
Two males and one female: abdominal position
Two males and one female: eyelid closure
Two males and one female: apathy
Two males died within 24 hours after treatment.
In a second pre-experiment 4 animals (2 males, 2 females) received orally a single dose of 2000 mg/kg b.w. test item suspended in PEG 400.
All treated animals expressed toxic reactions: reduction of spontaneous activity and apathy.
Two males and one female: eyelid closure
None of the treated animals died. Therefore, 2000 mg/kg b.w. test item was estimated to be a suitable dose. - Conclusions:
- In conclusion, it can be stated that during the study described and under the experimental conditions reported, the test article did not induce micronuclei as determined by the micronucleus test with bone marrow cells of the mouse. Therefore, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in this micronucleus assay.
- Executive summary:
A study according OECD TG 474 was performed to investigate the potential of the substance to induce micronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) in the bone marrow of the mouse.
The test article was suspended in polyethylene glycol 400. This suspending agent was used as negative control. The volume administered orally was 10 mL/kg bw . 24 h and 48 h after a single application of the test article the bone marrow cells were collected for micronuclei analysis.
Ten animals (5 males, 5 females) per test group were evaluated for the occurrence of micronuclei. 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) per animal were scored.
To describe a cytotoxic effect due to the treatment with the test article the ratio between polychromatic and normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE) was determined in the same sample and reported as the number of NCE per 2000 PCE.
The following dose levels of the test article were investigated:
24 h preparation interval: 200, 670 and 2000 mg/kg bw. 48 h preparation interval: 2000 mg/kg bw.
In a pre-experiment 2000 mg/kg was estimated to be suitable. The animals expressed toxic reactions. After treatment with the highest dose of the test article the number of NCEs was slightly increased as compared to the corresponding negative controls thus indicating that the substance had weak cytotoxic effectiveness.
In comparison to the corresponding negative controls there was no statistically significant enhancement in the frequency of the detected micronuclei at any preparation interval after application of the test article and with any dose level used.
20 mg/kg bw cyclophosphamide administered per os was used as positive control which showed a distinct increase of induced micronucleus frequency.
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the study described and under the experimental conditions reported, the test article did not induce micronuclei as determined by the micronucleus test with bone marrow cells of the mouse. Therefore, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in this micronucleus assay.
Reference
Table 1: Summary of results
test group |
dose mg/kg |
sampling |
PCE with |
range of micronuclei per 2000 PCE |
PCE/NCE |
suspending |
0 |
24 |
0.06% |
0-3 |
2000/1518 |
test |
200 |
24 |
0.07% |
0-4 |
2000/1612 |
test |
670 |
24 |
0.06% |
0 - 3 |
2000/1582 |
test |
2000 |
24 |
0.06% |
0-4 |
2000/1907 |
cyclo- |
20 |
24 |
0.57% |
6 -20 |
2000/1735 |
suspending |
0 |
48 |
0.05% |
0-3 |
2000/1601 |
test |
2000 |
48 |
0.06% |
0-4 |
2000/1747 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Ames test
The investigations for mutagenic potential were performed using Salmonella typhimurium TA 100, TA 98, TA 1535, TA 1537, and TA 1538 as tester strains. The plate incorporation test with and without addition of rat liver S-9 fraction (Aroclor-induced) was used.
The substance was tested in three series of experiments at the following concentrations:
First series of experiments: 5, 10, 50, 250, 500, and 750 µg/plate
Second and additional series of experiments:
1, 5, 10, 50, 250, and 375 µg/plate (TA 98, TA 1535, TA 1537, and TA 1538)
1, 5, 10, 50, 250, and 500 µg/plate (TA 100)
9-Aminoacridine, daunomycin, 1-ethyl-2-nitro-3-nitrosoguanidine, methyl methanesulfonate, 2-nitrofluorene, 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine, and sodium azide served as positive control compounds for testing the bacteria. 2-Aminoanthracene was used for testing the bacteria and the activity of the S-9 preparation.
The positive controls showed normal reversion properties of all strains and good metabolic activity of the S-9 mix used.
With and without addition of S-9 as the metabolizing system, the substance did not show any mutagenic activity in the concentration range used (reference 7.6.1 -1).
In vivo micronucleus test
A study according OECD TG 474 was performed to investigate the potential of the substance to induce micronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) in the bone marrow of the mouse.
The test article was suspended in polyethylene glycol 400. This suspending agent was used as negative control. The volume administered orally was 10 mL/kg bw . 24 h and 48 h after a single application of the test article the bone marrow cells were collected for micronuclei analysis.
Ten animals (5 males, 5 females) per test group were evaluated for the occurrence of micronuclei. 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) per animal were scored.
To describe a cytotoxic effect due to the treatment with the test article the ratio between polychromatic and normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE) was determined in the same sample and reported as the number of NCE per 2000 PCE.
The following dose levels of the test article were investigated:
24 h preparation interval: 200, 670 and 2000 mg/kg bw. 48 h preparation interval: 2000 mg/kg bw.
In a pre-experiment 2000 mg/kg was estimated to be suitable. The animals expressed toxic reactions. After treatment with the highest dose of the test article the number of NCEs was slightly increased as compared to the corresponding negative controls thus indicating that the substance had weak cytotoxic effectiveness.
In comparison to the corresponding negative controls there was no statistically significant enhancement in the frequency of the detected micronuclei at any preparation interval after application of the test article and with any dose level used.
20 mg/kg bw cyclophosphamide administered per os was used as positive control which showed a distinct increase of induced micronucleus frequency.
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the study described and under the experimental conditions reported, the test article did not induce micronuclei as determined by the micronucleus test with bone marrow cells of the mouse. Therefore, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in this micronucleus assay (reference 7.6.2 -1).
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labeling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
The available test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Thus, the test item is considered not to be classified for genotoxicity under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as amended for the twelfth time in Regulation (EU) No 2019/521.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.