Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 209-162-9 | CAS number: 557-21-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
For that endpoint, one reliable study to assess the repeated dose toxicity on hydrogen cyanide on rats was available.
Based on the similarity of chemical structures of zinc cyanide and hydrogen cyanide, the study results on hydrogen cyanide can be extrapolated to zinc cyanide.
Hydrogen cyanide has a NOAEL of 100 ppm, which can be converted into a NOAEL of 10.8 mg/kg/day for the cyanide.
When extrapolated to zinc cyanide, the NOAEL of zinc cyanide becomes 24.3 mg/kg/day.
These calculations are supported by the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Toxic effect type:
- dose-dependent
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- chronic toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1955
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Weanling male and female albino rats of the Carworth Farms strain were used. The rats were individually housed in wire-mesh cages elevated above the drop- pings, with water and the appropriate diets available at all tlmes. The food was fumigated with hydrogen cyanide.The control and two experimental groups of 10 males and 10 females were initiated on the 2-year feeding study. One experimental group was placed on a 100 p.p.m. feeding level, and the other received a diet containing 300 p.p.m. of hydrogen cyanide. The food of the test rats was prepared fresh every 2 days for the 2-year period and analyzed for its initial hydrogen cyanide content.
The parameters analysed in this study are :
- mortality, tumor development, body weight, level of cyanide and thiocyanate in blood.
- weight of liver, kidneys, spleen, brain, heart, adrenals, and ovaries of each animal
- histopathology of heart, lung, liver, spleen, stomach, small and large intestines, kidney, adrenal, thyroid, uterus and ovary, and the cerebrum and cerebellum of the brain. - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- male/female
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 2 years
- Frequency of treatment:
- every 2 days
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 ppm
- Remarks:
- control
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 ppm
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 ppm
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 animals per sex per dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Positive control:
- No positive control
- Statistics:
- No statistical analysis were done
- Clinical signs:
- not examined
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- A comparison of survival data of the control animals with the experimental ones indicates a random distribution of mortality. During the first 75 weeks of feeding the total mortality of each group of 20 rats was as follows: three in the control group, two at the 100 p.p.m. level, and two at the 300 p.p.m. level. In the ensuing 29 weeks of feeding, deaths became more frequent and a final analysis of survival data shows that seven control animals had died as compared with eight in the 100 p.p.m. group and five in the 300 p.p.m. group. The higher incidence in the latter months of the study is probably due to the increasing age of the rats.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The growth curves are almost identical for the three groups of males throughout the 104-week feeding period. The females, however, showed considerable variation. The controls of this group exhibited an abnormal rise after 91 weeks of feeding, accompanied by 2 deaths. The 100 p.p.m. females reached an abnormal peak at 78 weeks; this peak was due to tumor development in 1 rat which died after 78 weeks, with a terminal weight of 759 grams. The dashed line is the curve for the entire 100 p.p.m. group; the dotted line from the 52nd week to the 91st week represents the group exclusive of this tumored rat. The sudden decline after 1.5 years of feeding appeared to be due to rapid loss of weight, particularly by two rats, but there were also a general senility and weight loss in this group. The 300 p.p.m. level appeared to be of normal nature, reaching a peak at the end of 78 weeks of feeding and declining slowly as the rats approached the 104th week.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The liver, kidneys, spleen, brain, heart, adrenals, and testes or ovaries of each animal were weighed, and the ratios of organ weight to body weight appeared to be within normal limits.
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- During the 2 years of feading no gross signs of cyanide toxicity were observed. In the latter stages of the study a number of the rats were unthrifty in appearance, with alopecia, emaciation, tumors, and sores on their bodies. Gross findings which were frequently encountered were: pale, granular and thickened livers, congestion of the medulla of the kidney, abnormally small spleens, enlarged adrenals, atrophied, encysted, and inflamed genital organs, and enlarged, hemorrhagic pituitaries. Many nodes and tumors were found throughout the viscera.
- Neuropathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 100 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- In a study conducted for a 2-year period, food containing 100 and 300 p.p.m. of hydrogen cyanide produced no noticeable signs of cyanide toxicity. Therefore, the concentration of 100 ppm of hydrogen cyanide is used as NOAEL. By extrapolation of the results, the cyanide NOAEL level is therefore 10,8 mg/kg/day. This NOAEL is supported by the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS).
- Endpoint:
- chronic toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Remarks:
- hydrogen cyanide
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
Zinc cyanide and Hydrogen cyanide have similar chemical structures. They share the cyanide group.
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
The source substance is Hydrogen cyanide.
The target substance is Zinc cyanide.
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
Based on the similarity of chemical structures between zinc cyanide and hydrogen cyanide, the analogue read across approach is justified. Therefore, the study results on hydrogen cyanide can be extrapolated to zinc cyanide . - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 100 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- Based on the similarity of chemical structures of zinc cyanide and hydrogen cyanide, the study results on hydrogen cyanide can be extrapolated to zinc cyanide.
Hydrogen cyanide has a NOAEL of 100 ppm, which can be converted into a NOAEL of 10.8 mg/kg/day for the cyanide.
When extrapolated to zinc cyanide, the NOAEL of zinc cyanide becomes 24.3 mg/kg/day.
These calculations are supported by the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). - Executive summary:
For that endpoint, one reliable study to assess the repeated dose toxicity on hydrogen cyanide on rats was available.
Based on the similarity of chemical structures of zinc cyanide and hydrogen cyanide, the study results on hydrogen cyanide can be extrapolated to zinc cyanide.
Hydrogen cyanide has a NOAEL of 100 ppm, which can be converted into a NOAEL of 10.8 mg/kg/day for the cyanide.
When extrapolated to zinc cyanide, the NOAEL of zinc cyanide becomes 24.3 mg/kg/day.
These calculations are supported by the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS).
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 24.3 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- chronic
- Species:
- rat
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.