Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 949-740-4 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 19 December 2018 - 21 February 2019
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- This study was conducted according to OECD Guideline 202 and in accordance with the OECD Principles of GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met. The method used to determine ‘water solubility’ in the OECD 202 study was by use of a water accommodated fraction followed by quantitative HPLC analysis. This is not considered appropriate methodology for determining the ‘solubility’ of a surface-active substance such as MEL-B. As the test substance is surface active, a surface tension study was performed to determine the critical micelle concentration instead. This was determined to be 5.15 mg/L as described in Section 4.8 and should be considered as the greatest aqueous concentration that can be reliably tested as per the Reach R7b endpoint guidance. This means that any material added to an aqueous system at a concentration greater than 5.15 mg/L will result in the formation of micelles, which are not considered to be in solution. This also means that during the daphnia study, the organisms at any concentration greater than 5.15 mg/L were exposed to a mixture of dissolved MEL-B and MEL-B micelles. This brings into question the validity of results obtained from any group tested above 5.15 mg/L as for the purpose of aqueous toxicity testing, substances must be fully in solution. It should be considered that the tested concentrations under the CMC remain valid, but the concentrations above the CMC are invalid, for the reasons stated above. Therefore, as the 48 h EC50 value originally calculated under the study (2.58 mg/L) has been generated from concentration data under the CMC, this can be considered a relatively robust value. The study report originally estimates the 24 h EC50 values as > 46.2 mg/L, however, as this concentration cannot have been reliably tested, this has been revised in the summary to > 5.15 mg/L, the CMC, as no effects were noted and as this is the maximum bioavailable amount of test item. The full data has been reported, but this endpoint have been revised in light of the CMC value.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test
- Version / remarks:
- "Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilization Test" stipulated in the "Testing Methods for New Chemical Substances " (March 31, 2011, No.0331-7, Pharmaceutical and Food Safety Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; March 29, 2011, No.5, Manufacturing Industries Bureau, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry; No.110331009, Environmental Policy Bureau, Ministry of the Environment, Japan; latest revision, March 29, 2018, No.0329-13, Pharmaceutica1 and Food Safety Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; No.20180326-1, Manufacturing Industries Bureau, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry; No.1803293, Environmental Policy Bureau, Ministry of the Environment, Japan)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- April 13, 2004
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guidance Document, No 23 (Second Edition), July 2018 " Guidance Document on Aqueous-phase Aquatic Toxicity Testing of Difficult Test Chemicals"
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: TOYOBO CO., LTD,
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: The test sample was stored in a cold and dark storage place. - Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: 0.5, 1.58, 5, 15.8 and 50 mg/L (geometric series with a factor of 3.16 - square root of 10)
- Sampling method: At the start of exposure (from another solution sampled separately from the preparation container), and before renewal, after renewal, and end of exposure (the mixed solution taken out with equal volume from the middle layer of the test solution in the test vessels) (4 occasions in total). Approximately 100 mL of sample taken on each occasion.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: not reported - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: The weighed test sample and dilution water were mixed to produce each nominal test concentration. They were stirred with a magnetic stirrer for 48 h at about 20°C. Then the suspension was filtered with a membrane filter (GV, 0.22 µm pore size, Merck Millipore) with suction. The filtrate was stirred for 30 minutes at about 20°C to recover dissolved oxygen concentration decreased by the suction filtration. This was carried out for the start of exposure and renewal of test solution.
- Eluate: dechlorinated tap water - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Daphnia magna
- Strain/clone: Clone A
- Age at study initiation (mean and range, SD): less than 24 h old
- Method of breeding: not reported
- Source: University of Sheffield, UK, 1990
- Age of parental stock (mean and range, SD): 21 days
- Feeding during test: none
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: Young daphnids produced by parents that were cultured in the test facility were used
- Acclimation conditions (same as test or not): The parents were bred in the same quality of water, water temperature (20±1°C) and photoperiod (16 h light, 8 h dark)
- Type and amount of food: parent animals were fed Chlorella vulgaris algae at equivalent of 0.1-0.2 mgC/day/daphnia.
- Feeding frequency: daily
- Health during acclimation (any mortality observed): 0% mortality
- Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
- Hardness:
- 20 mg/L (chemical characteristics of dilution water conducted on 10 July 2018)
- Test temperature:
- 19.8-19.9°C
- pH:
- 7.8-8.0
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 8.6-9.0 mg/L
- Salinity:
- -
- Conductivity:
- 8.7 mS/m (chemical characteristics of dilution water conducted on 10 July 2018)
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- 0.500, 1.58, 5, 15.8, 50 mg/L nominal concentrations; 0.25, 0.79, 3.64, 13.1, 46.2 mg/L measured concentrations.
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 100 mL glass beaker
- Type (delete if not applicable): covered with transparent plastic lid
- Volume of solution: 100 mL
- Aeration: no
- No. of organisms per vessel: 5
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 4
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 4
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: dechlorinated tap water
- Total organic carbon: <0.5 mg/L
- Chlorine: less than 0.02 mg/L
- Alkalinity: 21 mg/L
- Conductivity: 8.7 mS/m
- Culture medium different from test medium: no
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: 16 h light, 8 h dark
- Light intensity: not reported
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : yes, 24h 48 h
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: no
RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Test concentrations: 0.5, 1, 5, 50, 100 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: yes - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Potassium dichromate
- Duration:
- 24 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 5.15 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- refer to justification
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 2.58 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Details on results:
- - Behavioural abnormalities:
none
- Observations on body length and weight: none
- Other biological observations: none
- Mortality of control: none
- Other adverse effects control: none
- Immobilisation of control: none
- Abnormal responses: 14 dapnhids immobilised, 13 displaying lethargy and 2 showing reduced activity at 48 h in 3.64 mg/L measured concentration. 7 daphnids immobilised, 1 displaying lethargy and 2 showing reduced activity at 24 h at 13.1 mg/L measured concentration, 20 daphnids showing immobilisation and lethargy at 48 h.
3 daphnids immobilised, 1 displaying lethargy and 2 showing reduced activity at 24 h at 46.2 mg/L measured concentration, 20 daphnids showing immobilisation and lethargy at 48 h.
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: no
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: no - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid?
Test with reference substance conducted periodically (9-11 Oct 2018)
- ECx: 48 h EC50 0.13 mg/L - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The 24 h and 48 h EC50 values for Daphnia magna were >3.64 mg/L and 2.58 mg/L, determined using Microsoft Excel, using the binomial test method (US EPA/600/485/013, March 1985). No confidence limits were provided.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The 48-hour EC50 of the test item to D. magna was estimated to be 2.58 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
A study was performed according to OECD 202 (2004) to assess the acute toxicity of the test item to Daphnia magna. Following a range-finding test, 20 daphnids (4 replicates of 5 animals) were exposed to aqueous solutions of the test item at nominal concentrations of 0.50, 1.58, 5.0, 15.8 and 50.0 mg/L for 48 h under semi-static conditions. Chemical analysis showed measured test concentrations to range from 0.576 to 47.3 mg/L, although levels in the nominal 0.50 mg/L concentration were below the limit of quantification (0.5 mg/L). The time-weighted arithmetic mean measured concentrations were determined to be 0.250 (reference value), 0.790, 3.64, 13.1 and 46.2 mg/L. The critical micelle concentration of the test item was determined to be 5.15 mg/L, and therefore this brings into question the validity of results obtained from any group tested above 5.15 mg/L. The 48 h EC50 value originally calculated under the study (2.58 mg/L) has been generated from concentration data under the CMC value and is a robust value. The study report originally estimates the 24 h EC50 values as > 46.2 mg/L, however, as this concentration cannot have been reliably tested, this has been revised in the summary to > 5.15 mg/L, the CMC values, as no effects were noted, and this is the maximum bioavailable amount of the test item. This is in line with ECHA Guidance document R.7b, Table 7.8 -3 (2017).
Therefore, exposure of Daphnia magna to the test item gave the following result based upon time-weighted average concentrations: 48-h EC50– 2.58 mg/L. All validity criteria were met.
Reference
Table 1: Immobility
Measured Concentrationa (mg/L) |
Vessel |
24 hours |
48 hours |
||
Number of immobilised daphnids/Total daphnids |
Immobility (%) |
Number of immobilised daphnids/Total daphnids |
Immobility (%) |
||
Control |
A |
0/5 |
0 |
0/5 |
0 |
B |
0/5 |
0/5 |
|||
C |
0/5 |
0/5 |
|||
D |
0/5 |
0/5 |
|||
0.250 (reference value) |
A |
0/5 |
0 |
0/5 |
0 |
B |
0/5 |
0/5 |
|||
C |
0/5 |
0/5 |
|||
D |
0/5 |
0/5 |
|||
0.790 |
A |
0/5 |
0 |
0/5 |
0 |
B |
0/5 |
0/5 |
|||
C |
0/5 |
0/5 |
|||
D |
0/5 |
0/5 |
|||
3.64 |
A |
0/5 |
0 |
4/5 |
70 |
B |
0/5 |
3/5 |
|||
C |
0/5 |
5/5 |
|||
D |
0/5 |
2/5 |
|||
13.1 |
A |
3/5 |
35 |
5/5 |
100 |
B |
1/5 |
5/5 |
|||
C |
1/5 |
5/5 |
|||
D |
2/5 |
5/5 |
|||
46.2 |
A |
1/5 |
15 |
5/5 |
100 |
B |
2/5 |
5/5 |
|||
C |
0/5 |
5/5 |
|||
D |
0/5 |
5/5 |
a: Time weighted mean of the measured concentrations
Table 2: Measured concentrations of test item in test solutions
Nominal Concentration (mg/L) |
Measured Concentration (mg/L) (Percentage of measured concentration versus that at each preparation % |
||||
At the Start |
24 hours |
At the End |
Time-weighted arithmetic mean |
||
Before the Renewal |
After the Renewal |
||||
Control |
n.d |
n.d |
n.d |
n.d |
- |
0.500 |
n.d |
n.d |
n.d |
n.d |
0.250a |
1.58 |
0.859 |
0.576 (67.0) |
1.05 |
0.717 (68.5) |
0.790 |
5.00 |
3.81 |
3.31 (87.0) |
4.04 |
3.44 (85.1) |
3.64 |
15.8 |
13.9 |
12.8 (92.4) |
13.0 |
12.7 (97.4) |
13.1 |
50.0 |
47.3 |
45.2 (95.5) |
46.5 |
45.9 (98.9) |
46.2 |
a: reference value calculated from the geometric rate and the measured concentration of the lowest quantified exposure level.
Description of key information
48h EC50 2.58 mg/L; OECD 202; Adachi R (2019)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 2.58 mg/L
Additional information
A study was performed according to OECD 202 (2004) to assess the acute toxicity of the test item to Daphnia magna. Following a range-finding test, 20 daphnids (4 replicates of 5 animals) were exposed to aqueous solutions of the test item at nominal concentrations of 0.50, 1.58, 5.0, 15.8 and 50.0 mg/L for 48 h under semi-static conditions. Chemical analysis showed measured test concentrations to range from 0.576 to 47.3 mg/L, although levels in the nominal 0.50 mg/L concentration were below the limit of quantification (0.5 mg/L). The time-weighted arithmetic mean measured concentrations were determined to be 0.250 (reference value), 0.790, 3.64, 13.1 and 46.2 mg/L.The critical micelle concentration of the test item was determined to be 5.15 mg/L, and therefore this brings into question the validity of results obtained from any group tested above 5.15 mg/L. The 48 h EC50 value originally calculated under the study (2.58 mg/L) has been generated from concentration data under the CMC value and is a robust value. The study report originally estimates the 24 h EC50 values as > 46.2 mg/L, however, as this concentration cannot have been reliably tested and would have contained solids as well as the soluble bioavailable fraction, this value has been revised in the summary to > 5.15 mg/L. This is the CMC value, at which no effects were observed i.e. the maximum bioavailable amount of the test item. Hence, the test item will not be toxic to the 50 % level during this period. This is in line with ECHA Guidance document R.7b, Table 7.8 -3 (2017).
Therefore, exposure of Daphnia magna to the test item gave the following result based upon time-weighted average concentrations: 48-h EC50– 2.58 mg/L. All validity criteria. were met.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.