Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 242-177-9 | CAS number: 18297-63-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to microorganisms
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 26 Jun - 18 Jul 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 209 (Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test (Carbon and Ammonium Oxidation))
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- In some cases, the initial and final dissolved O2 concentrations were outside the recommended range. No adverse effects on the results are expected given that the O2 consumption rate was determined over the linear portion of the O2 consumption trace.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- 19 Nov 2018, The Department of Health of the Government of the United Kingdom
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: 50, 90, 160, 280 and 500 mg of test item (nominal, in triplicates) were each separately dispersed in approximately 200 mL of deionized reverse osmosis water, sealed with Nescofilm and ultrasonicated for approximately 15 min followed by magnetic stirring for 24 h at room temperature, shielded from light. Synthetic sewage (16 mL), activated sewage sludge (250 mL) wand water were added to a final volume of 500 mL to give the required final concentrations of 100, 180, 320, 560 and 1000 mg/L (three replicates each).
- Controls: Identical conditions but without test item.
- Evidence of undissolved material: Yes, after 0 h a few very small particles of test item were visible at the surface in the 100 mg/L and 180 mg/L samples.In all other samples, a slightly cloudy dispersion with particles of test item visible at the surface was noted at 0 h and some test item particles remained visible in the 560 and 1000 mg/L samples after 30 min and 3 h. - Test organisms (species):
- activated sludge of a predominantly domestic sewage
- Details on inoculum:
- - Inoculum collection: A mixed populaiton of activated sewage sludge was obtained on 26 Jun 2019.
- Name and location of sewage treatment plant where inoculum was collected: Severn Trent Water Plc sewage treatment plant (aeration stage), Leicestershire, UK, treating predominantly domestic sewage.
- Preparation of inoculum for exposure: The activated sewage sludge was maintained on continuous aeration in the laboratory at 21 °C overnight prior to use in the test.
- Initial biomass concentration: The suspended solids concentration of the obtained activated sewage sludge was 2.7 g/L and was adjusted to 3.0 g/L prior to the addition of synthetic sewage. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 3 h
- Test temperature:
- approximately 20 °C
- pH:
- 7.3 - 7.8 (at 0 h)
7.4 - 7.9 (after 3 h) - Dissolved oxygen:
- 5.69 - 6.15 mg O2/L (64 - 69% of saturation level 8.9 mg O2/L)
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- 100, 180, 320, 560 and 1000 mg/L (nominal)
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Conical flask
- Fill volume: Synthetic sewage (16 mL), activated sewage sludge (250 mL) and water were added to a final volume of 500 mL to give the final concentrations.
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
- Suspended solids concentration (weight of dry solids per volume): 2.7 g/L. The suspended solids concentration was adjusted to 3.0 g/L prior to the addition of synthetic sewage. The suspended solids level of the activated sewage sludge was checked prior to use to ensure the suspended solids level of the activated sewage sludge was 3.0 g/L.
- Nutrients provided for bacteria: Yes, a synthetic sewage (16 g peptone, 11 g meat extract, 3 g urea, 0.7 g NaCl, 0.4 g CaCl2.2H2O, 0.2 g MgSO4.7H2O, 2.8 g K2HPO4 dissolved in 1 L) was added as a respiratory substrate.
- Preparation of test system: 16 mL of synthetic sewage was diluted to 250 mL with water and 250 mL of inoculum (controls). Thereafter, at 15 min intervals, the procedure was repeated for the second control, reference item and test item vessels and four further control vessels. For the test item vessels, synthetic sewage (16 mL), activated sewage (250 mL) and water were added to the test item replicates (dispersed in approximately 200 mL deionized reverse osmosis water) to a final volume of 500 mL.
- Aeration: Yes, with clean, oil-free compressed air at a rate of 0.5 to 1.0 L per minute.
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Deionized reverse osmosis water
- Particulate matter: < 1 mg/L Total Organic Carbon
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: Yes, the pH of the test item dispersions was measured after stirring and adjusted to a pH between 7.0 and 8.0.
- Light intensity: Normal laboratory lighting
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED:
- Measurement of respiration rates after 3 h exposure: 250 mL sample aliquots were transferred to darkened glass Biological Oxygen Demand bottles and the respiration rate was measured with a Yellow Springs dissolved oxygen meter fitted with a BOD probe. The rate of respiration was measured over the linear portion of the oxygen consumption trace or over an approximate 10 min period in cases of low oxygen consumption.
- Other: pH and dissolved oxygen was measured and observations on test item preparations were made throughout the test
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: approximately 1.75 - 1.8
- Range finding study : Yes
- Test concentrations of range-finder: 10, 100, 1000 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: Yes. No statistically significant toxic effects were shown at the test concentrations of 10 and 100 mg/L. However, statistically significant toxic effects were shown at the test concentration of 1000 mg/L. It was considered unnecessary and unrealistic to test at concentrations in excess of 1000 mg/L. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 3,5-dichlorophenol
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 200 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Details on results:
- - Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium:
The test item was not always fully disperesed and some particles remained visible in the test vessels.
- Blank controls oxygen uptake rate: 25.78 mg per gram dry weight of sludge per hour
- Coefficient of variation of oxygen uptake rate in control replicates: 5.88% - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? Yes, the reference item gave an EC50 (3 h) of 5 mg/L with acceptable confidence limits, confirming the acceptability of the inoculum used in the test system.
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The percentage inhibition values were plotted against the concentration for the reference item/test item, a line fitted using the X1fit software package (IDBS) and the EC10, EC20, EC50 and EC80 values determined from the equation for the fitted line. The EC50 and EC80 values for the test item were determined by inspection of the inhibition of respiration rate data. The 95% confidence limits were calculated for the reference item EC50 using the method of Litchfield and Wilcoxon (1949).
In order to determine the NOEC, a one way analysis of variance incorporating Bartlett's test for homogeneity of variance (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981) and Dunnett's multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control (Dunnett, 1955) was carried out on the oxygen consumption data after 3 h to determine any statistically significant differences between the test and control groups. All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS computer software package (SAS, 1999 - 2001). - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
Reference
RESULTS
No statistically significant toxic effects were shown at the test concentration of 100 mg/L. However, statistically significant toxic effects (p < 0.05) were shown at the test concentrations of 180, 320, 560 and 1000 mg/L (nominal) but it was not possible to determine an EC50 value for the test item as no concentration tested resulted in greater than 50% inhibition. Based on these results, the NOEC (3 h) was 100 mg/L. It was considered unnecessary and unrealistic to test at concentrations above 1000 mg/L. The derived effect values are summarized in Table 1 and the oxygen consumption rates and percentage inhibition values after 3 h are summarized in Table 2.
Table 1. Derived effect values.
|
[mg/L] |
95% confidence limits [mg/L] |
EC10 (3 h) |
200 |
- |
EC20 (3 h) |
450 |
- |
EC50 (3 h) |
> 1000 |
- |
EC80 (3 h) |
> 1000 |
- |
NOEC (3 h) |
100 |
- |
Table 2. Oxygen consumption rates and percentage inhibition values after 3 h contact time.
Nominal Concentration (mg/L) |
Initial O2 Reading (mg O2/L) |
Measurement Period (minutes) |
Final O2 Reading (mg O2/L) |
O2 Consumption Rates (mg O2/L/hour) |
Inhibition (%) |
|
Control |
R1 |
5.8 |
6 |
2.0 |
38.00 |
- |
R2 |
4.5 |
4 |
2.1 |
36.00 |
- |
|
R3 |
5.1 |
5 |
2.0 |
37.20 |
- |
|
R4 |
4.3 |
3 |
2.4 |
38.00 |
- |
|
R5 |
6.0 |
5 |
2.5 |
42.00 |
- |
|
R6 |
5.6 |
5 |
2.2 |
40.80 |
- |
|
100 mg/L |
R1 |
4.7 |
4 |
2.1 |
39.00 |
[1] |
R2 |
5.0 |
5 |
1.9 |
37.20 |
4 |
|
R3 |
4.8 |
4 |
2.3 |
37.50 |
3 |
|
180 mg/L |
R1 |
5.9 |
7 |
1.9 |
34.29 |
11 |
R2 |
5.3 |
5 |
2.3 |
36.00 |
7 |
|
R3 |
5.4 |
6 |
1.9 |
35.00 |
9 |
|
320 mg/L |
R1 |
5.3 |
6 |
1.9 |
34.00 |
12 |
R2 |
5.5 |
6 |
2.3 |
32.00 |
17 |
|
R3 |
6.1 |
8 |
2.1 |
30.00 |
22 |
|
560 mg/L |
R1 |
5.6 |
7 |
2.1 |
30.00 |
22 |
R2 |
5.6 |
7 |
2.0 |
30.86 |
20 |
|
R3 |
5.5 |
5 |
3.0 |
30.00 |
22 |
|
1000 mg/L |
R1 |
6.3 |
10 |
1.8 |
26.40 |
30 |
R2 |
6.7 |
10 |
2.3 |
26.40 |
32 |
|
R3 |
6.4 |
10 |
2.0 |
26.40 |
32 |
VALIDITY CRITERIA
The study fulfilled the validity criteria defined by the guideline (Table 3).
Table 3: Validity criteria for OECD 209.
Criterion from the guideline |
Outcome |
Validity criterion fulfilled |
The blank controls (without the test substance or reference substance) oxygen uptake rate should not be less than 20 mg oxygen per one gram of activated sludge (dry weight of suspended solids) in an hour. |
The specific respiration rate of the controls was 25.78 mg oxygen per gram dry weight of sludge per hour. |
Yes |
The coefficient of variation of oxygen uptake rate in control replicates should not be more than 30% at the end of definitive test. |
The coefficient of variation of oxygen uptake in the control vessels was 5.88%. |
Yes |
Description of key information
EC10 (3 h) = 200 mg/L (nominal, OECD 209)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC10 or NOEC for microorganisms:
- 200 mg/L
Additional information
The effects of 1,3-bis(trimethylsilyl)urea (CAS No. 18297-63-7) on the respiration of activated sewage sludge microorganisms was assessed with an experimental study according to OECD 209.
Domestic activated sewage sludge was exposed to an aqueous dispersion of the test item at nominal concentrations of 100, 180, 320, 560 and 1000 mg/L for 3 h in controlled conditions with the addition of a synthetic sewage as a respiratory substrate. A negative control and reference control were run in parallel.
After 3 h contact time, the respiration rate was determined by measurement of the Biological Oxygen Demand over the linear portion of the oxygen consumption trace and the obtained data was compared to data for the control and reference item. Observations were made on the test item preparations throughout the test and pH and dissolved oxygen were monitored.
After 0 h, a few very small particles of test item were visible at the surface in the 100 mg/L and 180 mg/L samples. In all other samples, a slightly cloudy dispersion with particles of test item visible at the surface was noted at 0 h and some test item particles remained visible in the 560 and 1000 mg/L samples after 30 min and 3 h.
No statistically significant toxic effects were shown at the test concentration of 100 mg/L. However, statistically significant toxic effects (p < 0.05) were shown at the test concentrations of 180, 320, 560 and 1000 mg/L but it was not possible to determine an EC50 value for the test item as no concentration tested resulted in greater than 50% inhibition. Based on these results, the EC10 (3 h) was 200 mg/L and the NOEC (3 h) was 100 mg/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.