Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 242-665-1 | CAS number: 18912-80-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
The source substance is a structural isomer of the target substance. The two differ only in the degree of branching of the terminal alkyl chain. The structural difference is not expected to confer any significant difference in terms of the eye irritancy potential of the target from the source substance.
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
Source: 2-(2-n-butoxyethoxy)ethanol. Smiles CCCCOCCOCCO (DEGBE)
Target: 2-(2-isobutoxyethoxy)ethanol. Smiles CC(C)COCCOCCO (DEGiBE)
Impurities: Both substances are mono-constituent in nature. There are no impurities in either that would invalidate the read across
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
See hypothesis above. The eye irritation of the target substance can be predicted from the experimentally determined eye irritation potential of the source component , which is identical apart from the branching of the terminal alkyl chain. Branched chain structures tend to be less lipophilic and therefore have lower eye irritation potential, as exemplified by the lower logKow. (This is supported by the overall tendency for eye irritation potential shown by this series of glycol ethers which increases with increasing length of the alkyl chain and increasing partition coefficient (logKow)
4. DATA MATRIX.
Experimentally determined physicochemical characteristics:
- Boiling point: target substance 240C, source substance 230C.
- Density: target substance 0.942 , source substance 0.955.
- Flash point: target substance 99C , source substance 115C
QSAR values for logKow
- LogKowwin: target substance 0.22, source substance 0.29.
Other: both fully water miscible.
DEGBE: Experimental result: Irritating
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
Reference
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 1984
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: A well reported study recorded in detail. Not all of the end points were recorded to enable a full and definitive comparison with classification criteria.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- , not all required parameters reported
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Strain: abino
- Housing: individual in wire mesh floor cages.
- Acclimation period: 1 week
- Other: animals checked for prior eye injury before tests.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- no data - Vehicle:
- water
- Controls:
- other: second eye of each animal used as a control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.1ml of 5%, 10%, 20%, 50% and undiluted
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single exposure. No washout reported.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 14 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6 per concentration
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): No washout reported
SCORING SYSTEM:
Grade 0: no effect
Grade 1: barely detectable effect
Grade 2: mild effect
Grade 3: moderate effect
Grade 4: severe effect
Grade 5: severe effect with complication
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: hand-slit lamp / biomicroscope / fluorescein
- 2% fluorescein siodium and a biomicroscope. - Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 hour
- Score:
- 1.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 48 hour
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- other: Fully reversed by day 5
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 hours
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- other: fully reversed by day 7
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 72 hours
- Score:
- 0.5
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- other: fully reversed by day 7
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- See table in remarks field below.
- Other effects:
- See table in remarks field below.
- Interpretation of results:
- moderately irritating
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol causes moderately severe conjunctivitis and mild corneal injury which resolves spontaneously within 14 days. The thresholds for effects are 25% for mild keratatitis and 10% for conjunctivitis. The transient increase in intra-occular pressure seen are typical of materials which do not cause severe corneal injury.
- Executive summary:
In a study that was broadly similar to the requirements of an OECD guideline study, the eye irritation potential of 2 -(2 -butoxyethoxy)ethanol was examined in the rabbit. Both pure substance and various dilutions in water were examined. The study did not report on all end points normally used to determine eye irritancy classification against EU criteria and did not use the Draize scoring system. This makes a definitive interpretation difficult. The reported effects for chemosis and iritis do not appear to be severe enough to warrant classification under the EU criteria for these two end points.
Results synopsis
Classification uncertain.
Other end points mean (max):
Time (days) | Lachrymation | Congestion | Chemosis | Blepharitis | Iritis | Keratitis |
1 | 1.8 (2) | 2. 7(3) | 1.5 (2) | 1.2 (2) | 1.0 (2) | 1.2 (2) |
2 | 0.7 (2) | 2.5 (3) | 1.0 (1) | 1.5 (2) | 0.5 (2) | 1.0 (2) |
3 | 0.4 (1) | 2.2 (3) | 0.4 (1) | 1.5 (2) | 0.5 (1) | 1.3 (2) |
Fully reversed day | 5 | 14 | 5 | 10 | 7 | 14 |
Results for dilutions. 50% solution, mean (max):
Time (days) | Lachrymation | Congestion | Chemosis | Blepharitis | Iritis | Keratitis |
1 | 1.5 (2) | 2. 5(3) | 0.7 (1) | 1.7 (2) | 0.7 (1) | 1.2 (2) |
2 | 0.3 (1) | 2.3 (3) | 0.5 (1) | 1.2 (2) | 0.2 (1) | 0.7 (1) |
3 | 0 | 0.5 (1) | 0 | 0.7 (1) | 0 | 0 |
Fully reversed day | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
Results for dilutions. 25% solution, mean (max):
Time (days) | Lachrymation | Congestion | Chemosis | Blepharitis | Iritis | Keratitis |
1 | 0.5 (2) | 2. 5(3) | 0.2 (1) | 1.5 (3) | 0 | 0.8 (1) |
2 | 0 | 1.7 (3) | 0 | 0.6 (2) | 0 | 0 |
3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fully reversed day | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | - | 2 |
Results for dilutions. 10% solution, mean (max): Only effects seen were mild congestion which had fully reversed within 24 hours.
Testing of intra-occular pressure (IOP) could only be carried out with solutions up to 10% in strength as the chemosis caused by stronger solutions interfered with measurements. A statistically significant but moderate increase in IOP was seen for solution strengths of 5% or more and volumes greater than 0.04ml, but these returned to normal values within an hour.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
Reference
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 10.02.1987-03.03.1987
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Basic daten given. Report which meets basic scientific criteria.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- , washing not done until 72 hours after application when fluoroscine reading had been performed.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: Small white russian, Chbb-SPF
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Dr. Karl Thomae GmbH, Biberach, Germany
- Weight at study initiation: 2,3-2,5 kg
- Housing: stainless steel cages (one animal each)
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 14 days
-sex: femal
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 1
- Humidity (%): 60 ± 5
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: The untreated eye served as control.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0,1 cm3 - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 0,1 cm3 of the test substance were applied to the conjunctival sac of one eye of the animals. Treated eyes were assessed using fluoroscine after72hours, following which the eyes were washed out.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- The animals were observed 1, 24, 48 and 72 hrs as well as 6,8,10,13, 17 an 21 days after application.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): warm saline after fluoroscine assessment.
- Time after start of exposure: 72 hrs
SCORING SYSTEM: according to Draize, 1959
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 hrs
- Score:
- 1.22
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 21 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 hrs
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 21 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: circumcorneal injection noted along with slight to marked reddening of the iris in all animals.
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 hrs
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 13 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Bloody mucous noted in 2 of 3 animals at 48 and 72hrs.
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 hrs
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8 days
- Interpretation of results:
- highly irritating
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Executive summary:
In an eye irritancy study that closely followed guidelines, 2 -(2 -butoxyethoxy)ethanol was found to cause significant eye irritation. Some of the lesions, notably the iris and corneal effects persisted until the end of the 21 day study, whilst conjunctival redness and odema had fully disappeared within 14 days. Although effects which remain persistent up to the end of the observation period (21 days) should be regarded as irreversible effects and warrant classification of the substance as a serious eye irritant (H318 and R41 respectively), this should not automatically be the conclusion in this case because washing was done until 72 hours after application. According to the OECD guideline, washing is normally performed 24 hours after application and delayed washing is likely to delay recovery. Although this study clearly shows that this substance warrants classification as an eye irritant, the degree of severity of the irritant effects should be based on all the available data and not just this single study.
Data source
Materials and methods
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-[2-(2-methylpropoxy)ethoxy]ethanol
- EC Number:
- 242-665-1
- EC Name:
- 2-[2-(2-methylpropoxy)ethoxy]ethanol
- Cas Number:
- 18912-80-6
- Molecular formula:
- C8H18O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-[2-(2-methylpropoxy)ethoxy]ethan-1-ol
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
Results and discussion
In vivo
Results
- Remarks on result:
- probability of severe irritation
- Remarks:
- Sufficient to warrant classification
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.