Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 617-298-9 | CAS number: 82097-50-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 07 Sep 2010 to 06 Oct 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 011
- Report date:
- 2011
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2008
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5395 (In Vivo Mammalian Cytogenetics Tests: Erythrocyte Micronucleus Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1998
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-(2-chloroethoxy)-N-[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)carbamoyl]benzene-1-sulfonamide
- EC Number:
- 617-298-9
- Cas Number:
- 82097-50-5
- Molecular formula:
- C14H16ClN5O5S
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-(2-chloroethoxy)-N-[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)carbamoyl]benzene-1-sulfonamide
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 8 – 9 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: mean value 34.4g (*SD ± 1.8g); 31.1 – 37.9 g
- Housing: single; in Makrolon Type II/III, with wire mesh top
- Diet: Pelleted standard diet, ad libitum
- Water: Tap water. Ad libitum
- Acclimatisation period: minimum 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 22 ± 2°C
- Humidity: 45 - 71 %
- Photoperiod: Artificial light 6.00 a.m. - 6.00 p.m.
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 09 September 2010 to: 06 October 2010
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- sterile water
- Details on exposure:
- FORMULATION:
On the day of the experiment, the test item was formulated in sterile water
Volume administered: 10 mL/kg body weight. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Bone marrow samples were collected at the central sampling interval of 24 h after treatment.
For the highest dose level an additional bone marrow sample was taken at 48 h after treatment - Frequency of treatment:
- Animals received a single dose of the test item
- Post exposure period:
- The animals of all dose groups, except the positive control were examined for acute toxic symptoms at intervals of around 1 h, 2 - 4 h, 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h after administration of the test item or the vehicle controls. Sampling of the bone marrow was done 24 and 48 hours after treatment
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 other: mg/kg bw
- Remarks:
- 24 h preparation interval
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 other: mg/kg bw
- Remarks:
- 24 h preparation interval
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 000 other: mg/kg bw
- Remarks:
- 24 h preparation interval
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 000 other: mg/kg bw
- Remarks:
- 48 h preparation interval
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 14 males were assigned to the high dose group
7 males were assigned to the middle dose group
7 males were assigned to the low dose group
5 males were assigned to negative control groups
5 males were assigned to positive control groups - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Cyclophosphamide:
- Route of administration: oral
- Dose: 40 mg/kg b.w., once
-Volume: 10 mL/kg b.w.
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow; 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) per animal were analysed for
micronuclei - Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
A preliminary study on acute toxicity was performed in both male and female mice (two animals per sex per dose level) under identical conditions as in the mutagenicity study concerning: animal strain, vehicle, route, frequency, and volume of administration. The animals were treated once orally with the test item and examined for acute toxic symptoms at intervals of around 1 h, 2-4 h, 6 h, 24 h, 30 h, and 48 h after administration of the test item. The test dose levels were chosen according to the following scheme: 5 – 8 – 12.5 – 20 – 32 – 50 – 80 – 125 – 200 – 320 – 500 – 800 – 1250 – 2000 mg/kg b.w.. No substantial sex specific differences on toxic symptoms were observed, therefore, the main experiment was performed using male animals only. The treated animals did not express any clinical signs of toxicity. On the basis of these data 2000 mg/kg b.w., the maximum OECD Guideline recommended dose for this assay, was considered suitable. No gender specific differences in toxicity were observed, thus, the main study was performed using male animals only, as permitted by the Guideline.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES:
At the beginning of the treatment the animals (including the controls) were weighed and the individual volume to be administered was adjusted to the animal’s body weight. The animals received the test item, the vehicle or the positive control substance once orally. Seven males were treated per dose group and sampling time. Five males each were treated for the vehicle and positive control group. The animals of all dose groups, except the positive control were examined for acute toxic symptoms at intervals of around 1 h, 2 - 4 h, 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h after administration of the test item or the vehicle controls. Sampling of the bone marrow was done 24 and 48 hours after treatment.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
The animals were sacrificed using CO2 followed by bleeding. The femora were removed, the epiphyses were cut off and the marrow was flushed out with foetal calf serum using a syringe. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 1500 rpm (390 × g) for 10 minutes and the supernatant was discarded. A small drop of the re-suspended cell pellet was spread on a slide. The smear was air-dried and then stained with May-Grünwald. Cover slips were mounted. At least one slide was made from each bone marrow sample.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
Evaluation of the slides was performed using NIKON microscopes with 100× oil immersion objectives. Per animal 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) were analysed for micronuclei. To describe a cytotoxic effect the ratio between polychromatic and normochromatic erythrocytes was determined in the same sample and expressed in polychromatic erythrocytes per 2000 erythrocytes. The analysis was performed with coded slides. Immature and mature erythrocytes were identified by their pale and blue to green colour, respectively. Micronuclei are distinguished by being small nuclei separate from and additional to the main nuclei of the cells.
- Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is classified as mutagenic if it induces either a dose-related increase or a clear
increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in a single dose group.
Statistical methods were used as an aid in evaluating the results. However, the primary point of consideration is the biological relevance of the results.
A test item that fails to produce a biological relevant increase in the number of
micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes is considered non-mutagenic in this system.
A test item failing to meet the criteria for a positive or negative response may be judged
equivocal in this assay and may be considered for further investigation.
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA:
The study was considered valid as the following criteria are met:
- at least 5 animals per group can be evaluated.
- PCE to erythrocyte ratio should not be less than 20 % of the negative control.
- the positive control shows a statistically significant and biological relevant increase
of micronucleated PCEs compared to the negative control. - Statistics:
- Statistical methods were used as an aid in evaluating
the results: Statistical significance at the five per cent level (p < 0.05) for the incidence of micronuclei was evaluated by means of the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- All animals did not express any toxic reactions. The animals of the vehicle control groups (sterile water) for both sampling times did also not express any toxic reactions.
The mean number of polychromatic erythrocytes was not decreased after treatment with the test item as compared to the mean value of PCEs of the vehicle control, indicating that the test substance did not have any cytotoxic properties in the bone marrow.
In comparison to the corresponding vehicle controls there was no biologically relevant enhancement and statistically significant increase in the frequency of the detected micronuclei at any preparation interval and dose level after administration of the test item.
The mean values of micronuclei observed after treatment with the test substance were below or near to the value of the respective vehicle control group and mainly within the historical vehicle control range. Additionally no clear dose dependence could be observed and furthermore the group of animals sampled 48 hours after treatment with the highest test item dose level did not show any statistically or biologically relevant enhancement of micronucleated PCEs.
A dose of 40 mg/kg b.w. cyclophosphamide administered orally was used as positive control, which showed a substantial increase of induced micronucleus frequency. The volume of the positive control administered was 10 mL/kg b.w.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1. Summary of Micronucleus Test Results
test group | dose mg/kg b.w. | sampling time (h) | PCEs with micronuclei (%) | range | PCE per 2000 erythrocytes |
vehicle | 0 | 24 | 0.130 | 1 -4 | 1227 |
test item | 500 | 24 | 0.086 | 0 -4 | 1220 |
test item | 1000 | 24 | 0.071 | 0 -4 | 1172 |
test item | 2000 | 24 | 0.086 | 0 -5 | 1217 |
positive control |
40 |
24 |
2.760 |
42 -67 |
1068 |
vehicle | 0 | 48 | 0.070 | 0 -3 | 1216 |
test item | 2000 | 48 | 0.100 | 0 -4 | 1215 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by the micronucleus test in the bone marrow cells of the mouse.
Therefore, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in this bone marrow micronucleus assay. - Executive summary:
An OECD TG 474 genetic toxicity study was performed under GLP in order to investigate the potential of the test substance to induce micronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) in the bone marrow of the mouse (NMRI). The test item was formulated in sterile water, which was also used as vehicle control. The volume administered orally was 10 mL/kg body weight (b.w.). At 24 h and 48 h after a single administration of the test item, the bone marrow cells were collected for micronuclei analysis.
Seven males per test group (except the control groups with 5 males only) were evaluated for the occurrence of micronuclei. Per animal 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs) were scored for micronuclei. To describe a cytotoxic effect due to the treatment with the test item the ratio between polychromatic and normochromatic erythrocytes was determined in the same sample and reported as the number of PCEs per 2000 erythrocytes. The following dose levels of the test item were investigated: 24 h preparation interval: 500, 1000, and 2000 mg/kg b.w. 48 h preparation interval: 2000 mg/kg b.w. The highest dose was estimated by a pre-experiment to be suitable.
After treatment with the test item the number of PCEs was not substantially decreased as compared to the mean value of PCEs of the vehicle control, thus indicating that the test item did not exert any cytotoxic effects in the bone marrow. In comparison to the corresponding vehicle controls there was no biologically relevant or statistically significant enhancement in the frequency of the detected micronuclei at any preparation interval after administration of the test item and with any dose level used. The mean values of micronuclei observed after treatment with the test item were below or near to the value of the vehicle control group.
A dose of 40 mg/kg b.w. cyclophosphamide administered orally was used as positive control, which showed a substantial increase of induced micronucleus frequency. The volume of the positive control administered was 10 mL/kg b.w.
In conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by the micronucleus test with bone marrow cells of the mouse. Therefore, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in this bone marrow micronucleus assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.