Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2012-05-30 to 2012-06-05
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Tellurium dioxide
- EC Number:
- 231-193-1
- EC Name:
- Tellurium dioxide
- Cas Number:
- 7446-07-3
- Molecular formula:
- O2Te
- IUPAC Name:
- oxotellane oxide
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- lot/batch No.of test material: EK1008F023
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CBA
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: ELEVAGE JANVIER; Route des Chènes Secs B.P. 4105; 53940 LE GENEST-ST-ISLE, France
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 19.1 - 20.9 g
- Housing: Group caging - mice were provided with glass tunneltubes; Type II. polypropylene/ polycarbonate
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ssniff SM R/M-Z+H Autoclavable complete diet for rats and mice - ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water from the municipal supply from 500 ml bottle, ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70 %
- Air changes (per hr): 15-20 air exchange/hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours daily light
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- propylene glycol
- Concentration:
- Preliminary experiment: 0, 50 and 100 %
Main experiment: 0, 25, 50, 100 % - No. of animals per dose:
- Preliminary experiment: 2 females per dose
Main experiment: 4 females per dose, 8 animals for negative control - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Compound solubility: examined in a short Preliminary Compatibility Test; the 100 % w/v formulation (suspension) using Propylene glycol (PG)
as vehicle was suitable for the test.
- Irritation: no signs of irritation were observed in the preliminary test
- Lymph node proliferation response: not assessed, according to guideline
MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method: proliferation of lymphocytes in the lymph nodes; incorporation of ³H-methyl thymidine is measured by β-scintillation counting as disintegrations per minute (DPM).
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: A stimulation index of 3 or greater is an indication of a positive result.
TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
During the assay, each mouse was topically dosed on the dorsal surface of each ear with 25 μl of the appropriate formulation applied using a pipette. Each animal was dosed once a day for three consecutive days (Days 1, 2 and 3). There was no treatment on Days 4, 5 and 6. - Positive control substance(s):
- hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- A significant lymphoproliferative response (stimulation index value of 13.0) was noted for the positive control chemical and this result confirmed the validity of the assay.
In vivo (LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Parameter:
- other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
- Remarks on result:
- other: DPM values are presentet in the table below.
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 3.7
- Test group / Remarks:
- 100 % (w/v)
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 2
- Test group / Remarks:
- 50 % (w/v)
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 3.9
- Test group / Remarks:
- 25 % (w/v)
Any other information on results incl. tables
No mortality or sign of systemic toxicity or local irritation were observed during the study. Test item precipitate was observed in all test item treated groups.
No treatment related effects were observed on animal body weights.
The appearance of the lymph nodes was normal in the negative control group and in all test item treated groups.
DPM, DPN and Stimulation Index Values for all Groups
Test Group Name |
Measured DPM/group |
Group DPM (backgroud corrected) |
No. of Nodes |
DPN |
Stimulation Index Values |
Background (5 (w/v) % TCA ) |
34.5 |
|
- |
|
|
Negative control PG |
2538 |
2503.5 |
16 |
156.5 |
1.0 |
Tellurium dioxide 100% (w/v) in PG |
4634 |
4599.5 |
8 |
574.9 |
3.7 |
Tellurium dioxide 50% (w/v) in PG |
2562 |
2527.5 |
8 |
315.9 |
2.0 |
Tellurium dioxide 25% (w/v) in PG |
4920 |
4885.5 |
8 |
610.7 |
3.9 |
Positive control 25 % HCA in PG |
16318 |
16283.5 |
8 |
2035.4 |
13.0 |
DPN = DPM divided by the number of lymph nodes
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: CLP; EU GHS (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008)
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the present assay Tellurium dioxide tested in Propylene Glycol as vehicle, was shown to have a sensitization potential
(sensitizer) in the Local Lymph Node Assay. However, the dose response was not clear, no high SI values were seen and metals are known to
have a lower predictivity in the LLNA than organic molecules. - Executive summary:
In an OECD Guideline 429 study (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay), groups of four female CBA/J Rj mice were treated with: 100, 50 and 25% (w/v) Tellurium dioxide in PG. The negative control group received PG and the positive control group received 25 % α-Hexylcinnamaldehyde (HCA) in PG.
The solutions of the test item were applied on the dorsal surface of ears of experimental animals (25 μl/ear) for three consecutive days (Days 1, 2 and 3). There was no treatment on Days 4, 5 and 6. On Day 6, the cell proliferation in the local lymph nodes was measured by incorporation of tritiated methyl thymidine (3HTdR) and the values obtained were used to calculate stimulation indices (SI).
No mortality or sign of systemic toxicity or local irritation were observed during the study. No treatment related effects were observed on animal body weights in any treated groups. Test item precipitate was observed in all test item treated groups.
Stimulation index values of the test item were 3.7, 2.0 and 3.9 at treatment concentrations of 100, 50 and 25% (w/v), respectively.
α-Hexylcinnamaldehyde (25% (w/v) dissolved in PG) was used as a positive control to demonstrate the appropriate performance of the assay. A significant lymphoproliferative response (stimulation index value of 13.0) was noted for the positive control chemical and this result confirmed the validity of the assay.
In conclusion, under the conditions of the present assay Tellurium dioxide tested in Propylene Glycol as vehicle, was shown to have a sensitization potential (sensitizer) in the Local Lymph Node Assay. However, the dose response was not clear, no high SI values were seen and metals are known to have a lower predictivity in the LLNA than organic molecules.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.